The bulk update request #5682 is pending approval.

create implication nude_ambiguous (365) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_andromorph (850) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_anthro (35727) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_female (28085) -> nude (1266819) # duplicate of implication #50373
create alias nude_feral (166) -> feral (624329)
create implication nude_gynomorph (3626) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_herm (327) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_human (1770) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_humanoid (4570) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_intersex (4305) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_male (25432) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_maleherm (228) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_taur (349) -> nude (1266819)

Reason: In my tagging, I've noticed that some (if not all) of the [state of clothedness] (by) [character {gender}/{body type}] tags do not implicate the logical parent tags (ex. nude_female does not imply nude). Even if there are any preexisting implications, this should cover all bases by requesting ones for all variations at once.

Requesting seven bulk updates grouped by the parent tags, navigation for the topic posts of which below:

• topic #40835 — Implications of the "fully_clothed" tag
• topic #40836 — Implications of the "clothed" tag
• topic #40837 — Implications of the "partially_clothed" tag
• topic #40840 — Remaining implications of the "topless" tag
• topic #40841 — Remaining implications of the "bottomless" tag
• topic #40838 — Implications of the "mostly_nude" tag
• topic #40839 — Implications of the "nude" tag ◀ (You are here)

Update²: Requesting alias nude_feral to feral for being a super little loser tag bloat baby

"nude_feral" is unnecessary since it's the expected state of a feral character. Ferals shouldn't be tagged nude since it's just extra tag bloat (searching feral would have largely identical results as "nude feral" or "nude_feral").

slocheze said:
Update: Requesting alias nude_feral to nude for being a little loser tag bloat baby

ferals aren't supposed to be tagged with nude at all, it's the default state.

sipothac said:
ferals aren't supposed to be tagged with nude at all, it's the default state.

Correct, alias nude_feral -> feral instead.

slocheze said:
create implication nude_andromorph (269) -> nude (1071054)
create implication nude_gynomorph (1713) -> nude (1071054)
create implication nude_herm (231) -> nude (1071054)
create implication nude_maleherm (220) -> nude (1071054)

These should imply nude_intersex instead, with nude_intersex implying nude. They should also imply andromorph, gynomorph, herm, and maleherm respectively.

Relatedly, there's topic #37849

leomole said:
I'm going to suggest that the [clothedness]_[gender] tags be aliased to [clothedness] and [gender]. These compound tags are not scalable and e6 was not designed to handle them. See related topic #34712 and topic #37737.

watsit said:
Relatedly, there's topic #37849

leomole said:
I'm going to suggest that the [clothedness]_[gender] tags be aliased to [clothedness] and [gender]. These compound tags are not scalable and e6 was not designed to handle them. See related topic #34712 and topic #37737.

I don't necessarily disagree tbh, but I think that ship's already sailed (see the already approved implications on https://e621.net/forum_topics/40840 and https://e621.net/forum_topics/40841)

strikerman said:

leomole said:
I'm going to suggest that the [clothedness]_[gender] tags be aliased to [clothedness] and [gender]. These compound tags are not scalable and e6 was not designed to handle them. See related topic #34712 and topic #37737.

I don't necessarily disagree tbh, but I think that ship's already sailed (see the already approved implications on https://e621.net/forum_topics/40840 and https://e621.net/forum_topics/40841)

I do not support any of those tags nor the OP tags, and I intend to never tag them. Should I be downvoting every thread that I think tries to legitimize tags I would rather have purged from the site? That's no small amount of downvotes.

abadbird said:
I do not support any of those tags nor the OP tags, and I intend to never tag them. Should I be downvoting every thread that I think tries to legitimize tags I would rather have purged from the site? That's no small amount of downvotes.

It would help discussions if you also posted an accompanying comment, but there's nothing stopping you from just voting and peacing out.

slocheze said:
The bulk update request #5682 is pending approval.

create implication nude_ambiguous (365) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_andromorph (850) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_anthro (35727) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_female (28085) -> nude (1266819) # duplicate of implication #50373
create alias nude_feral (166) -> feral (624329)
create implication nude_gynomorph (3626) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_herm (327) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_human (1770) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_humanoid (4570) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_intersex (4305) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_male (25432) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_maleherm (228) -> nude (1266819)
create implication nude_taur (349) -> nude (1266819)

Reason: In my tagging, I've noticed that some (if not all) of the [state of clothedness] (by) [character {gender}/{body type}] tags do not implicate the logical parent tags (ex. nude_female does not imply nude). Even if there are any preexisting implications, this should cover all bases by requesting ones for all variations at once.

Requesting seven bulk updates grouped by the parent tags, navigation for the topic posts of which below:

• topic #40835 — Implications of the "fully_clothed" tag
• topic #40836 — Implications of the "clothed" tag
• topic #40837 — Implications of the "partially_clothed" tag
• topic #40840 — Remaining implications of the "topless" tag
• topic #40841 — Remaining implications of the "bottomless" tag
• topic #40838 — Implications of the "mostly_nude" tag
• topic #40839 — Implications of the "nude" tag ◀ (You are here)

Update²: Requesting alias nude_feral to feral for being a super little loser tag bloat baby

Should imply nude_andromorph/gynomorph/maleherm/herm to nude_intersex instead. All the tags should also imply their corresponding gender/form

The bulk update request #8217 is pending approval.

Reason: Doing it right.
Edit: BTR from topic #37849

Gender/Form implication navigation:
R - Slocheze's BUR pending
S - My BUR pending
C - No further steps necessary