The bulk update request #3941 is active.
create implication penis_in_slit (440) -> slit_penetration (2197)
create implication penis_in_slit (440) -> penile_penetration (318384)
create implication vibrator_in_slit (33) -> vibrator (22491)
remove implication dildo_in_slit (76) -> slit_penetration (2197)
create implication tail_in_slit (29) -> slit_penetration (2197)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (70) -> slit_penetration (2197)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (70) -> tentacle_penetration (15247)
Reason: Stuff in slit implies slit penetration, just like with anal/vaginal.
dildo_in_slit -> slit_penetration is redundant because it's already implied through sex_toy_in_slit.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has failed: Error: tail_in_slit already implies tail_play through another implication (create implication tail_in_slit -> tail_play)
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator