Oh sure, this gets accepted here, but when I tried to post a high quality webm of Friendship is Manly 2 , it was rejected for being IRRELEVANT TO THE SITE.

Daneasaur said:
Oh sure, this gets accepted here, but when I tried to post a high quality webm of Friendship is Manly 2 , it was rejected for being IRRELEVANT TO THE SITE.

The guys in "Friendship is Manly 2" are all 100% human with pretty hair, which makes it irrelevant to this site. If they'd all had horns / wings / more anthropomorphic then it probably would have been approved.

This guy has three horns coming out of his forehead which makes him humanoid instead of human. Non-human traits on a human-like character can make things relevant to the site. Humanoid and anthro versions of feral characters usually stay, but 100% human versions are just too human to stay. And that webm upload you mentioned was deleted for being irrelevant to the site because it was all just humans.

furrypickle said:
100% human - makes it irrelevant to this site.

Then we need higher quality control for a lot of submissions here.

Taking hardly any time, I had no problem finding an easy handful of images that would fall into those guidelines.

post #14043

post #13828

post #12576

Daneasaur said:
Then we need higher quality control for a lot of submissions here.

Taking hardly any time, I had no problem finding an easy handful of images that would fall into those guidelines.

post #14043

post #13828

post #12576

those were all posted Years before the strict no human-only content rule came here.

Daneasaur said:
Then we need higher quality control for a lot of submissions here.

Taking hardly any time, I had no problem finding an easy handful of images that would fall into those guidelines.

post #14043

post #13828

post #12576

All of those are from 7-8 years ago when the approval rules were different. Deleting older uploads that used to be valid wouldn't be fair to our uploaders. And it wouldn't be fair to people who'd favorited those in the years since they'd been uploaded. It's not their fault policies change over time. So older stuff is grandfathered in and current approval guidelines only apply to current uploads.

You should read this thread since that might answer most of your questions about this rule. And the forum is a much better place to discuss this if you have more concerns or questions about it.

furrypickle said:
All of those are from 7-8 years ago when the approval rules were different. Deleting older uploads that used to be valid wouldn't be fair to our uploaders. And it wouldn't be fair to people who'd favorited those in the years since they'd been uploaded. It's not their fault policies change over time. So older stuff is grandfathered in and current approval guidelines only apply to current uploads.

You should read this thread since that might answer most of your questions about this rule. And the forum is a much better place to discuss this if you have more concerns or questions about it.

I had a feeling you'd pull the "those are old images" card, so I came prepared.

post #768081

post #734198

post #722943

So what is my point to all this?

Mostly that I have a mod who seeks me out not just here, but on other websites as well to slap me if I so much as post one thing SLIGHTLY out of the rulings, yet these files, posted not long ago, get a free pass.

Daneasaur said:
snip

is it really necessary to do this on my art post? and pickle just told that forum is better place for discussing this

Mutisija said:
is it really necessary to do this on my art post? and pickle just told that forum is better place for discussing this

Not really. i brought up some rather important tagging and grouping subjects and all of them have been ignored. Most of the forum posts are ignored.

besides, won't stop the mod from singling me out, in fact will make it easier.