Topic: [APPROVED] The Great Cub Apocalypse

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I (and hopefully a few other users) have been slowly plugging away at the set and, as of writing, the remaining posts to be cleaned out now number fewer than 6900.

today, as I had some extra time to do so, I managed to clean out a couple of copytags from the set entirely (including fluffy_pony, so, if those posts were deterring anyone from working on the set, they're gone now).

...and done. the beast has been slain, cub is now entirely dead*.

*the young_<form> tags have now been added to every applicable post within the set, most of the rest had young removed, and the remaining 21 posts contained young characters who don't fit in the current 5 form categories.

alphamule

Privileged

dba_afish said:
...and done. the beast has been slain, cub is now entirely dead*.

*the young_<form> tags have now been added to every applicable post within the set, most of the rest had young removed, and the remaining 21 posts contained young characters who don't fit in the current 5 form categories.

Gah, sorry I wasn't able to help with the final push! I have been adding them when I see them missing, though. Good job! :)

I wasn't even going to try figuring out which young didn't apply to, because that's far more controversial.

alphamule said:
I wasn't even going to try figuring out which young didn't apply to, because that's far more controversial.

removing young was more out of necessity than anything, most of the time it was cases were I couldn't even tell which character in the post was supposed to be the "young" one. and rather than just leave it so I see the posts over and over again.

either way, the set's still there. my removal of the tag should account for the first like 160 posts (2 and a bit pages) in set:cub_apocolypse -young order:change, if anyone wants to look that over and disagree with my assessment they can.

alphamule

Privileged

Posts like post #145361 ...
I'm not even sure. I can't really tag it young_<gender> without knowing what to do about hydras. I'm trying to find where in Wiki, it says what happens when both a male and female have a merged body. I thought it was herm or maleherm depending on species and secondary characteristics (i.e. breasts for mammals or peacock tail for peacocks are blatant).

alphamule said:
Posts like post #145361 ...
I'm not even sure. I can't really tag it young_<gender> without knowing what to do about hydras. I'm trying to find where in Wiki, it says what happens when both a male and female have a merged body. I thought it was herm or maleherm depending on species and secondary characteristics (i.e. breasts for mammals or peacock tail for peacocks are blatant).

Technically, they're conjoined (fraternal) twins, not a hydra. The heads are two different sexes, but the body is a blend of both. However, only male genitals are visible, so I'd say tag as young_male.

alphamule

Privileged

clawstripe said:
Technically, they're conjoined (fraternal) twins, not a hydra. The heads are two different sexes, but the body is a blend of both. However, only male genitals are visible, so I'd say tag as young_male.

Ah, I wasn't sure if the outlines were supposed to be skin folds or anus+vaginal or cloaca. Yeah, hydra tag for dragons is... confusing that way. It's hydra problems tag, not hydra, though.