The bulk update request #3941 is active.
create implication penis_in_slit (455) -> slit_penetration (2244)
create implication penis_in_slit (455) -> penile_penetration (327148)
create implication vibrator_in_slit (34) -> vibrator (22897)
remove implication dildo_in_slit (78) -> slit_penetration (2244)
create implication tail_in_slit (29) -> slit_penetration (2244)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (75) -> slit_penetration (2244)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (75) -> tentacle_penetration (15684)
Reason: Stuff in slit implies slit penetration, just like with anal/vaginal.
dildo_in_slit -> slit_penetration is redundant because it's already implied through sex_toy_in_slit.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has failed: Error: tail_in_slit already implies tail_play through another implication (create implication tail_in_slit -> tail_play)
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator