The bulk update request #740 has been rejected.

change category lilin (0) -> lore
change category succubus (4676) -> lore
change category incubus (0) -> lore
change category lilin_(lore) (0) -> lore
change category succubus_(lore) (0) -> lore
change category incubus_(lore) (0) -> lore
create alias succubus (4676) -> succubus_(lore) (0)
remove alias lilin (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias incubus (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias inccubus (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias inccubi (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lesser_succubi (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lust_demon (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias succubi (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias incubi (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias sex_devil (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias sex_demon (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lusty_demon (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lesser_succubus (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lesser_incubus (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias lesser_incubi (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias succubus_pony (0) -> demon (111764)
remove alias succubust (0) -> demon (111764)

Reason: Establishing lilin, succubus, and incubus as Lore category tags. Derived from forum topic #28766.

Edit:

• Added the category changes lilin_(lore), succubus_(lore), and incubus_(lore) to be re-categorized as Lore category tags.
• Added the alias succubus -> succubus_(lore) (as well as an alias for lilin -> lilin_(lore) and incubus -> incubus_(lore) in the "Tags For Another BUR" section).

EDIT: The bulk update request #740 (forum #306374) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

d.d.m. said:
category lilin -> lore
category succubus -> lore
category incubus -> lore

I'm still not sold on them being useful tags. But they should have the _(lore) suffix if they're going to be lore tags.

watsit said:
But they should have the _(lore) suffix if they're going to be lore tags.

+1 to this. At least, that seems to be what's going on for the lore tags, so these should likely follow suit, if they're accepted as lore tags.

I've updated the BUR and the "Tags For Another BUR" section. All the tags will now be aliased to lilin_(lore), succubus_(lore), and incubus_(lore) instead.

In the future BUR:

imply lilin_(lore) -> demon

Unless demon is going to become demon_(lore) too, this doesn't seem appropriate since demon depends on some TWYS elements whereas lore tags don't.

watsit said:
In the future BUR:
Unless demon is going to become demon_(lore) too, this doesn't seem appropriate since demon depends on some TWYS elements whereas lore tags don't.

Yeah, Lilin are supposed to be demons, but they don't always look like it.

Yeah, that would be a bad implication since posts tagged as lilin_(lore) wouldn't always count as demons. Removed the implication lilin_(lore) -> demon from the 'Tags For Another BUR' section.

I was going to suggest implication of Succubus -> demon, (but checked wikipedia and this forum)
but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus starts with "A succubus is a demon or supernatural entity in folklore, in female form, ..." and "In modern representations, a succubus is often depicted as a beautiful seductress or enchantress, rather than as demonic or frightening."

Ok to update succubus wiki with the "or supernatural entity" bit?

I'm not sure how useful Succubus, Incubus, and omnibus (not included in your BUR!) would be themselves, they may do well with an alias to lilin_(lore).

furrin_gok said:
I'm not sure how useful Succubus, Incubus, and omnibus (not included in your BUR!) would be themselves, they may do well with an alias to lilin_(lore).

As far as I know, those are just female or male-specific versions of lilin. So lilin_(lore) might be all we need, combined with gender tags, or lore gender if necessary to get the point across…

I still think lore information belongs in the description box rather than it’s own tag category, but whatever, lol

The bulk update request #740 (forum #306374) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.