Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: crown_only -> crown

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

pleaseletmein said:
feels kinda weird for a character wearing a crown to be considered nude while a character wearing a hat is only mostly nude.

I really think hat_only/headwear_only should be counted as nude too. I don't know if there's any edge-case exceptions, but hats are always an accessory rather than an article of clothing imo.

pleaseletmein said:
feels kinda weird for a character wearing a crown to be considered nude while a character wearing a hat is only mostly nude.

EDIT: actually even more so with helmet_only, which is implicated to headgear_only

motorcycle helmets, full helms, and other whole-head helmets definitely feel like they'd ought to be cover-y enough to count towards mostly_nude.

faucet said:
I really think hat_only/headwear_only should be counted as nude too. I don't know if there's any edge-case exceptions, but hats are always an accessory rather than an article of clothing imo.

I'd... tend to agree, although some headwear like veils and balaclava I think still ought to count.

Updated

orphan_crippler said:
What if is a close-up to the character's head? Or is used by a character that doesn't typically wear any clothes? post #1250168

I never use the *_only tags on posts like this, simply because they could be wearing other clothing, but you just can't see it. I expect people searching headhear_only are, in fact, looking specifically for posts where a character is entirely nude but for a piece of headgear. Not stuff like your example, where you can't even tell one way or another.

  • 1