Read the rules before proceeding!

Topic: Your Weirdest Kink

Posted under Off Topic

well, i'm fairly certain it's BS based on what wikipedia says of the topic.

as for my new avatar. i probably wouldn't have even known about this pic had i not been looking around to see if any other pics by mike_puncekar were missing the artist tag/source links. i'm pretty sure i've seen more of his work around here but i stopped looking after 20-30+ pages of the koopa tag. (i doubt that shyguy is the only pic we have here that was drawn by that artist.)

Updated by anonymous

lostpony said:
treos that seems the kind of thing you have to either believe or not believe, what sort of proof can there be of orgasms without ejaculation? even video wouldn't prove the feeling happened.

You can definitely orgasm without ejaculation. Many women do it all the time. :P

Updated by anonymous

treos said:
...that stuff is likely meant to go out...not be held in like that.

Having had a vasectomy, I will confirm that my swimmers do not leave the scrotum, and simply get reabsorbed inside. Nothing unhealthy about that.

Also, the point is to attain orgasm without there being ejaculate, not just 'shutting the door' so it diverts to the bladder. It is professed that males can have multiple orgasms this way, without the refractory period interfering (if oversensitivity does not become an issue, that is).

Updated by anonymous

Sharp_Coyote said:
Having had a vasectomy, I will confirm that my swimmers do not leave the scrotum, and simply get reabsorbed inside. Nothing unhealthy about that.

Also, the point is to attain orgasm without there being ejaculate, not just 'shutting the door' so it diverts to the bladder. It is professed that males can have multiple orgasms this way, without the refractory period interfering (if oversensitivity does not become an issue, that is).

I have been able to achieve a full body orgasm once via this method ,minus the vasectomy. It is was pretty much accidental. It was a little painful ,but it was so cool. I have not been able to make it happen again since then(last year). Being a male I did not know I could enact such a thing. But the feeling was exactly as described when it happens to a female. All muscles in my body went haywire.

I hope you all enjoyed an anatomy lesson.

Updated by anonymous

Mine would probably be anything alien. Xenomorphs, Experiments, Petresko's creatures..
Hell, I get my rocks off looking at H.R. Giger's work sometimes.

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
I'm not sure if I have any weird kinks. I do however have an uncommon preference. To the general populace that is. I find different bodies, psyches and cultures of that of man interesting. In short an interspeciest. I'm also a zoophile to some extend, however few female animals are capable to consent to sex so I'm probably never going there. There is also the intelligence barrier which is a quality I like with friends. Even if other intelligent species were around I'm not sure if I would seek a relationship with one though I would love to befriend one. A romantic friendship wouldn't be off the table either.

Not a single animal on earth is able to consent...

Updated by anonymous

NoxCL said:
Not a single animal on earth is able to consent...

Humans can. Remember, humans are still animals.
Dolphins are able too... But they also sometimes don't care and just go for it.

Updated by anonymous

NoxCL said:
Not a single animal on earth is able to consent...

That's not true. It's obvious when male animals want to fuck you. Female dolphins are able to consent.

Updated by anonymous

NoxCL said:
Not a single animal on earth is able to consent...

What about presenting?

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
Say what you will, nobody has seen into an animal's head.

My cat once decapitated a chipmunk. Does that count?

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
Say what you will, nobody has seen into an animal's head.

I bet some surgeons have.

Updated by anonymous

I think it's a tie between the sound of squeaking glass and cheek pinching.

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
Say what you will, nobody has seen into an animal's head.

They have, actually. I'm perfectly aware of my own thoughts.

Surgeons have cracked open animal heads and found that some had brains that operated the same way ours do.

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
Say what you will, nobody has seen into an animal's head.

Animals can communicate with each other, display emotions and moods, and can "consent" to sex at least as good as your drunk friend, if not better.

http://articles.extension.org/pages/9786/horse-breeding-behavior

Winking looks like nonverbal communication indicating consent to me.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160317-do-bonobos-really-spend-all-their-time-having-sex

http://www.salon.com/2014/06/14/human_on_dolphin_sex_is_not_really_that_weird/

Can't see into an animal's head? That's just not accurate. Brain scanning approaches may be more informative than verbal communication anyway:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/science/tickling-rats-neuroscience.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/11/rats-tickling-brains-moods/

Your Sexual Assault Prevention and Awareness Center definition of consent does not necessarily apply to animals or animals and humans, but animals can resist rape attempts. Given the evidence, the burden of proof is on you when you claim non-human animals cannot consent (even with humans).

A well-functioning animal may be in a better position to consent than some mentally ill humans.

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
Say what you will, nobody has seen into an animal's head.

Can't we just use brain scanners or similar equipment for that?

Updated by anonymous

I don't think the burden of proof rests solely on the person who's giving the benefit of the doubt and saying that maybe fucking your dog isn't what it wants. At the very least there's a really questionable power dynamic going on there, like parent-child incest or fraternization.

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
I don't think the burden of proof rests solely on the person who's giving the benefit of the doubt and saying that maybe fucking your dog isn't what it wants. At the very least there's a really questionable power dynamic going on there, like parent-child incest or fraternization.

We've offered up a lot of links and mentions and you haven't offered anything. If you can't accept your loss, at least pretend you were never a part of the argument.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
We've offered up a lot of links and mentions and you haven't offered anything. If you can't accept your loss, at least pretend you were never a part of the argument.

That's more of a personal attack than an argument.

Oh no, my family name has been disgraced by people who even furries throw under the bus immediately whenever the subject comes up. My peers are sure to condemn me forever.
I'm not trying to dismiss you, but surely you have some self-awareness of the position you're advocating. It's not one that you're going to persuade most people of with a couple links.

Speaking of which, this is a random argument on the internet, not a college essay. I do not have the patience or dedication to this to convince me I need twenty pages of MLA-cited sources.

Updated by anonymous

I agree that a comment can be equally legitimate as an article. It's just that articles and such usually go more into debt and whatnot. A comment is often more of a summery.

Updated by anonymous

treos said:
inter-species stuff though that shouldn't be surprising given how much i like non-human creatures.

i imagine humans strong opposition to such things will likely cause trouble when anthros become a thing irl. likely to the point of some pure/impure breed discrimination among other problems.

Well we will be there to protect them if it were to happen.
I mean I would love an anthro boyfriend it would be sexy.
Plus they would be able to speak human languages I hope.
Well I hope someday they are a thing.

treos said:
...oh the things i'd be tempted to try if were i ever to meet a lucario...

also,

i know your pain well. curiosity can lead to horrible, dreadful, things on the internet sometimes. :/

such as a living gasm drive pic involving scat...and somehow being worthy of not 1-2 but all 4 of e621's wtf tags: what, why, what_has_science_done, where_is_your_god_now, as well as one i had never known of before, penis_everywhere

O_O that was quite the discovery... that creature had cocks and pussies in places i didn't know or think possible.

For your lucario comment we share the same feelings

Trigaroo said:
hind paws, preferably feral paws (canines and felines mostly)

Same here they generally make the character cuter and sexier

I dont know if its a kink but rocket raccoon with anatomically correct genitals really turns me on

Updated by anonymous

The fantasy of being wounded is somehow interesting. Minor things, like scratches from a cat. All those "wild" things like claws or sharp teeth.

And being surrounded by comfy, cuddly things, touching and feeling, rubbing myself against them ...

Updated by anonymous

HappyCatling said:
The fantasy of being wounded is somehow interesting. Minor things, like scratches from a cat. All those "wild" things like claws or sharp teeth.

And being surrounded by comfy, cuddly things, touching and feeling, rubbing myself against them ...

I can relate to that.

Updated by anonymous

EDmuxZ said:
I'm into a LOT, but I'm not about to break out a list. My weirdest kink would probably be mild butt/breast expansion? I'm not entirely sure.

If that's the weirdest one, buddy, I don't think you're into as much as you think you are.

Updated by anonymous

Loli (as an extension of small breasts)
Yeah, I'm pretty plain (and have a sizable blacklist)

Updated by anonymous

The weirdest kink I have is also one of the most prominent ones I have in my art. My violent dragon art, specifically, is the weirdest one and the hardest one for me to explain, so I'll try to explain it here. If I fuck up, well, at least I attempted it.

I was born in a time when the only dragon imagery you were likely to find that showed a dragon not being killed was in a children's book or in an animated TV special such as "Puff The Magic Dragon." I was also raised by rather abusive parents. They weren't the types that beat their kids black and blue, but rather they were psychologically abusive. When I entered puberty around age 9 and started getting sexually aroused, I would often find myself aroused watching violent movies, usually civil war movies where the North was winning and the South was desperately clinging to life, and then there'd be a battle sequence and Confederate soldiers would be screaming, crying, being thrown around like ragdolls, and that kind of stuff aroused me, though I thankfully was never stupid enough to tell my parents about it.

Anyway, dragons were a part of my life since I was little. I mentioned Puff The Magic Dragon above, and that was one of the things I loved the most when I was very little. But in 1982, I found the then-new arcade game Dig Dug, and there was a dragon in it named Fygar, who was your enemy. At the end of each round, if one of your enemies was still alive, they tried to escape through the top left part of the screen. I felt like Fygar and his compatriot Pooka the balloon guy were really the underdog in the video game, just like the Confederate soldiers were in the movies that were so exciting to me. Since Dig Dug was interactive instead of just me sitting in front of a TV screen watching things happen without my input, I took great pleasure in saving at least one Fygar in the game and then catching him just as he was about to escape, and pumping him up... but then I would just kind of hold off on popping him and would be torn between killing him and letting him go. Back in those days, most kids played video games in arcades where you paid a quarter into a machine, and there were quite often other kids waiting to play, and they would get really impatient with me.

But anyway, I eventually discovered that dragons were almost always depicted in the art of the time being killed, and I found that a lot of Renaissance era paintings showed the dragon being vastly outmatched by the knight in shining armor such as St. George or St. Michael, and I found that it was the sense of total hopelessness on the dragon's part that I really got off to, and so when I started drawing my own pornography as a 13 year old boy, I did dragons almost exclusively, and the vast majority of the dragon images I did were of the hopeless cause variety where the dragon would be fighting for his or her life and not even having a chance at living through the encounter.

But I think what made me so into that kind of violent art was the fact that as a badly abused child, I identified with the dragon. In a way, drawing the dragons getting brutally killed like that was a way of empathizing with them because I myself had been basically relegated to being the family scapegoat. Since for me being outwardly angry was forbidden by my parents, the art gave me a way of expressing my anger without them catching on that that was what I was doing. Plus I hid my art rather well, so most of the time they never even saw my art.

At the end of the day, my violent dragon art isn't about the violence itself, but rather the hopelessness of the victim and the fear as well as the lengths they will go to just to survive the encounter. I always felt hopeless and like my life was well out of my control, so drawing dragons not as monsters trying to wreak havoc on a kingdom but instead as innocent victims just trying to get away and live another day was a form of catharsis for me. I would draw all sorts of violent art, not just killing, but also dismemberment and genital mutilation and stuff like that, and often I would make the "knight in shining armor" a cruel, sadistic piece of shit like my step-father who was having a grand old time causing the dragon to suffer. For a few years, I drew them in a comic type format with multiple frames, and in some of those cases the dragon would survive, sometimes only barely by some feat of pure luck, but other times they would be saved by divine intervention and would live a long and happy life afterward.

And since dragons are depicted as wild animals a lot of the time, I would treat them like their greatest dream would be having a family and mating, so I would draw them mating when they were attacked, which also reflected back on my own life and the dreams I had from a very young age which were constantly being thwarted by various circumstances in my life, most prominently my asshole parents. To this day, I still draw this stuff and enjoy the same subject matter by other artists as well, and it still has a lot of the same cathartic effect on me now that it did when I was a boy.

So there's my explanation. I hope it made some sense, and I also hope it doesn't scare the living shit out of anyone who reads it. But if it does, there's nothing I can really do about that.

Updated by anonymous

I'm gay, but I can enjoy yiff of men gangbanging a woman. I'm dominant, so there's something highly erotic about it; as long as the woman doesn't look like a human and there's not a good view of her vag.

Updated by anonymous

InannaEloah said:
-snip-

I'm sorry to hear that. I first thought you were aroused by violence alone which doesn't sound like the best of kinks. But it is the situation that interests you and I get that. I'm also romanticizing the past by how the limited content one have available forms you. When you looked up art you went for what I assume was available for you; old paintings.

I had similar experiences in video games like you. It didn't arouse me sexually but I found it fascinating in an emotional way for a lack of better words. I remember playing an old PS1 sidescroller demo. You played as a guy with an antigravity beam gun which could pick things up, including the monster guy enemies. There were spikes which you needed to get over at times and you could throw the bad guys at them to make a bridge over it. A few times I would pick up a live baddy and hold them over the spikes and watch them cry and flail. Dropping them I could see that were still alive and twitching, finally killing them when I jump on one. Then there were Jurassic Park: The Lost World also for the PS1. A great underrated game. Also a sidescroller. Like with the movie, there is a dreadful sense of hopelessness and despair in the levels including Ingen and their mercenaries. I found the second level of Sara quite scary as you had to venture into overgrown, dark and overrun parts of Ingen's caves and facilities.
Playing as the raptor, you could really toy with the merc's lives. I had sessions where I pounced one, watching him struggle under me. Slowly clawing and biting him to death. Sometimes I let them struggle away from me so I could pounce them again. You could do something similar as the T-Rex as well. It was possible to bite a guy and let them squirm in your mouth. Funny enough they will eventually escape your powerful jaws.

Updated by anonymous

Cum inflation plain and simple. Why? I like Cum. I don't have much else to say

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
I'm sorry to hear that. I first thought you were aroused by violence alone which doesn't sound like the best of kinks.

Yeah, a lot of people have made that assumption about me over the years. Like I said, it's a hard one for me to explain, which is why my post was as long as it was. But like you said, it is the situation that I'm attracted to, not the violence itself. And the art has a huge impact on viewers when compared to other things I draw, not just here on e6 but pretty much everywhere, and most often that impact tends to draw a lot of negative attention my way. But I suppose that's part of the price I pay for drawing what I want to draw instead of what I think everybody else would want me to draw.

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
I'm sorry to hear that. I first thought you were aroused by violence alone which doesn't sound like the best of kinks.

That is the best kink

Updated by anonymous

InannaEloah said:
Yeah, a lot of people have made that assumption about me over the years. Like I said, it's a hard one for me to explain, which is why my post was as long as it was. But like you said, it is the situation that I'm attracted to, not the violence itself. And the art has a huge impact on viewers when compared to other things I draw, not just here on e6 but pretty much everywhere, and most often that impact tends to draw a lot of negative attention my way. But I suppose that's part of the price I pay for drawing what I want to draw instead of what I think everybody else would want me to draw.

I would like to correct myself. What I meant to say is that it sounded like that at the start of your first post before explaining it further. I have looked on your art before and I noticed the similar situations in them. I didn't think all that much on the artist's preference. People draw messed up stuff and I don't find it odd. Any child have drawn gore. I'd be lying if I said I didn't find them interesting. There's one quote from a MTG card that I found so true that it stuck around with me.
-Death seduces anyone who studies it.

Updated by anonymous

Was going to write a simple kink list but remembered the original question of weirdest.

Updated by anonymous

Vote, mostly consensual though.
Genital slits with a penis emerging.
Older male anthros but not muscular.

Updated by anonymous

We talking real world or just stuff we like to fap to? Because boy oh boy are those completely different universes for me.

Updated by anonymous

I have a lot of weird ones but I'm going to have to go with egg laying. I find it oddly hot

Updated by anonymous

Oddly, thinking about it...

Living machines. But only in particular fashions; I have maybe an unhealthy attraction to tanks.
Just tanks.

Updated by anonymous

I know I already posted, but I found another...

I find it kinky when the person (furry or not) is in armor.

Iron Man outside of his suit? Meh.
Iron Man in his suit? HOLYFUCKMEPLEASE

Updated by anonymous

Pretty vanilla for the most part, only thing I love that could be considered weird is sounds and heavy foodplay.

Updated by anonymous

I admit to liking watersports but that's really the only weird thing I'm into. Aside from that, I'm pretty vanilla.

Updated by anonymous

Tcharger said:
Pretty vanilla for the most part, only thing I love that could be considered weird is sounds and heavy foodplay.

Foodplay?

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Foodplay?

what, you dont like rubbing choclate syrup and whip cream all ver yourself to be hot?

Updated by anonymous

RusterFuck said:
what, you dont like rubbing choclate syrup and whip cream all ver yourself to be hot?

I'm asking for a definition not for a sarcastic response, buddy.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
I'm asking for a definition not for a sarcastic response, buddy.

didnt realize you needed a definiton for something so balantly obvious, friend-o.

Updated by anonymous

Psychologically breaking fictional characters I like and/or can relate to, including my own, usually involving nightmare fuel based on real life phobias I have. It's not a kink though. It's more like a mix between Catharsis (This time, it isn't happening to me.) and utility (I can show what is happening through my eyes without any real people being in danger).

Also, nightmare fuel of any type, though that's also not a kink. I just have a weird sense of what is comfortable and what isn't. Sound is usually a part of it.

Also, I have an interest in ASMR, though I avoid any sexual ones, as those tend to cause panic attacks for me.

Updated by anonymous

Xenophilia. Any human-like male with a nonhuman female is good enough for me. More of a fetish than a kink, but it suffices.

Updated by anonymous

UnusualParadox said:
Xenophilia. Any human-like male with a nonhuman female is good enough for me. More of a fetish than a kink, but it suffices.

much the same here only i prefer males.

actually, given how many people are into the kind of non-human content hosted on this site. xenophilia is probably much more common and normal than one might think. of course, xenophilia can easily extend beyond an interest in the species themselves and be more than sexual in nature.

Updated by anonymous

UnusualParadox said:
Xenophilia. Any human-like male with a nonhuman female is good enough for me. More of a fetish than a kink, but it suffices.

I've honestly got the same thing. Human men, elven men, something similar, being intimate with a very obviously nonhuman woman (or receptive male), whether furry, alien, monstrous, whatever, hits me in all the right spots.

Updated by anonymous