The tag implication #47142 bulge_frottage -> frottage has been rejected.

Reason: bulge frottage is the frottage of bulges

EDIT: The tag implication bulge_frottage -> frottage (forum #345882) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

EDIT: The tag implication bulge_frottage -> frottage (forum #345882) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

gattonero2001 said:
Reason: bulge frottage is the frottage of bulges

frottage is when:

two characters press and rub their erect penises together.

A bulge isn't necessarily a penis, let alone an erect penis.

topic #30920

watsit said:
A bulge isn't necessarily a penis

What else would it be?

wat8548 said:
What else would it be?

Balls. A nondescript lump. A sock.

This was already suggested in forum topic #30920, which is still pending.

It may not be technically correct, but I still think it's a useful tag.

oozeenthusiast said:
It may not be technically correct, but I still think it's a useful tag.

Bulge_frottage itself is fine. But if I search for frottage, I expect to see penises touching/rubbing, not bulges of fabric or flesh that may or may not be penises underneath. Bulge doesn't implicate penis, so bulge_frottage shouldn't implicate frottage which is specifically for penises rubbing together.

watsit said:
Bulge_frottage itself is fine. But if I search for frottage, I expect to see penises touching/rubbing, not bulges of fabric or flesh that may or may not be penises underneath. Bulge doesn't implicate penis, so bulge_frottage shouldn't implicate frottage which is specifically for penises rubbing together.

Point taken.

The tag implication bulge_frottage -> frottage (forum #345882) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

This makes bulge_frottage imply sex now, which is not always true
as has been stated bulge_frottage does not have to involve penises at all, so it wouldn't be frottage.
This was overall met with mixed or negative reactions, I don't see why it was approved

Are you sure this should be approved, considering the frottage wiki, the voting, and the discussion underneath the request @Rainbow_Dash?

The tag implication bulge_frottage -> frottage (forum #345882) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

It's fixed now

This one got a little confusing with that other BUR as well