The tag implication #45458 outside_sex -> sex has been rejected.

Reason: It implies sex.

EDIT: The tag implication outside_sex -> sex (forum #340248) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

topic #30314 topic #30001

faucet said:
topic #30314 topic #30001

So we can't make this really obvious and non-controversial implication because there is a controversial not-resolved BUR request which contain (or may contain) this implication ?

mikael_the_d said:
So we can't make this really obvious and non-controversial implication because there is a controversial not-resolved BUR request which contain (or may contain) this implication ?

Kinda putting the cart before the horse there, the controversial BUR needs to be resolved before this implication can be made. And also, like you said, this implication is a part of said BUR, and therefore is a duplicate. So like.... either way its going to be rejected

The tag implication outside_sex -> sex (forum #340248) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.