The bulk update request #2157 is pending approval.

create implication woman_yelling_at_a_cat (86) -> taylor_crying_and_pointing (0)
create implication woman_yelling_at_a_cat (86) -> confused_cat_at_dinner (0)
create implication taylor_crying_and_pointing (0) -> meme (52611)
create implication confused_cat_at_dinner (0) -> meme (52611)

Reason: Woman Yelling at a Cat is actually the merging of two distinct images into one single meme.
post #2880050 post #3136009 post #2331873
Some images only have one half of the story, while others swap out half of it, and these images no longer fit woman_yelling_at_a_cat.

See also:
- topic #23021 - This implication might need to be moved if we carry through with it.

Since the meme is the combination of the two images, even if only half is referenced, it's still the one meme. I don't think it needs to be split in two simply because someone can depict just one frame.

watsit said:
Since the meme is the combination of the two images, even if only half is referenced, it's still the one meme. I don't think it needs to be split in two simply because someone can depict just one frame.

They're two separate memes to start with. The confused cat was originally named he_no_like_veggies but that just seems a bit too vague.

post #2056937 is another he_no_like_veggies