You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
Pheanir
MemberPerfect, I was missing salt for my 'porn soup' anyway ~
If you're really complaining (passively aggressive) about this, porn is probably the last thing you should point out or criticize things like that. Zaush's art is stunning and since it's a commissioned/patron-requested image, I'd say these comments are a tad inappropriate. Especially here on e621; just enjoy the porn, dammit! :P
D4rk
Blockedpost #1820020
UmmNo
MemberThank you for helping with tags, when the high quality is released I’m sure this will be replaced.
But I do not know the names of many of the zootopia characters.
SwiperTheFox
MemberI can't begrudge bi/gay furries one bit for thinking about their fursonas getting lewd with Nick Wilde, even to the point of drawing and/or writing it all out. The character is genuinely sexy and such situations are pretty harmless to anybody else's enjoyment of Zootopia. It can be done badly, but it's also not some kind of a line-crossing idea inherently.
At the same time, making Nick into a sort of ultra-submissive is an annoying meme at this point, and why the adultery/cheating/cucking/dishonesty fetish held about him has gotten so popular is truly beyond me. There's no reason to take an otherwise simple moment and complicate it by insisting that Judy Hopps has to do something against him and/or vise versa. Yes, I know that kinks usually don't make logical sense, but it's pushed so much and gets so irritating. Nick's not some kind of weird abuser-meets-doormat-meets-sicko combination.
In my personal opinion, this image partly does that yet mostly doesn't. There's no negative context in terms of build-up or anything, with any emotional manipulation or the like being totally absent. Nick is being both dominant and submissive at the same time. However, the frustrating shoehorning in of Judy with Gideon Gray in the background as well as Mr. Otterton apparently finding Nick more interesting than his own hot wife drags the picture down a lot. It's Adam Wan pushing that adultery/cheating/cucking/dishonesty fetish even when it has no inherent place in what could simply be Nick playing around with some friends, with either nobody else involved or maybe having Judy as an approving participant. I don't mind the image yet have to regret the missing potential.
It seems to boil down to this: treat Nick as if you genuinely like him and enjoy how he got created. Seems like common sense. Try to play up the positive. He's a character from a show made to teach morals about compassion and growth, after all.
MarcusFlintcock
MemberI think we all learned a valuable lesson here:
It's porn. People can do what they want with it. And you can have your opinion on it.
But use the goddamn blacklist if needs must.
milesseventh
MemberThe actual lesson is to ignore comments section, lol
user 168550
MemberThis is not being made for your entertainment. It just happens to be available to you. It was made for someone else's entertainment and you can have a look at it.
If this was given to you by some institution and would be regulated, you'd have a point. But you can certainly stop the shit show and the personal judgement.
SwiperTheFox
MemberIt's minor, I know, and already taken care of here, but I'd like to point this out directly: 'casual_nudity' happens when characters get naked without any particular goal or purpose in mind.
Losing one's clothes right before kinky times, right after, or even during them: that's different, and they should be labeled as just being 'nude'.
RT Pilon
BlockedFear not, for there are no Zootopian characters here, these are just knock-offs.
You can give them any of the movie names you like if you're that way inclined, but those of the fandom will know better.
OnTheHekkinBrink
MemberAmazing how some of these comment threads develop.
(not trying to call anyone out, just an observation)
crazodd
MemberThe otter wants to play too.
ImakandiLion
MemberWill we get more Finnick in this art style?
Whatever2008
MemberI love this ×-×
ImakandiLion
MemberWas it ever confirmed Nick was straight?
ImakandiLion
MemberNo. It's that Nick was never shown to be either or so why should the artwork matter if he is portrayed as straight, gay, or bi?
Blodhgarm92
MemberWhy should it matter as to what is canon when it comes to Nick's partner preference? An artist can choose to make whatever they want because it is their art in the end and they have the final say with what content the piece portrays.
ImakandiLion
MemberYeah that was my point too. Also since Nick wasn't shown to be interested on either side it's pretty much up for grabs.
Moodawg
Memberi'm putting the "what? no kiss for daddy?" line at finnick as a point for the gay/bi side lol.
ImakandiLion
MemberLOL same not to mention how Nick's personality is sarcasm especially at the end towards Judy he says "You know you love me". However I think it was that line that made people think him an Judy are a couple instead of just friends.
AnythingButFoxes
MemberWhat was that? You’ll need to speak up, I can barely hear you from up there on your high horse.
NameChangeRequest1
MemberHis art keeps getting more arousing. My god, I thought the otter fox facial was hot. And then we get this.
NachoWolf01
MemberCan never get enough gay Nick, honestly. Zaush's writing skills may be god-awful, but he draws the hottest Nick pics out of anyone else.
Hope he makes more.
user 80752
MemberOh boy...
Lemme grab the popcorn
Spyra
MemberDude just use the blacklist then and you won't have to see art like this ever again
Fenrir26
MemberGuys, I understand that what these two were saying was kinda pointless. But why are you all so sensitive about it, do really expect to only see comments like "Awesome", "I love dis" or "more"? Of course, that Zaushs art is great, but the reason there is comment section is so that people could actually say what they think (positive or negative) whenever you like it or not.
Especially when according to admins, this is not a PORN site but an ART site.
Pheanir
MemberYou're right, I should have sticked to the picture itself. No matter what Zaush draws, it always looks amazing. This picture here is no exception ;)
rumpasaur
MemberI think the point is wholesome characters doing naughty things guys
iliketigers
MemberJust wow. A really nice variation of the texture zaush uses, great work!
Llewell
MemberWouldn't that mean *no one* should make porn of him? Or maybe I missed the part of Zootopia where they had a big orgy idk, maybe it was in the deleted scenes?
If ya don't like it, blacklist it. If you don't mind it don't post three paragraphs of how it doesn't live up to your expectations when it is free porn that *IS NOT TAILORED SPECIFICALLY FOR YOU*, not forced upon you, not diminishing any preexisting pornography, but rather created for anyone interested to enjoy. If you have helpful notes on the artwork, not the subject matter, those are obviously acceptable, but going "wahh wahh its not my kink so its bad :C" is just.. sad.
Honestly, the attempt at some kind of high ground on a degenerate (and I use the term endearingly) site such as this is just insulting.
Someone making Nick take dick isn't going to change Nick's canon so stop acting like it's a crime against the character's integrity.
Whatever2008
MemberWhy is everyone bitching? this is one of the hottest pics on the site
Updated
A Dopey Robot
MemberThe condition of being alive.
Chaos.
C-John15
MemberSuch is the fate of popular foxes in the fandom. Look at Krystal. She went through everything Nick is going through back when she was the darling of the Furries. Now it's someone else's turn.
slapstick70
MemberYou're right. However, that doesn't mean they can't get comments back or get downvoted. What you're basically asking is that everyone who didn't like their comment shut up and not give their own opinions. Being allowed to speak is a two way street. If you give a hot take then you should expect for people to respond.
DubstepUmbreon
MemberTrue, but there are characters in the background that would be classified as having ‘casual_nudity’
Satchel
MemberImagine being upset that porn wasn't made with you in mind. Holy crow, guys, if you don't like porn, don't fap to it! It's really that simple.
Updated
JWT07
BlockedLol, you should have taken your own advice
Tont furry1
BlockedFr
Fennecpaws
MemberLmao, you people actually think Nick is straight. He's nothing in canon, he's not in a relationship with Judy, they are nothing beyond friends and colleagues. Y'all just projecting yourselves bc you desperately want pussy irl, pretty pathetic tbh.
leothefox314
MemberWhere is Judy in this?
AarontheFishCat
MemberThis comment section was a pleasure to read
Beautiful art nonetheless
Login to respond »