Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

JAKXXX3 said:
Is there a tag for when a character is shown to be imaginary? In the example post below, the sheep is real, but the other characters are only present in the reflection, so they're just figments of the sheep's imagination.
post #1914724

Not that I know of, offhand, searching on "imagin*" on the "Tags" tab as a general tag. There is altered_reflection for the reflection showing something different, though.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
style_parody? Should probably have an style_emulation alias.

Along with style_parody, there's also on_model for "Depictions of copyrighted characters which are, regardless of subject matter, stylistically nigh indistinguishable from the original source material".

So basically, it seems that style_parody is a catchall for a parody of another artist's style (be it an official copyrighted property, or someone else's artistic style), while on_model is specifically for style-accurate depictions of copyrighted works. I don't know if both are worth keeping though (since there is considerable overlap between the two tags, it may be better to alias one to the other), but I guess that's irrelevant for the subject matter of this thread.

Updated by anonymous

Idk if someone already asked this but is there a tag for traditionally human characters drawn as furries? Sort of like a reverse version of the “humanized” tag. I tried “anthrofied” and all that got me was anthro versions of feral characters.

Updated by anonymous

CDTVproductions said:
Idk if someone already asked this but is there a tag for traditionally human characters drawn as furries? Sort of like a reverse version of the “humanized” tag. I tried “anthrofied” and all that got me was anthro versions of feral characters.

furrification? It's mentioned in the anthrofied wiki.

Updated by anonymous

What's the name for the bunny_costume body clothing item if it's not being used as part of a bunny costume?
Is it just considered a one-piece swimsuit then?

Updated by anonymous

donteven said:
What's the name for the bunny_costume body clothing item if it's not being used as part of a bunny costume?
Is it just considered a one-piece swimsuit then?

Wiki says it's a "tight swimsuit", but IDK personally.

Updated by anonymous

Do we have a tag for those thongs with tiger stripes or leopard spots in it?

Or in general, a tag for cheetah print fabric?

Updated by anonymous

I was wondering on why this forum thread hasn't been pinned yet?

Updated by anonymous

I also posted this as it's own topic ( Big/Small Tags (Redux) ) but I figured it fits here, too.

Taking about general Big and Small tags.

It's fairly difficult to find content including characters that are small/short, but not micro (roughly between 1ft and 3ft). It's also not particularly easy to find big/tall non-giant/macro characters (roughly between 7ft and 10ft). There are a number of reasons why it's such an undertaking to find search terms that will allow one to consistently find post that reflect what one might be trying to find in this circumstance. This addition to the tags seems to be the only way to solve this.

Here's how I would define and qualify the small male/female tag:

--
General: Small Male or Female
post #1854744 post #1899496 post #1844931 post #1623735 post #1803449

An anthro character who is smaller compared to average human size, typically less than 3ft tall, but no shorter than 1ft ( See micro ).

or

A feral character who's species is considered to be small, like lagomorphs and rodents, or a proportionally smaller sized version of larger species, like poodles in the case of canines.

Usually characters can be considered small based on comparing their size to the size of other characters or their surroundings, however a character can also be considered small in featureless backgrounds if the character is naturally considered small, and there are no indicators of changes in size or bodily proportion.
--

The Big Male or Female tag would be similarly defined and qualified, obviously being tailored to characters roughly between 7-10ft for anthros, and larger feral characters like large western dragons, or tibetian mastiffs in the case of canines.

I don't expect all or even most posts to necessitate size-related tags, and there are indeed circumstances where it is unreasonable to determine a character as big or small, however there are more than enough circumstances where it is sufficiently discernible to qualify the need for these tags.

Feel free to leave constructive criticism on my given definitions and qualifiers, as I'm sure they can be improved on.

I'd be more than willing to start tagging posts accordingly, once I'm given authorization to do so by whomever is qualified to permit it.

Big thanks to whomever reads this whole thing, and considers the proposition.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1927344 post #802846
Is there a tag for the ball shaped goo creatures? Feral, if it even applies, isn't good enough since it gets animalistic ferals like post #1960050.

Waddling head kind of fits, at least better than feral. Though maybe we want to keep that one limited to blobs with feet?

Adding a form tag for rotund things that lack all limbs might be useful in general. Could be used for creatures like voltorb, some gastlys, etc, in addition to goo blobs. But I have no name suggestions for such tag.

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag for a male character experiencing pain from being unable to ejaculate?

I looked up blue_balls and well... they're balls that are blue, lol.

I do not know if much art of this exists, I just really want to see some.

There is the tag orgasm_denial, but it seems to focus more on the desperation of the character than pain. When I look up orgasm_denial pain I get only a few results but those run a pretty big gamut of things that are painful not relating to testicular discomfort from arousal (electrocution, urethral sounding, CBT, etc).

There's only two that seem to fit the theme I'm looking for and I wonder if there's an easier way to find more.

Updated by anonymous

Do we have a tag for this kind of... "clothing"? Is it actually bondage? Seems more like a skimpy garter belt and... something?

post #1902732

Updated by anonymous

ikdind said:
Do we have a tag for this kind of... "clothing"? Is it actually bondage? Seems more like a skimpy garter belt and... something?

post #1902732

There's a little handful of results using bondage_harness, but I wonder if there's an official name for this.

Bondage harness is what I got when I looked this up on Google. It seems to be similar?

Updated by anonymous

wolftacos said:
There's a little handful of results using bondage_harness, but I wonder if there's an official name for this.

Bondage harness is what I got when I looked this up on Google. It seems to be similar?

That seems reasonable, I'll go with that and anyone can edit tags if they feel they have a better descriptor.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Waddling head kind of fits, at least better than feral. Though maybe we want to keep that one limited to blobs with feet?

Adding a form tag for rotund things that lack all limbs might be useful in general. Could be used for creatures like voltorb, some gastlys, etc, in addition to goo blobs. But I have no name suggestions for such tag.

rolling head maybe, a footless variant of waddling?

Updated by anonymous

Do we have a tag, besides begging, for dialogue where one character tells another to "slow down"? What about telling another character to "wait"? And dialogue where a character declares they are going to orgasm, what of that?

Updated by anonymous

minna679 said:
Do we have a tag, besides begging, for dialogue where one character tells another to "slow down"? What about telling another character to "wait"? And dialogue where a character declares they are going to orgasm, what of that?

Dialog isn't normally part of the tagging system (beyond mentioning that there is dialog/text, what language it is, and if someone wants it translated to english). Given non-english text and the potential for poor translations, tagging based on what it says can be problematic.

Updated by anonymous

Watsit said:
Dialog isn't normally part of the tagging system (beyond mentioning that there is dialog/text, what language it is, and if someone wants it translated to english). Given non-english text and the potential for poor translations, tagging based on what it says can be problematic.

Makes sense! Thanks.

Updated by anonymous

post #1423166 post #1978703 post #1982691

is there a generalized tag for when there is a secondary image inside a post that on its own would usually be tagged as its own character? pops up in thought_bubbles, pictographs, and in pictures/ on screens.

the closest I could find was cutaway but that doesn't seem to cover the extra person part of the concept. this sort of thing is annoying without a tag since you can have a pic tagged solo with bits in the post that don't belong to the focus character. by the tag descriptions, currently the left post would count as duo and the middle and right post would count as solo I believe.

the left post is currently tagged as solo; without the bubble, text, or "x" the middle post would count as duo since the penis would count as a character; and ... "imaginary_breasts" huh? no clue. do they belong to someone? are they a freshly conjured fap device without an owner? does that even matter for tagging purposes? who can say...(?)

Updated by anonymous

sneezer22 said:
post #1423166 post #1978703 post #1982691

is there a generalized tag for when there is a secondary image inside a post that on its own would usually be tagged as its own character? pops up in thought_bubbles, pictographs, and in pictures/ on screens.

There's picture_in_picture, for pictures within posts, but that's barely tagged.
With thought_bubble it seems to be mostly paired with fantasizing, which could probably apply with speech_bubble as well if it's a character verbalising a fantasy? It's not a precise match for what you're looking for, but it's heavily featured there.

I'd just call your middle example plain pictographics and leave it as solo though.

Updated by anonymous

MagnusEffect said:

There's picture_in_picture, for pictures within posts, but that's barely tagged.
With thought_bubble it seems to be mostly paired with fantasizing, which could probably apply with speech_bubble as well if it's a character verbalising a fantasy? It's not a precise match for what you're looking for, but it's heavily featured there.

thanks for the info :3

I'd just call your middle example plain pictographics and leave it as solo though.

totally, it's just that it's a penis pictographic which leads to an annoying(to me) situation where there's a post tagged as "solo female" that also, appropriately, has the penis tag. that's why i put it with the other two since they all create situations where an image has:

  • "an internal depiction that is not 'real' or physical in the image's reality but might pass as a character in another situation"

which creates an edge case for tagging the number of characters. might be worth making a tag close to picture_in_picture. a bit lengthy but maybe character_image_in_picture

Updated by anonymous

What's the tag for clothing that is naturally part of a character's body? Like with the pokemon Jynx or Gardevoir

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag for the way that water reflects water in this way? water_reflection seems to just be for objects being reflected like a mirror, not the "light show" that you get in dark/enclosed environments. If there isn't already a tag for this phenomenon, does anyone know if is has a proper name?
post #1996319 post #1920693

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1982420 post #1914536 post #2009277
These three images have different sorts of mouths, from one that opens sideways, a triangle of "lips", and an x or diamond of them. Are there any tags for these?

I believe you're looking for chelicerae, though the second example probably could be considered pedipalps considering how they look, and the first one looks more like stylized mandibles really.

Chelicerae are often seen in arachnids, and one of the more common ones seen in furry media often are the jackknife variety. However, the 3 segmented type is also not too uncommon, seen mostly on scorpions. One of the rarer ones is the scissor type

Updated by anonymous

ImpidiDinkaDoo said:
I believe you're looking for chelicerae, though the second example probably could be considered pedipalps considering how they look, and the first one looks more like stylized mandibles really.

Chelicerae are often seen in arachnids, and one of the more common ones seen in furry media often are the jackknife variety. However, the 3 segmented type is also not too uncommon, seen mostly on scorpions. One of the rarer ones is the scissor type

These appear to be applying to things that aren't jaws, such as the claws. And some of them don't even make sense then, such as post #1823326, that seems to be a jackknife but it's tagged as a 3-segment.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
These appear to be applying to things that aren't jaws, such as the claws. And some of them don't even make sense then, such as post #1823326, that seems to be a jackknife but it's tagged as a 3-segment.

Yeah that example seems to have been a mistag, would be better tagged as a jacknife.

Types for reference, for those reading

Updated by anonymous

ImpidiDinkaDoo said:
Yeah that example seems to have been a mistag, would be better tagged as a jacknife.

Types for reference, for those reading

Alright, I was worried I just misunderstood what was what. I would love a dedicated guide for our purposes on this to know how we should treat them best.

Updated by anonymous

A clarification. ambiguous_on_feral is supposed to refer to a human of ambiguous gender, as a counterpart to male_on_feral and female_on_feral, isn't it? Or am I just misinformed?

Sorrowless said:
I would appreciate a tag for muzzled french kissing. Here's the most recent post with this:

post #2014109

Wouldn't it be almost the same thing as french_kissing -human -humanoid? I think it would miss very few pics.

Edit: oops, wrong formatting.

Updated by anonymous

NobiteeHere said:
Is there a tag for when someone is being forced to penetrate someone else like this:

power_bottom

The term "Power Bottom" is related to BDSM and in particular the D/s aspect.

It indicates that a partner who is being penetrated (the "bottom", which is not to be confused with submission) is the one taking control of the situation. This is commonly expressed in gay sexual activities where the bottom partner physically being on top is showing dominance.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:

Is there a tag for the way that water reflects water in this way? water_reflection seems to just be for objects being reflected like a mirror, not the "light show" that you get in dark/enclosed environments. If there isn't already a tag for this phenomenon, does anyone know if is has a proper name?
post #1996319 post #1920693

I don't know of any such tag, but that definitely would be a good tag to have (if anyone can think of the term for it). I've seen that pattern in many other posts with water that aren't necessarily a water_reflection.

OneMoreAnonymous said:

A clarification. ambiguous_on_feral is supposed to refer to a human of ambiguous gender, as a counterpart to male_on_feral and female_on_feral, isn't it? Or am I just misinformed?

Wouldn't it be almost the same thing as french_kissing -human -humanoid? I think it would miss very few pics.

Unless I'm mistaken, ambiguous_on_feral most definitely works as an ambiguous_gender counterpart to the other <gender>_on_feral tags. It also shouldn't be exclusive to posts that only feature humans (that's what human_on_feral is for).

Quote from 'ambiguous_on_feral' wiki:

For use on pictures involving bestiality where an ambiguous_gender character (usually anthro, human or humanoid) is interacting sexually with a feral.

Do not use for feral_on_feral images.

So long as the ambiguous_gender part of ambiguous_on_feral holds true for the post being tagged, the only exclusion is feral_on_feral posts.

Updated by anonymous

I’ve seen some pics on this site that don’t really go full vore but have mouth play in it. This comic is a perfect example
post #1008542 post #1008543

If there isn’t a tag for this there should be. It’s kinda hard to find pics like this that don’t go full vore. Also what are your opinions mouth play.
Sorry for the odd question.

Updated by anonymous

Si_288 said:
I’ve seen some pics on this site that don’t really go full vore but have mouth play in it. This comic is a perfect example

If there isn’t a tag for this there should be. It’s kinda hard to find pics like this that don’t go full vore. Also what are your opinions mouth play.
Sorry for the odd question.

well there's body_in_mouth but the pic you posted doesn't even seem to go that far since its mostly just a hand. this feels more like something that might be called vore-ish. there's also inside_mouth, but that seems more like a tag that needs to be invalidated/aliased to body_in_mouth.

or maybe you just wanted the tag you already mentioned in your comment: mouth_play. that one seems to have a few body_in mouth pics that probably shouldn't be tagged but might be what you wanted. the problem is there isn't any inherant vore likelyhood/vibe in them, mostly just a mouth/tongue/oral massage/touching.

see also:

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
Is there a tag for the way that water reflects water in this way? water_reflection seems to just be for objects being reflected like a mirror, not the "light show" that you get in dark/enclosed environments. If there isn't already a tag for this phenomenon, does anyone know if is has a proper name?
post #1996319 post #1920693

caustics is the general phenomenon of light creating those kinds of light bands with water and other kinds of transparent surfaces, though it also applies to underwater environments, not just the above-water reflection variant.

Updated by anonymous

Been wondering about a tag for 'upside_down_penis' (alias:upsidedown_penis)
rare case with human-like dicks
but seems to be much more common with canine dicks

Updated by anonymous

dubstepboy420 said:
post #2026406
Is there a tag for a character gently slapping their partner's butt, without the intention to inflict pain upon them?

Would a combination of hand_on_butt and pat be enough? There's not much postings with pat, though, but it's been used, as well as misused already too.

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag for surprise at the size of a penis? I thought it was cock_shock but I couldn’t find anything.

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag for a character whose penis has its own tongue? i was certain there was one but now it yields no results.

Updated by anonymous

Any tags for thick_calves? Or similar ones

Updated by anonymous

i mean, yes, but none of those are as specific. can i just start tagging shit with 'thick_calves' or should i make a discussion thread first

Updated by anonymous

FurZ said:
i mean, yes, but none of those are as specific. can i just start tagging shit with 'thick_calves' or should i make a discussion thread first

technically yes, yes you can. thick_calves currently has 11 listed tags(though only 7 of them come up in a search, weird).

some best practices might be:
make a wiki, make a see also section in that wiki that links to related tags, add a link for the new tag's wiki to the see also's of those related tags, add the tag to a pertinent tag_group, and ask for appropriate aliases/implications for the tag if there are any.

forum #181201 is a good one if you want opinions for making a new tag, or just feel like announcing you've made or decided to use one.

what kind of posts were you planning on using the tag for? any examples?

Updated by anonymous

Tag(s) for hanging in the sense of holding onto, clinging...

Like in images post #1465684 post #1896102

Not like in images post #2016841 post #1995494

I think the current hanging should be hung, as the one doing the hanging is quite passive, when A character fully or partially suspended by their arms, legs, wrists, or ankles using some bondage method (ropes, chains, straps, etc)., as described in hanging_by_limb.

I find myself having discovered three different sets focusing carefully on the distinction of whether a character is being hung, suspended, or lifted, but none of a character being voluntarily suspending themselves... This should probably tell me something about myself.

Updated by anonymous

urielfrys said:

Tag(s) for hanging in the sense of holding onto, clinging...

Like in images post #1465684 post #1896102

Not like in images post #2016841 post #1995494

I think the current hanging should be hung, as the one doing the hanging is quite passive, when A character fully or partially suspended by their arms, legs, wrists, or ankles using some bondage method (ropes, chains, straps, etc)., as described in hanging_by_limb.

I find myself having discovered three different sets focusing carefully on the distinction of whether a character is being hung, suspended, or lifted, but none of a character being voluntarily suspending themselves... This should probably tell me something about myself.

hanging seems mostly reasonable, if you talk about a picture or chandelier you say it's hanging even though it's passive. hung imo would be more for talking about a recent occurrence, "what did you do with the painting?; I hung it on the wall." semantics I guess

suggestions for a tag name for the pics:hanging_from_another, or clinging_to_another

Updated by anonymous

sneezer22 said:
hanging seems mostly reasonable, if you talk about a picture or chandelier you say it's hanging even though it's passive. hung imo would be more for talking about a recent occurrence, "what did you do with the painting?; I hung it on the wall." semantics I guess

suggestions for a tag name for the pics:hanging_from_another, or clinging_to_another

"What does that character do? The character is hung by it's tail/hand/etc."
"What does that character do? The character is hanging it's tail/hand/etc."

The first one is passive action by the character. The latter one is active.

But I think "clinging" works as an active hanging verb in many cases too. It is, indeed, less time sensitive, although, it does bring some sense of despair into the activity.

Updated by anonymous

On the category tag_group:touching there is a general rule, that holding_ means one touching one own self, and hand_on_ means touching self or another, but there are some inconsistencies, like "hand_on_hip", which makes sense liguistically, but is confusing easily, when using tags. (One needs to go check the wiki page more often to confirm if one remembers the policy right or not.)

Updated by anonymous