News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

tom nook (animal crossing and etc) created by gobanire
Viewing sample resized to 41% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (2)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • You still think Swastikas look cool
    The real Nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In a real fourth Reich you'll be the first to go

    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF

    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    UNLESS YOU THINK

    -John F. Kennedy, 1981

  • Reply
  • |
  • 455
  • MapOfTheWorld said:
    The swastika is not a religious symbol. It's a symbol used by the Nazis, with an ideology based on genocide.

    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

  • Reply
  • |
  • 143
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Huh. Guess you do learn something new everyday. It's quite sad how a single group of people can completely change the meaning of a symbol like that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 72
  • Hermlove150 said:
    Huh. Guess you do learn something new everyday. It's quite sad how a single group of people can completely change the meaning of a symbol like that.

    Same goes with salutes. The nazi salute is a modified roman salute and looks very similar to the bellamy salute that was used by americans decades before the nazis used theirs. Now performing a roman or bellamy salute in public will get you labeled as a nazi by people who can't tell the difference.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 38
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Nazis and their relation to vampire attacks aside, it was also a prominent symbol on Navajo rugs. Studied Native American culture in college and I remember like 75% of the class go all *gasp* when they saw the swastika

    Yes, it was associated with the Reich. Those with common sense and knowledge shouldn't easily get triggered.

    I can drone on with my inept opinions, but this isn't the place for it. The fact is, people are going to like it or dislike it. It's an image, and that's what it is, just an image.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • BlueDingo said:
    It's kinda sad how so many people downvote things like this just because it contains a religious symbol they don't like.

    man, don't do this. don't bring religion into this when every bit of context of this picture makes it clear that it's about naziism and nothing else.

    there's no point in bringing up religion here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 106
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Yea but the problem with that "argument" is, you're describing this , but the image shows this . The first is the Hindu swastika, which actually IS a sign of peace. The one in the image is The Third Reich Flag, which is the flag of genocide. A knife was originally used to cut food. That doesn't mean I can stab someone and not get in trouble.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 42
  • JustSomeGuy1243 said:
    The reason I don't blacklist is so that I can tell artist of images even worse than this that they should feel bad. Not really this image. People do stuff like this all the time. I'm talking about gore, scat, vore, piss, ect. It's why people think furries are the scum of the internet. Without those people, furries would get a (slightly) less bad image.

    You're trying to tell the furry community, home of being the most tolerant of these fetishism's to lighten up? As one person?

    2016 anthro bloominrose blue_background briskby clone_high clothed clothing disney female fur grey_body grey_fur humor icon judy_hopps lagomorph leporid mammal meme mtv parody police police_uniform rabbit reaction_image sad simple_background solo style_emulation the_hands_of_sincerity third-party_edit uniform wide_eyed zootopia

    But-- but, why though?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    The Nazi swastika is Counter-clockwise, while the Hindu swastika is clockwise. Furthermore, when the swastika is in a diamond-shape rather than a square-shape—that is, its base is tilted so the lowest point is its angle—and transposed against a red flag with a white, circular center, we can only assume that it is a swastika. People were not downvoting this symbol because they dislike the Hindu swastika, but because they are sensitive to joking about genocidal ideologies.
    Furthermore, Tom Nook clearly has an “SS” on his apron, which reinforces the nazism aspect of this piece.
    Please don’t be pretentious and call people out for disliking an entire religion just because the origin of the Nazi Swastika came from Hinduism. There are realistically no parallels between nazism and Hinduism, so you can’t blame anyone for not knowing the origin of the Nazi swastika and thus conceptualizing it as the only usage of the swastika.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 46
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Except nothing about this image is that. It's literally an angry Tom Nook holding a Nazi Flag. There is nothing that can even slightly be construed as a religious usage of this symbol. If an entire generation of people started using the goddamn letter "A" on a green flag to genocide an entire race/religion of people, then we'd start to identify the letter A with genocide as well, ESPECIALLY WHEN PUT ON A GREEN FLAG.

    Maybe if you show me some fucking Hindu artwork with a Swaztika in it I would say "Neat art". Until then, you can't convince me that the black-clad racists are just really appreciative of eastern religion..

  • Reply
  • |
  • 22
  • AFuckingWeeb said:
    I like how my post never received moderator approval but this shit does

    post #1358987

    "This post was deleted by Mario69. Reason: Does not meet minimum quality standards. (Photo of traditional media)"

    Use a scanner next time.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • MapOfTheWorld said:
    The swastika is not a religious symbol. It's a symbol used by the Nazis, with an ideology based on genocide.

    Also wrong. Nazism is based in fascism, nationalism, socialism, and racial supremacy. Genocide was the end product of these and many other factors.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • I just find it funny that a random innocent game character like Tom Nook is holding a Nazi flag with an angry look on his face.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Nathmurr said:
    I just find it funny that a random innocent game character like Tom Nook is holding a Nazi flag with an angry look on his face.

    He's anything but innocent. He probably emulated Dahmer in his basement lol. That's why villagers suddenly "move out" and you never see them again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • BlueDingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    And what's your point? This is the NAZI flag, and that is very obvious. It is not being used in a religious manner, it is being used, in this picture, to represent the Nazi party. The telltale signs are red background, white circle, and a tilted swastika with harsh lines and angles

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • Chance_Wallace said:
    Please don’t be pretentious and call people out for disliking an entire religion just because the origin of the Nazi Swastika came from Hinduism.

    Not that you're wrong or anything or that the person you replied to was wrong, but people these days are just so aloof that the instant they see anything related to the Nazis, their heads explode.

    Some people need things like this to be explicitly pointed out to them.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • MapOfTheWorld said:
    The swastika is not a religious symbol. It's a symbol used by the Nazis, with an ideology based on genocide.

    So is the sickle and hammer, but nobody bats an eye to that, and they even praise it too. Communism has killed well over 4 times as many people as Nazism has, but nobody cares just because it wasn't done with discrimination. Genocide is ok as long as you don't discriminate who you kill I guess.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Imaderule34 said:
    You should just accept that the symbol is ruined forever now.

    Only to sensitive and ignorant Americans and Europeans who have never really used the symbol beforehand anyways. Literally almost nobody outside of America/Europe cares that it was used by Nazis. A lot of Japanese teens use it all the time in selfies, calling it the "Manji", and a lot of them are completely unaware that it was ever used in WW2 (look it up on youtube, "What do the japanese think of the swastika?". Most of them have never even seen the red white and black swastika), and would likely still use it after learning about its use in WW2, because they're not sensitive snowflakes. Hindus still use it religiously to this day. Not everybody is a sensitive snowflake and the world does not revolve around America. Tell any non-American Hindu that they are supporting Nazism and they'll likely respond "What's a Nazi?"

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Dragonfly96 said:
    Only to sensitive and ignorant Americans and Europeans who have never really used the symbol beforehand anyways. Literally almost nobody outside of America/Europe cares that it was used by Nazis. A lot of Japanese teens use it all the time in selfies, calling it the "Manji", and a lot of them are completely unaware that it was ever used in WW2 (look it up on youtube, "What do the japanese think of the swastika?". Most of them have never even seen the red white and black swastika), and would likely still use it after learning about its use in WW2, because they're not sensitive snowflakes. Hindus still use it religiously to this day. Not everybody is a sensitive snowflake and the world does not revolve around America. Tell any non-American Hindu that they are supporting Nazism and they'll likely respond "What's a Nazi?"

    Of course. Forgot that if anyone points out a clear example of racism/nazi party they are automatically a sensitive snowflake.

    we'll just pretend this raccon is apart of the hindu crowd. Racism and nazi's don't exist after all.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • Nice little piece of comedy to some extent given the way it is done I think it was either done for comedic effect or simply to start arguments it doesn't appear to be a propaganda post to me like some may claim. It just seems like a joke to me and one I heard often people I have seen often compare tom nook to a communist or nazi. And in response to the whole issue in the comments, The nazi flag was inspired by the manji a symbol in Buddhism meaning harmony it was basically roated to make the symbol of the nazi party if I remember correctly the reasoning was basically they had the goal of unifying those they deemed acceptable and thereby in their logic create harmony. It was still a horrible thing but I don't see why we need an argument over this in any thread with the symbol on it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • bluedingo said:
    It's kinda sad how so many people downvote things like this just because it contains a religious symbol they don't like.

    How fucking stupid can you possibly be? This is clearly a swastika and not a religious symbol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • why is this stuff allowed by the e621 peeps?
    im not trying to start anything, i just want to know because its obvious this will start an argument right?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • All of the trolls in the comments. You’re reaching by comparing this to Hindu and eastern religious culture. The cultural symbol doesn’t require THE SAME COLOR SCHEME AND DESIGN AS THE NAZI COUNTER-PART.

    He is also wearing an SS symbol along his cloth. You can’t spin this as “oops people hating on religious symbols :)))”
    This is obviously intended to be problematic and point towards Nazi-ism.

    Also people trying to make free speech arguments.......Hate speech isn’t free speech you troglodytes. You don’t have the right to spread hate or violence whenever or wherever you want.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • vivaboo said:
    All of the trolls in the comments. You’re reaching by comparing this to Hindu and eastern religious culture. The cultural symbol doesn’t require THE SAME COLOR SCHEME AND DESIGN AS THE NAZI COUNTER-PART.

    He is also wearing an SS symbol along his cloth. You can’t spin this as “oops people hating on religious symbols :)))”
    This is obviously intended to be problematic and point towards Nazi-ism.

    Also people trying to make free speech arguments.......Hate speech isn’t free speech you troglodytes. You don’t have the right to spread hate or violence whenever or wherever you want.

    Did you just tell us not to say something?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • vivaboo said:
    All of the trolls in the comments. You’re reaching by comparing this to Hindu and eastern religious culture. The cultural symbol doesn’t require THE SAME COLOR SCHEME AND DESIGN AS THE NAZI COUNTER-PART.

    He is also wearing an SS symbol along his cloth. You can’t spin this as “oops people hating on religious symbols :)))”
    This is obviously intended to be problematic and point towards Nazi-ism.

    Also people trying to make free speech arguments.......Hate speech isn’t free speech you troglodytes. You don’t have the right to spread hate or violence whenever or wherever you want.

    Nah. You might disagree with it, but hate speech is free speech. You can argue there ought to be social consequences, and I would agree, but if people don't have the right to say hateful things then that's not true freedom of speech. There is an imposed limit to speech.
    Mind you I'm not agreeing with any hate speech, but I will defend the right of hateful people to say hateful things, because if you can take their freedom to say what they want away there's nothing stopping the powers that be from taking that same right away from you, me, or anyone. Yes hate speech is distasteful, but at the end of the day it's words, and words only have as much power as the one reading/hearing them give them.
    Mind you this doesn't extend to acts of violence. You're making the common mistake of conflating hateful words with hateful acts. Words cannot lynch a black man. They cannot throw a firebomb into a synagogue. They can't beat a gay teenager to death. Words can't kill. They can drive people to do these things, yes, but that's why we have legal consequences. I would argue that people that are radicalized by hateful ideas are susceptible to those ideas to begin with. If someone is foolish enough do such things they surely deserve to be punished. But I've said all I care too on the subject at this point.
    I'm here to jerk off to furry woman and/or appreciate good artwork, not debate ethics. As a free speech purist I was compelled to throw my hat into the ring, and I believe I have done just that.
    Oh, but if I may add one thing, to both you and everyone clutching their pearls these day: learn to recognize jokes. It may be presumptuous, but a lot of those "religious symbol" comments seem structured more like jokes than earnest arguments. My favorite one was the Buddhist Kiss fan comment, it made me chortle.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • nightlord14 said:
    Nah. You might disagree with it, but hate speech is free speech. You can argue there ought to be social consequences, and I would agree, but if people don't have the right to say hateful things then that's not true freedom of speech. There is an imposed limit to speech.
    Mind you I'm not agreeing with any hate speech, but I will defend the right of hateful people to say hateful things, because if you can take their freedom to say what they want away there's nothing stopping the powers that be from taking that same right away from you, me, or anyone. Yes hate speech is distasteful, but at the end of the day it's words, and words only have as much power as the one reading/hearing them give them.
    Mind you this doesn't extend to acts of violence. You're making the common mistake of conflating hateful words with hateful acts. Words cannot lynch a black man. They cannot throw a firebomb into a synagogue. They can't beat a gay teenager to death. Words can't kill. They can drive people to do these things, yes, but that's why we have legal consequences. I would argue that people that are radicalized by hateful ideas are susceptible to those ideas to begin with. If someone is foolish enough do such things they surely deserve to be punished. But I've said all I care too on the subject at this point.
    I'm here to jerk off to furry woman and/or appreciate good artwork, not debate ethics. As a free speech purist I was compelled to throw my hat into the ring, and I believe I have done just that.
    Oh, but if I may add one thing, to both you and everyone clutching their pearls these day: learn to recognize jokes. It may be presumptuous, but a lot of those "religious symbol" comments seem structured more like jokes than earnest arguments. My favorite one was the Buddhist Kiss fan comment, it made me chortle.

    It's call to action that's illegal speech. You can't insight terrorism and you can't yell fire. I'm getting this from Steven Crowder's hate speech isn't real change my mind video.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • gayfur said:
    It's call to action that's illegal speech. You can't insight terrorism and you can't yell fire. I'm getting this from Steven Crowder's hate speech isn't real change my mind video.

    That I can agree with. Saying "let's engage in violence against X group of people" is objectionable and should be a criminal act...fuck then there would be a lot of criminals on the streets rn XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Well.. the Japanese *were* on the Axis powers side and not with us on the Allies, side, during World War 2.

    It's kind of funny to imagine an angry tanuki.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Everyone’s big mad over an image that was made as a joke... that’s why everyone complaining about it are being called snowflakes

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • buggo said:
    I'm not even that much of a fan of the Fourth Reich but I do appreciate the artwork, and the administration teams tolerance to it, the freedom of speech gives types to everyone to express themselves. Positive or negative, I'm sure the freedom of press was one of the standpoints for any immigrated furs.John F. Kennedy wanted to suppress the freedom of speech? I guess he got shot for a good reason, then. You don't condemn what's right and wrong on this site, or anywhere except for what you own. In turn, giving you no justification to try and suppress others because you don't agree with them. That's childish.

    Which is exactly my point, if this was really a talk of toleration, we would tolerate hateful people and try to turn them into a more positive light instead of going out and assaulting them in public? It's stupid the way people think nowadays.

    Also, why isn't Nook a jew? It'd be way funnier if he was a jew.

    Finally, a normal human being who can take and understand a joke, we gotta learn to be more open. People make jokes about how white people are inbred, stupid, or any other buzzword but if you make the same jokes about other races, religions, or ideologies you end up like dankula and become ostracized from society, I really miss old internet culture. And if you mass downvote my comment or black list it, you prove my point. Give nook some jew curls and a david on his apron, then it would be perfect.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • I find it hilarious that someone can post art or a Thicc bunny from an animated children's cartoon farting and shitting and that could get tons of upvotes but when someone makes a meme with a Nazi flag and the SS lightning bolts it's downvoted straight to hell.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Thank god people downvoted this, and what is with the nazi defenders in the comments? Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • dragoncoochie said:
    Thank god people downvoted this, and what is with the nazi defenders in the comments? Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.

    If you're going to do what I think you're going to do, then you're a

    COP

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • bluedingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Technically speaking the symbol used by Buddhists and other religions is called a manji and it is slightly different. The swastika is drawn at a 45° angle while the manji is drawn parallel. Additionally a swastika is usually displayed against a white and red background though it is not necessary.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • The level of salt in this comment section is just amazing. look at the top post.
    Nazis will forever rent free in your head :) not like there was much inside of it beforehand anyway.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • bluedingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    you aren't wrong, but that cross in the white circle on the red background is very much explicitly a nazi thing, as are the Waffen S.S. markings on his apron. Context is important

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • citrus-eel said:
    How fucking stupid can you possibly be? This is clearly a swastika and not a religious symbol.

    It's almost certain they are fully aware of how wrong they are and are just being malicious and disruptive

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • no weird stuff, no porn, not crudely drawn, no 9/11 sex

    just straight up nazi tom nook and that's it, it's all you need to get a downvote rain

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • What makes this worse is that the art style is actually good. This is either serious or the artist tried way too hard on their shitpost

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • doomguy2021 said:
    And that's something I never thought I'd see.

    And as a Jewish person, this makes me extra pissed.

    I'm Jewish as fuck and I fucking love shit like this. It's so fucking funny reading comments for this shit. lel.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • BlueDingo said:

    MapOfTheWorld said:The swastika is not a religious symbol. It's a symbol used by the Nazis, with an ideology based on genocide.

    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.Wikipedia article]

    yeah no this is very obviously the nazi use of the swastika and by pretending otherwise you're just being a credible rube or deliberately trying to muddy the waters to allow shit like this innazis out

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • bluedingo said:
    It's kinda sad how so many people downvote things like this just because it contains a religious symbol they don't like.

    tell me what religion displays a swastika in a white circle inside a red rectangle, backwards, and turned 45°. And also wears a symbol saying SS on their clothes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • duracell said:
    You still think Swastikas look cool
    The real Nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In a real fourth Reich you'll be the first to go

    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF

    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    UNLESS YOU THINK

    -John F. Kennedy, 1981

    Fuck Nazis but Buddhist Furs and Hindu Furs (which the Swastika was primarily used in before Nazism) are cool.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • t0pkek said:
    Finally, a normal human being who can take and understand a joke, we gotta learn to be more open. People make jokes about how white people are inbred, stupid, or any other buzzword but if you make the same jokes about other races, religions, or ideologies you end up like dankula and become ostracized from society, I really miss old internet culture. And if you mass downvote my comment or black list it, you prove my point. Give nook some jew curls and a david on his apron, then it would be perfect.

    This coming from the same guy that wrote "edgy and gay" on about 20 posts in a row.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Nazis are a dying group and i couldnt be happier. see you later when you get the shit beat out of you for saying bigoted shit to the wrong person

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I love how all these comments are taking a silly meme image at face value and freaking out over it

    protip: joking about nazis on the internet does not make you a nazi

  • Reply
  • |
  • -9
  • Soon after turning in his own nephews in order to keep the League of National Socialist Animals off his back, Tom Nook begins a last ditch attempt at trying to blend in and avoid the labor camps. 2039, colorized.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • duracell said:
    You still think Swastikas look cool
    The real Nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In a real fourth Reich you'll be the first to go

    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF

    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    UNLESS YOU THINK

    -John F. Kennedy, 1981

    Chuckling at people not getting the joke here, every. single. time.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • bluedingo said:
    For thousands of years, it was and still is a symbol related to several eastern religions. Its usage by the Nazis doesn't change that.

    Wikipedia article

    Yet the flag is the Nazi flag, this isn’t a post using a religious symbol for religious reasons, it’s literally a Nazi flag post

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • duracell said:
    You still think Swastikas look cool
    The real Nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In a real fourth Reich you'll be the first to go

    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF

    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    UNLESS YOU THINK

    -John F. Kennedy, 1981

    pretty sure this is a tom nook hatepost not a nazi lovepost

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • nazi furries have always been a strange case to me, like Hitler would probably be sending us to the camps if furries were a thing then.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • duracell said:
    You still think Swastikas look cool
    The real Nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In a real fourth Reich you'll be the first to go

    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs
    Nazi furs, FUCK OFF

    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    You'll be the first to go,
    UNLESS YOU THINK

    -John F. Kennedy, 1981

    Lee Harvey Oswald (probably) shot JFK in '63

    If he hadn't, we probably would've gotten the amazing speech

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.