Topic: Tag Projects

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Braeburned

Member

I know sleep_sex is the tag for when at least one character is asleep during sex. Is there a tag for when both characters that are having sex are asleep? Might be too specific to warrant its own tag, but I thought i'd ask.

Strikerman

Janitor

braeburned said:
I know sleep_sex is the tag for when at least one character is asleep during sex. Is there a tag for when both characters that are having sex are asleep? Might be too specific to warrant its own tag, but I thought i'd ask.

I could only find a couple other examples of this (post #2422353, post #2197216) but they all seem to be under the sleep sex tag only. A mutual sleep sex tag (or something like that) couldn't hurt IMO.

AlexYorim

Member

Not sure if I could refer from this thread, but can cyan be de-aliased from blue? Cyan and teal are different colors from blue and green. Cyan is a subtractive primary color used in printers, it has its own wavelengthm, and it's way too green to be blue, that it would look muddy when mixed with red. In fact, red is the opposite color of cyan.

Here's a video on why cyan is different from blue.

darryus

Member

alexyorim said:
Not sure if I could refer from this thread, but can cyan be de-aliased from blue? Cyan and teal are different colors from blue and green. Cyan is a subtractive primary color used in printers, it has its own wavelengthm, and it's way too green to be blue, that it would look muddy when mixed with red. In fact, red is the opposite color of cyan.

Here's a video on why cyan is different from blue.

+1
I'd be up to be part of the team to go through posts with blue_* tags and find ones to re-categorize as cyan_*

zebrafluffer

Member

Many taggers automatically add "Scales" tag to anything that is "Scalie."
I want to clean this up, but it's freaking daunting. Heck, the fact that there are six pages of https://e621.net/posts?tags=scales+amphibian++ indicates that people don't understand the Tag What You See principle.
I'll sort through the 57k images as much as I can since I'm still in quarantine, but that's not enough.
Could we edit the Scalie and Scales wiki to reflect that the first does not automatically mean the second?

Also, I'd like some recommendations for making this mission more achievable. I'm thinking to create a canned reply that I can copy/paste whenever I correct a tag like "Thank you for the submission. Please remember the Tag What You See rule and only tag Scalies with Scales if they are visible."

tittybitty

Privileged

zebrafluffer said:
Many taggers automatically add "Scales" tag to anything that is "Scalie."
I want to clean this up, but it's freaking daunting. Heck, the fact that there are six pages of https://e621.net/posts?tags=scales+amphibian++ indicates that people don't understand the Tag What You See principle.
I'll sort through the 57k images as much as I can since I'm still in quarantine, but that's not enough.
Could we edit the Scalie and Scales wiki to reflect that the first does not automatically mean the second?

Also, I'd like some recommendations for making this mission more achievable. I'm thinking to create a canned reply that I can copy/paste whenever I correct a tag like "Thank you for the submission. Please remember the Tag What You See rule and only tag Scalies with Scales if they are visible."

You likely know about this already, but the tagme tool is a huge help for things like this.

tyciol

Blocked

didn't there used to be stuff like female_feral and male_feral and so on?

these got merged into male / female

but this is a loss for when you search art containing more than 1 char and you want certain combinations.

For example if you search human_on_feral you can't specify the desired sex of the human or the feral now...

bitWolfy

Former Staff

tyciol said:
didn't there used to be stuff like female_feral and male_feral and so on?

these got merged into male / female

but this is a loss for when you search art containing more than 1 char and you want certain combinations.

For example if you search human_on_feral you can't specify the desired sex of the human or the feral now...

female_on_feral and male_on_feral

Braeburned

Member

Is there a name for this sex pose? I tend to find it under standing_sex and stand_and_carry_position , but it seems unique enough to warrant its own name. bridal_carry exists, but it appears to be used almost exclusively for non-penetrative pictures, so either it needs to be used on pictures with penetration more often, or we could use some sort of "bridal_carry_position" tag to specify when its a sex pose rather than just someone being carried

post #2306709 post #2348863 post #2455618 post #2487793

MagnusEffect

Member

braeburned said:
or we could use some sort of "bridal_carry_position" tag to specify when its a sex pose rather than just someone being carried

Sounds good to me. A lot of distinct sex positions just aren't tagged because nobody's bothered starting yet. bridal_carry_position sounds like a name that would satisfy people enough to stick.

OneMoreAnonymous

Member

I just noticed female_(lore) being used on crossgender images, and this is wrong, isn't it? That is what tags like ftm_crossgender are for, unless I'm mistaken. The lore tag is supposedly to apply to canonically female characters which on that particular picture don't qualify as female via TWYS.

Am I misapprehending things?

Watsit

Privileged

onemoreanonymous said:
I just noticed female_(lore) being used on crossgender images, and this is wrong, isn't it? That is what tags like ftm_crossgender are for, unless I'm mistaken. The lore tag is supposedly to apply to canonically female characters which on that particular picture don't qualify as female via TWYS.

Am I misapprehending things?

If you are, then I am to. A crossgender picture of Krystal as a male shouldn't get female_(lore), for example, it should only get that if they're intended to be female in the picture but TWYS dictates they get tagged as something not female. Consequently, a picture of Krystal tagged ambiguous_gender but is intended to be ftm_crossgender should get tagged male_(lore), not female_(lore).

Braeburned

Member

Currently, incubus and Succubi get replaced by demon , which I think is incorrect.
Demons are a very general term for evil spirits/devils. Incubi/Succubi is almost like a species of demon, who are a lot more historically/inherently sexual in nature. Incubui/Succubi are also gendered, while demon is not. If you currently search e621 for a incubi (male sex demon), you get all results for "demon", which is mostly succubi (female sex demon), hell hounds and imps.
Incubus and Succubi should imply demon, but not replace it. All incubi/succubi are demons, but not all demons are incubi/succubi

tittybitty

Privileged

braeburned said:
Currently, incubus and Succubi get replaced by demon , which I think is incorrect.
Demons are a very general term for evil spirits/devils. Incubi/Succubi is almost like a species of demon, who are a lot more historically/inherently sexual in nature. Incubui/Succubi are also gendered, while demon is not. If you currently search e621 for a incubi (male sex demon), you get all results for "demon", which is mostly succubi (female sex demon), hell hounds and imps.
Incubus and Succubi should imply demon, but not replace it. All incubi/succubi are demons, but not all demons are incubi/succubi

I don't think there's any consistent idea of what a incubi/succubi looks like as compared to other "demons". If we can't visually distinguish them it doesn't work as a separate tag.

Braeburned

Member

tittybitty said:
I don't think there's any consistent idea of what a incubi/succubi looks like as compared to other "demons". If we can't visually distinguish them it doesn't work as a separate tag.

Does it not work to consider them as a "species" of demon? Alpaca/Llama, Mouse/Rat, Ferret/Stoat etc, are often visually indistinguishable but get separate tags.

tittybitty

Privileged

braeburned said:
Does it not work to consider them as a "species" of demon? Alpaca/Llama, Mouse/Rat, Ferret/Stoat etc, are often visually indistinguishable but get separate tags.

Unlike mouse/rat vs rodent, which have real visual differences which can be seen and tagged. Incubi/succubi don't have any commonly understood physical characteristics that differentiate them from demons. Basically they are demons who seduce or tempt morals. Does that mean all sexy demons are incubi/succubi? If you were to go through all the posts tagged demon how would you decide which are incubi/succubi and which aren't? How would you write the wiki page that would allow others to consistently differentiate between them?

Sins and Virtues

Member

Is there a tag that describes naturally small characters with big genitals? Someone told me that there are certain boorus use the "small but hung" tag for this purpose.

Not sure if this is the right thread to ask this so apologies in advance.

Edit: Decided to go ahead and make the tag myself, which you can find here: small_but_hung

Updated

Watsit

Privileged

Many posts erroneously have both vore imminent_vore, due to a past implication that was (somewhat) recently deimplicated. Except in cases of sequences or more than two characters (which may or may not change anything), only one can apply... a character is either currently being vored (vore), or is about to be vored (imminent_vore). A good tagging project may be going through those posts and either removing imminent_vore or vore (noting that vore may be getting implicated by oral_vore or soft_vore or the like).

tsukemono

Former Staff

I've learned that many pokemon posts lack defining species, relying on their pokemon species for description.

Is it a good idea to implicate a pokemon to it's base species, like arcanine -> canid, meowth -> felid, etc?

As it is, those who search or blacklist by animal family (canid, felid, equid, etc) are missing hundreds or thousands of posts.

Siral Exan explained that there are circumstances where a pokemon is represented, but not actually present in the post (such as a pikachu mask, or eevee costume). In which case the implication would mis-tag those posts.
However, after looking into it this is relatively rare (<1%).

With that said; is it better to implicate pokemon with their species to add clarifying tags to posts lacking which will add an erroneous tag to the minority, or should they not be implicated - leaving thousands of posts without critical species tags.

I'm for the former, clarifying thousands (Tens of thousands? There are a lot of pokemon) of posts is worth compromising a relative few - which can be fixed easy. Fixed in that, a post with a 'pikachu mask' can be changed to just 'mask'.

Watsit

Privileged

tsukemono said:
Siral Exan explained that there are circumstances where a pokemon is represented, but not actually present in the post (such as a pikachu mask, or eevee costume). In which case the implication would mis-tag those posts.
However, after looking into it this is relatively rare (<1%).

Not to mention, it'd apply to other animals too; if an arcanine mask causes the post to be tagged with arcanine, a wolf mask should cause the post to be tagged with wolf, and the latter implicates canid because of it. If arcanine shouldn't imply canid because the arcanine mask shouldn't be tagged canid, then wolf shouldn't imply (canis->canine->)canid because the wolf mask shouldn't be tagged (canis/canine/)canid.

There are other arguments given for why implications shouldn't be made, though I don't personally agree with them (with the same general logic that swapping out the pokemon species for a real-life species in the same situation still brings in those same implications anyway). I'm clearly not in the majority with that opinion, though. See also topic #20896 topic #23438 and topic #26783.

But anyway, yeah, it is a problem that many posts are missing proper species tags because they just get tagged with the pokemon species. zoroark -canid and braixen -canid results in over 2 thousand posts each (I get 31 pages of results for each of those searches, at 75 posts per page, that's over 75 x 30 = 2,250), and even if you agree with not implicating species and some of these cases shouldn't get the species tag, the majority almost certainly should, so it's still a massive number of missing base species tags. And that's only two pokemon (two of the more popular ones, but still; there's more that are popular, like lucario, zeraora, delphox, the lycanrocs...).

Updated

tsukemono

Former Staff

See also topic #20896 topic #23438 and topic #26783.

Damn this is an old topic, and it seems the powers that be have decided pokemon are exempt from species implication. Though I don't believe that is the best choice.

I think abscondler asked an important question in topic #23483:

does this improve the search experience for users more than it hinders it

They say no, but I disagree. A good search experience is one where you are shown what you ask for. If I search for felid, I want to see everything that looks like it belongs in the cat family. Including cat-like pokemon. There is a recurring theme: What if a pokemon in drawn in such a way it does not resemble it's original species? I believe it should not be tagged as that pokemon. Similar to: what if a lion is drawn in such a way it does not resemble a felid? I agree with the implication in place, it is not a felid.

Take a look at these 25 cat-looking speicies. ~meowth ~persian ~alolan_meowth ~alolan_persian ~galarian_meowth ~skitty ~delcatty ~glameow ~purugly ~purrloin ~liepard ~shinx ~luxio ~luxray ~litleo ~pyroar ~espurr ~meowstic ~litten ~torracat ~incineroar ~solgaleo ~dusk_mane_necrozma ~zeraora ~perrserker that is about 13800 posts, where 8500 do not have a felid tag.

This is not a good search experience for felid, I'm missing out on thousands of cats! Posts that contain one of those 25 cat pokemon that are changed to no longer resemble that pokemon should not be tagged with that pokemon. A horse with pokemon colorations is not that pokemon. A horse with a pokemon mask or costume is not that pokemon.

Looking into 24 dog-like pokemon, ~Rockruff ~Lycanroc ~Growlithe ~Houndoom ~Houndour ~Mightyena ~Yamper ~Poochyena ~Suicune ~Umbreon ~Eevee ~Ninetales ~Entei ~Jolteon ~Manectric ~Vulpix ~Furfrou ~Flareon ~Glaceon ~Electrike ~Raikou ~Luxray ~Fennekin ~Luxio of those 39100 posts, 21800 do not have a canid tag.

The 9 horse-like pokemon ~Ponyta ~Rapidash ~Galarian_Ponyta ~Galarian_Rapidash ~Blitzle ~Zebstrika ~Keldeo ~Mudbray ~Mudsdale 600 of the 2300 posts lack equid.

Of the 92 bug-like pokemon, only 127 of the 7700 are tagged as bug.

I'm using cat-like and dog-like because canonically they might not be a cat or dog, but with TWYS that shouldn't matter.

I read that separation of real and fictional animals is a reason to not implicate these examples. Simply blacklisting pokemon will accomplish this. Side note, Mythological animals have real species implications, so they can not be separated from real animals - another implication of [any mythical creature] -> mythical_creature can fix this.

So, for copywrite. A character wearing a pikachu mask should not be tagged with pikachu, simply mask and pokemon are sufficient. The same goes a pokemon themed anything, sans actual hybrids; a lion with a pikachu motif should not be tagged pikachu.

It may not be perfect to separate a pokemon as characters and pokemon as speicies, but without it tens of thousands of under-tagged posts are under-represented. The fringe cases similar to "that horse that looks like a pikachu is not a rodent" are incredible rare - and besides, I agree! A horse that looks like a pikachu (that isn't a hybrid) should not have a rodent tag, and consequently: should not have a pikachu tag. Situations like this are the proportional minority by a long shot, but they are given the priority. For improving search experience I think the majority should be prioritized. Remember that this is a vast majority.

In topic #23438, abscondler has a good list of examples, I don't agree with them exactly but it a good point for illustration, so I also made a list of how I think it should be. "->" is an implication in these examples.

A regular lion
lion -> felid

A lion with pikachu coloration
lion -> felid

A lion with a pikachu cosutme
lion -> felid, costume, pokemon

A lion drawn as a pikachu (not a hybrid)
pikachu -> rodent

A pikachu with a lion coloration
pikachu -> rodent

A pikachu with a lion costume
pikachu -> rodent, costume

A pikachu drawn as a lion
lion, pokemon

A pikachu-lion hybrid
lion -> felid, pikachu -> rodent, hybrid

A pikachu removed of all its rodent qualities
(tags that represent its new qualities) it is no longer a pikachu

A lion removed of all its lion qualities
(tags that represent its new qualities) it is no longer a lion

A Pikachu named John drawn as a lion (not a hybrid)
lion -> felid, john_(character)

Mufasa (a lion character) drawn as a pikachu (not a hybrid)
pikachu -> rodent, mufasa

So tl/dr;
Implicating pokemon with the real species they are (or appear to be) improves the tags of tens of thousands of posts. It will compromise posts that are improperly tagged, but these are relatively few and can be fixed.

Watsit

Privileged

tsukemono said:
What if a pokemon in drawn in such a way it does not resemble it's original species? I believe it should not be tagged as that pokemon.

Either that, or is should be tagged as the pokemon and what it now resembles, along with hybrid, depending on whether there's anything resembling the pokemon still discernible. A cat/fox hybrid should be tagged cat+fox+hybrid, even if the only fox-like attribute may be a bushy tail (which is fox-like, but not unique to foxes) or a color pattern that's reminiscent of a fox.

tsukemono said:
Looking into 24 dog-like pokemon, ~Rockruff ~Lycanroc ~Growlithe ~Houndoom ~Houndour ~Mightyena ~Yamper ~Poochyena ~Suicune ~Umbreon ~Eevee ~Ninetales ~Entei ~Jolteon ~Manectric ~Vulpix ~Furfrou ~Flareon ~Glaceon ~Electrike ~Raikou ~Luxray ~Fennekin ~Luxio of those 39100 posts, 21800 do not have a canid tag.

To be fair, some of those aren't dog-like. Suicune, Entie, and Raikou, for example, could be argued to more resemble cats (it's a long-standing idea that the american localization screwed up with calling them the legendary dogs, as they're supposed to be large cats), and eevee and the eeveelutions are largely a mishmash of various mammals. But still, it's one thing to argue a specific pokemon does or doesn't fit a given base species, and another to say no pokemon should ever implicate any base species.

tsukemono said:
It may not be perfect to separate a pokemon as characters and pokemon as speicies, but without it tens of thousands of under-tagged posts are under-represented.

Pokemon species tags are distinct from characters anyway. If a grovyle is tagged grovyle, there's no way to know which grovyle character named Grovyle that's referring to. If there's a grovyle who is known enough to be tagged as a specific character, it can be given a unique name (e.g. the grovyle in Explorers is simply called Grovyle in the games, but here he gets the character tag grovyle_the_thief to identify him specifically, and that can follow him regardless of whether he's depicted as a treecko or something else).

tsukemono

Former Staff

watsit said:
Pokemon species tags are distinct from characters anyway. If a grovyle is tagged grovyle, there's no way to know which grovyle character named Grovyle that's referring to.

I agree, unique pokemon - with or without a name - can be specified. See meowth from team rocket, in which case the species would not be implied for him specifically, just how any other character does not imply species. Adding to my previous examples:

A regular Meowth
meowth -> felid

Meowth from Team Rocket depicted as a Meowth
meowth_(team_rocket), meowth -> felid

Meowth from Team Rocket depicted as a pikachu
meowth_(team_rocket), pikachu -> rodent

Watsit

Privileged

leotheairwolf said:
Another tag project I've started working on is adding the sensory_deprivation tag to pictures with characters wearing blindfolds. Just throwing it out there since it's a pretty big one.

That sounds like a rather loose interpretation. Wouldn't that also mean anyone with their eyes closed is also experiencing sensory deprivation? I'd say it should be more for when a character is deprived of more than one of their senses by another character or some other external force, for an extended period. Being locked in a dark, silent room would be sensory deprivation. Merely having your eyes covered shouldn't count, IMO, especially if it can be easily removed.

Leotheairwolf

Member

watsit said:
That sounds like a rather loose interpretation. Wouldn't that also mean anyone with their eyes closed is also experiencing sensory deprivation? I'd say it should be more for when a character is deprived of more than one of their senses by another character or some other external force, for an extended period. Being locked in a dark, silent room would be sensory deprivation. Merely having your eyes covered shouldn't count, IMO, especially if it can be easily removed.

Just because you can easily take off a blind fold doesn't mean it isn't still depriving you of your sight.

Watsit

Privileged

leotheairwolf said:
Just because you can easily take off a blind fold doesn't mean it isn't still depriving you of your sight.

Then anyone with their eyes closed, or covering their mouth, nose, ears, etc, are being deprived of a sense, and should get the tag.

Leotheairwolf

Member

watsit said:
Then anyone with their eyes closed, or covering their mouth, nose, ears, etc, are being deprived of a sense, and should get the tag.

You don't get the difference between wearing something that deprives you of your sense and just closing your eyes do you?

Also, what sense would covering your mouth be blocking anyway? Speech isn't a sense, and nothing is stopping me from tasting what's covering my mouth.

Watsit

Privileged

leotheairwolf said:
You don't get the difference between wearing something that deprives you of your sense and just closing your eyes do you?

What do you think eyelids are? Fleshy eye coverings that block sight when they're down, and allow when they're up. When there's nothing preventing the eye-covering from being removed, be it eyelids or a blindfold, you're not being deprived of your senses because they're not being taken or kept from you, you're (temporarily) forfeiting their use.

leotheairwolf said:
Also, what sense would covering your mouth be blocking anyway? Speech isn't a sense, and nothing is stopping me from tasting what's covering my mouth.

That's not what sensory deprivation is. Think of sensory deprivation tanks or rooms. They don't prevent you from seeing or hearing at all, but they isolate you from the surrounding environment. You can see the room, and you can hear yourself and the noise you make, but it blocks everything from the outside. A mouth covering doesn't stop you from tasting the covering, just as a blindfold doesn't necessarily prevent you from seeing the blindfold, but it prevents you from using your senses on external things.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

leotheairwolf said:
Another tag project I've started working on is adding the sensory_deprivation tag to pictures with characters wearing blindfolds. Just throwing it out there since it's a pretty big one.

I disagree with your interpretation of sensory_deprivation as well.
For example, this isn't sensory deprivation, despite being tagged as such:

post #2674585

Technically, the character is being deprived of a sense... but that's not what the tag stands for. Sensory deprivation should always include a degree of helplessness and isolation.
By your definition, a character wearing ear plugs would also qualify for this tag.

post #898135

Which is rather ridiculous.

tittybitty

Privileged

leotheairwolf said:
Another tag project I've started working on is adding the sensory_deprivation tag to pictures with characters wearing blindfolds. Just throwing it out there since it's a pretty big one.

I also disagree with your interpretation of the tag. Also who wrote that wiki? "Images that are tagged with blindfold or ear_plugs should also have the sensory_deprivation tag."?? If that's true it should be done with a tag implication not just thrown in the wiki like that.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

tittybitty said:
Also who wrote that wiki?

This guy. Someone with a grand total of twenty one (21) post changes, 1 wiki edit, and 1 comment. No forum interactions.
Not someone who I would trust to define what tags mean.

I'll go throw together a quick wiki page based on the wikipedia entry for the term.

Leotheairwolf

Member

tittybitty said:
I also disagree with your interpretation of the tag. Also who wrote that wiki? "Images that are tagged with blindfold or ear_plugs should also have the sensory_deprivation tag."?? If that's true it should be done with a tag implication not just thrown in the wiki like that.

The reason blindfold and earplugs don't imply sensory deprivation is because you can still have a blindfold or ear plugs in an image without them being worn.
Since blindfolded is aliased to blindfold, there isn't really a good way to search for images for blindfolded characters.

ohmanwhatsthis

Member

There are a ton of character tags for Yu-Gi-Oh cards but none of them imply the species tag duel_monster, which makes me wonder why the tag exists since so few posts it applies to have actually been tagged with it

knotfish

Member

I have noticed that there are 26 pages of images tagged "pinup" but have rating:safe, conflicting with the wiki definition that pinup should be at least rating:questionable.

Another thing is that there are over 102 pages of images tagged as "athletic" but with no gender specific tag i.e, "solo athletic -athletic_male -athletic_female -athletic_intersex -athletic_ambiguous".

Gotta get Garry

Member

Should there be a harder crackdown on intraspecies? Like I'm aware that the mods and vigilant users are doin enough already, but hardly anyone uses it (1.5k out of god knows how many more) and my specific problem lies with pokemon/digimon etc. Intraspecies seems to only apply when interspecies is nonstated, like, can I just get what I search for? (Yes I'm selfish what else) I get that you all are busy people, but I just thought to bring this up. Perhaps somthing to tackle when the mountain of other requests are filled.

Leotheairwolf

Member

underminor said:
Should there be a harder crackdown on intraspecies? Like I'm aware that the mods and vigilant users are doin enough already, but hardly anyone uses it (1.5k out of god knows how many more) and my specific problem lies with pokemon/digimon etc. Intraspecies seems to only apply when interspecies is nonstated, like, can I just get what I search for? (Yes I'm selfish what else) I get that you all are busy people, but I just thought to bring this up. Perhaps somthing to tackle when the mountain of other requests are filled.

Didn't know that was a thing. I'll keep that tag in mind from now on.

Gotta get Garry

Member

Do you think that the small_penis tag should be updated to include proportional sizes? Such as a large dragon with a human sized penis (7-6 in or something) would be considered small to another dragon. Or vice versa when a micro character engaging a macro character. I don't know, 9 to 11 seems average in furry terms so I might just be nitpicking the smaller sizes.

StrongBrush1

Member

So...

I recently added a tag called "multiple_pregnancies", to denote when multiple characters in a scene are visibly pregnant. I know we already have a both_pregnant tag, but that only works for specific instances when two characters are pregnant. I could use some help rounding up all the images on this site to which this tag applies, but...

As of now, the only way I can think of to do this is searching "pregnant -solo" and combing through the results. And there's like 40 friggin pages of that, even with the max 250 posts per page.

Tortured Torchic

Member

Should there be a tag like Paywall_Tease for posts that censor an image or animation with the intent of enticing people to go support them?

user 404793

Blocked

I'm new to this, but with known character parings like nick/judy or legoshi/haru would it be possible for a mod to mass tag them with larger_male smaller_female (-cross_gender, -cross_species)since most pictures of them don't have these tags and show up despite black lists.

DubsTheFox

Janitor

felvoex said:
...would it be possible for a mod to mass tag them...

I guess they could. But I don't think that's a good idea. Sometimes they are drawn the same size or Nick smol and Judy big, for example. But we could do this with bitWolfy's tag project assistant TagMe!

unknown clone

Member

felvoex said:
I'm new to this, but with known character parings like nick/judy or legoshi/haru would it be possible for a mod to mass tag them with larger_male smaller_female (-cross_gender, -cross_species)since most pictures of them don't have these tags and show up despite black lists.

I'm having trouble logging back into tagme at the moment, but I'll make a project for it once I figure this out.

If anyone has any other couples in mind for this, let me know and I can add them.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

unknown_clone said:
I'm having trouble logging back into tagme at the moment, but I'll make a project for it once I figure this out.

TagMe is effectively broken at the moment, alongside any other utilities that are using E621's API to fetch data.
Sorry about that. It should be back within a day or so.

Watsit

Privileged

rando_rock said:
Should the countershading tags classified in the meta category instead of general?

Unless I'm missing something, countershading means the underside of the character is a lighter shade than the rest of their body. It's a visible thing you can see, so General should be fine.

user 404793

Blocked

unknown_clone said:
I'm having trouble logging back into tagme at the moment, but I'll make a project for it once I figure this out.

If anyone has any other couples in mind for this, let me know and I can add them.

Oh thank you very much

dubsthefox said:
I guess they could. But I don't think that's a good idea. Sometimes they are drawn the same size or Nick smol and Judy big, for example. But we could do this with bitWolfy's tag project assistant TagMe!

ill learn more on that

irbyz

Member

balls_outline and penis_outline have a few dozen (locked) Questionable rated submissions.

Would update if I could but probably easier to add to the list here as "ongoing" for those with better update access rather than fire off a stack of reports. :)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6