atisoko said:
You should have cub

I do as well, this isn't tagged as cub tho so it wouldn't matter on this post anyway

vezera said:
does the blacklist not work on purpose or what, i've had young in my blacklist forever and this stuff still shows up for me

Is there a double filter in place? If you have "young rating:explicit" on one line the way I do, this wouldn't be filtered as it's not explicit.

This could go one of two ways. "Oops, sorry" after spitting her out, or "Oops." *Burp*

Downvoting this just because you don’t like vore is not valid, just blacklist and move on smh

Flagged? Will it get deleted? Find out next time on bizyvore
Thankfully it wasn’t

yeah this one might get taken down sadly. i wanna see how it goes thoooo :(

adam_theapple987 said:
What about down voting on the basis of it depicting minors

What about separating fiction from reality?

previous post from this artist would show what they do just block the artist that post cub/young shit and you'll be good

adam_theapple987 said:
What about down voting on the basis of it depicting minors

It's pixels on a screen, once you find a minor that has magical super powers and turns into a giant red panda tell me cause that will be the day I'm a millionaire.

sonarrrr said:
yeah this one might get taken down sadly. i wanna see how it goes thoooo :(

Doubt

vezera said:
I do as well, this isn't tagged as cub tho so it wouldn't matter on this post anyway

I was under the impression that cub was now under the young tag but I'm not an expert. Maybe young:rating questionable would work for you.

I thought anything depicting young humans was banned now

r3dart said:
I thought anything depicting young humans was banned now

Only if it is explicit.

bizymouse said:
Doubt

im happy you were right lmao

This post is now flagged for the third time.
Someone is persistent.

snedmano said:
This post is now flagged for the third time.
Someone is persistent.

Can't say who flagged this, because it's hidden for a reason, but what I can say it has been three seperate completely users and nobody of these has engaged the comment section.

mairo said:
Can't say who flagged this, because it's hidden for a reason, but what I can say it has been three seperate completely users and nobody of these has engaged the comment section.

Interesting, so it's not the same person desperately wanting this taken down using multiple flags.

It's just multiple different people misunderstanding the rules and also failing to check for any previous flags.

Perhaps the flag form should show previous flags or show a warning if there are previous flags, so a situation like this could be avoided.
I've now created a feature request for this. topic #45858

mairo said:
Can't say who flagged this, because it's hidden for a reason, but what I can say it has been three seperate completely users and nobody of these has engaged the comment section.

scandalous

bizymouse said:
scandalous

It's almost like it should get mentioned in the description. :-D

alphamule said:
It's almost like it should get mentioned in the description. :-D

Well, seems that didn't stop someone from flagging the post a fourth time. :o

snedmano said:
Well, seems that didn't stop someone from flagging the post a fourth time. :o

Rude! (LOL)

Oh well, I tried. It's up to a higher power (staff) to deal with people ignoring that reminder. All we can do is try to educate people.

alphamule said:
Rude! (LOL)

Oh well, I tried. It's up to a higher power (staff) to deal with people ignoring that reminder. All we can do is try to educate people.

It's kind of like the 11 foot 8 Bridge.
You can make a ridiculous amount of warnings, but some people still choose to ignore them.

snedmano said:
It's kind of like the 11 foot 8 Bridge.
You can make a ridiculous amount of warnings, but some people still choose to ignore them.

You could even have red lights triggered by height sensors, and they'd drive on through them past TWO intersections to get under the bridge.