Aliasing cum_on_paws → cum_on_feet
Link to alias
Reason:
Just in case. The type of foot can be expressed via other tags if users care to.
Updated
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Aliasing cum_on_paws → cum_on_feet
Link to alias
Just in case. The type of foot can be expressed via other tags if users care to.
Updated
ragswift said:
Aliasing cum_on_paws → cum_on_feet
Link to aliasReason:
Just in case. The type of foot can be expressed via other tags if users care to.
But the hand of an anthro creature like a lion counts as a paw, especially if its hands have pads just like its feet do.
Updated by anonymous
FatherOfGray said:
But the hand of an anthro creature like a lion counts as a paw, especially if its hands have pads just like its feet do.
Technically, lions have four feet.
Two front ones, two back ones.
Updated by anonymous
ragswift said:
Technically, lions have four feet.
Anthro lions don't.
Updated by anonymous
Point taken.
Nobody's gunna be typing cum_on_footpaws or cum_on_hindpaws, because it's too clunky.
Updated by anonymous
If they're anthro and standing on their hind legs, then those are their feet, and the paws on their arms, because they're anthro, are hands. +1 alias, so long as it is explicitly for hind paws of non-ferals or any paw of a feral.
Updated by anonymous
Nah, they're correct; this alias would cause some issues, I think. I'd just wanted it for convenience but hadn't considered the different meanings of the word 'paw' fully.
Updated by anonymous
ragswift said:
Nah, they're correct; this alias would cause some issues, I think. I'd just wanted it for convenience but hadn't considered the different meanings of the word 'paw' fully.
Meh... why should paw vs. hand/foot get a specific tag dealing with being cum-covered? Search cum_on_foot/hand + paw and tag paw-like extremities separate.
Updated by anonymous
123easy said:
Meh... why should paw vs. hand/foot get a specific tag dealing with being cum-covered?
It should be aliased to invalid_tag because it's ambiguous. But only if it were actually being used.
On that point, ragswift, you really should stop trying to make aliases like partial_erection → half-erect. It's counterproductive to attempt to predict all the tag synonyms people might use.
Updated by anonymous
DrHorse said:
It should be aliased to invalid_tag because it's ambiguous. But only if it were actually being used.On that point, ragswift, you really should stop trying to make aliases like partial_erection → half-erect. It's counterproductive to attempt to predict all the tag synonyms people might use.
I'm not actually trying to predict crowd-behavior most of the times I do this, but rather get in some tags which grok a bit better to me, and perhaps to others (which is why I don't see the harm in it as it stands, really).
If we had this I would feel less need to go about this via public aliasing.
Updated by anonymous