*Really long post with summary @ end*

Part I - Tag Implications

Requesting tag implications of

bestiality -> sex
feral_on_feral -> sex
anthro_on_feral -> sex

Reason:They all should depict some sort of sexual activity

Also,what about

bestiality -> human

Reason:By definition,bestiality should involve a human & a feral
-

Part II - Questions up for discussion

#1
However, there seems to be lots of WoW pictures that show elves,or other magical creatures with ferals that are tagged with bestiality but not with human, as seen using the following query: world_of_warcraft bestiality -human

-
#2
Do elves count as human if comparison to being anthro or feral?

If not,do we need a separate category for human-like creatures?
-
#3
Another semi-related question:
What does a centaur count as?
I've considered tagging them as both human and feral (and thus it gets the bestiality & feral on feral tags), since that's literally what they are, but that could lead to quite a bit of search confusion later on

The most notable post depicting this situation is post #2474 (bondage,and a host of questionable piercing implications)

Edit:A comment from RedOctober found in the comments

RedOctober said:
On another note, I removed the "human" tag. She's got a human top, but she's still a centaur, which isn't really human.

Conclusion/Summary

• Various tag implications
• Do/should elves count as human?
• What does centaur x feral count as? Should the centaur be tagged as both human & feral? Should that also imply it be tagged as both bestiality and feral on feral?

post #167087
post #157605
post #160303
these are examples of anthro_on_feral where sex is not happening. I'm sure there are some for bestiality as well. I don't support a feral_on_feral tag since all you'd need to do is add -anthro or -bestiality to get the same effect.

Yes elves/draenei/etc can be counted as human in the context of bestiality, even if they aren't tagged human. Centaurs are not feral, but could be counted as anthro. As far as post #2474, idk, that's a weird one.

these are examples of anthro_on_feral where sex is not happening. I'm sure there are some for bestiality as well.

Hm,been wondering about that.You're right!Looks like the wiki for those should reflect that

I don't support a feral_on_feral tag since all you'd need to do is add -anthro or -bestiality to get the same effect.

Seems a bit counter productive to use 3 tags to search for one theme, but I can see where you're coming from with respect to keeping it simple

There was some discussion about it in forum #21536 ,but it was mainly about interspecies and x_on_x ordering

Yes elves/draenei/etc can be counted as human in the context of bestiality, even if they aren't tagged human. Centaurs are not feral, but could be counted as anthro. As far as post #2474, idk, that's a weird one.

That makes sense,agreed

Edit:
In that case, would the bestiality -> human implication make sense as well?

titaniachkt said:

In that case, would the bestiality -> human implication make sense as well?

No, it doesn't. post #166296 is clearly bestiality, but no humans are involved.

Snowy said:
No, it doesn't. post #166296 is clearly bestiality, but no humans are involved.

Understood; makes sense as well

Thanks for clearing that up you two