treos said:
i don't remember which country it was from but for some reason they had the feet of those in the video censored.

Thailand.

something Suit was talking about in his latest video. that "halal meat" stuff.

i looked around and it looks like an animal rights group released some hidden camera videos showing what really happens in halal slaughterhouses and...it's pretty bad.

article

thankfully that's not an autoplay video on that site but even without the video, the pics alone are unpleasant to see so unpleasant content warning for any who click that link.

i don't care what someone chooses to believe in. this is just wrong and terrible.

To drop in, first forum post made: "uncut" to describe unaltered penises, and a wiki suggesting fully retracted foreskin should be assumed an altered penis. Yes, it's a concise word, but it fits a view of "cut" being vanilla.

NeverGive said:
To drop in, first forum post made: "uncut" to describe unaltered penises, and a wiki suggesting fully retracted foreskin should be assumed an altered penis. Yes, it's a concise word, but it fits a view of "cut" being vanilla.

I have heard this norm started like a 100 years ago in the US as a way to prevent their sons from masturbating.

NeverGive said:
To drop in, first forum post made: "uncut" to describe unaltered penises, and a wiki suggesting fully retracted foreskin should be assumed an altered penis. Yes, it's a concise word, but it fits a view of "cut" being vanilla.

Yeah, it's all just a conspiracy to normalize this unspeakable atrocity.

Or, my theory: it's simple way to convey the lack of something. To do that, you almost have to mention what it is that has not happened. That's how English tends to work.

"Asexual." "Atheist." This isn't newspeak, here. How would you describe someone without an earring without referring to a piercing or an earring? There's nothing about the "standard" there.

got some bad news about the internet.

FCC Repeals Net Neutrality

i wish this was a joke. this will end badly.

edit: o_O the heck is going on with disqus? this makes the 2nd time i check my notifications only to find spam (the "find hot girls" dating ad type) trying to add me to their favorites.

1. i ain't into females.
2. gtfo of my notifications you dumb spammers! i don't tolerate your presence in my email so why would i tolerate it anywhere else on the internet?

then again, maybe i should consider myself lucky that it's only that type of spam and not something truly stupid like penis enlargement shit. >.< if it was that type of spam then i'd be concerned over malware of some kind.

Gonna get heavy for a sec, but yanno, despite all my pseudo-aggression and posturing, I'm still most angry about my abandonment issues.

I mean I'm not mad that I've developed them. I'm mad that they come up.

EightyNine said:
Gonna get heavy for a sec, but yanno, despite all my pseudo-aggression and posturing, I'm still most angry about my abandonment issues.

I mean I'm not mad that I've developed them. I'm mad that they come up.

You lose enough people important to you and you'll get as shaky as me.

I wouldn't know what that's like at all! I'm surrounded by people who love and adore me and I've never had people I absolutely needed in my life walk out on me or leave me for someone else who turned out to be a dick!

:'D

ugh...wth is your malfunction THIS time, shittube? you're loading the rest of the page fine but now your not loading the video at all. no error message or anything. it's just sitting there with the loading circle of dots spinning.

why the F can they not fix this shit website? it's like that scene from Judge Dredd. Dredd: "You can use it...IF you can ever get it to work." that is pretty much all that crappy broken website is.

F5...nothing. F5...nothing. CTRL+ F5 *multiple times*...STILL nothing!

and they think people will want to use this garbage to watch tv? they must be dreaming quite the fantasy.

treos said:
ugh...wth is your malfunction THIS time, shittube? you're loading the rest of the page fine but now your not loading the video at all. no error message or anything. it's just sitting there with the loading circle of dots spinning.

why the F can they not fix this shit website? it's like that scene from Judge Dredd. Dredd: "You can use it...IF you can ever get it to work." that is pretty much all that crappy broken website is.

F5...nothing. F5...nothing. CTRL+ F5 *multiple times*...STILL nothing!

and they think people will want to use this garbage to watch tv? they must be dreaming quite the fantasy.

There are two potential solutions:
1. Hit the pause (or replay) button, then hit play.
2. Get the Youtube Flash Video Player. Step back/forward (left/right arrow keys) only does 1 second instead of 5, but it's better than nothing.

Furrin_Gok said:
There are two potential solutions:
1. Hit the pause (or replay) button, then hit play.
2. Get the Youtube Flash Video Player. Step back/forward (left/right arrow keys) only does 1 second instead of 5, but it's better than nothing.

or reboot the laptop because something on this shitty piece of crap laptop went and broke...AGAIN!

what i'd like to know is why VLC media player also manages to stop working correctly when this happens. i really don't see how that and firefox are related since i don't use VLC to do anything in the browser.

What makes me angry: unthinking adherence to the letter of the law with little or no regard for what the actual effect is. The people that care more about the fact that something is codified than why it's codified, and going to great lengths to enforce it even when it's absolutely counter-productive.

Stuff like the copyright abuse on Youtube and elsewhere, and even certain site policies here. It's all so frustrating to see ridiculous things happen, unopposable, by petty technicality.

treos said:
or reboot the laptop because something on this shitty piece of crap laptop went and broke...AGAIN!

what i'd like to know is why VLC media player also manages to stop working correctly when this happens. i really don't see how that and firefox are related since i don't use VLC to do anything in the browser.

It could be a memory issue if it's affecting multiple programs at the same time.

What makes me angry is a certain topic, that if I mention it, I will get hoarded on, bashed, scrutinized, or possibly even banned for mentioning... Which also angers me, a LOT.

Heteroxon said:
What makes me angry is a certain topic, that if I mention it, I will get hoarded on, bashed, scrutinized, or possibly even banned for mentioning... Which also angers me, a LOT.

I think talking about not being allowed to mention something is kind of mentioning it. Either whoever you directed your post at knows what you meant, making the post just passive-aggressively mentioning it, or the person doesn't know, making it pointless because it would require fixing something without knowing what needs fixing, or even if it needs fixing. You might need to just let it go, whatever it happens to be.

Heteroxon said:
What makes me angry...

I know that feel, man. It frustrates me to no end when something's not even up for discussion. It goes back to what I was saying earlier... People use legal power to get their way far more than to actually make things more stable, and it ends up sapping potential life from creative environments.

People only ever do what they think is justified, but that doesn't make it any easier to accept for other people. I just wish everyone could realise that, or care.

Imuthes said:
I know that feel, man. It frustrates me to no end when something's not even up for discussion. It goes back to what I was saying earlier... People use legal power to get their way far more than to actually make things more stable, and it ends up sapping potential life from creative environments.

People only ever do what they think is justified, but that doesn't make it any easier to accept for other people. I just wish everyone could realise that, or care.

When it comes to the law, yes, but a website is someone's property. If a site owner doesn't want something on it, then they don't have to have it on the site.

oh yeah that would get anyone pissed, some whiny little piss ass making life harder then it needs to be

how the heck did i miss this news just a week or 2 ago?

this isn't Turkey. they shouldn't be allowed to get away with stuff like this here in the US.

edit: Foreign Ministry sends diplomatic note to US envoy over violence outside Turkish mission

and then they blame US for what happened? fuck them!

This Week in Stupid (04/06/2017)

yep...that's what college has become. i wonder how many people actually go to college for "higher learning" these days. most seem to just go there to be indoctrinated and turned into racist, bigoted, "anti-racist anti-bigotry" assholes. they are being taught and trained to be precisely that which they claim to oppose.

opposing a "day of racial segregation" is racist... right...

this just keeps getting progressively worse as time goes on.

Either: grown-ass man diddled an 8 year old kid. Fuck everything about that.
Or: kid made up a story to score points in an argument about rape culture, not thinking that the person he told would tell anyone (which was true), but then when it got out anyway he didn't come clean and let it go to trial and put an innocent man through all this shit. Fuck everything about that, too.

I don't actually know which one of these was the case. We all found the kid's testimony unconvincing (he was honestly the defense's best witness), but that's kind of what you'd expect even if it did happen, what with the time gap (roughly a decade). So I'm angry, but I don't know who I'm angry at.

treos said:
This Week in Stupid (04/06/2017)

yep...that's what college has become. i wonder how many people actually go to college for "higher learning" these days. most seem to just go there to be indoctrinated and turned into racist, bigoted, "anti-racist anti-bigotry" assholes. they are being taught and trained to be precisely that which they claim to oppose.

opposing a "day of racial segregation" is racist... right...

this just keeps getting progressively worse as time goes on.

What do you mean "opposing a day of racial segregation?" Context and nuance matter.

LumenSageAlexander said:
What do you mean "opposing a day of racial segregation?" Context and nuance matter.

that is related to the evergreen state college's annual 2-day event known as "The Day of Absence" followed by the "Day of Presence". see the "2017 protests section of that wiki page and the linked pages for more information. links 6 through 11.

i said what you quoted because of this: "In 2017 the process was altered, with white students encouraged to attend off campus activities, while the events for minority students were held on the Evergreen campus."

and when Bret Weinstein opposed this the students that forced the change flipped their shit and well, you can see the result in Sargon's video.

The Most Important Election in a Generation

11:20 in this section

ho-ly fuck... she means to completely strip them of any and all forms of cyber security. in this day and age...that sounds like a terrifyingly bad plan. she should be INCREASING the security and strengthening it, not weakening and removing it outright.

treos said:
This Week in Stupid (04/06/2017)

yep...that's what college has become. i wonder how many people actually go to college for "higher learning" these days. most seem to just go there to be indoctrinated and turned into racist, bigoted, "anti-racist anti-bigotry" assholes. they are being taught and trained to be precisely that which they claim to oppose.

opposing a "day of racial segregation" is racist... right...

this just keeps getting progressively worse as time goes on.

Its awesome to watch the SJW movement destroy its self. These people go after a liberal jewish professor and call him racist for not partaking in a day of forced racial segregation. Thats the autisic thing I ever heard of. Its a good thing the college is getting partially defunded, they'll have to clean up their act by getting rid of the professors pushing this bs and the administrators that help facilitate the bs.

summer heat...

i'm beginning to wonder what months our seasons are split up by. cause i don't think summer always started halfway through the year in june...did it?

that and MAN do i hate going outside during this season's heat. if there's no clouds over us then it's just blindingly bright and purely HOT. not warm, hot. and i don't tan, i burn. >:(

and you can say how sunlight is good for you blah blah blah... i don't care. is getting sun burned good for you too?

hmmm... i guess i do do the nudist thing sometimes when i'm alone in my room but aside from... certain activities >.> it's usually when i've been outside for more than 3-5 minutes and walk back in drenched in sweat. and it doesn't help that my room gets the brunt of the afternoon sun so even with my window unit set to high/cool/70 and a little metal fan on medium it STILL gets warm in here some times.

this time of the year just gets a lot of complaints from me.

ThoughtCrime said:
Its awesome to watch the SJW movement destroy its self. These people go after a liberal jewish professor and call him racist for not partaking in a day of forced racial segregation. Thats the autisic thing I ever heard of. Its a good thing the college is getting partially defunded, they'll have to clean up their act by getting rid of the professors pushing this bs and the administrators that help facilitate the bs.

Wouldn't say it's autistic. Us Autistic people can at least handle quantitative logic. These guys fit closer to megalomania or Sociopathy

Limit of 5 dmails per hour!

annoying...

you know it's summer time when, at 8PM, you have 2 fans set to medium and aimed at 2 different directions in your room along with a window unit set to high/cool/70 and said window unit (air conditioner) still says it's 80+ in the room.

-_- summer heat sucks. i don't know how my uncle can call 75+ cool.

treos said:
annoying...

you know it's summer time when, at 8PM, you have 2 fans set to medium and aimed at 2 different directions in your room along with a window unit set to high/cool/70 and said window unit (air conditioner) still says it's 80+ in the room.

-_- summer heat sucks. i don't know how my uncle can call 75+ cool.

For me, that was 6 months ago. I'm freezing my tits off right now.

Wait, you're complaining about a 27°c summer? Ours are ~35°c (~95°f), sometimes 40+ (104+).

This.
https://pvplive.net/c/gta-v-modding-tool-open-iv-shutting-down-after-tak
The CEO of Take Two is a fucking idiot. What the hell does he hope to accomplish by doing this? Due to this, though, GTA V is now down to a 7/10 on Steam, with over 19,000 negative reviews and counting. I'm not a PC gamer, but even I know this is a mistake. There's even a mod for GTA V. It's called the Fuck Take Two Blimp.

BlueDingo said:
For me, that was 6 months ago. I'm freezing my tits off right now.

Wait, you're complaining about a 27°c summer? Ours are ~35°c (~95°f), sometimes 40+ (104+).

Went on vacation once and managed to be in North Dakota when it was 120°f. It literally had not happened before. As in, it's a historical record. I still remember thinking the wind would cool me down. The wind was hot. Our car's air conditioner overheated, along with the hotel's. I'm pale enough that people have mistaken me for an albino with dyed hair. I did not need to know hat it was possible to literally fit yourself like a glove, but it turns out, yes. It is.

JoeX said:
This.

The CEO of Take Two is a fucking idiot. What the hell does he hope to accomplish by doing this? Due to this, though, GTA V is now down to a 7/10 on Steam, with over 19,000 negative reviews and counting. I'm not a PC gamer, but even I know this is a mistake. There's even a mod for GTA V. It's called the Fuck Take Two Blimp.

yeah, i brought this up in the gaming thread. and apparently Take Two recently bought that kerbel space program game too so i guess fans of that one might need to watch out as well.

kamimatsu said:
Went on vacation once and managed to be in North Dakota when it was 120°f. It literally had not happened before. As in, it's a historical record. I still remember thinking the wind would cool me down. The wind was hot. Our car's air conditioner overheated, along with the hotel's. I'm pale enough that people have mistaken me for an albino with dyed hair. I did not need to know hat it was possible to literally fit yourself like a glove, but it turns out, yes. It is.

geez, bet you wound up burnt worse than me during that trip.

edit: School Photoshopped Trump Shirts Out of Yearbook

more trump hate stupidity... censoring school yearbooks.

4:20 yep, that's pretty much what this is.

treos said:
geez, bet you wound up burnt worse than me during that trip.

It was pretty bad. when I said literally fitting myself like a glove, I meant the actual definition of "literally". That glove used to be my arm.

Turn 1 Mental Misstep.

It's just fucking rude.

i'm sick of seeing news about germany. all it does is leave me PISSED off at their complete and utter weakness and ineptitude.

"migrant rape crimes doubled within 1 year!"

"FGM: multiculturalism gone wild!"

"police afraid to fight back as muslim gangs run rampant" (ok, i kinda forgot the article title but that's not far off the mark)

if there's any, ANY native germans left in germany after the next 5 years and they STILL give in to their invaders as they've done thus far i'll be sitting back and laughing & mocking them for complaining about problems they welcomed and LET happen.

what did that one article say?

""In Berlin, a court acquitted a 23-year-old Turkish man of rape because his victim could not prove that she did not give her consent. The court heard how the man shoved the woman's head between the steel bars of the headboard of a bed and repeatedly violated her over a period of more than four hours. The woman cried "stop" and resisted by scratching the accused on the back, but at some point she stopped resisting. The court asked: "Could it be that the defendant thought you were in agreement?""

"The court asked: "Could it be that the defendant thought you were in agreement?"

welcome to germanistan where rape is a felony...if it even gets that lvl of punishment.

Feminazis: "what's this 'rape' you speak of?" (same for FGM)

i need to stop checking the news so much. because even in gaming news there's hardly anything good worth hearing about these days (oh look, another game with shitty microtransactions. another asset flipper? meh, tell me something new that i haven't heard about a hundred times already.). all i ever see in the news is more and more stuff that makes me hate and wish i never had to live on this planet.

and in the east we have china worrying about internet addiction. yeah... have you people ever stopped to think that maybe people prefer gaming/internet/anime/movies/etc. over irl because irl really is that bad and just keeps on getting worse?

wait, nevermind... i overlooked the timestamp on that video and that was from december last year. oops

TRANS-TRENDER FLAG REVEALED

ಠ_ಠ i am not saying anything past L...G...B when i use that acronym because everything tacked on to the end has nothing to do with those 3 sexualities.

1:46 really? coming from the increasing number of movements and groups of people hijacking the LGB acronym and community? piss the fuck off!

gotta fuck everything up, don't you? can't leave anything alone...

edit: i'm gay as in LGB.

i am not LGBT because transgender is not a sexuality.

i am not LGBTP because pedophilia is not a sexuality.

i am not LGBTPBLM because black lives matter is NOT A SEXUALITY!

treos said:
TRANS-TRENDER FLAG REVEALED

ಠ_ಠ i am not saying anything past L...G...B when i use that acronym because everything tacked on to the end has nothing to do with those 3 sexualities.

First off, the proposed new flag has nothing to do with transsexuals. It has everything to do with putting black and brown people where racist white gays can't ignore them. It has everything to do with the fact that a huge number of us are tired of a movement that's supposed to espouse equal treatment of people becoming inundated by racism.

Secondly, who the fuck suggested pedophilia and BLM are part of the LGBT umbrella?

Thirdly, trans people exist and are valid. Get the fuck over it.

In fact, the Stonewall Riots, which had a MASSIVE amount to do with the formation of the LGBT umbrella and the gay rights movement as a whole, owe a great deal to black trans women.

I'm starting to think you only hang around the forums waiting for someone to say something that conflicts with your ideology so you can pounce on them. It can't be a coincidence that the majority of your posts are social justice related and your response time so quick.

LumenSageAlexander said:
First off, the proposed new flag has nothing to do with transsexuals. It has everything to do with putting black and brown people where racist white gays can't ignore them. It has everything to do with the fact that a huge number of us are tired of a movement that's supposed to espouse equal treatment of people becoming inundated by racism.

BLM are trying to inject racial politics into a community that was never about race. This will only flare racial tensions and divide the community.

LumenSageAlexander said:
Secondly, who the fuck suggested pedophilia and BLM are part of the LGBT umbrella?

There are quite a few people out there who are trying to legalize pedophilia and treat it as a sexual orientation. NAMBLA for example.

LumenSageAlexander said:
Thirdly, trans people exist and are valid. Get the fuck over it.

He didn't say trans people don't exist. He said transgender is not a sexuality.

BlueDingo said:
I'm starting to think you only hang around the forums waiting for someone to say something that conflicts with your ideology so you can pounce on them. It can't be a coincidence that the majority of your posts are social justice related and your response time so quick.

I ignore this thread most of the time, but sometimes I just want to voice my opinion.

And most of the time someone here has already said something that kind of ties into what was making me angry.

I guess you could say this thread makes me angry.

(plus, is two hours really a quick response time?)

BlueDingo said:
BLM are trying to inject racial politics into a community that was never about race. This will only flare racial tensions and divide the community.

A) BLM =/= Black people as a community or as a whole. The fact that a number of black people have asked for this change doesn't mean it's been spurred by any specific organization or movement. In fact, since hearing of this flag thing, this is actually the first time I've heard BLM mentioned in relation to it. B) Race politics tie HEAVILY into the same systematic issues that plague queer politics, and many nonwhite people happen to BE queer, so...

BlueDingo said:
There are quite a few people out there who are trying to legalize pedophilia and treat it as a sexual orientation. NAMBLA for example.

Okay, I'll rephrase - what the fuck does pedophilia have to do with this issue?

BlueDingo said:
He didn't say trans people don't exist. He said transgender is not a sexuality.

He sure doesn't seem to think they're valid, though. And they're still part of the pride movement, whether he likes it or not.

LumenSageAlexander said:
I ignore this thread most of the time, but sometimes I just want to voice my opinion.

And most of the time someone here has already said something that kind of ties into what was making me angry.

I guess you could say this thread makes me angry.

(plus, is two hours really a quick response time?)

It is for someone showing up out of nowhere on a worldwide platform.

LumenSageAlexander said:
A) BLM =/= Black people as a community or as a whole. The fact that a number of black people have asked for this change doesn't mean it's been spurred by any specific organization or movement. In fact, since hearing of this flag thing, this is actually the first time I've heard BLM mentioned in relation to it. B) Race politics tie HEAVILY into the same systematic issues that plague queer politics, and many nonwhite people happen to BE queer, so...

Just because there are many colored people who happen to be gay, that doesn't mean the LGB community needs racial politics added to it. I stand by my previous post.

LumenSageAlexander said:
Okay, I'll rephrase - what the fuck does pedophilia have to do with this issue?

This specific flag issue, nothing.

LumenSageAlexander said:
He sure doesn't seem to think they're valid, though. And they're still part of the pride movement, whether he likes it or not.

You mean the gay pride movement? Transgender =/= gay.

BlueDingo said:
There are quite a few people out there who are trying to legalize pedophilia and treat it as a sexual orientation. NAMBLA for example.

another is the Heart Progress group who prefer to be called "pedosexuals".

LumenSageAlexander said:
He sure doesn't seem to think they're valid, though. And they're still part of the pride movement, whether he likes it or not.

BlueDingo said:
You mean the gay pride movement? Transgender =/= gay.

originally it was LGB if i'm not mistaken. then LGBT when trans people came along. transexuals which later started being called transgender iirc. so that no longer has anything to do with the LGB thing as it's now known to not be a sexuality but rather something to do with the brain.

then came the Heart Progress and NAMBLA pedo groups trying to hijack it and now BLM. and it seems BLM also try to hijack the pride parade events too.

LumenSageAlexander said:
B) Race politics tie HEAVILY into the same systematic issues that plague queer politics, and many nonwhite people happen to BE queer, so...

fact: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual are all sexual orientations.

skin color and ethnicity are not sexual orientations so no, racial politics doesn't have anything to do with it.

as for not treating trans people as valid. how uniquely do i have to treat them before they're satisfied? no, seriously, cause it never seems to be enough with them. i'll treat them no differently than anyone else just so long as they stop making stupid demands of others. like the countless fictional pronouns BS. you're either male or female, that's it. but if they keep making ridiculous demands then i'm gonna keep saying no in response.

LGB: equality is too much to ask of this world, isn't it?

BlueDingo said:
I'm starting to think you only hang around the forums waiting for someone to say something that conflicts with your ideology so you can pounce on them. It can't be a coincidence that the majority of your posts are social justice related and your response time so quick.

o_O that makes me wonder where the other 2 (or was it 3?) are. since there's 3-4 here who usually jump at the chance to attack someone for saying anything against trans people.

treos said:
ಠ_ಠ i am not saying anything past L...G...B when i use that acronym because everything tacked on to the end has nothing to do with those 3 sexualities.

To be honest I always figured if they're going to include identities, they should at least not treat it as a synonym for sexual orientation, and it wouldn't hurt to consider including Asexuality as well instead of just looking at Agender and saying "close enough".

I'm hated by every side because of that. One side thinks I meant Non-Binary, and then when I tell them it's not the same thing, I get called a SJW. The other side thinks I'm transphobic because apparently I'm just conditioned to think that and have to unlearn it because god forbid I just be a guy who likes girly things and would rather be in someone's arms than in their pants.

It's always been baffling that people call me transphobic. Never was good at figuring out what was for what, so the only way I'd call someone something they aren't is if they flat out told me, because as much as I've proven an Autistic person can learn social skills, in the subject of what traits look like what, I have amassed a gargantuan wealth of FA.

treos said:
TRANS-TRENDER FLAG REVEALED

Haaaahahahahahahaha....Rotflmao fucking racist black and brown people.

These motherfuckers took a symbol that had nothing to do with race and made it racial haaaahahaha. It's only a matter of time before they're literately oppressing the white people in the LGBTQdoubleplusgood community.

Best timeline ever!

LumenSageAlexander said:
It has everything to do with putting black and brown people where racist white gays can't ignore them.

If your going to start claiming white gays are racist, your going to have to show some proof. Like a video or article about white gays lynching or beating black/brown gays. Everyone already knows how you people like to throw that word around.

ThoughtCrime said:
If your going to start claiming white gays are racist, your going to have to show some proof. Like a video or article about white gays lynching or beating black/brown gays. Everyone already knows how you people like to throw that word around.

That was a qualifier, not a blanket.

LumenSageAlexander said:
First off, the proposed new flag has nothing to do with transsexuals. It has everything to do with putting black and brown people where racist white gays can't ignore them. It has everything to do with the fact that a huge number of us are tired of a movement that's supposed to espouse equal treatment of people becoming inundated by racism.

Secondly, who the fuck suggested pedophilia and BLM are part of the LGBT umbrella?

Thirdly, trans people exist and are valid. Get the fuck over it.

In fact, the Stonewall Riots, which had a MASSIVE amount to do with the formation of the LGBT umbrella and the gay rights movement as a whole, owe a great deal to black trans women.

Blacks are often treated unfairly in the LGBT community, sure. But adding those colors to a literal rainbow flag, well, it's hard to see that as anything but specifically excluding whites. And Asians, even. Just doesn't make sense, and it's a meaningless gesture that will only distract people from the problems LGBT blacks face by making LGBT whites feel ostracized by the political orientation that has come to be associated with their sexuality. It's "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender," not "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People of Color."

Things that seem specifically designed to be divisive to others, no matter how inclusive they seem from your perspective, are not going to heal any wounds.

Fenrick said:
Blacks are often treated unfairly in the LGBT community, sure. But adding those colors to a literal rainbow flag, well, it's hard to see that as anything but specifically excluding whites. And Asians, even. Just doesn't make sense, and it's a meaningless gesture that will only distract people from the problems LGBT blacks face by making LGBT whites feel ostracized by the political orientation that has come to be associated with their sexuality. It's "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender," not "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People of Color."

Things that seem specifically designed to be divisive to others, no matter how inclusive they seem from your perspective, are not going to heal any wounds.

That and there is already a civil rights flag with black and purple, and it's specifically a sexual orientation, and mention of it is still nowhere to be found despite both colors now being used.

kamimatsu said:
That and there is already a civil rights flag with black and purple, and it's specifically a sexual orientation, and mention of it is still nowhere to be found despite both colors now being used.

Are you referring to this one or this one?

BlueDingo said:
Are you referring to this one or this one?

o_O Labrys Pride? never heard of that before.

LumenSageAlexander said:
That was a qualifier, not a blanket.

Yeah you're right, but you made it seem like there's a huge problem with wide spread racism against blacks in the lgb/lgbt( or whatever they want to call themselves ) community. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be some bigotry but I highly doubt its even an issue. A good amout of people that cry about racism all the time are generally full of shit. They love to play the victim card and act as if everyone/everything is against them. Nothing is ever their fault, it's always racist white people because they and foosball are the devil. So unless there's a bunch of gay rights advocacy groups that are suppressing the voices of black gays or wide spread violence against black gays, I think the people complaining about racism in the lgb community are full of shit.

BlueDingo said:
Are you referring to this one or this one?

The first one.

People who want to RP with me and they only ever respond with less than a sentence of content. Like this complaint is longer and more in depth.

LoveSigil said:
People who want to RP with me and they only ever respond with less than a sentence of content. Like this complaint is longer and more in depth.

Me actually being guilty of this due to fear of saying the wrong thing or revealing info that wouldn't be known IC, or worse, accidentally implying someone thought something they didn't.

It's why I prefer Furcadia over F-List. The latter can ban for those things, and the former has "this moment never happened" as an official rule.

When tags don't work like they're supposed to.

YOUTUBE ENDORSES AND PROMOTES CHILD ABUSE?

the channel he's talking about.

people...stop trying to normalize pedophilia. like...wtf? the kids in that masturbation (and likely the rest of that channels videos) are too young for this kind of topic. stop trying to teach sex ed to kids who are too young for it and probably haven't even reached puberty yet.

i mean, i'm all for teaching kids things while they're young but on certain topics you need to draw the line somewhere. for these people, there is no line. there is no minimum age requirement. and that channel has what, 2.2mill+ subs? for fucks sake you freaks...

3:30 "ok, mom!" O_O MOM?! holy FUCK! i thought this was the modern era, not some ancient pro-pedo era of human civilization.

4:30 exactly!

4:42 woman, the kid is clearly embarrassed! for one, this whole topic is clearly embarrassing for her. second, you're doing this to her...in front of a camera...for a video that people all around the world can see. i'll be surprised if these kids grow up and become normal people after this shit.

4:45 girl: "no..." *covers face with hands*

the girl is clearly not comfortable with this and doesn't want to talk about this shit. what is wrong with you?

this is both disgusting and disturbing as all fuck! this. is. SICK! these parents should be rotting in jail. and i thought the daddyoffive fiasco was bad...

treos said:
stop trying to teach sex ed to kids who are too young for it and probably haven't even reached puberty yet.

What age is correct for sex ed? 18? You have 10 year olds out there getting pregnant.

Education critical in preventing adolescent pregnancy, underscores UN agency

Don't fall for manufactured outrage. The kids are being sexploited for YouTube but it is not a criminal act.

Lance_Armstrong said:
What age is correct for sex ed? 18? You have 10 year olds out there getting pregnant.

Education critical in preventing adolescent pregnancy, underscores UN agency

Don't fall for manufactured outrage. The kids are being sexploited for YouTube but it is not a criminal act.

12 and up... middle school... like NORMAL people.

manufactured outrage?

oh and not only are they talking to these kids about masturbation but those blurred things? those are actual dildos. so when they start talking about how to use those, they're pretty much explaining how to have sex. kids this young do not have any reason to know how to have sex with someone.

tell me...all of us. are you pro-pedophilia?

and i think i saw at one point, one of these female pedos was explaining how condoms are used too...

treos said:
tell me...all of us. are you pro-pedophilia?

Oh no, condoms! That could lead to safe sex!

Basic sex ed is taught in elementary schools. Maybe not where you live?

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/spring-fever/

https://www.noodle.com/articles/what-sex-education-in-elementary-school-should-look-like

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12340552

Tell all of us, are you against effective sex ed?

Lance_Armstrong said:
Tell all of us, are you against effective sex ed?

what is wrong with you? of course i'm not against safe sex and kindergaten? o_O wtf? those kids likely wouldn't be hitting puberty for years. they would have no reason to need to know about sex related topics.

actually, that reminds me of a comment on post #1232944:

LightningBlaze said:
Ya gotta remember dude, children watch porn.

really? and you guys ban anyone under the age of 18 here. maybe we should start letting that slide too. i mean, if it helps them learn about sex related content early on then it must be good and helpful, right?

as for the "You have 10 year olds out there getting pregnant." bit. yeah...i can't imagine why...oh, maybe because your teaching your kids how to have sex at such a young age? what do you think would happen?

treos said:
as for the "You have 10 year olds out there getting pregnant." bit. yeah...i can't imagine why...oh, maybe because your teaching your kids how to have sex at such a young age? what do you think would happen?

Or... kids who know nothing at all about sex, anatomy, masturbation, etc. are the easiest for adults to exploit. Sex ed or even condom distribution to kids is not associated with a decrease in abstinence.

There are even earlier pregnancies out there, with the youngest documented birth at 5.5 years and 8 years old as recently as 2004. I wrote 10 year olds because there was a recent case of it in Indiana.

Obesity has been studied as a possible cause of earlier puberty. Exposure to BPA plastic is also being examined. Puberty in 8 year olds is no longer uncommon.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Puberty in 8 year olds is no longer uncommon.

wtf? is the only suitable response i can give to your posts on this topic anymore.

cause it doesn't seem like you understand just how wrong and fucked up all of this is.

edit: Teaching Kids How To Masturbate is Bullsh!t

treos said:
wtf? is the only suitable response i can give to your posts on this topic anymore.

cause it doesn't seem like you understand just how wrong and fucked up all of this is.

At least we learned one thing today: you are angry.

Lance_Armstrong said:
At least we learned one thing today: you are angry.

and that you seem ok with what can be counted as child abuse and/or sexual grooming.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Obesity has been studied as a possible cause of earlier puberty. Exposure to BPA plastic is also being examined. Puberty in 8 year olds is no longer uncommon.

"Not uncommon" might be pushing it a bit. More common than ever, sure, but it still doesn't happen much.

When I was at school, the topic was brought up a few times in primary school but not actually taught until year 7. I'd say any younger than 11 is unnecessary.

treos said:
as for the "You have 10 year olds out there getting pregnant." bit. yeah...i can't imagine why...oh, maybe because your teaching your kids how to have sex at such a young age? what do you think would happen?

The kids aren't impregnating each other. It's almost certainly an adult raping/coercing/persuading the child and there's no guarantee the child is being taught anything, especially if it's rape (as in actual rape, not statutory rape).

BlueDingo said:
The kids aren't impregnating each other. It's almost certainly an adult raping/coercing/persuading the child and there's no guarantee the child is being taught anything, especially if it's rape (as in actual rape, not statutory rape).

uh...right >.> guess that slipped my mind earlier.

treos said:
edit: Teaching Kids How To Masturbate is Bullsh!t

Most kids already know how by then, so it is indeed useless. It's safe to assume a kid is going to realize "doing this feels awesome", even without having discovered sex. Pretty sure a kid will figure out basic reward-based conditioning. The problem is that they don't see the difference between "do this with a body part and feel awesome" and "use good manners and get a cookie". Turns out having a sex drive isn't a prerequisite for seeking physical pleasure, and nobody thought to teach when NOT to.

Ajit Pai's stupid smug fucking face. I have never wanted to punch someone this bad before. I want my furry porn, dammit! Don't ruin this for me, asshole!

JoeX said:
Ajit Pai's stupid smug fucking face. I have never wanted to punch someone this bad before. I want my furry porn, dammit! Don't ruin this for me, asshole!

What effect do you think the FCC will have on your porn sites?

Lance_Armstrong said:
What effect do you think the FCC will have on your porn sites?

They're trying to get rid of Net Neutrality. This gives ISPs the ability to block certain websites and slow down Internet connections. I'm worried that it will affect sites like e621.

JoeX said:
They're trying to get rid of Net Neutrality. This gives ISPs the ability to block certain websites and slow down Internet connections. I'm worried that it will affect sites like e621.

Oh I wouldn't worry too much I mean they would only do that so they could pump a little extra money out of sites they block so that their user base of said sites will have uninhibited access, but its not like ISP's would ever do that.

Okay yeah sarcasm done, really The end of Net Neutrality was the single worse idea ever, my hope is that after the blocking and throttling happens that every single person gets pissed off and starts writing emails for the reinstatement of NN and the subsequent firing Ajit Pai for being such an utter fool on this topic.

Lance_Armstrong said:
What effect do you think the FCC will have on your porn sites?

Getting rid of Net Neutrality is something those FCC jerk offs and other liberals have been aiming for a long time. Throttling connection speeds, forcing higher fees for unrestricted access, censoring things that ISPs don't like. The fact Comcast is behind it (which owns MSNBC, which is a liberal-leaning news outlet), AT&T, Verizon). What amazes me the most, is either people don't seem to care, or don't know how much it can impact the internet as we know it.

It's just as bad as that Trans-Pacific Policy or whatever they wanted to pass, also not good for the internet or the freedoms people have. Yeah, this is why I hate politics and why I think a majority of politicians are morons. I can't stand those big, faceless corporations, including the FCC. What good have they done for us? Nothing that I can think of.

Bastards. Yes, I'm upset at them, the direction our freedoms are going, the way this country is run, etc. Oh the things I want to vent about, but shouldn't, ad infinitum. Verizon, AT&T and Comcast can all suck it, there, censor that, FCC.

United_Gamers said:
Oh I wouldn't worry too much I mean they would only do that so they could pump a little extra money out of sites they block so that their user base of said sites will have uninhibited access, but its not like ISP's would ever do that.

Okay yeah sarcasm done, really The end of Net Neutrality was the single worse idea ever, my hope is that after the blocking and throttling happens that every single person gets pissed off and starts writing emails for the reinstatement of NN and the subsequent firing Ajit Pai for being such an utter fool on this topic.

Problem is, how do you write those emails?