The tag alias #47384 person_as_gift -> gift_wrapped has been rejected.

Reason: We should avoid "person".

All cases seem to present a case, where a character is having gift wrapping on them.

Should there emerge a case, where a character is presented as a gift, without being wrapped as one, character_as_gift should be brought to use, instead of person_as_gift or person_present.

This relates to alias request person_present -> gift_wrapped

EDIT: The tag alias person_as_gift -> gift_wrapped (forum #298017) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Why should we avoid "person"? Is this a site rule somewhere?

ccoyote said:
Why should we avoid "person"? Is this a site rule somewhere?

^^^^^^^^^^^

generally "character" is better to use than "person" as peeps are gonna argue that ferals aren't "people", and other dumb shit, it's best to cut out as much ambiguity as possible.

gift-wrapped is too vague for this.
Though yes, 'character' would be more in-line with the existing standards than 'person'.

How about aliasing these to character_as_gift instead?

We could still approve this and the associated topic #27635, and mass update gift_wrapped in another BUR so that it'll be replaced with character_as_gift. I'll make a BUR for this.

The bulk update request #332 has been rejected.

Reason: A mass update of gift_wrapped -> character_as_gift, along with several more aliases. Associated with aliases from topic #27634 and topic #27635.

• I'm also wondering if similar tags like naked_ribbon should also be aliased to character_as_gift, or if it would be better suited under the *_only group of tags.

Edit:

• Altered a bunch of aliases to keep gift_wrapped_character as it's own distinct tag from character_as_gift.
• The aliases person_present -> gift_wrapped from topic #27635 and person_as_gift -> gift_wrapped from this forum topic might need to be rejected, then resubmitted as aliases person_present/person_as_gift -> character_as_gift (since gift_wrapped is now being aliased to gift_wrapped_character instead of character_as_gift).
• Added the implication gift_wrapped_character -> character_as_gift.

EDIT: The bulk update request #332 (forum #298087) has been rejected by @slyroon.

ribbon_bondage and character_as_gift should be kept separate and naked_ribbon could be either. Also I hope you realize that this would also mean that all of the characters being placed in boxes would now be mixed in with all of the characters wrapped in ribbons. Only the gift wrapped tagged have been placed in character as gift, none of the other concepts in the gift tag have yet.

It will probably be fine to merge the tags, but I wont be sure until I have a better idea of the use cases.

I've edited the BUR, so now there will be a character_as_gift tag (for more general use) and a gift_wrapped_character tag (for character_as_gift with ribbons).

I think I'll refrain from doing anything with ribbon_bondage and naked_ribbon for now, and try to keep this BUR somewhat simple.

The tag alias person_as_gift -> gift_wrapped (forum #298017) has been rejected by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #332 (forum #298087) has been rejected by @slyroon.