The bulk update request #5216 is pending approval.

create implication slit_penetration (2192) -> slit_play (2937) # duplicate of implication #11941
create implication slit_fingering (351) -> slit_play (2937) # duplicate of implication #29758
create implication slit_vore (24) -> slit_play (2937)
create implication slit_tribadism (9) -> slit_play (2937)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (37) -> slit_penetration (2192)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (37) -> mutual_penetration (1034)
create implication double_slit_penetration (21) -> slit_penetration (2192)
create implication double_slit_penetration (21) -> double_penetration (32656)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (70) -> tentacle_penetration (15222)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (70) -> slit_penetration (2192)
create implication penis_in_slit (439) -> slit_penetration (2192) # duplicate of implication #50523
create implication tail_in_slit (29) -> slit_penetration (2192)
create implication tail_in_slit (29) -> tail_play (10391)

Reason: this should make it a lot easier to find the various types of activities involving genital slits. I've left out slit_licking, oral_slit_play, tongue_in_slit, and frottage_in_slit because I'm not really sure what should be done with those.

Hmm, 3 of those are duplicates of existing implication requests... and those 3 should probably get approved, but sooooo long of backlog. Also, these all look reasonable.

Some overlap with topic #36850.

I wasn't sure if I should leave out the duplicate suggestions especially since half of these implications kinda rely on slit_penetration implying slit_play, and that suggestion has been pending for 5 years now, and I'm not really sure what i should do when that happens.

The bulk update request #5252 is pending approval.

create implication slit_masturbation (255) -> slit_play (2937)
create implication slit_masturbation (255) -> masturbation (159737)

Reason: slit_masturbation is a combination of slit_play and masturbation

Don't necessarily agree with slit_vore implying slit_play (is oral_vore mouth_play?) but otherwise 👍

whogiveashit said:
Don't necessarily agree with slit_vore implying slit_play (is oral_vore mouth_play?) but otherwise 👍

From my understanding slit_play is more analogous to tags like anal or cloacal, and both anal_vore and cloacal_vore implicate anal and cloacal respectively. But I could be wrong and it might be better to implicate genital_slit in the same way that sheath_vore implicates sheath.