Sexyfur: post #79960

acct0283476 said:
... Silly question. Do Naylor's comics [...] count as neither comics nor paysite content?

http://e621.net/pool/show/288 was kind of making me wonder, being it's from this year, but it was approved instead of deleted.

Well, http://e621.net/pool/show/409 is Naylor's newest comic, and still the featured ad on his website.

I say, folks have no respect for a guy trying to make some money.

Oh shit, I got it off of g-e-hentai. I haven't been to his site in so long to see it in the ads. I checked the avoid posting and it said he was removed, but if it's still in place, my bad.

Well, yeah, he was removed from the list, but I don't think his status went straight from DNP to 'well <i>fuck</i> him' (Though I could be wrong, considering). I mean, those are still either full comics or new paysite content whichever way you look at it -- it'd be that his <i>non-</i>site stuff (like what he throws up on FA or wherever) is now postable, and old stuff. You don't even need to go to his site to check, they've got <i>"2010 Jay Naylor www.jaynaylor.com"</i> pasted on the bottom margin of every page.

Yes please folks, even if a person is not on the Avoid Posting list, the '2 year' approximate guideline for pay material still stands. Most artists are nice enough to allow the site unlimited access to their freely available material - the least we can do is try and respect the fact they're trying to earn an honest buck and keep pay stuff hands-off while it's still even remotely relevant.

In that case, here's a start on them (all 2010):
<b>http://e621.net/pool/show/190</b>
<b>http://e621.net/pool/show/408</b>
<b>http://e621.net/pool/show/409</b>
<b>http://e621.net/pool/show/288</b>

Hardblush:
post #80059, post #80062 to post #80073

Riversyde said:
Hardblush:
post #80059, post #80062 to post #80073

There is an entire pool of it
http://e621.net/pool/show/410

I edited the Jay Naylor wiki to reflect the 2 year rule.

Aurali said:
There is an entire pool of it
http://e621.net/pool/show/410

I know there is, but the owner could easily remove everything from the pool.
And then I'd be linking to an empty pool.
Just being precautious.

I would hope that pools have a history log to protect against vandalism.

post#80380 post#80379

Weren't these deleted before?

Edit: How the fuck do you people make links, I'm so clueless... ;-;

sonikku said:
post#80380 post#80379

Weren't these deleted before?

Edit: How the fuck do you people make links, I'm so clueless... ;-;

Put a space between the t and the hash thing, like this:
post #80380 post #80379
Should probably check this out too: http://e621.net/help/cheatsheet

Riversyde said:
Put a space between the t and the hash thing, like this:
post #80380 post #80379
Should probably check this out too: http://e621.net/help/cheatsheet

I see
post #80408

http://e621.net/post/show/80580/

post #80751

SF:
post #81125
post #81128

Neolucky :
post #81127

SF :
post #81144
The watermark has been shopped off.

Is this really allowed to be here?
http://e621.net/post/show/80587/

sonikku said:
Is this really allowed to be here?
http://e621.net/post/show/80587/

Flagged.

Derp
http://e621.net/post/show/81173/

C'mon people, at least try to hide what it is*

*Please don't

post #82010
I'm fairly sure it's Neolucky, at least it's her character.
Considering i've never seen one of her pics without watermark, that leads me to think it's shopped and might even be SF or Hardblush.
Maybe the experts of gay oriented stuff can confirm.

edit : someone made the same observation in comments

post #82038

I don't know, maybe my controllers are too old for good rumble.

post #82522

Schmexyfur.

Softpaw:
post #82545, post #82546, post #82548, post #82550, post #82551, post #82552

post #82674
post #82675
post #82676

FAD (<2yrs old):
post #82660
post #83502
post #83503
post #83504 (Look at the bottom-right, the date/etc is faint)

Does pool #237 fall under it as well?

post #84188

This strip's no older than a month.

post #85244 is Sexyfur.

neolucky: post #85662
It was deleted before, so I'd imagine it should be deleted again.

SF :
post #85958

Dunno if it's been reported by anyone else or not, but found one at http://e621.net/post/show/85958/blush-breasts-brown_hair-cowgirl-hair-hat-lapine-l .

Neolucky :
post #86703
post #86677
post #86654
post #82010

Sexyfur: post #51501

This one somehow was never caught.

pool #454 is Jay Naylor's latest pay-for comic, and very much still being actively advertised on his website.

http://e621.net/post/show/87580
Hardblush.

Also Hardblush: post #87581

I think the art of Slyus's recently posted is Hardblush material, seeing as how it isn't on their FA account...
post #87988, post #88032, post #88033

SF :
post #88276

So, are these DNP too?

http://e621.net/post/show/88417

http://e621.net/post/show/88416

No, those are previews that were posted on FA. The full versions would be DNP.

No, they're still DNP. No Sexyfur. Nothing even RELATED to it. Never. Ever.

Ever.

Never.

Really? I always thought previews were okay, as long as the full versions weren't posted. The previews are publicly available, not part of SF/TailHeat.

In any case, I've flagged a bunch of Scappo's SF/TH preview pics.

Arcturus said:
No, they're still DNP. No Sexyfur. Nothing even RELATED to it. Never. Ever.

Ever.

Never.

Good to know for future reference...

You should quote that and add it to the rules page as well...

I thought the

NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR
NO SEXYFUR

would've been clear enough.

Evidently not for some people...
Look at all the comments from here, post #88417
Either that, or they're just illiterate...LOL

WolfieWolfie1992 said:
Evidently not for some people...
Look at all the comments from here, post #88417
Either that, or they're just illiterate...LOL

and they called me a dumbass. WHO'S WEARING THE ASS HAT NOW!! lol

Well Arc, the preview/promo stuff doesn't always have tags...

deadjackal said:
Well Arc, the preview/promo stuff doesn't always have tags...

True. But still. No sexyfur >:E

Or I beat everyone with sticks. EVERYONE.

Arcturus said:
True. But still. No sexyfur >:E

Or I beat everyone with sticks. EVERYONE.

Know your audience. Some people here would actually enjoy it.

Arcturus said:
True. But still. No sexyfur >:E

Or I beat everyone with sticks. EVERYONE.

Arc knows how to threaten me with a good time!

hardblush

http://e621.net/post/show/87575/badger-bed-belt-bracelet-cloths-crossdressing-dino
http://e621.net/post/show/43173/balls-butt-canine-chase-collar-cute-do_not_distrib
http://e621.net/post/show/80276/advert-belt-dildo-gay-hardblush-lagomorph-line_art
http://e621.net/post/show/80275/advert-antlers-bottomless-cervine-deer-fleshlight-
http://e621.net/post/show/30409/amber_eyes-anal-bulge-canine-crossdressing-erectio

post #88813

Just another day on e6.

Also, here's something else we don't need.
http://e621.net/pool/show/437
A pool of a tag.

Just like pool #293 and pool #294.

post #88813

post #88925
post #88926
post #88927

Clubstripes content less than a month old.

Sexyfur:
post #89362
post #89363
post #89364
post #89365
post #89366

Sexyfur:post #89368

post #89534

post #89534

acct0283476 said:
post #89534

I remember like a few months ago, someone posted a link to a larger version, asking if it was ok to post. We said no, and now a smaller crap version is posted.

Most likely cropped SF :
post #89835

Kald said:
Most likely cropped SF :
post #89835

Unfortunately you are correct. The art style matches his other SF works.

Tailheat :
post #90318
post #90316

SF:
post #90464
post #90465

Two-month-old folio by Miu:
post #90751, post #90752, post #90754,
post #90755, post #90758, post #90761,
post #90764, post #90765, post #90767,
post #90770, post #90773, post #90777

pool #477 is Softpaw
And post #91435 is a repost of post #74509

Sexyfur: post #91751

Well, it starts :
post #91979
post #91980

Sexyfur:
post #91979
post #91980

Tailheat:
post #91996
post #91997
post #91998

Sexyfur:
post #92053
post #92054

DragonRanger said:
Sexyfur:
post #91979
post #91980

Tailheat:
post #91996
post #91997
post #91998

Any reason why the Sexyfur links say "This post does not exist" while the Tailheat links are an actual deleted post?

Valence said:
Any reason why the Sexyfur links say "This post does not exist" while the Tailheat links are an actual deleted post?

because the admins/mods delete them as fast as possible