Sparkmane said:
Just look for anus -genitals

is only tagged on 75 posts and furthermore even if it was tagged on things this search wouldn't include posts containing more than one character where one has genitals and one does not.

Sparkmane said:
I think this might be too specific. It's not unique enough to bother bringing into one tag; you can search for cum_on_face and one_eye_closed to get what you're after - I don't think it's worth making a cum tag for every feature of the face.

That's the same search I did to find my example image...however there were a ton of results where the cum wasn't over the eye, in fact I'd say over the half the results the cum wasn't over the eye...the character was just closing one eye for some other reason.

If there isn't a tag for it I definitely think they're should be. Imo this isn't too hyper-specific like cum_on_cheek or cum_on_forehead or some shit that I would be against as well, this is the suggestion that the cumshot was so wild and messy that it nearly got in the character's eye, which seems like a valid thing that deserves its own tag.

I'll probably go ahead with cum_over_eye unless someone has a better suggestion. I don't really like cum_on_eyelid because there could just be a single drop of cum on the corner of an eyelid and suddenly someone would be like "oh, dat needs da cum_on_eyelid tag! Me good tagger!" When in reality that's not really the point.

Dyrone said:

I'll probably go ahead with cum_over_eye unless someone has a better suggestion. I don't really like cum_on_eyelid because there could just be a single drop of cum on the corner of an eyelid and suddenly someone would be like "oh, dat needs da cum_on_eyelid tag! Me good tagger!" When in reality that's not really the point.

I would have concerns about cum_over_eye being also tagged to characters with their eyes opens.

Also, Cum_on_eyes/cum_on_eyelids would fall in line with the rest of the cum_on* tags

Dyrone said:
That's the same search I did to find my example image...however there were a ton of results where the cum wasn't over the eye, in fact I'd say over the half the results the cum wasn't over the eye...the character was just closing one eye for some other reason.

If there isn't a tag for it I definitely think they're should be. Imo this isn't too hyper-specific like cum_on_cheek or cum_on_forehead or some shit that I would be against as well, this is the suggestion that the cumshot was so wild and messy that it nearly got in the character's eye, which seems like a valid thing that deserves its own tag.

I'll probably go ahead with cum_over_eye unless someone has a better suggestion. I don't really like cum_on_eyelid because there could just be a single drop of cum on the corner of an eyelid and suddenly someone would be like "oh, dat needs da cum_on_eyelid tag! Me good tagger!" When in reality that's not really the point.

oh oh oh, no, use cum_blinded - it'll really get the point across & it'll look different enough from cum_on_face

cum_on_Eileen

SnowWolf said:
I would have concerns about cum_over_eye being also tagged to characters with their eyes opens.

Perhaps, but I would hope they would automatically gravitate to cum_in_eyes...at least that's the tag I think of when I think of cum actually being IN a character's eyes.

SnowWolf said:
Also, Cum_on_eyes/cum_on_eyelids would fall in line with the rest of the cum_on* tags

It would, but I'm thinking more of something covering the eye, so the cum_over_eyes tag would be more related to hair_over_eyes

Sparkmane said:
oh oh oh, no, use cum_blinded

Hmmm...that's a possibility. Wiki article would have to state that this doesn't require total blindness however, because sometimes the cum is over just one eye.

Dynablade_Savior said:
I do have to wonder, is there a tag for a creature with only a butthole?

Example:
https://e621.net/post/show/1566806/ambiguous_penetration-animated-anthro-blue_fur-but

I think you want anus featureless_crotch

There's no tag for people with only a butthole and there should not be, but that simple pair of tags should get you the tidy buttholes you're after.

p.s. you are now 'the anus guy' as per another post I made on here.

Sparkmane said:
I think you want anus featureless_crotch

That's already been said...

Did we have any tag for posts such as this?:
post #1373853

I mean, besides disembodied_penis. Something that'd help excluding those from searches, they tend to get in the way of fixing the mistagged character counts. :P

Genjar said:
Did we have any tag for posts such as this?:
post #1373853

I mean, besides disembodied_penis. Something that'd help excluding those from searches, they tend to get in the way of fixing the mistagged character counts. :P

We've got solo as well. You can find those by searching for disembodied_penis solo, and report anybody mistagging images that contain another character.

Furrin_Gok said:
We've got solo as well. You can find those by searching for disembodied_penis solo, and report anybody mistagging images that contain another character.

Well, I've actually been trying to clean up mistagged character counts from combos like that one, but there's so many of those penis-only posts that it's getting harder to spot the mistags.

If there's no tag specifically for those, I guess I'll just have to use the old routine of adding those into a set to filter them out.

I feel like there might be a place for a tag that is essentially... Dick/pussy and nothing else.

y'know

post #1531129 post #805892 post #1579034
post #1096268 post #652857 post #840511

Not these. Well, maaaaybe the first one, but no:
post #1578698 post #1459725 post #1419049 etc

Y'know.. Nothing but GENITALS ... no hands, no penetration probably, just... DIIIIIIIIICK. (or Pussy. whatever)

Yeah, there's already the crotch_shot/butt_shot for the bottom trio, so those are searchable and don't need to be included in the new tag.

I already added a lot of the solo penis posts to a set, could easily tag them if we can think of a good tag name. I can't come up with anything better than penis_only, and that wouldn't be consistent with how anus_only is used.

Genjar said:
Yeah, there's already the crotch_shot for the bottom trio, so those are searchable and don't need to be included in the new tag.

I already added a lot of the solo penis posts to a set, could easily tag them if we can think of a good tag name. I can't come up with anything better than penis_only, and that wouldn't be consistent with how anus_only is used.

Lone_penis! No XD Uh... Extreme_close_up? solo_penis?

I feel like solo_penis/solo_pussy is the best option... but I feel like there's gotta be something BETTER.

these are... pictures that almost seem intended to show you the anatomy or design of the penis. *thoughtful frown* but I don't think there's a good way to tag that and make it obvious....

SnowWolf said:
these are... pictures that almost seem intended to show you the anatomy or design of the penis. *thoughtful frown* but I don't think there's a good way to tag that and make it obvious....

Something like penis_model?
Ties in with model_sheet, and it's a familiar term for animators (image searching for '3d penis model' is pretty much this).

Genjar said:
Something like penis_model?
Ties in with model_sheet, and it's a familiar term for animators (image searching for '3d penis model' is pretty much this).

Something like that. That's not bad, that's not bad... but does it really say "just a dick" ...? Hmm.

The only other thing I'm coming up with is, like "penis_design" or something. *shrug*

Is there a tag for a perspective from which you, the viewer, are the voyeur? Instead of seeing another character looking in, the picture is drawn from an angle so that you are, for example, seeing the character through a window in a place she would expect privacy.

I can only find one half-decent example of what I'm talking about and it's an exhibitionist pic, so I'm not even going to share it. Would 'candid' be a good term?

Sparkmane said:
Is there a tag for a perspective from which you, the viewer, are the voyeur? Instead of seeing another character looking in, the picture is drawn from an angle so that you are, for example, seeing the character through a window in a place she would expect privacy.

I can only find one half-decent example of what I'm talking about and it's an exhibitionist pic, so I'm not even going to share it. Would 'candid' be a good term?

We do have a first person view tag, so if you do a search like pov ~voyeur ~being_watched or something you may be able to find some images like this. However, I don't believe it has a specific tag for it. Perhaps we can make voyeur pov a thing?

Genjar said:
Did we have any tag for posts such as this?:
post #1373853

I mean, besides disembodied_penis. Something that'd help excluding those from searches, they tend to get in the way of fixing the mistagged character counts. :P

free_willy

Sparkmane said:
Is there a tag for a perspective from which you, the viewer, are the voyeur? Instead of seeing another character looking in, the picture is drawn from an angle so that you are, for example, seeing the character through a window in a place she would expect privacy.

You mean something like peeping first_person_view? That results in some mishits, but there's so few posts that a new tag doesn't seem needed (yet).

Genjar said:
You mean something like peeping first_person_view? That results in some mishits, but there's so few posts that a new tag doesn't seem needed (yet).

I wasn't looking for a new tag, so 'peeping' seems to cover what I'm after.

peeping candid would be the best I guess but with my blacklist up I only get three results for 'candid' and two of them are people who misspelled 'canid'

edit: Thanks! I forgot to say thanks.

Is there a tag for when a sweater has a much taller gap for the arms than necessary?
post #1583540

Are there tags for various common colors of tentacles? There are color tags for nearly everything else

No-one-you-know said:
Are there tags for various common colors of tentacles? There are color tags for nearly everything else

Yep, but they're hardly used and poorly tagged unfortunately. Might go through some post and tag a bit myself.

SnowWolf said:
Something like that. That's not bad, that's not bad... but does it really say "just a dick" ...? Hmm.

I just realized that we already have a well-established tag group for this: *_shot (foot_shot, etc).

I'll just go ahead and tag those as penis_shot.

Genjar said:
I just realized that we already have a well-established tag group for this: *_shot (foot_shot, etc).

I'll just go ahead and tag those as penis_shot.

I was gonna say that it's different, but after glancing at foot_shot, it really isn't, lol.

post #1587340
Do we have a tag specifically for neck lacerations? I'm okay with biting and clawing but not on the neck.

do we have a tag for Cum eating direct from a dog bowl. or would you just combine gokkun with dog-bowl?

Is there a tag for "feathered scalies", or does "feathers" + "scalie" suffice?
post #1598423
I know it's probably good enough for solo images, but I'm not sure about images with multiple characters, where, say... a scalie and avian could be interacting (which usually would result in scalie + feathers), but the scalie itself isn't necessarily feathered.

AbiCordo said:
Is there a tag for "feathered scalies", or does "feathers" + "scalie" suffice?
post #1598423
I know it's probably good enough for solo images, but I'm not sure about images with multiple characters, where, say... a scalie and avian could be interacting (which usually would result in scalie + feathers), but the scalie itself isn't necessarily feathered.

I don't see any evidence of scales on that particular image, but an image that does have both should be find to have both tags.
...That said, I'm surprised we have a tag for scalie but our best tag for feathered characters is just avian or feathers.

Furrin_Gok said:
I don't see any evidence of scales on that particular image, but an image that does have both should be find to have both tags.

The creature doesn't have scales, but it seems to be some sort of feathered reptile, which is why I tagged it as scalie. (This was under the assumption that "scalie" referred to something that looked reptilian/had many traits of scaled creatures, rather than actually needing scales, since scales is a separate tag.)

AbiCordo said:
The creature doesn't have scales, but it seems to be some sort of feathered reptile, which is why I tagged it as scalie. (This was under the assumption that "scalie" referred to something that looked reptilian/had many traits of scaled creatures, rather than actually needing scales, since scales is a separate tag.)

It doesn't look like a reptile to me, it looks more avian.

Furrin_Gok said:
It doesn't look like a reptile to me, it looks more avian.

I can kind of see that. I guess the reasons I see them as scalie would be:

• Clawed hands rather than wing hands/arms
• No wings
• A long tapering tail rather than just tailfeathers
• Muzzle instead of beak

To specify, I guess to me they look like some kind of anthro Velociraptor, but the feathered kind rather than the depiction with rough skin.

AbiCordo said:
I can kind of see that. I guess the reasons I see them as scalie would be:

• Clawed hands rather than wing hands/arms
• No wings
• A long tapering tail rather than just tailfeathers
• Muzzle instead of beak

To specify, I guess to me they look like some kind of anthro Velociraptor, but the feathered kind rather than the depiction with rough skin.

And that's the thing, raptors were more closely related to avians than lizards.

Furrin_Gok said:
And that's the thing, raptors were more closely related to avians than lizards.

In the end, I guess-- just, it has more visual traits I associate with lizards/reptiles/etc than with avians. If you want it changed, I'll definitely change it, I'm just going based on what things look like to me.
Wanted to make sure everything was considered before the decision was made.

Is there any tag for rocky shores? Such as:
post #1563387 post #1566520 post #1366082

Just tagging those as seaside doesn't seem specific enough. And they don't fit in the beach tag, because that's full of sandy beaches and search-wise it'd likely be most useful if it were kept that way.

I suppose seaside + desolate combo kind of works, if there's no existing tag.

(Also, I noticed that the seaside tag is a bit problematic. Beach can be tagged for lake shores and such, but it implies seaside. Maybe seaside should be renamed to shore..)

Genjar said:
Is there any tag for rocky shores? Such as:
post #1563387 post #1566520 post #1366082

Just tagging those as seaside doesn't seem specific enough. And they don't fit in the beach tag, because that's full of sandy beaches and search-wise it'd likely be most useful if it were kept that way.

I suppose seaside + desolate combo kind of works, if there's no existing tag.

(Also, I noticed that the seaside tag is a bit problematic. Beach can be tagged for lake shores and such, but it implies seaside. Maybe seaside should be renamed to shore..)

Honestly, I hate the idea of 'desolate' for that. White... technically correct, desolate images suggest a lack of life, while the ocean.. well, maybe I'm biased, but water is life.

(I swear I remember something about how some tag was aliased away because it was impossible to tell something about it. It was something like "impossible to tell if it was a lake or an ocean" but I have no idea and can't find anything about it..)

Maybe we should try to... tag sandy_beach and rocky_beach?

In other news, beachrock is a thing...

Oh, I just found rocky shore -- this is the thing.

Maybe it should be... well... rocky_shore?

Hmm...

• rocky_shore implies seaside
• sandy_beach implies seaside

....beach aliases to sandy_beach?

beach sand turns up about 6.5K results...
beach -sand turns up about 8K. Yuck.

Let's see...

A lot of these are...

post #1597108 post #1593002 - ambiguously on sand, with only some "beach like trappings"
post #1592253 post #1590717 - bikini shots outside?
post #1589071 post #1588091 - in water, with no beach visible.

but there's a lot of legit beach too, so no mass alias.. yuck.

I made an effort last december to clean up the surf tag (as in.. the place where the waves meet the sand... not surfing or surfers)) (though it seems like I didn't do a very good job. Late december was also when I was murderously sick, though, so who knows what happened. Actually really confused on that. I remember spending hours at this, but it's still a mess...)

Anyway... I'd love to see the seaside tagged more descriptively.

Beach, and sandy_beach and rocky_beach and surf (shoreline?) and rocky_shore and beach_rocks and... stuff!

but... 15K posts.

You could probably "zoom" through beach sand and tag "sandy_beach" quickly, but. there's still the other 60% of the tag....

SnowWolf said:
Honestly, I hate the idea of 'desolate' for that. White... technically correct, desolate images suggest a lack of life, while the ocean.. well, maybe I'm biased, but water is life.

Noted. Will untag those once we figure out a better replacement.

Oh, I just found rocky shore -- this is the thing.

Maybe it should be... well... rocky_shore?

Exactly what I was thinking of using, if it turned out that there's no existing tag for it. ...still surprised that there isn't one.

beach sand turns up about 6.5K results...
beach -sand turns up about 8K. Yuck.

And that's after I finished tagging about 1.5K beach posts with sand.
In general, these are poorly tagged. For instance: beach -detailed_background - about 8K posts. And nearly all of them have detailed backgrounds.

And I remember tagging beach -outside -inside at one point, but now that's up to ~2.5K posts too.

A lot of these are...

post #1597108 post #1593002 - ambiguously on sand, with only some "beach like trappings"
post #1592253 post #1590717 - bikini shots outside?
post #1589071 post #1588091 - in water, with no beach visible.

Yep. Tried to add various beach-related tags today, but having posts such as those mixed in slows down tag scripting a lot.

The first group at least heavily implies that they're on a beach, thanks to parasols and such. I suppose it could be argued that they're in a desert, or in some cases, in a large sandbox. And that does bring up the problem with the seaside implication again: it's not really taggable as seaside if there's no water at all...

The second group is definitely mistagged. Just because they're wearing skimpy clothing, doesn't mean that they're necessarily on a beach.

The third group does imply shore, since there's water shallow enough to stand in. So I can see why those get tagged as such.

Edit: Reworked the beach wiki, since the old one was just a wikipedia definition and useless for tagging. Any objections about the new version?

Edit-2: Also greatly expanded the existing seascape tag while at it.

I have no problem with the new rocky shore tag, but I feel like we should also have sandy shore and have both shore tags group together into beach.

We don't seem to have anything to a character holding out/(implied) offering an empty collar, do we? It seems to be a fairly common theme:
post #314867
post #1248914
post #1447360

Kaik said:
We don't seem to have anything to a character holding out/(implied) offering an empty collar, do we? It seems to be a fairly common theme:
post #314867
post #1248914
post #1447360

I was about to say offering_leash, but that's currently only tagged for the reverse: offering the leash when the collar is worn by the character.

Meh, I guess we overlooked the reverse when organizing those. No tag for it at the moment, as far as I know.

Genjar said:
I was about to say offering_leash, but that's currently only tagged for the reverse: offering the leash when the collar is worn by the character.

Meh, I guess we overlooked the reverse when organizing those. No tag for it at the moment, as far as I know.

I'd be open to offering_collar.

Genjar said:
Noted. Will untag those once we figure out a better replacement.

Just my two cents though :)

Exactly what I was thinking of using, if it turned out that there's no existing tag for it. ...still surprised that there isn't one.

It might be that there isn't an obvious... word for it. People don't usually say "Let's go to the Rocky Shore" ... they talk about going to the beach, even if the beach is covered in stones and it's cold outside.

I'd presume, anyway.

I don't know. I grew up in Hawaii. c_c

The only beach-alternative word we have is like... black sand beach. otherwise itttsss... hm. We don't really have a word for where there's only rocks. just that the beach has eroded away.

And that's after I finished tagging about 1.5K beach posts with sand.

Aw geeze. o_o

In general, these are poorly tagged. For instance: beach -detailed_background - about 8K posts. And nearly all of them have detailed backgrounds.

Yeah :(

And next to no one tags amazing_background which probably my favorite tag. c_c

And I remember tagging beach -outside -inside at one point, but now that's up to ~2.5K posts too.

To be fair, that one ought to be an implication. If you can see a beach, 99.99% of cases, it's outside.

Yep. Tried to add various beach-related tags today, but having posts such as those mixed in slows down tag scripting a lot.

Just to make sure, you DO have an image-zoom addon like Imagus installed yeah? helps a whole lot in eyeballing thumbnails. Still doesn't fix it, though. :(

The first group at least heavily implies that they're on a beach, thanks to parasols and such. I suppose it could be argued that they're in a desert, or in some cases, in a large sandbox. And that does bring up the problem with the seaside implication again: it's not really taggable as seaside if there's no water at all...

(Do we have enough here to justify starting a new thread to talk about all this?)

I agree about the first groun -- tag what you see says that that's a beach. but there's no seaside involved.

...actually...

seaside -beach hasss.. about 650 pictures.

I see:

Beaches.

post #1598500 - I'd call this a tropical/beach thematic backgroup

post #1587450 - In the water

post #1583797 post #1548443 - this seems to take place at a dock or pier of some sort.

post #1599577 post #1553902 - why is this tagged seaside??

Which leads me to another thought.. pier is ALIASED to seaside. That should be undone. c_c

....I also found the thing I was looking for earlier. It was that beaches can happen at lakes, thus that beach -> seaside was inaccurate. post #268818 was an example.

The second group is definitely mistagged. Just because they're wearing skimpy clothing, doesn't mean that they're necessarily on a beach.

The third group does imply shore, since there's water shallow enough to stand in. So I can see why those get tagged as such.

for the third.. I agree. and, it does kind of.. imply. Just like the people on the sand with no water.

But it could also be a river or a lake.

Edit: Reworked the beach wiki, since the old one was just a wikipedia definition and useless for tagging. Any objections about the new version?

I like it! :D

Hmmmm...

So.. I'm thinking...

Seaside SHOULD be done away with. Aliased to something that generally means "hey, this takes place near a body of water"... not just ones that take place near salty-water of significant size.

My brain is not working tonight... so I"m not coming up with anything more... specific.

but I thiiiink we can do this with without ... drastically retagging everything. I mean, there are a lot of tags missing on pictures, and some messy tags. But I don't think there's any huge "Eliminate Tag A, convert it into Tag X and Tag Y" situations that would happen with this...

let's see... collecting some random water-related tags here...

river - 1337
riverbank - 3 (this, while misspelled, might not be a bad tag to keep around ... though... it probably has near 100% overlap with 'river' so maybe not.)

rocky_shore - 82 and growing ;)
shore - 78 and... probably growing too?
shoreline - 7
seashore - 3
sea_shore - 1
shore_line - 1

pond - 536
Steam has been aliased to creek - 329 posts.
lake - 1177
lakeside - 4

seabed - 9
seaside - 15197
sea - 6615
seascape - 275
waterscape - 55

waterfall - 1933
hot_spring - 900
canal - 7

Yep. them's a list of tags.

Do we have a tag for when a character's cheeks are pulled? I've found cheek_pull, but it's only been applied to 5 posts.
post #1597664 post #1568562 post #1566213 post #1548698 post #1545914

Furrin_Gok said:
I'd be open to offering_collar.

That sounds good, I'd be down to start that tag going when I got some time to kill.

SnowWolf said:
It might be that there isn't an obvious... word for it. People don't usually say "Let's go to the Rocky Shore" ... they talk about going to the beach, even if the beach is covered in stones and it's cold outside.

'Going to the beach' usually implies that there'll be sand. If someone invited me to a beach and it turned out to be full of rocks, I'd be quite confused.
When heading to rockier shores, people generally just say why they're going there: "I'm going fishing" or "I'm going bird-watching", etc.

Regardless, it's tagged as rocky_shore now. Not quite sure about some of the posts, it's sometimes hard to tell if it's a shore or just a large rock jutting out of the water.

And next to no one tags amazing_background which probably my favorite tag. c_c

I never know when to tag that. Posts like post #1399244, etc: "This is detailed, but is it detailed enough to be tagged as 'amazing'? Ehh.."

To be fair, that one ought to be an implication. If you can see a beach, 99.99% of cases, it's outside.

beach inside finds a not-insignificant number of posts. Mostly of windows overlooking a beach. So it'll have to be tagged manually, unfortunately.

Just to make sure, you DO have an image-zoom addon like Imagus installed yeah?

Used to, but they were too slow. Might reinstall one as a backup, but usually I just crank the browser zoom up to 300% or so, which makes the thumbs easy to see.

seaside -beach hasss.. about 650 pictures.

I think someone mass-tagged all seaside posts as beach at one point. So long ago that it's far too late to slap them for it now.

Seaside SHOULD be done away with. Aliased to something that generally means "hey, this takes place near a body of water"... not just ones that take place near salty-water of significant size.

Aliasing it to shore should work. Though that'd require some existing aliases/implications to be moved around, and that's unlikely to happen. I'm still waiting for some of the years old ones to be fixed, so I can get back to work on those (slime_girl, googirl, gooboy, slime_monster -> goo_creature instead of goo).

riverbank - 3 (this, while misspelled, might not be a bad tag to keep around ... though... it probably has near 100% overlap with 'river' so maybe not.)

If we use shore instead of seaside, that should work for rivers too. 'river' + 'shore' = riverbank. And yeah, river doesn't seem taggable if there's no visible bank, so it's pointless.

shoreline - 7
seashore - 3
sea_shore - 1
shore_line - 1

Manually merged into shore, I'd say. Too rare for aliases.

lakeside - 4

'lake' + 'shore'

seabed - 9

Seems useful, should be tagged more. Underwater doesn't usually depict the seabed, so it's worth a tag.

A few more additions to the 'bodies of water' tag list:
bay - 30 (though mostly used as a color tag)
lagoon - 20
fjord - 15
cove - 9

Genjar said:
'Going to the beach' usually implies that there'll be sand. If someone invited me to a beach and it turned out to be full of rocks, I'd be quite confused.

True! Unless.... it's just part of living in the area. If I mention going to the dam, everyone around here knows what I mean, I don't have to clarify it by name or that it's a big earthen dam or anything like that.

When heading to rockier shores, people generally just say why they're going there: "I'm going fishing" or "I'm going bird-watching", etc.

I mean, even beaches-with-sand come in a lot of different shapes and sizes.

• This is a beach
• So's this
• This too
• I'm not sure if this is technically a beach, bit I want to be there.
• Beach!
• I've actually been here and played here as a kid. This is the place where the sandy beach transitionsinto more of a rocky beach-thing.
• Here's just around that bend you can see-- there is clearly beach. we're at the beach, we're just not in a sandy spot. Actually, this spot was always really cool because there would be a lot of tidepools at low tide, and, as an enterprising 8 year old, you could convince yourself that you maybe actually COULD catch one of the fish if you tried hard enough.
• all a few feet away from this
• and if you go a mile or two along the coast
• Bonus

Man, now I'm homesick...

Anyway, I dunno. It was always "the beach".

Regardless, it's tagged as rocky_shore now. Not quite sure about some of the posts, it's sometimes hard to tell if it's a shore or just a large rock jutting out of the water.

Maybe it oughta be something like "beach_rocks" but everything I come up with sounds like... well, really dumb. Or overly complicated "Tidal Rocks" or whatever.

I think something could be a sandy beach and a rocky_shore at the same time.

Maybe we should try and distinguish between a pebbley beach and a beach with rocks?

I never know when to tag that. Posts like post #1399244, etc: "This is detailed, but is it detailed enough to be tagged as 'amazing'? Ehh.."

I know what you mean :) I'd say for that one... not so much, It adds tons to the atmosphere... but it's more ambience than anything.

beach inside finds a not-insignificant number of posts. Mostly of windows overlooking a beach. So it'll have to be tagged manually, unfortunately.

Somehow, I overlooked this possibility, no pun intended.

Used to, but they were too slow. Might reinstall one as a backup, but usually I just crank the browser zoom up to 300% or so, which makes the thumbs easy to see.

Well, dunno what browser you use, but Imagus works pretty smoothly for me. Browser zoom is probably pretty damn effective too, though. :)

I think someone mass-tagged all seaside posts as beach at one point. So long ago that it's far too late to slap them for it now.

Well they... ... ugh. They tried.

Aliasing it to shore should work. Though that'd require some existing aliases/implications to be moved around, and that's unlikely to happen.
I'm still waiting for some of the years old ones to be fixed, so I can get back to work on those (slime_girl, googirl, gooboy, slime_monster -> goo_creature instead of goo).

Yeah.... c_c

If we use shore instead of seaside, that should work for rivers too. 'river' + 'shore' = riverbank. And yeah, river doesn't seem taggable if there's no visible bank, so it's pointless.

Technically a bank and a shore are differnet things, but, yeah, no.

I like shore though--it's multipurpose :D

Manually merged into shore, I'd say. Too rare for aliases.

Thanks :)

I was mostly looking for a list of "what do people tag".. that said, I agree and disagree -- depending on what we come up with in the end, we might want aliases for stupid proofing. But probably not.

Seems useful, should be tagged more. Underwater doesn't usually depict the seabed, so it's worth a tag.

Completly agreed-- hmm.. I know that a seabed can have unique-sea-only features... but do lakes have distinctly lake-ish features? and is there a word that covers both sea-bed and lake-bed and river-bed etc? Maybe they shoudl all be aliased into ocean/sea bed... simplicity rather then specificity.

A few more additions to the 'bodies of water' tag list:
bay - 30 (though mostly used as a color tag)

Oh yeah... there was a whole slew of horsey coat "things" I found once.... yet somehow palomino only has 20 posts.

(on a side note, what DO we think of words for specific coat colors and patterns? Bay (brown with dark nose/socks) siamese (white/cream with brown/black color points), Palomino (pale brown with white socks/markings and a light yellow mane), merle (gray with erratic black speckles) and the like? )

I stil lfeel like there are more watery words we're not thinking of.. hmmm....

Furrin_Gok said:
Looks like the generic term for those three is train_position.

choo choo

Any specific tags for being covered in goo? Such as:
post #1604554

If not, how about goo_covered? Kind of similar to cum_covered, should be easy to remember.

...or maybe it should be goo_encasement, to go with the existing (but ambiguous) encasement tag?

Anyone knows why the ruined orgasm tag was removed? It's a legitimate thing in the domination genre, which unlike an orgasm denial, it denotes some release while keeping the denial aspect, which can be considered worse as it only edges the person even more than no cumming at all.

GrosserKurfurst said:
Anyone knows why the ruined orgasm tag was removed? It's a legitimate thing in the domination genre, which unlike an orgasm denial, it denotes some release while keeping the denial aspect, which can be considered worse as it only edges the person even more than no cumming at all.

If you used the search box at the top of the forum, you would be directed to forum #257222 which talks about it. Please read it in it's entirety before replying, if you chose to reply.

SnowWolf said:
If you used the search box at the top of the forum, you would be directed to forum #257222 which talks about it. Please read it in it's entirety before replying, if you chose to reply.

Thank you!

Put in some preliminary work on visual guide section of tag_group:sex_positions. That's been in plans for years, about time that it got started.

It's missing most of the positions, but I'll get around to expanding it... eventually. Finding good thumbs is hard, most are too visually cluttered (detailed backgrounds, etC) to be used in that way.

But anyway, noticed one thing while at it: do we really have no tag for the classic 'bodyguard' position? Both partners standing, facing the same direction, also known as 99. We do have the generic standing_sex tag, but that could really use some organization.

Maybe it's tagged as something else here...? If not, I'm gonna start tagging those as bodyguard_position, any objections?

Is there a special tag for 'feral sitting'?
post #1591442

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Is there a special tag for 'feral sitting'?
post #1591442

There's on_haunches, though that doesn't require the character to be on 'all fours', and some of the current tagging is... odd. (Non-ferals should be tagged as crouching instead.)

Genjar said:
Put in some preliminary work on visual guide section of tag_group:sex_positions. That's been in plans for years, about time that it got started.

It's missing most of the positions, but I'll get around to expanding it... eventually. Finding good thumbs is hard, most are too visually cluttered (detailed backgrounds, etC) to be used in that way.

But anyway, noticed one thing while at it: do we really have no tag for the classic 'bodyguard' position? Both partners standing, facing the same direction, also known as 99. We do have the generic standing_sex tag, but that could really use some organization.

Maybe it's tagged as something else here...? If not, I'm gonna start tagging those as bodyguard_position, any objections?

None here--but I've used up my brain today: I just wanted to say that you're pretty awesome :)

Is there a tag for when a character with big/long ears wears their ears as if it was a kind of hairstyle?
post #1609308
And, I know there's a name, but I also can't remember the tag for the band keeping her ears like that. It's not hairband, I don't think, because that's like what Amy Rose has in her hair.
post #520745

post #1541856
Is there a tag for when a character seemingly has compound_eyes but has non-compound eyes inside them?

AbiCordo said:
Is there a tag for when a character with big/long ears wears their ears as if it was a kind of hairstyle?
post #1609308
And, I know there's a name, but I also can't remember the tag for the band keeping her ears like that. It's not hairband, I don't think, because that's like what Amy Rose has in her hair.
post #520745

I'm not aware of an 'ear hairstyle' tag, but there is tied_ears, where the ears are tied off with a band or something, which may be relevant. The tags flopped_ears or droopy_ears may also apply if they are depicted in such a way.

Is there a tag for tentacles penetrating someone?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Is there a tag for tentacles penetrating someone?

There's tentacle_sex...but apparently that is supposed to mean any sexual act done with tentacles...so it's not specific to penetration. I'd suspect that a search of "tentacle_sex penetration" would have to suffice for your needs.

My question...is there a tag for when a character has a symbol on their clothing like so:

post #1594847 post #1410430 post #1282907

Furthermore is there a tag for specific symbols on clothing? Like for when someone is wearing a star/heart/skull on their shirt/hat/pants etc.? Stuff like that.

Dyrone said:
My question...is there a tag for when a character has a symbol on their clothing like so:

post #1594847 post #1410430 post #1282907

Furthermore is there a tag for specific symbols on clothing? Like for when someone is wearing a star/heart/skull on their shirt/hat/pants etc.? Stuff like that.

Yes, the *_pattern and/or *_print tags (heart_pattern, skull_pattern, star_pattern, etc). Unfortunately they're often very undertagged.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Yes, the *_pattern and/or *_print tags (heart_pattern, skull_pattern, star_pattern, etc). Unfortunately they're often very undertagged.

See I always thought those implied a sort of overall pattern like so:

post #1474618

But I suppose the word "print" doesn't really specify how many are printed...pattern definately does imply a sequence though. I would personally be in favor of merging aliasing all the "pattern" to just "print".

There also seems to be some confusion in the heart_print tag where people have tagged it where there's a heart in a character's fur or on their skin:

post #1205566

I think these are meant to be naturally-occurring (not a tattoo) and should be under heart_marking instead...I will try to clean those up today.

Also peeps are confusing it with a heart_cutout: post #1457213

Jesus...that tag has problems...might have to write a damn wiki for it too!

Dyrone said:
See I always thought those implied a sort of overall pattern like so:

Single symbols are often tagged as *_symbol, such as null_symbol. Though those don't differentiate between clothing and other places. And I dunno what happened to skull_symbol and star_symbol, I guess someone decided to wipe those at some point. Maybe the assumption is that searching for something like skull symbol should work, but that seems messy.

The heart_symbol wiki currently redirects to the generic <3 for no apparent reason.

Tagging those as *_pattern doesn't make sense, not when other pattern tags such as pattern_background are strictly for repeating patterns. ...a pirate-style skull logo on a cap is not a skull_pattern, as far as I see it.

Genjar said:
Single symbols are often tagged as *_symbol, such as null_symbol. Though those don't differentiate between clothing and other places. And I dunno what happened to skull_symbol and star_symbol, I guess someone decided to wipe those at some point. Maybe the assumption is that searching for something like skull symbol should work, but that seems messy.

The heart_symbol wiki currently redirects to the generic <3 for no apparent reason.

Tagging those as *_pattern doesn't make sense, not when other pattern tags such as pattern_background are strictly for repeating patterns. ...a pirate-style skull logo on a cap is not a skull_pattern, as far as I see it.

Might be best to use *_print then. And then, for *_pattern tags, we'll have them imply their *_print tags

All *_pattern tags are *_print tags, but not all prints will be a pattern (a la a single heart on a shirt rather than a repeating pattern of hearts, etc)

Coloured insides/genitalia. Been looking for a tag but haven’t found one. Seems popular enough to be one. The See below:

https://e621.net/post/show/1023939

Skatole said:
Coloured insides/genitalia. Been looking for a tag but haven’t found one. Seems popular enough to be one. The See below:

https://e621.net/post/show/1023939

There is [color]_pussy/penis don't know anything about an 'oddly_colored_genitalia' tag though.

Skatole said:
Coloured insides/genitalia. Been looking for a tag but haven’t found one. Seems popular enough to be one. The See below:

https://e621.net/post/show/1023939

That picture is already tagged blue_anus and blue_penis.

Is there a tag for images that mimic the source from which a character is (or the copyright)? Like it could be mistaken with official artwork?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
There is [color]_pussy/penis don't know anything about an 'oddly_colored_genitalia' tag though.

Yeah I’ve been searching the wiki today and I can’t seem to find one. Should definitely be a tag imo, it’s fairly common.

SnowWolf said:
That picture is already tagged blue_anus and blue_penis.

I know, but I was looking for a tag for coloured genitalia in general. There’s a tag for ‘coloured_cum’, which is much less common.

Skatole said:
I know, but I was looking for a tag for coloured genitalia in general. There’s a tag for ‘coloured_cum’, which is much less common.

Sounds like the job for an implication...you should probably suggest one. Something like blue_penis -> colored_penis and blue_penis -> colored_genitalia. Then go through and do that for all the unusual colors.

Onto my question...is there a tag for shorts that look as though they have been cut away at the bottom? Like they were pants but now they're shorts?

post #509158

Dyrone said:
Onto my question...is there a tag for shorts that look as though they have been cut away at the bottom? Like they were pants but now they're shorts?

post #509158

cutoffs

darryus said:
cutoffs

Doh...should have know...forgot what they were called.

What about this? https://us.rule34.xxx//images/2575/6d5fdfb7404059cbcbee503cc534b738.jpeg?2860404

Those piercings that are essentially just spikes shoved through her skin? Is there a tag for that?

Also...is there a tag for when a limb has been replaced with a weapon?