The bulk update request #5683 is pending approval.
create implication topless_ambiguous (15) -> topless (121859)
create implication topless_anthro (8937) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #42319
create implication topless_female (5119) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #38429
create implication topless_feral (0) -> topless (121859)
create implication topless_herm (0) -> topless (121859)
create implication topless_human (257) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #42322
create implication topless_humanoid (396) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #42320
create implication topless_intersex (151) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #42331
create implication topless_male (11930) -> topless (121859) # duplicate of implication #38630
create implication topless_maleherm (0) -> topless (121859)
create implication topless_taur (4) -> topless (121859)
Reason: In my tagging, I've noticed that not all of the topless_[character {gender}/{body type}] tags implicate the logical parent tag topless (ex. topless_anthro and topless_female do, but topless_ambiguous and topless_taur do not). This should cover the remainder (topless_ambiguous and topless_gynomorph gave me an error in the BUR, cause they're definitely covered).
Requesting seven bulk updates grouped by the parent tags, navigation for the topic posts of which below:
- topic #40835 — Implications of the "fully_clothed" tag
- topic #40836 — Implications of the "clothed" tag
- topic #40837 — Implications of the "partially_clothed" tag
- topic #40840 — Remaining implications of the "topless" tag ◀ (You are here)
- topic #40841 — Remaining implications of the "bottomless" tag
- topic #40838 — Implications of the "mostly_nude" tag
- topic #40839 — Implications of the "nude" tag
Updated
