You can stop this ridiculous argument now.
Anyone who continues will receive a record.

We currently have 63 posts with this character in sexual situations on the site right now.
We don't need flame wars starting up every time a new post is added to that number.
If you don't like it, do what Yetanothertemp said and blacklist ara_(fluff-kevlar) rating:e.

coomr said:
What the fuck is wrong with you, this is the third time you have done this despite the owner of the character telling you not to

Any links to what you said?

coomr said:
What the fuck is wrong with you, this is the third time you have done this despite the owner of the character telling you not to

Correct me if I am wrong but Fluff didn't tell them to not do it? He said he wasn't a fan but also wasn't going to try and stop people from doing art of her?
Maybe I am missing something here.

Besides , he admitted there wasn't much he could do to stop people and he wasn't going to try.
You aren't changing much by leaving a comment like this as well.

Great art , either way. Just enjoy it or move on , if you don't want to.

This is why I'm applying for data entry positions

I wouldn't say 'permission' is the best word. My exact words were, after being shown it, "not a fan of hardcore with her, but i dont reall go out of my way to stop anyone." I know lewd art of her will be drawn, but just because I'm personally not a fan, I don't draw it or request it, or approve of it. But I also can't physically stop people from doing it, it just doesn't do anything for me, and I wouldn't be promoting/RT it. If you ever wanted to post one, I won't stop you. There are ways to make said images less bothersome to me, but I just don't encourage or get much out of it.

I'm only human after all, and like many of you I have sometimes hard-to-define, nuanced emotional positions towards things. I think that's why in the past I often just said hard "no" cause it was easier to type, lol.

In case anyone was wondering what Fluff actually said. Always better to go to check instead of putting words in another person's mouth.

coomr said:
What the fuck is wrong with you, this is the third time you have done this despite the owner of the character telling you not to

calm down son it's just a drawing

coomr said:
What the fuck is wrong with you, this is the third time you have done this despite the owner of the character telling you not to

False, a good false
FK actually answered on the others, the tl;dr of it is that they don't necesarily approve but trying to stop it is pointless.

I love work with Vst, he’s one of my favourite characters right now, hope to see more work of him, either from fluff or you

Ara is always so sexy~

coomr said:

bored_hunter9 said:
Any links to what you said?

Or simply the revenge porn tag, which is full of ara art made against the owners requests

1. Take your own advice and do your own research https://e621.net/posts/3911721 I suggest following that Twitter link with the Wayback machine now that the account has been nuked

2. Use your eyes, the revenge_porn tag has 3, count em, 3 ara posts out of the MOSTLY xeono pieces

3. Reduce your ego to the actual size of your dick and begone from future replies troll

coomr said:
What the fuck is wrong with you, this is the third time you have done this despite the owner of the character telling you not to

Wrong. Had you simply did your homework by going to this very image here https://e621.net/posts/3911721 and see the very comment that came right out of the horse's mouth saying "I don't approve but I also won't stop other artists from doing it", your comments repeating the same false claims wouldn't have been downvoted/reported to hell and back...three times. 🙄

You're welcome and have a nice PROPERLY EDUCATED day on the Internet.

Nice artwork BTW, Chalk. 👍

cyberkaps said:
coomers will defend they smut to the death I see. funniest part was when he drew crap like this second time, butters assumed he had permission but Kevlar said his not cool with this so butters later draw cute ara pin up with description "sorry for lewding ara here is more wholesome image
" Now he did it the third time, with that creature too, nice """sorry""" bro. So no wonder, most artist i talked with bad mouths this dude lmao.

Just like we told Coomer after running his falsehoods on a keyboard into a fiery downvoting bomb of an embarrassment, we're also gonna repeat the same facts to you: Fluff did not say or do anything about stopping Butter & any other artists from drawing this kind of arts of his character. He just doesn't approve the idea but he also clearly said THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENED (https://e621.net/posts/3911721) that he won't stop people from drawing what they wish. Case dismissed.

volpethrope said: Don't pretend to actually be a fan of Fluff's if you're gonna cheer for the pedo artist drawing disrespectful smut.

cyberkaps said: But hey if you want to defend pedo artist who bullshitted his "apology" on something he repeated again, when you just as bad as this guy and this is just waste of oxygen dealing with likes of you mr "we".

Oh no... He has a few cub posts! Oh the humanity!!

You people are the reason others hate the furry community so much. Enjoy your porn and stop pointing your hands at others for what you want to do, but can't.

If Fluff said he won't stop people from lewding Ara, that is as good as saying “lewd Ara” because why the fuck wouldn't they draw her in whatever way they want?
If your fragile egos can't take a damn good artist making some damn good art of a “FoRbBiDeN ChArAcTeR” then, ya know... Use your fucking blacklist for those kind of tag combinations?

You don't get to bitch and moan at someone who has done no wrong, call them a pedophile and run away REEEEEing at the injustice of seeing “your waifu” get railed good and proper.

Worth noting that Ara_(fluff-kevlar) is a-sexual and that posts featuring sex with her from kevlar will never be a thing.

Kevlar has already made a post on another image of Ara being fucked already.

https://e621.net/posts/3911721?q=ara_%28fluff-kevlar%29

Arguements here aren't really warranted...
Additionally, the artist will post their opinion on this post here if they wish to, as they have in the other post linked above...

nightfire said:
SNIP.

bussymanly said:
SNIP.

All that I can see are people who don't know how to use their blacklist.

If you REALLY dislike seeing some characters in sexual situations, make sure to use that character tag along with the most common explicit tags.

Otherwise you are just being a judgmental asshole for no reason other than to stir up drama.
Fluff has already said his piece on this matter, and that is that.

solenoid4lyf said:
All that I can see are people who don't know how to use their blacklist.

If you REALLY dislike seeing some characters in sexual situations, make sure to use that character tag along with the most common explicit tags.

Otherwise you are just being a judgmental asshole for no reason other than to stir up drama.
Fluff has already said his piece on this matter, and that is that.

In this case it would be

You would want to add.

Maybe adding rating:q to the end if you want to be extra sure

lurkinglupinoyd said:
Good art but a reprehensible person. Sad. Onto the blacklist they go!

I wasn't joking about giving out records, you know.

lurkinglupinoyd said:
Eh, fair enough. I could quibble, but I know it's not worth it.
Still, good to know announcing blacklisting intentions is against the rules, didn't know that before.

I think it was more of the reference to the artist. don't think announcing blacklistings is against the rules though, considering all of the various other images and how their comment sections tends to go.

Embrace the true Equality of rule 34. If it exists..

bored_hunter9 said:
I think it was more of the reference to the artist. don't think announcing blacklistings is against the rules though, considering all of the various other images and how their comment sections tends to go.

It actually is, specifically.

1.5 Refusal to Use Blacklist

• Do not complain about image and video content that could be blacklisted. Simply add the corresponding tag to your blacklist. If you believe that a post is missing a valid tag, you should add the tag yourself.
• Do not make messages announcing that you have blacklisted a specific tag or certain kinds of content.

Lots of records get handed out on those comments sections for exactly this.
We aren't trying to be a wet blanket; on the contrary, we are trying to let people enjoy their content in peace.

Holy shit o///o

cinder said:
I wasn't joking about giving out records, you know.

Based.

woops, didnt see the mod posts.

content, begone.

I'm getting flashbacks to the Star Ballz incident.

*Sips milkshake*
Amazing how people refuse to use the blacklist, or, read the statements from the artist of the OC they allegedly care so much for.
Props to the higher ups for handling the matter well.

What the Hell happened in this comment section!?

Wait can some explain, whats going on in the comments right now?

hm wonder when the vst will get their name. as so far they the only one with out some name aside from unit designation

larns said:
Wait can some explain, whats going on in the comments right now?

Fluff-kevlar the artist behind Ara does not want Ara getting into vaginal penetrative situations as its against her character or whatever, butterchalk made one type of this image before, with Fluff even commenting on it. Saying that he doesnt aprove but he wont make a big deal out of it trying to stop it.
So the back-lash here is the people who want Fluffs wishes respected, and it became a conflict between the people who didnt saw it as a big deal.
edit: the ID of the post where Fluff commented is 3911721

Wasn't expecting to see another ARA piece from butterchalk - what a treat! <3

Dope piece

(Insert joke about data transfer rates and baud speeds)

So is this an In-her-net plug? A dong-up modem line? TCP/IP (Transmission of Cock Protocol Inside Pussy) connection? One thing's for certain and that it's obviously not a floppy drive. The sex tech jokes almost write themselves here.

Edit: On second thought, nevermind.

Funny enough, I haven't even seen this until today, come across accidentally. As most have said, I don't promote hardcore ARA porn, or ask for it, but I won't actively stop it or lose my mind.

In all honesty, Bchalk's art is fantastic, the quality, detail, forms, movement are always great. Even if it's a subject I don't really do, I can still tell the appreciation for the characters by how well they're done, referenced, and kept as in-character as possible, given the situation. It would be a lot more bothersome to me if it was ARA in some hotel room fucking a random furry/stranger. This, at least, keeps her in setting and character as much as 'would be' if it were to happen, if that makes sense.

fluff-kevlar said:
Funny enough, I haven't even seen this until today, come across accidentally. As most have said, I don't promote hardcore ARA porn, or ask for it, but I won't actively stop it or lose my mind.

In all honesty, Bchalk's art is fantastic, the quality, detail, forms, movement are always great. Even if it's a subject I don't really do, I can still tell the appreciation for the characters by how well they're done, referenced, and kept as in-character as possible, given the situation. It would be a lot more bothersome to me if it was ARA in some hotel room fucking a random furry/stranger. This, at least, keeps her in setting and character as much as 'would be' if it were to happen, if that makes sense.

Hey can you draw more ara? Because like, she is cool n stuff.

coomr said:
Or simply the revenge porn tag, which is full of ara art made against the owners requests

Honestly, now that you point that out, based on FK's responses is that tag actually appropriate? Their response seems less "I don't want this, don't do this" that the tag implies, and more "Meh, I don't care for it, but you do you" and if it was the latter we used I feel like a LOT more pictures would have that tag.

pecan said:
Honestly, now that you point that out, based on FK's responses is that tag actually appropriate? Their response seems less "I don't want this, don't do this" that the tag implies, and more "Meh, I don't care for it, but you do you" and if it was the latter we used I feel like a LOT more pictures would have that tag.

Tbh I don't think the tag itself is site appropriate. It's just drama waiting to happen and doesn't really explain anything about the art itself. It's meta in an unhelpful way

I was waiting for this moment a long time ago :33!!!!

somerandomguy2003 said:
Correct me if I am wrong but Fluff didn't tell them to not do it? He said he wasn't a fan but also wasn't going to try and stop people from doing art of her?
Maybe I am missing something here.

Besides , he admitted there wasn't much he could do to stop people and he wasn't going to try.
You aren't changing much by leaving a comment like this as well.

Great art , either way. Just enjoy it or move on , if you don't want to.

I think Fluff was referring that HE was not going to draw her in that way, in his canon but that he was not going to do anything if the rest did because it is impossible to control, like you pointed out.

Taxing

*creates character*

*makes porn of the character*

*does not want his character to get viginal*

*doesnt likes it but accepts that he cant control the internet*

*stupid fanboys get crazy about it*

bashaka said:
*creates character*

*makes porn of the character*

*does not want his character to get viginal*

*doesnt likes it but accepts that he cant control the internet*

*stupid fanboys get crazy about it*

Thank you for the tldr.