The bulk update request #2592 is pending approval.

create implication humanoid_penis_in_slit (326) -> humanoid_penis (454401) # duplicate of implication #42191
create implication humanoid_penis_in_slit (326) -> genital_slit (33100) # duplicate of implication #42192
create implication humanoid_penis_in_slit (326) -> hybrid_penis (14013)

Reason: "humanoid_penis_in_slit" should imply "humanoid_penis", "genital_slit", "hybrid_penis".

It would be consistent with how "sheathed_humanoid_penis" implies "humanoid_penis", "sheath", and "hybrid_penis".

I don't think a slit is a sheath

Indeed, I made a mistake :s I meant to write genital_slit. I fixed it. Thanks!

As someone already said, humanoid_penis_in_slit name suggests penetration rather that penis placement.

It would be better to change it to something like slitted_humanoid_penis (similar to sheathed_humanoid_penis).

Edit: Furrin Gok already created an appropriate BUR in topic #31074.