News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

jeff and sam created by pronista
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted (1)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • Kattlarv said:
    Gotta say, despite more or less only doing the same thing, (or well, to what I noticed uploaded here) over and over, they are improving, and getting better at it. They have a really neat style and good aesthetics. One trick ponies do work sometimes :3

    Not 100 on the characters, but that said, they seem to be from some somewhere, so I can't judge anything personality wise in that regard.

    I swear to god if I ever meet you in real life I'm stealing your keyboard.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 35
  • PopNotes said:
    I swear to god if I ever meet you in real life I'm stealing your keyboard.

    we'll be two robbers >:3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Donro said:
    It took ages to draw all those frames for him then he cuts me off, thats the thanks some artists get

    Plz.
    I was there for the very beginning AND making of this.
    You have literally nothing to do with this anim.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Genjar

    Former Staff
    2011 annoyed antennae_(anatomy) arthropod biped black_markings blessed_image blue_eyes bottomwear clothed clothing crossed_arms daww digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) digital_watercolor_(artwork) duo feral front_view green_body hawk_moth human insect insect_wings lepidopteran lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari painting_(artwork) pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background simulated_traditional_(artwork) solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view topwear watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

    pokepony said:
    female but we can't tag female because no vagina is shown

    Doesn't always require visible genitals, just a certain level of unambiguousness. In this particular one, I'd say that the eyelashes make her seem feminine enough to tag as female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Char

    Former Staff
    alpha_channel ambiguous_gender charmander chibi fire flaming_tail full-length_portrait generation_1_pokemon glasspanda humor looking_at_viewer low_res nintendo orange_body orange_skin pokemon pokemon_(species) portrait reptile scalie simple_background solo tail third-party_edit transparent_background unknown_artist what

    pokepony said:
    female but we can't tag female because no vagina is shown

    You don't have to see genitals in order to say whether someone looks male or female. At least I HOPE you don't have to, otherwise you must lead a very interesting and confusing life. :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • PopNotes said:I swear to god if I ever meet you in real life I'm stealing your keyboard.

    Hum... really ought a stop giving feedback late at night, looking at it now has it come off as a lot less complimentary than I first imagined... was meant as a "they know how to do it, unlike some others" more or less... and I forgot, is the "unlike some others" part still allowed? I forget if you're allowed to say someone is better than average...

    Char said:You don't have to see genitals in order to say whether someone looks male or female. At least I HOPE you don't have to, otherwise you must lead a very interesting and confusing life. :P

    While true, there has been pictures of them as a male, and lke said, as nothing is showing, they are kind of a "unknown". Especially with furries, considering all herms, cross-dressers and apples. But that aside, the artist got the final say in it. Though, still doesn't stop people from tagging with the ambi-gender, or imagining them as whatever.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Donro said:
    It took ages to draw all those frames for him then he cuts me off, thats the thanks some artists get

    Donro said:
    Bullshit I drew every frame

    I'm sure you have proof for that claim, right?

    Otherwise your artist-tag stays off of this image.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    I'm sure you have proof for that claim, right?

    Otherwise your artist-tag stays off of this image.

    Donro is talking about a completely different animation that isn't even remotely posed like this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Donro said:
    http://gyazo.com/9fae8a8627e3ef24749c4c4e5005421d

    Very nice. This is a legitimate chat log. And we did talk about working on a different animation together. You were going to sketch, and I was going to do everything else, like the outlining, colouring, inbetweening, animation. Here are the sketches you did for me.
    http://goput.it/38zy.png
    http://goput.it/4pm7.png

    Unfortunately you turned on me before we took that any further.

    There isn't a date in your screenshot. So here is a screenshot from my Skype client.

    http://goput.it/97jf.png
    >13 November 2013

    The animation you're claiming to have drawn was already underway three weeks before that chat, and I even posted a sample of it with all the major pieces already done, two weeks before that chat.

    http://www.furaffinity.net/view/11932327/
    >Posted: October 28th, 2013 10:50 PM

    I would appreciate it if you stopped bothering me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 21
  • Donro said:
    http://gyazo.com/9fae8a8627e3ef24749c4c4e5005421d

    Proves that there was a BJ animation planned, not necessarily this one, further, the sketches linked by pronista are clearly your style and have nothing to do with this one.

    Roy_McCloud said:
    Donro is talking about a completely different animation that isn't even remotely posed like this.

    And here is the problem, this animation is fully independent from the sketches, thus absolutely no artist credit for donro on this one.

    Any questions?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.