Penguinempire-Dennis said:
The transformation_sequence tag is basically used for the same thing as transformation on this site. But what tag do I use for the sort of transformation sequence that Sailor Moon does?

probably henshin or something

darryus said:
probably henshin or something

Henshin has 4 posts. And they don't reflect a magical girl style transformation.

we have magical_girl_outfit, but...

I don't think we have one of those.

we should, though! :D

I mean clothing_transformation has 5 posts...

and doens't rewlly apply./

I'd argue like "magical_girl_transformation" would be a good tag

Is there a tag for when characters have segmented body parts? I noticed a few "segmented" tags, but they're hardly used at all, so I was thinking maybe there's a different tag or that those aren't considered good names.

Examples: her arms are separated at the shoulder, she has it at the elbows and presumably shoulders as well, etc.

AbiCordo said:
Is there a tag for when characters have segmented body parts? I noticed a few "segmented" tags, but they're hardly used at all, so I was thinking maybe there's a different tag or that those aren't considered good names.

Examples: her arms are separated at the shoulder, she has it at the elbows and presumably shoulders as well, etc.

I feel something like doll_joints would make sense or maybe robot_joints. Both tags seem to be used for essentially the same thing.

post #1533985
Is there a tag for when a character appears to be pressing against glass?

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1533985
Is there a tag for when a character appears to be pressing against glass?

Yup, on_glass

AstealthA said:
Yup, on_glass

Well why the heck was against_glass aliased before it ever got tagged in the first place? I searched for that, with the empty tags box checked, and didn't get any results.

Since “rex” in Tyrannosaurus Rex means “king” in latin, shouldn’t female t-“rex’s” be refered to as... t-regina’s?

masterwave said:
Since “rex” in Tyrannosaurus Rex means “king” in latin, shouldn’t female t-“rex’s” be refered to as... t-regina’s?

I’ll take what this guy’s smoking.

Is there a tag for when character is pushing down an erection? I don't think this counts as covering_crotch, exactly.
post #1534248

JAKXXX3 said:
Is there a tag for when character is pushing down an erection? I don't think this counts as covering_crotch, exactly.

hand_on_penis is the only one I can think of. unwanted_erection could maybe work but it would depend on the picture.

Furrin_Gok said:
Well why the heck was against_glass aliased before it ever got tagged in the first place? I searched for that, with the empty tags box checked, and didn't get any results.

was actually added to 23 posts before it got aliased.

Is there a tag for when there are feathers coming off of a character's arms so that they have like a hybrid wing/arm thing going on? Example:

post #1406615

darryus said:
against_glass was actually added to 23 posts before it got aliased.

Well that's weird. It's not even an empty tag.

Dyrone said:
Is there a tag for when there are feathers coming off of a character's arms so that they have like a hybrid wing/arm thing going on? Example:

post #1406615

Wing hands.

Dyrone said:
Is there a tag for when there are feathers coming off of a character's arms so that they have like a hybrid wing/arm thing going on? Example:

post #1406615

There's also winged_arms and feather_hands. I can't really tell if the hands are feathers too since they look a little defined, I think at least winged_arms should apply though.

Is there a way to make the blacklist hide things under a certain score or favcount?

For example,

insert_tag_here -favcount:>39

You can do this in an individual search, but it would be more convenient if it was always active like a blacklisted tag.

Human-Shaped said:
Is there a way to make the blacklist hide things under a certain score or favcount?

For example,

insert_tag_here -favcount:>39

You can do this in an individual search, but it would be more convenient if it was always active like a blacklisted tag.

Unfortunately the blacklist doesn't play very well with metatags.

Furrin_Gok said:
Unfortunately the blacklist doesn't play very well with metatags.

Any way to suggest this idea, or do they not take suggestions anymore?

I remember there being some kind of thread for that at one point. I asked when they'd get rid of the blacklist's 3900 character limit, but that was two years ago and still no idea @.@

Is there something like a clitoral_stimulation tag for images like the following where the clitoris is directly being targeted?

post #1527241 post #1238746 post #521164 post #872451

Also, why doesn't there seem to be a tag for armpits?

luls said:
Is there something like a clitoral_stimulation tag for images like the following where the clitoris is directly being targeted?

post #1527241 post #1238746 post #521164 post #872451

Also, why doesn't there seem to be a tag for armpits?

clitoral

also the plain armpit tag has long since been invalidated, however there are specific armpit tags like armpit fetish, cum on armpit, etc

I know suggestive_gesture is a tag, but should there be any specific tags related to the things being suggested? Maybe even just for the ones like fellatio or titfucks, since those are very common?

E.g.: " suggesting_fellatio ", " suggesting_paizuri ", etc. Or, if that's too long of a name, "faux_fellatio/pseudofellatio", "faux_titfuck/pseudotitfuck", etc.

One thing I never thought of before: are there tags for... gender identity stuff? Like, for when a character's identity doesn't match up with their physical body?

I'm very indifferent to the whole subject, but I started uploading a few character info sheets recently, and it got me wondering what I'd do in cases like that-- where someone who is physically a male/female/etc but is said to prefer being called otherwise.

(I know I already said it, but to be doubly clear, this is not a sensitive subject for me. I know it can be for other people, so apologies if I word it poorly, or seem like I'm not treating the subject with proper respect.)

AbiCordo said:
One thing I never thought of before: are there tags for... gender identity stuff? Like, for when a character's identity doesn't match up with their physical body?

I'm very indifferent to the whole subject, but I started uploading a few character info sheets recently, and it got me wondering what I'd do in cases like that-- where someone who is physically a male/female/etc but is said to prefer being called otherwise.

(I know I already said it, but to be doubly clear, this is not a sensitive subject for me. I know it can be for other people, so apologies if I word it poorly, or seem like I'm not treating the subject with proper respect.)

unfortunately text and external knowledge is always ignored in gender tagging. the gender tags are purely for classifying what characters appear to be physically. though character owners are allowed to clarify for example character's pronouns in description and stuff like that.

also there is the visibly trans tag for characters that have clearly transitioned (which is.. probably not what you are looking for), but thats about it.

Lord_Eggplant said:
unfortunately text and external knowledge is always ignored in gender tagging. the gender tags are purely for classifying what characters appear to be physically. though character owners are allowed to clarify for example character's pronouns in description and stuff like that.

also there is the visibly trans tag for characters that have clearly transitioned (which is.. probably not what you are looking for), but thats about it.

Alright. I figured as much, but wasn't sure. In case there was, I just wanted to be sure I wasn't disrespecting the creators by failing to classify their OCs correctly.

Thank you. ^^

Is there a tag for this fellatio-from-behind position?

post #1546026

Is there a tag for...
Things that have more than four limbs?
I know there's probably something for four arms and the like, but what about a more general tag?

Maybe "extra limbs", since something like a slime can have four arms and no legs. Then again, you could just put 4_limbs + legless for that. Or, "extra arms", "extra legs", etc.

multi_arm or multi_leg is probably what you want.

Tag for when - while the image is animated - it has either very minimal animation, or even animation that is barely noticeable?

I think a tag for that kind of thing might actually be pretty useful, as people are likely to complain when an "animated" image seems like it's almost a normal JPG/non-animated PNG.

We have a tag for living aircraft, but is there one for road-based automotives, like car, truck, van, or motorcycle living_machines? I'd like a way to search specifically for that sort.

Furrin_Gok said:
We have a tag for living aircraft, but is there one for road-based automotives, like car, truck, van, or motorcycle living_machines? I'd like a way to search specifically for that sort.

living_hovercraft

Munkelzahn said:
living_hovercraft

I'm not sure if the hovercraft will count, much as I'd like to. I'm trying to figure out if something already exists.

I thought it strange we had no armpit_focus tag. I do know armpits was invalidated and why but I'm not really sure what constitutes armpit_fetish even after reading the wiki. Can we get some picture examples on there? Is this armpit_fetish?
post #1551770
They seem detailed enough but this isn't a fetish I'm accustomed to. Should armpit_focus be aliased to armpit_fetish even though the former isn't in use? (Probably not.) We have foot_fetish and foot_focus coexisting but what's the line for any sort of *_fetish and *_focus tags?

Unrelated to armpits, a pass should probably be made to remove foot_focus from foot_shot posts as I just saw about a dozen recent posts tagged incorrectly, according to the wikis.

Furrin_Gok said:
We have a tag for living aircraft, but is there one for road-based automotives, like car, truck, van, or motorcycle living_machines? I'd like a way to search specifically for that sort.

Currently, there is no tag used for living cars/motorcycles/etc., if you want to start adding the tag living_automobile or just living_vehicle would probably be good tags to go with. We also don't seem to have a tag for living locomotives.

No reason not to add tags for other types of living vechicles, afaics. The only reason living_aircraft got its own tag first was because those are the most common kind of living vehicles.

darryus said:
Currently, there is no tag used for living cars/motorcycles/etc., if you want to start adding the tag living_automobile or just living_vehicle would probably be good tags to go with. We also don't seem to have a tag for living locomotives.

Should we follow suit with aircraft and just make the tag living_groundcraft? Road based, locomotives, snow mobiles and possibly even hovercrafts if we don't bunch them into watercrafts.

Is there a tag for being penetrated or presenting in this/these poses?:
post #1480750 post #1278466

Furrin_Gok said:
Looks like broken source was used a couple of times. I think there was something else, but I can't find it.

Any news about this?
Currently broken source is only used once.
I wanted to tag some pictures because, well, the source has been deleted.

It's not a source request either. As the URL used to link the actual source, it just got deleted and the original URL is still useful for archive search.

I guess I'll use this tag until I find something better.
Your comment was the best I got out of forum and tag searches so far.

FurryLover121 said:
Is there a tag for being penetrated or presenting in this/these poses?:
post #1480750 post #1278466

I believe the latter of the two would be t_square_position the I'm not so sure about former, but I'd guess that doggystyle would be accurate.

Tag for robots that are made to seem like certain animals?
Like, maybe something similar to the "[x]_humanoid" tags?
post #1554597 post #1550725

AbiCordo said:
Tag for robots that are made to seem like certain animals?
Like, maybe something similar to the "[x]_humanoid" tags?
post #1554597 post #1550725

I've always tagged them as if the character wasn't a robot (as well as the robot tag, of course). So, I'd probably tag the first image as cow_humanoid and the second as anthro rabbit. This way every character in a post is able to have a form tag (anthro, feral, taur, humanoid, human).

AbiCordo said:
Tag for robots that are made to seem like certain animals?

robot + appropriate form and species tags.

post #1347431 - feral robot dog
post #114108 - anthro robot dog

...and so on.

Adding a robot_humanoid tag might be worth considering though, since that's the format we've used for other tags already (monstrous_humanoid for monster + humanoid, etc). Among other things, it'd be handy for searching for non-humanlike robots (with -robot_humanoid).

do we have a tag for "reverse furries" or whatever they are called?
post #992467

Do we have a tag for this:

A Human* is shrunken and placed into the womb of an anthro. He or she is later rebirthed, but remains Human, having only become biologically related to the mother regardless of species.

It is basically a variation of rebirthing, but does it have a specific name and tag?

*Doesn't have to be Human

eelf said:
do we have a tag for "reverse furries" or whatever they are called?
post #992467

Yes, reverse_furry. Human_costume also applies if a "human skinsuit" is involved

realandyisepic said:
Do we have a tag for this:

A Human* is shrunken and placed into the womb of an anthro. He or she is later rebirthed, but remains Human, having only become biologically related to the mother regardless of species.

It is basically a variation of rebirthing, but does it have a specific name and tag?

*Doesn't have to be Human

No, but I'd think transformation unbirthing human will work for 'becoming the species/a related species' stuff. Some of what you're asking for is story-based and won't be tagged here by default. It's also getting suuuper niche to the point there might be less than 20 images on the site showing it at all.

regsmutt said:
No, but I'd think transformation unbirthing human will work for 'becoming the species/a related species' stuff. Some of what you're asking for is story-based and won't be tagged here by default. It's also getting suuuper niche to the point there might be less than 20 images on the site showing it at all.

Well, I think something like transformationless_rebirthing or something on the lines of that could work.

regsmutt said:
No, but I'd think transformation unbirthing human will work for 'becoming the species/a related species' stuff. Some of what you're asking for is story-based and won't be tagged here by default. It's also getting suuuper niche to the point there might be less than 20 images on the site showing it at all.

realandyisepic said:
Well, I think something like transformationless_rebirthing or something on the lines of that could work.

Except you said he's not transforming. Nor is he becoming "biologically related," as he already had his DNA, even if he gets a new umbillical cord.

Regarding the rear views... would take_your_pick apply?

abadbird said:
android is for humanoid- or anthro-like robots, and it has the implication. Android could be renamed to robot_humanoid, but I'd worry about humanoid's baggage that would seem to exclude anthro-shaped robots.

I actually really like the robot-humanoid idea.. it would be more inline with some of our other tags.

Me being me, I'd also argue in favor of a feral robot tag of some sort too.

We have furry_character_wearing_fursuit and not_furry_wearing_fursuit. A tag like furry_wearing_human_suit would not seem out of place.

I actually really like that.

abadbird said:
android is for humanoid- or anthro-like robots, and it has the implication. Android could be renamed to robot_humanoid, but I'd worry about humanoid's baggage that would seem to exclude anthro-shaped robots.

Considering that we've usually tried to keep furry tags separate from not_furry ones, a tag that specifically combines anthro and humanoid is an oddity that probably shouldn't exist.

abadbird said:
We have furry_character_wearing_fursuit and not_furry_wearing_fursuit. A tag like furry_wearing_human_suit would not seem out of place.

Should we have humanoid_suit separate, or connected as nonfurry_suit?

Do we have a tag for when a character has their fingers in their hair? Would that be a useful thing to tag, as part of a character's pose?

Example, post #1560159 (it's definitely a weird case, though, also tagged "what", because... what).

A tag like bioluminescence, but for non-living organisms like robots/etc? Or perhaps even cyborgs?

Basically, anything where the light affixed to the body is mechanical rather than natural. (Of course, unless "bioluminescence" should be used for these cases as well.)

post #1550706 post #1554613

Oooo. A rather important one, so it probably has a tag that I don't know about--

Something for images that are technically 'sexually explicit', but contain no trace of erotic acts, or even suggestiveness? e.g.: Genitals are visible, but nothing is being done with them, and nobody even seems to be interested in sex.

1) I know there's casual_nudity and casual_exposure (because I'm a weirdo who likes weird things), but there are still situations where I don't think those would apply. Tail genitals being visible is one thing I can think of.

2) Then there's also images like the below that clearly appeal to voyeurism despite being casual - usually seem suggestive in positioning/etc, drawing attention primarily to the exposed genitalia/body...
post #1554748 post #1155946 post #1274004

...while other images are 'sexually explicit' but focus on something else, drawing attention away (or at least dividing it) from those elements.
post #1565536 post #1372917

I'm not saying I need a tag for each, but maybe for one or the other? Maybe something that even encompasses both?

AbiCordo said:
Oooo. A rather important one, so it probably has a tag that I don't know about--

Something for images that are technically 'sexually explicit', but contain no trace of erotic acts, or even suggestiveness? e.g.: Genitals are visible, but nothing is being done with them, and nobody even seems to be interested in sex.

1) I know there's casual_nudity and casual_exposure (because I'm a weirdo who likes weird things), but there are still situations where I don't think those would apply. Tail genitals being visible is one thing I can think of.

2) Then there's also images like the below that clearly appeal to voyeurism despite being casual - usually seem suggestive in positioning/etc, drawing attention primarily to the exposed genitalia/body...
post #1554748 post #1155946 post #1274004

...while other images are 'sexually explicit' but focus on something else, drawing attention away (or at least dividing it) from those elements.
post #1565536 post #1372917

I'm not saying I need a tag for each, but maybe for one or the other? Maybe something that even encompasses both?

Suggestions for Tags (If there are none)

Of course, these should probably only apply to images that are rated as 'explicit' and don't have the tags 'sex' or 'presenting_*'. Though, there are probably a lot of 'presenting_*' images where the presenting isn't on purpose, so that one is debatable...

• Very General
• light_nsfw, nsfw_lite, technically_nsfw, etc

• More specific
• sexual_intent, non-sexual_intent & ambiguous_intent
• casually_explicit & purposely_explicit
• sfw_focus, nsfw_focus & questionable/risqué_focus

Also stuff that's marked explicit for thing that any reasonable* person would agree is sfw, but is marked explicit by technicality. It could even be called explicit_by_technicality. Example might be an otherwise sfw image with a crude penis doodle hidden somewhere or a non-sexual image of a feral that just happens to have a sheath or a non-detailed/'Neko Atsume' style butt.

*I'm not arguing that the rules are unreasonable.

We have breast_fondling, but is there a tag for when a character is fondling their own breasts?
post #1419631

I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

Example:
https://e621.net/post/show/1566806/ambiguous_penetration-animated-anthro-blue_fur-but

Dynablade_Savior said:
I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

Example:
https://e621.net/post/show/1566806/ambiguous_penetration-animated-anthro-blue_fur-but

Well, there's featureless_crotch and ambiguous_gender. But I don't think there's really any tags for some kind of "confirmed ambiguous" for character who just isn't, rather than their gender being indeterminable, which is what ambiguous_gender is usually for.

Although featureless_crotch anus ambiguous would probably return all the same results that type of tag would anyway.

Dynablade_Savior said:
I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

Example:
https://e621.net/post/show/1566806/ambiguous_penetration-animated-anthro-blue_fur-but

I... huh.

darryus said:
Well, there's featureless_crotch and ambiguous_gender. But I don't think there's really any tags for some kind of "confirmed ambiguous" for character who just isn't, rather than their gender being indeterminable, which is what ambiguous_gender is usually for.

Although featureless_crotch anus ambiguous would probably return all the same results that type of tag would anyway.

I think featureless_crotch anus -x_anus works a bit better?

Still... I feel like... maybe there's room for a tag here.

I mean....

We normally infer a character's gender/sex based off of visible cues... but how do we deal with a complete lack of genitals?

Some pictures, it's more like.. "The attention isn't the genitals, so we haven't drawn them" while others are more like "this character lacks genitals"

Compare:

post #1541083 post #1326060 post #340660

and:

post #1135230 post #1376791 post #1341481

I dunno. I mean. Maybe there's a place for anus_only?

Moles. Skin blemishes. Do we have a tag for that? 'cause right now "moles" just has a singular instance of four images of the same base and "mole" brings up the animal (obvs.) Skin_blemish also isn't a tag. Surely we have a tag this would fit under, don't we?

AnotherDay said:
Moles. Skin blemishes. Do we have a tag for that? 'cause right now "moles" just has a singular instance of four images of the same base and "mole" brings up the animal (obvs.) Skin_blemish also isn't a tag. Surely we have a tag this would fit under, don't we?

mole_(marking) and beauty_mark (note not all beauty marks are moles and not all moles are beauty marks, of course.)

Unfortunately this often gets mistagged as the animal, "mole", and needs cleaning up afterwards. Honestly I feel mole should be disambiguated and the species would be mole_(species)

But for now, those tags are how we tend to tag moles.

Dynablade_Savior said:
I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

If I remember right, the anus_only tag was made for that. But the current wiki description doesn't match that usage, so it's bit of a mess.. Half of the posts are tagged by the original usage, and the other half by the wiki.

Genjar said:
If I remember right, the anus_only tag was made for that. But the current wiki description doesn't match that usage, so it's bit of a mess.. Half of the posts are tagged by the original usage, and the other half by the wiki.

*blinks*

Well. I should have looked to see if that tag existed before I mentioned it.

That said, looking at the tags posted with anus_only, I see 3 things:

1 - "I don't have genitals, only an anus"
(see above)

2 - "Through camera angles, nothing but my anus is visible"
post #1555532 post #1554003 post #1554455

3 - "My other genitals are covered in some fashion and the attention is mostly on my anus." ... This one is split into two categories:

3a - the 'clothing aside' method: post #1530670 post #1534785 post #1457285

3b - And the pussy_tape method: post #1562384

Generally speaking, I see the following tags here

1. No genitals, only an anus - Aka, the topic of these posts genital-less? anus_only? no_genitals_only_anus?
2. Only_anus_exposed?
3a. ...some combination of Presenting_anus + something else?
3b. Pussy_tape

I dunno. I has a tired.

Edit: I remembered one more circumstance for anus only, involving various forms of castration, neutering and other horrifying things.

SnowWolf said:
Generally speaking, I see the following tags here

1. No genitals, only an anus - Aka, the topic of these posts genital-less? anus_only? no_genitals_only_anus?
2. Only_anus_exposed?
3a. ...some combination of Presenting_anus + something else?
3b. Pussy_tape

1. It's so messy that I'm not sure if it can be salvaged, but I'd keep anus_only for this. Since the usage is quite similar to the planned clothing tag changes (naked_hat -> hat_only, etc).
2. For the most part, this seems searchable with combos. Especially with the addition of butt_focus. Not sure if a new tag is needed.
3. Searchable with presenting_anus pants_down and such.

Genjar said:
1. It's so messy that I'm not sure if it can be salvaged, but I'd keep anus_only for this. Since the usage is quite similar to the planned clothing tag changes (naked_hat -> hat_only, etc).
2. For the most part, this seems searchable with combos. Especially with the addition of butt_focus. Not sure if a new tag is needed.
3. Searchable with presenting_anus pants_down and such.

1.Eh, it's only 250ish posts. Not too bad. Especially as 75% of the posts don't 'need' anus_only by our definition. That said, it being in line with the other tags is a good thing.. though with the confusion, I wonder if something that is more descriptive might reduce confusion in the future. *shrug*

2. Mmm.. As I'm looking through, the biggest thing I'm seeing that I'm not seeing a tag for is clothing that deliberatly exposes the anus...

post #1379229 post #1437316

So that might be a thing too.

butt_focus also seems undertagged.

AS for if we need a new tag or not... I dunno. I can totally get that hiding half of the junk can be interesting and enticing in some fasion... so maybe that DOES make it worth tagging?

Couple questions...and I have wondered this for a while now. Is there a tag for when cum is basically on the eyelid like so?

post #1542836

Basically it's like she almost got cum in her eye but she closed it in time so it's sitting on her eyelid. If not...I was thinking of cum_on_eyelid or cum_over_eye.

Secondly I was wondering about things like this:

post #1534447

The tag I see for this is often sexually_suggestive however I feel that is not specific enough. There are lots of ways to be sexually suggestive that don't involve a phallic object. I was wondering if there was a tag that would specifically reference something that is phallic being treated as if it is a penis...you know...licking a Popsicle suggestively...something like that.

Is there a specific name for this posture?
post #1570933

Dyrone said:
post #1534447

The tag I see for this is often sexually_suggestive however I feel that is not specific enough. There are lots of ways to be sexually suggestive that don't involve a phallic object. I was wondering if there was a tag that would specifically reference something that is phallic being treated as if it is a penis...you know...licking a Popsicle suggestively...something like that.

As far as I'm aware there's no tag for this type of image, I've had a few looks before but never found anything. I like the sound of the tag simulating_fellatio for this type of image but I've never actually added it.

There's also suggestive_food

Sometimes a guy wants to have sex and a girl wants to have sex, and they have sex and that's just sex.

Sometimes a guy wants to have sex and the girl does not and so he forces himself upon her with threats or violence, and that is rape.

In between, there are times when a guy wants to have sex and a girl does not, but she does it anyway for some reason.

Perhaps she has lost a bet, or can't pay the rent, or there is some minor blackmailing going on, or she has made some arrangement to exchange the use of her vagina to the use of this unsavory fellow for something he can do for her.

Therefore; she said yes, she's not fighting back, but she's not happy about it.

What would be the proper tag for this sort of thing? I know blackmail is its own tag, but it 1) does not cover the full range of this concept and 2) covers more than this concept.

We'd be flagging it on stories that explain this, or on images where one or more individuals in the act are clearly consenting but not enjoying it; an angry or annoyed expression.

If the person really, REALLY doesn't want it; expressions of horror, streaming tears; I think it should still be under rape because it's more aggressive or intense or some such and clearly the person feels threatened into doing this.

What I'm talking about is a girl sucking her ex-boyfriend's cock to get her CDs back, while giving him a smoky glare indicating she'd rather not be doing so.

**Edit: With this in mind, is there some kind of tag for pity sex? That's hot, too.

Dyrone said:
Couple questions...and I have wondered this for a while now. Is there a tag for when cum is basically on the eyelid like so?

post #1542836

Basically it's like she almost got cum in her eye but she closed it in time so it's sitting on her eyelid. If not...I was thinking of cum_on_eyelid or cum_over_eye.

I think this might be too specific. It's not unique enough to bother bringing into one tag; you can search for cum_on_face and one_eye_closed to get what you're after - I don't think it's worth making a cum tag for every feature of the face.

Dyrone said:

Secondly I was wondering about things like this:

post #1534447

The tag I see for this is often sexually_suggestive however I feel that is not specific enough. There are lots of ways to be sexually suggestive that don't involve a phallic object. I was wondering if there was a tag that would specifically reference something that is phallic being treated as if it is a penis...you know...licking a Popsicle suggestively...something like that.

Maybe suggestive_oral would be worth making

Dynablade_Savior said:
I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

Just look for anus -genitals