The bulk update request #9447 has been rejected.

Reason: If a tag is able to indicate a clothing state along with either a gender, form, or role, that tag must imply both the clothing state (clothed, nude, etc.) and the gender/form/role. This is split into 5 separate BURs:

1. Clothed
2. Partially Clothed
3. Mostly Nude
4. Nude
5. Pred/Prey (I would have these in the first 4, but I would need 26 lines per BUR and BURs are limited to 25 lines. I wanted to avoid overflow so everything would play nice)

1/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9447 (forum #421725) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9448 has been rejected.

Reason: Part 2/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9448 (forum #421726) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9449 has been rejected.

Reason: Part 3/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9449 (forum #421727) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9450 has been rejected.

Reason: Part 4/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9450 (forum #421728) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9451 has been rejected.

create implication clothed_prey (15) -> clothed (1144840)
create implication clothed_pred (21) -> clothed (1144840)
create implication partially_clothed_prey (0) -> partially_clothed (131954)
create implication partially_clothed_pred (0) -> partially_clothed (131954)
create implication mostly_nude_prey (0) -> mostly_nude (124078)
create implication mostly_nude_pred (0) -> mostly_nude (124078)
create implication nude_prey (17) -> nude (1249091)
create implication nude_pred (9) -> nude (1249091)

Reason: Part 5/5

Change of plans, I was not aware that the prey and pred tags had been aliased to invalid disambiguation tags. As such, I'll simply imply clothing state.

EDIT: The bulk update request #9451 (forum #421730) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

First 4 are duplicates of both topic #40841 and topic #46735, and you've included some already existing implications.

As for clothedness of pred and prey, i'm not exactly sure if we're gonna keep em. We've aliased more popular clothed_[role] tags before, such as clothed teacher and clothed_student (actually i'm not sure if it's more popular if it's just one person populating the tag)

snpthecat said:
First 4 are duplicates of both topic #40841 and topic #46735, and you've included some already existing implications.

As for clothedness of pred and prey, i'm not exactly sure if we're gonna keep em. We've aliased more popular clothed_[role] tags before, such as clothed teacher and clothed_student (actually i'm not sure if it's more popular if it's just one person populating the tag)

Well damn, I didn't see those in the pending implications list. As for existing duplicates, not all of them are active. I was planning on seeing which ones were already active and editing the BUR accordingly to remove those that were already covered.

It'd really be helpful to see pending BUR aliases and implications when searching for regular aliases and implications, otherwise I wouldn't have put this whole thing together almost a full week late.
I guess I'll just have to check individual implications and aliases as well as pending BURs now.

The bulk update request #9447 (forum #421725) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9448 (forum #421726) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9449 (forum #421727) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9450 (forum #421728) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

The bulk update request #9451 (forum #421730) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

atomicblaze21 said:
It'd really be helpful to see pending BUR aliases and implications when searching for regular aliases and implications, otherwise I wouldn't have put this whole thing together almost a full week late.

As far as I can tell, right now, you have to look in two places to see all of the proposed aliases and implications: the MetaSearch page for one-at-a-time aliases and implications, and the BUR search page for BURs.

I have proposed giving MetaSearch the ability to search BURs, so that you only have to look in one place for everything.

I have also proposed putting links to both the MetaSearch and BUR search pages on the new-alias, new-implication, and new-BUR pages, so that even if the two searches can't easily be joined into one, people can at least get a hint that they should run two searches to find everything.

I also want a million dollars.

Not sure which of those three things will happen first. :)

atomicblaze21 said:
Well damn, I didn't see those in the pending implications list.

It'd really be helpful to see pending BUR aliases and implications when searching for regular aliases and implications, otherwise I wouldn't have put this whole thing together almost a full week late.
I guess I'll just have to check individual implications and aliases as well as pending BURs now.

You don't have to check (pending or otherwise) aliases and implications separately, MetaSearch goes for both. BURs on the other hand... they're separated from the alias and implication request system.

I would definitely be nice to have a place to see them all at once though, but I'm not so sure it'll come anytime soon.

As for existing duplicates, not all of them are active. I was planning on seeing which ones were already active and editing the BUR accordingly to remove those that were already covered.

Fair enough, but their presence even whilst pending will block the BUR.