The bulk update request #3941 is active.
create implication penis_in_slit (373) -> slit_penetration (1909)
create implication penis_in_slit (373) -> penile_penetration (287398)
create implication vibrator_in_slit (27) -> vibrator (20951)
remove implication dildo_in_slit (59) -> slit_penetration (1909)
create implication tail_in_slit (24) -> slit_penetration (1909)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (49) -> slit_penetration (1909)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (49) -> tentacle_penetration (13595)
Reason: Stuff in slit implies slit penetration, just like with anal/vaginal.
dildo_in_slit -> slit_penetration is redundant because it's already implied through sex_toy_in_slit.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has failed: Error: tail_in_slit already implies tail_play through another implication (create implication tail_in_slit -> tail_play)
EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator