As someone who absolutely hates spiders, this is actually pretty cute.

Hell yeah! Human male x "weird" is my jam. Here's hoping for more like this.

if only they were that cute IRL

The giant friendly spider.

Do I moan, cry, or scream I’m so confused.

rainsorrow said:
if only they were that cute IRL

Search on Google for Wolf spider faces, they actually are pretty cute.

Hey, as long as she keeps the fangs sheathed I'm weirdly not against this.

would be better if she was on her back though, can you imagine all those legs wrapped around you.

ashern said:
Search on Google for Wolf spider faces, they actually are pretty cute.

I prefer ogre spiders. They have a great pair of eyes.

What you're penetrating there would be the spinnerets. Spiders are one of the few arthropods where the genitalia actually are placed at the base of the abdomen, near the legs.

Very confusing, I know. Bug anatomy is weird.

I knew it was fiction in the movie. That's how Spider-Man was created.She got excited and inadvertently stung him on the dick

poofwoof said:
As someone who absolutely hates spiders, this is actually pretty cute.

I also hate spoders, the only ones I don't mind are peacock spiders cuz they're cute.....
Speaking of hating spiders someone else hates them even more than I do (an no it wasn't me who did this) 😂

FLAG: File is either corrupted, broken, or otherwise does not work - about 3 hours ago

That's enough internet for life

if only there was a climax scene, this would be perfect.

Still really nice though!

Cute, would love to see an animation like this with a male spider.

Hell yes, more with this model, please!!

By no means do I have any disrespect for this animation, it looks phenomenal, but ewwwwww I HATE close up of spiders

Idk why someone marked it as broken, works fine in FireFox. Maybe it's an unsupported browser that the person who flagged this is using?

I wish there were a tag for realistic spiders so I could blacklist it because this gave me a heart attack

louisculo said:
I wish there were a tag for realistic spiders so I could blacklist it because this gave me a heart attack

Try adding "feral spider" to your blacklist.

rainsorrow said:
if only they were that cute IRL

Species of Jumping spider can be pretty cute. Especially the peacock jumping spider

Can you do one with a fox pls?

Make this beautiful spider my wife wait...... FEMALE EATS MALE

When you turn your nightmare into a wet dream

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrtQgRd_UOI

[FLAG] File is either corrupted, broken, or otherwise does not work

Don't really find anything wrong with the file, regenerated samples just in case.

Did find this inspecting the file tho:

Metadata:
    SCENE           : Scene
    FILE            : C:\Users\Käyttäjä\Desktop\Blender models\Character\RealisticSpider\Animations\Inhouse\InHouseSpider.blend
    DATE            : 2023/03/12 11:46:40

> Käyttäjä

I'd actually like to see more spider porn like this

What the f

Zapreti mne hodit v redane

I wish all the spider were like this. Then I wouldn't kill them...

mcflyisachicken said:
I prefer ogre spiders. They have a great pair of eyes.

I prefer Fishing spiders. They can walk on water and catch fish 5 times their size!

NOPE

How to get rid of arachnophobia
This:

As someone who hates spiders. This is both a hell no and a yes please.

ah yes the one time my absolute fear manifests in the need to fuck

what fun

When you turn your nightmare into a wet dream

I love It! She So cute
I hope i can see more amazing work like this!

That's enough E6 for one night

sharkkboi said:
Idk why someone marked it as broken, works fine in FireFox. Maybe it's an unsupported browser that the person who flagged this is using?

No not at all. I suspect they may be using Safari which can view webms no problem. The issue stems from the fact that this site has no dedicated video player. You are seeing the video through your browser's video player. Videos that lack the sample options don't work properly. This is a fact I discovered after the 2nd video I flagged for being broken. It's been consistent everytime I have an issue with a video. Mairo keeps berating me over this. You can check my comments to see his replies to verify this. He keeps denying it yet the videos are fixed after he berates me.

Oh fuck me! While I'm no longer arachnophobic I still can't handle close ups of spider faces. I mean Frost Bite Spiders are fine but this I can't. Fucking made my skin crawl especially when I heard the spider walking noise in my head. Though the animation is solid.

sexygaydragon said:
No not at all. I suspect they may be using Safari which can view webms no problem. The issue stems from the fact that this site has no dedicated video player. You are seeing the video through your browser's video player. Videos that lack the sample options don't work properly. This is a fact I discovered after the 2nd video I flagged for being broken. It's been consistent everytime I have an issue with a video. Mairo keeps berating me over this. You can check my comments to see his replies to verify this. He keeps denying it yet the videos are fixed after he berates me.

Back decades ago, dedicated video player was the only choise, because only way to have multimedia content on websites was with plugins like Flash and depending on how that was coded, it could be better or worse. Nowdays browsers have build in players, so "dedicated video player" is just fancy graphics over browsers own media player. That's why Chrome has been updated so much because even Youtube just uses browsers own video player, you can even get browsers video player context menu by right clicking two times because of this. There is no such thing as "dedicated video player" with websites anymore!

The reason why many other websites do not have much issues is because instead of serving the file you upload, they transcode them universally. So even if I upload AVI using MJPEG to Youtube, you would never see that file and instead they transcode that into VP9 WebM and h264 MP4 (and AV1 MP4 and 3GP), then serve whichever works with your browser. This is literally what e621 samples are as well and that's why I have been saying that lack of samples cause this issue, because if your browser cannot play the file in format it was upload, it just dies because there's nothing as fallback, where with e621 samples there's other versions for the browser to try and playback. This is why e.g. iPhones rely on e621 sampling because they cannot see webm files directly.

The reason why I keep berating is because your initial claim has been that you are watching posts with browser that supports webm files, yet somehow they do not work if samples are missing. That simply means that the browser you are using does not support webm files, rather than there being problem with the webm file like you have claimed.
I also have no idea what "berating" means and I'm too lazy to open up google translate to translate it, but I'm guessing it's belitteling or yelling or something like that from context.

mairo said:
Back decades ago, dedicated video player was the only choise, because only way to have multimedia content on websites was with plugins like Flash and depending on how that was coded, it could be better or worse. Nowdays browsers have build in players, so "dedicated video player" is just fancy graphics over browsers own media player. That's why Chrome has been updated so much because even Youtube just uses browsers own video player, you can even get browsers video player context menu by right clicking two times because of this. There is no such thing as "dedicated video player" with websites anymore!

The reason why many other websites do not have much issues is because instead of serving the file you upload, they transcode them universally. So even if I upload AVI using MJPEG to Youtube, you would never see that file and instead they transcode that into VP9 WebM and h264 MP4 (and AV1 MP4 and 3GP), then serve whichever works with your browser. This is literally what e621 samples are as well and that's why I have been saying that lack of samples cause this issue, because if your browser cannot play the file in format it was upload, it just dies because there's nothing as fallback, where with e621 samples there's other versions for the browser to try and playback. This is why e.g. iPhones rely on e621 sampling because they cannot see webm files directly.

The reason why I keep berating is because your initial claim has been that you are watching posts with browser that supports webm files, yet somehow they do not work if samples are missing. That simply means that the browser you are using does not support webm files, rather than there being problem with the webm file like you have claimed.
I also have no idea what "berating" means and I'm too lazy to open up google translate to translate it, but I'm guessing it's belitteling or yelling or something like that from context.

Puffin supports webms as does Safari. When this site's videos work on neither it's definately the site. I don't know why you are ignoring the part that I'm not on an iphone or a phone in general and that android users are having the same issue. You are also wrong about youtube. And eveything else you've said. I wonder what other misinformation you've been spreading. Berating is a fairly common english word. Did you not graduate school? Berate-to insult or demean someone, usually in a harsh manner. Here's an example: Billy berated Timmy for being weaker than him. You keep berating me for reporting videos like you told me to do. Keep proving my point time and again. I will not tell your dumbass again. Never had this issue on any other website. Ergo the only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that it is an issue solely on the site. Fix your god damn shit and quit fucking ignoring everyone complaining about the same fucking problem. It's very clearly a problem that needs to be addressed since a lot of people are starting to have it. Oh but you could give two shits about mobile users. They don't matter to you at all.

Also it was your own words that you don't host nor support videos when you clearly do. Your own words that you shamelessly blamed the uploaders. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Now how about you quit fucking stalking me and actually make yourself useful for once. This will be the very last time I remove you from my blacklist. You will not hear from me again. I'll be honest it takes a lot for me to outright hate someone. Well you won the cupie doll buddy. If you truely were an archive site you'd have posts in multiple formats so anyone can view it. This site is actually very antiarchive.

sexygaydragon said:
Puffin supports webms as does Safari. When this site's videos work on neither it's definately the site. I don't know why you are ignoring the part that I'm not on an iphone or a phone in general and that android users are having the same issue. You are also wrong about youtube. And eveything else you've said. I wonder what other misinformation you've been spreading. Berating is a fairly common english word. Did you not graduate school? Berate-to insult or demean someone, usually in a harsh manner. Here's an example: Billy berated Timmy for being weaker than him. You keep berating me for reporting videos like you told me to do. Keep proving my point time and again. I will not tell your dumbass again. Never had this issue on any other website. Ergo the only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that it is an issue solely on the site. Fix your god damn shit and quit fucking ignoring everyone complaining about the same fucking problem. It's very clearly a problem that needs to be addressed since a lot of people are starting to have it. Oh but you could give two shits about mobile users. They don't matter to you at all.

Also it was your own words that you don't host nor support videos when you clearly do. Your own words that you shamelessly blamed the uploaders. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Now how about you quit fucking stalking me and actually make yourself useful for once. This will be the very last time I remove you from my blacklist. You will not hear from me again. I'll be honest it takes a lot for me to outright hate someone. Well you won the cupie doll buddy. If you truely were an archive site you'd have posts in multiple formats so anyone can view it. This site is actually very antiarchive.

Nnnnope.

Feel free to prove me wrong about youtube. Double right clicking I get browsers native controls if I want to and checking extra data, I can see the video is streaming the VP9 (as in WebM) transcode. Even with youtube-dl, I do not have access to original upload which the youtube user uploaded to youtube, but youtube will still store it
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/666421129027518474/1109080990573408296/image.png

[Cookies] Extracting cookies from chrome
[youtube] Extracting URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E41UjGUSzk
[youtube] 1E41UjGUSzk: Downloading webpage
[youtube] 1E41UjGUSzk: Downloading android player API JSON
[youtube] 1E41UjGUSzk: Downloading player e50626d8
[info] Available formats for 1E41UjGUSzk:
ID  EXT   RESOLUTION FPS CH │   FILESIZE    TBR PROTO │ VCODEC         VBR ACODEC      ABR ASR MORE INFO
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
sb2 mhtml 48x27        0    │                   mhtml │ images                                 storyboard
sb1 mhtml 80x45        0    │                   mhtml │ images                                 storyboard
sb0 mhtml 160x90       0    │                   mhtml │ images                                 storyboard
599 m4a   audio only      2 │    2.41MiB    31k dash  │ audio only         mp4a.40.5   31k 22k ultralow, m4a_dash
600 webm  audio only      2 │    2.77MiB    35k dash  │ audio only         opus        35k 48k ultralow, webm_dash
139 m4a   audio only      2 │    3.81MiB    49k dash  │ audio only         mp4a.40.5   49k 22k low, m4a_dash
249 webm  audio only      2 │    4.05MiB    52k dash  │ audio only         opus        52k 48k low, webm_dash
250 webm  audio only      2 │    5.34MiB    68k dash  │ audio only         opus        68k 48k low, webm_dash
140 m4a   audio only      2 │   10.12MiB   129k dash  │ audio only         mp4a.40.2  129k 44k medium, m4a_dash
251 webm  audio only      2 │    9.78MiB   125k dash  │ audio only         opus       125k 48k medium, webm_dash
17  3gp   176x144      8  1 │    6.26MiB    80k https │ mp4v.20.3      80k mp4a.40.2    0k 22k 144p
597 mp4   256x144     15    │    2.65MiB    34k dash  │ avc1.4d400b    34k video only          144p, mp4_dash
598 webm  256x144     15    │    2.23MiB    29k dash  │ vp9            29k video only          144p, webm_dash
160 mp4   256x144     30    │    6.12MiB    78k dash  │ avc1.4d400c    78k video only          144p, mp4_dash
278 webm  256x144     30    │    6.01MiB    77k dash  │ vp9            77k video only          144p, webm_dash
133 mp4   426x240     30    │   13.53MiB   173k dash  │ avc1.4d4015   173k video only          240p, mp4_dash
242 webm  426x240     30    │   11.49MiB   147k dash  │ vp9           147k video only          240p, webm_dash
134 mp4   640x360     30    │   26.31MiB   337k dash  │ avc1.4d401e   337k video only          360p, mp4_dash
18  mp4   640x360     30  2 │   53.03MiB   678k https │ avc1.42001E   678k mp4a.40.2    0k 44k 360p
243 webm  640x360     30    │   25.17MiB   322k dash  │ vp9           322k video only          360p, webm_dash
135 mp4   854x480     30    │   41.45MiB   530k dash  │ avc1.4d401f   530k video only          480p, mp4_dash
244 webm  854x480     30    │   39.52MiB   506k dash  │ vp9           506k video only          480p, webm_dash
22  mp4   1280x720    30  2 │ ~137.42MiB  1716k https │ avc1.64001F  1716k mp4a.40.2    0k 44k 720p
136 mp4   1280x720    30    │  124.05MiB  1587k dash  │ avc1.4d401f  1587k video only          720p, mp4_dash
247 webm  1280x720    30    │   74.77MiB   957k dash  │ vp9           957k video only          720p, webm_dash
298 mp4   1280x720    60    │  208.37MiB  2666k dash  │ avc1.4d4020  2666k video only          720p60, mp4_dash
302 webm  1280x720    60    │  130.92MiB  1675k dash  │ vp9          1675k video only          720p60, webm_dash
299 mp4   1920x1080   60    │  375.29MiB  4801k dash  │ avc1.64002a  4801k video only          1080p60, mp4_dash
303 webm  1920x1080   60    │  262.41MiB  3357k dash  │ vp9          3357k video only          1080p60, webm_dash
308 webm  2560x1440   60    │  776.32MiB  9932k dash  │ vp9          9932k video only          1440p60, webm_dash
315 webm  3840x2160   60    │    1.90GiB 24949k dash  │ vp9         24949k video only          2160p60, webm_dash

Oh look, it's all VP9 WebM and h264 MP4 (and 3GP) like I said!

Firstly, every single browser on iOS (including iPhones) is Safari. If you download and use Chrome, it's Safari but with Chrome buttons. This is because Apple disallows apps from using any other rendering engine for browsers and they can enforce this because users cannot sideload apps and have to go through Apple owned appstore.
And Safari on iOS does not support WebM files (outside WebRTC which is essentially stuff like real time video calls): https://caniuse.com/webm

If you are talking of desktop safari and this link doesn't work for you, you are still either lying or are on extremely outdated hardware and/or software:
https://static1.e621.net/data/5f/7d/5f7dc38f2d4f67c47eeeccebfe0babf9.webm

Puffin is also similar to Opera Mini or Opera Mobile data saver feature, where instead of just getting webpage, the browser actually fetches those elements from that browser makers server, where the files get compressed or streamed. That's why I have not liked when people say they can have flash content on iPhone with Puffin, because what is really happening is Puffins servers run that flash in their servers, record it and stream video feed of that flash into your phone. Basically random corporation is now seeing what you are viewing and promising not to look, on top of massive data consumption, lag, extra compression, etc.

Problems with Android so far has been with users who have been using older or outdated devices, which means their phone lacks support for VP9. Talking with many users and troubleshooting why some videos worked and some didn't, it did turn out they either had super old hardware or were running extremely old android version. Updating either has solved the issue and introducion of samples on the site have also made it so these kind of users can also watch 4K uploads, because previously the data throughput would have their phone suffocate.

I didn't really learn english in school, basics mostly and then rest online. Swedish was mandatory but I don't speak it at all outside "jag talar inte svenska" and I know even that's not written correctly. If it wasn't for Google Translate you wouldn't know what älykääpiö means either or what language even is that.

Just because we have problem while other websites don't, doesn't mean shit.
Youtube is hosted by multibillion corporation which sole purpose is video streaming and has dedicated systems to ensure that videos play even on twenty years old Nokia phone. We are a goddamn booru that's meant to host image files and video support has been slowly just implemented one step at a time, we didn't even have samples couple years ago!
Also what do you mean antiarchive? Archiving usually means just keeping the files as original as possible, low quality samples have nothing to do with that. If I archive perfect copy of old video game, just because it doesn't run in browser makes it less archived?

You still make absolutely no sense and I have yet to be proven wrong or given any additional information why your shit doesn't work without samples, outside that fixing samples fixes videos for you, meaning you cannot view webm files directly.

poofwoof said:
As someone who absolutely hates spiders, this is actually pretty cute.

Its odd, isn't it? things we normally stay away from or dislike become attractive during these fun "sessions"

Nice to see another arthropod appreciator on this platform.

birbface said:
What you're penetrating there would be the spinnerets. Spiders are one of the few arthropods where the genitalia actually are placed at the base of the abdomen, near the legs.

Very confusing, I know. Bug anatomy is weird.

Or the anus - can't penetrate the spinnerets.

smerg_the_dargon said:
Nice to see another arthropod appreciator on this platform.

Or the anus - can't penetrate the spinnerets.

Okay, yeah. That's true. Although it looks to be a bit too far down for that.

Glad to meet you, too!

You're really saying there's Spider feral porn but no shark feral porn??