The bulk update request #5683 is pending approval.

create implication topless_ambiguous (29) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_anthro (11992) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #42319
create implication topless_female (6485) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #38429
create implication topless_feral (0) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_herm (0) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_human (320) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #42322
create implication topless_humanoid (576) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #42320
create implication topless_intersex (191) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #42331
create implication topless_male (14794) -> topless (132383) # duplicate of implication #38630
create implication topless_maleherm (0) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_taur (5) -> topless (132383)

Reason: In my tagging, I've noticed that not all of the topless_[character {gender}/{body type}] tags implicate the logical parent tag topless (ex. topless_anthro and topless_female do, but topless_ambiguous and topless_taur do not). This should cover the remainder (topless_ambiguous and topless_gynomorph gave me an error in the BUR, cause they're definitely covered).

Requesting seven bulk updates grouped by the parent tags, navigation for the topic posts of which below:

• topic #40835 — Implications of the "fully_clothed" tag
• topic #40836 — Implications of the "clothed" tag
• topic #40837 — Implications of the "partially_clothed" tag
• topic #40840 — Remaining implications of the "topless" tag ◀ (You are here)
• topic #40841 — Remaining implications of the "bottomless" tag
• topic #40838 — Implications of the "mostly_nude" tag
• topic #40839 — Implications of the "nude" tag

Any chance you could remove the ones that are already in effect?

The bulk update request #7221 is active.

create implication topless_taur (5) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_ambiguous (29) -> topless (132383)
create implication topless_maleherm (0) -> topless_intersex (191)
create implication topless_herm (0) -> topless_intersex (191)
create implication topless_taur (5) -> taur (18641)
create alias topless_feral (0) -> feral (624326)
create implication topless_ambiguous (29) -> ambiguous_gender (317145)
create implication topless_maleherm (0) -> maleherm (4571)
create implication topless_herm (0) -> herm (27681)

Reason: *_maleherm and *_herm should imply *_intersex
Added the implications to form/gender

topless feral be like

^{_{Didnt find that meme on e6, was sure we had one variant of it around}}

EDIT: The bulk update request #7221 (forum #397104) has been approved by @slyroon.

topless should not be tagged on feral characters, so topless feral is inherently invalid (not to mention completely empty). The occasional feral character wearing pants or whatever is pretty easily found via the clothed feral tag plus the article of clothing. Tagging ferals as topless will just pollute the topless tag with undesired results, as people using that tag are most likely looking for bare chests/bare breasts on anthro/human/humanoid/maybe taur characters. They're not looking for ferals wearing pants... This is essentially the same issue as why ferals are not supposed to be tagged as nude. So it'll have to be a -1 from me until that part is removed.

edit: tangentially related, but the results for taur solo topless are remarkably poor. Most of these are nude. One of the results for topless_taur is also just nude, and one of them I think isn't even a taur...

scaliespe said:
topless should not be tagged on feral characters, so topless feral is inherently invalid (not to mention completely empty). The occasional feral character wearing pants or whatever is pretty easily found via the clothed feral tag plus the article of clothing. Tagging ferals as topless will just pollute the topless tag with undesired results, as people using that tag are most likely looking for bare chests/bare breasts on anthro/human/humanoid/maybe taur characters. They're not looking for ferals wearing pants... This is essentially the same issue as why ferals are not supposed to be tagged as nude. So it'll have to be a -1 from me until that part is removed.

Changed it to an alias

scaliespe said:

The occasional feral character wearing pants or whatever is pretty easily found via the clothed feral tag plus the article of clothing.

Though it can come up with some false positives, like post #3361916, where there's a clothed feral, but if no shirt or pants if you were searching for that article of clothing on a feral. I'll concede that there's no good way to cover those though, and it's not even a focus of the BUR.

I agree that topless/bottomless shouldn't be tagged on ferals; the connotations from anthros wearing only topwear or bottomwear is that they're missing the other article of clothing, while feral's default expectation is nudity

I dunno, once a feral character is wearing clothes I'm not sure if the "don't tag the defaults" mentality should continue to be applied.

The bulk update request #7221 (forum #397104) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #8224 is pending approval.

Reason: Rerouting the implications through clothed_[] rather than [] directly

This also brings the question of whether fully/partially_clothed/top/bottomless_feral should be aliased to clothed_feral rather than feral

Gender/Form implication navigation:
R - Slocheze's BUR pending
S - My BUR pending
C - No further steps necessary