Daneasaur said:
Remember folks, all Kangaskhan are female, so if you see the baby sporting a pecker, the crossgender tag applies.

I had to log in just to downvote this

Ok then, I dare anyone to play an un-modified game and catch a male kangaskhan.

I'll wait.

Daneasaur said:
Ok then, I dare anyone to play an un-modified game and catch a male kangaskhan.

I'll wait.

There are male Kangaskhan they're just rare

Spyra said:
There are male Kangaskhan they're just rare

There aren't, they are an all female species like Miltank and Chansey.

Daneasaur said:
There aren't, they are an all female species like Miltank and Chansey.

If they are all female then how are they populating?

Spyra said:
If they are all female then how are they populating?

Pokemon reproduce by intermingling with pokemon of the same egg group. The baby that is born is the same species as the mother.

Meaning a Kangaskhan can reproduce more kangaskhan by mating with any male off of THIS LIST.

Daneasaur said:
Pokemon reproduce by intermingling with pokemon of the same egg group. The baby that is born is the same species as the mother.

Meaning a Kangaskhan can reproduce more kangaskhan by mating with any male off of THIS LIST.

No one cares anymore! Everyone knows its a %100 female! I've played the damn game since I was a little shithead! Its a simple fucking tag! Lets all just drop it and move on!

Daneasaur said:
Congrats, you're wrong.

Yes, Kangaskahn are 100% female. But the reason you're getting downvoted is probably because that's the baby, not the mother. Considering how pokemon breeding and evolutions work, who knows if the baby even counts as a Kangaskhan.

Not to mention the cubone > marowak > kangaskhan (female only) evo chain which was planned but not implemented in the game. Some of it still remains (same egg groups, similar back spikes, etc), and some players consider it canon. So by that lore, the baby is a cubone and could be a male.

Thats a pretty dope picture /\

Daneasaur said:
That is making a fan theory more canon than the canonical final product.

But all right, lets go down this path:
post #1821631

Here is "Missingno 146". This is what 99% of people would argue is a proto-kangaskhan, thus proving the 100% connection of Cubone to Kangaskhan.

Problem: A beta for pokemon red and green has been found which has the programming order and most of the original pokemon.

Sprite sheet.

Name listing.

With simple observation, Kangaskhan is the second pokemon and at this point, she already has a baby in her pouch.

By looking forward, pokemon #17 (right after Nidoqueen) is Cubone. Bit of an odd placement and the back sprite shows it has some jagged spikes coming out of it.

If we continue down to 145 and 146, we finally come across Marowak and Missingno 146.

As we can see, Cubone, Marowak, Marowak's evolution, AND Kangaskhan are all in the game.

But we encounter two problems:

Problem 1: While conjecture can be made to assume Cubone was someone coming up with something to do with Kangaskhan's baby, we have no solid proof. The only evolutions of Cubone are into Marowak, and Marowak into 146. Where does Kangaskhan fit into this? Where is just the baby without bone weapons/armor? It isn't present and throws doubt into them being related at all.

Problem 2: In the canonical games, Cubone, Marowak, and Kangaskhan have nothing to do with one another. Even in Red and Blue, the spirit of Cubone's mother is a Marowak, not a Kangaskhan. Even in Sun/Moon where they give a regional variant for Marowak, it's even further removed from Kangaskhan, when instead this could have been amply used to say "see? That fan theory isn't completely wrong!"

Additionally, Kangaskhan has a mega evolution where the mother doesn't change, but instead, the baby matures. It dons the leg armor of the mother and shows to have an immature pouch.

That therefore leaves us in the park that any CANONICAL Kangaskhan are of a female only species.

"Where does the baby come from?" I'll counter your question: Where does Chansey get her eggs? You know, since "supposedly" no one on the planet of pokemon has any idea where pokemon eggs come from.

My God man just let it go your starting a whole argument over a tag and what is known remember dude TWYS and leave it alone

Spyra said:
My God man just let it go your starting a whole argument over a tag and what is known remember dude TWYS and leave it alone

My reply was a direct reply to a comment that put into question if the baby counts as a kangaskhan or not.

That multiple people couldn't understand that and downvoted me is not my problem.

If TWYS is all encompassing, you cannot put in the tags "Pokemon" and "crossgender" into the search and have anything pop up.

You've been here since 2013, you should know better.

Daneasaur said:
My reply was a direct reply to a comment that put into question if the baby counts as a kangaskhan or not.

That multiple people couldn't understand that and downvoted me is not my problem.

If TWYS is all encompassing, you cannot put in the tags "Pokemon" and "crossgender" into the search and have anything pop up.

You've been here since 2013, you should know better.

I may have only started since 2013 but that doesn't mean I don't know the rules man

Spyra said:
I may have only started since 2013 but that doesn't mean I don't know the rules man

Then you know that TWYS isn't all encompassing. There are exceptions to the rule.

Daneasaur said:
Then you know that TWYS isn't all encompassing. There are exceptions to the rule.

To certain things yes but when it's blatantly obvious on the picture you TWYS as here people see a male cub so the tags male, mother/son and such are valid no one sees anything close to what you mentioned in your first comment so it won't be taged as such.

Spyra said:
To certain things yes but when it's blatantly obvious on the picture you TWYS as here people see a male cub so the tags male, mother/son and such are valid no one sees anything close to what you mentioned in your first comment so it won't be taged as such.

I don't want to tag it as female/female. It should indeed be tagged male/female. I never contested that.