post #3724241
post #3728657
Reshirams~
post #3724241
post #3728657
Reshirams~
If I glitch in Pokemon Violet, the video ends
Still longer then I thought before glitchfest. :V
you may have temporarily lost your voice
but have gained the power of hot damn
Now sing “Boombastic”
check out the melons shes carrying
Means butthole.
@Kemonophonic: gooooooooooooooooosh you heccin' kemonononononononononononono...!
@TheHuskyK9: God I wish because I think I caught my roommate's sinus infection bug.
@Ratte: Sending clear sinus vibes your way 🙌🙌
@SilverSwan12: Big W for the LazyTown reference
I'm sudafed up with this fucking congestion
@TheHuskyK9: if the way is hazy you gotta do the cooking by the book
What do you call a glory hole with a blender on the other end of it?
A gory hole.
Ice cream sandwiches are OP
Meow! <3
Ratte said:
@savageorange: Probably so people can't break display by having an absurdly tall or long image. A lot of things allow limitations based on dimensions (such as DA) but not area.
Logical, but seems too simplistic a solution to me. Easy for uploaders to understand but penalizes making comics (for example).
A straight up 'you cannot upload images with an aspect ratio greater than 1:X / X:1' limit would be more to the point IMO.
@savageorange: Probably so people can't break display by having an absurdly tall or long image. A lot of things allow limitations based on dimensions (such as DA) but not area.
Alien_Fluff said:
Just found out that there are also new maximum image dimensions, too. Even for FA+ users.
https://twitter.com/ThePlag16564083/status/1596796987579322368
Has anyone got an answer as to why this is based on resolution and not pixel count? Or tested to see which it really is?
Just found out that there are also new maximum image dimensions, too. Even for FA+ users.
https://twitter.com/ThePlag16564083/status/1596796987579322368
Good job, FA. New update only uses approximately 2/3rds of my screen width, causing wider images to be visibly shrunk despite having plenty of screen space to view it full size.
@Ratte: IDASCU is where all these silly AI generated arts are coming from!?
also I am funny post #3710320
@Alien_Fluff: They have both a resolution and filesize restriction, but the filesize restriction is comically large compared to their current resolution restriction.
Alien_Fluff said:
So yeah, why a resolution restriction instead of a file size restriction?
I wonder how that's going to work. Previously/currently there's a restriction of 1280p in either direction, so it's shrunk to make the larger dimension fit; for "QHD"/2650x1440, does that mean the maximum height is increased by only 160 pixels taller, while the maximum width is 1370 pixels wider? So even a 1500x1500 image is still going to get scrunched, which really screws over comics more than normal widescreen images. Or is it total pixel count, so 1440x2650, 1920x1920, etc, fits? Hardly great either way, I know artists that regularly surpass even 3840x2160, but if they can't handle even 1500x1500, that's such a measly difference from the current 1280p limit that I have to ask, what's the point of the "upgrade"? Besides, if the issues us storage space, a 1K PNG can easily be larger than a 4K JPG.
Alien_Fluff said:
Fur Affinity is finally going to raise their default upload resolution soon: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/10392905
(Edit window timed out. Oops!)
Actually, yeah, it looks like they're going to restrict resolutions for everyone if this is anything to go by.
FA+ Perks
-- Coming Soon: Boosts the maximum upload resolution to 4K, displaying your work with the quality it deserves.
So yeah, why a resolution restriction instead of a file size restriction?
Fur Affinity is finally going to raise their default upload resolution soon: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/10392905
We’re also doubling our default resolution for all standard uploads! Regular users will be able natively post up to QHD resolution (3.7 megapixels, 2k,1440p, 2650x1440) and FA+ users net an additional upload limit to UHD (4k, 2160p, 8.3Mpix, 3840x2160).
However, the phrasing of this announcement concerns me. Does this mean that all users are now going to be restricted to a maximum resolution even if they try to use the old "change submission file" workaround? I know that the maximum file size has been 10 MB even with the workaround, but restricting the resolution is going to be problematic. I know FA needs to sell FA+ subscriptions to keep their servers running, but still...
It's invasion of necromancers are increasing levels of testosterone and males and toilets need to get that my previous example gets.
Segapede (prototype) - Unused Sequence 00
More Howard Drossin music goodness. =^-^=
By far the best comment flow I’ve ever started…
CHAOS MARIO 64 Will Break Your Brain
Best Mario is Sign Mario. :V
W0LFB3AT5 said:
Happy Food Comatose Day,everyonefellow 'Murikans
:P
🦃
post #1057792
Happy Food Comatose Day, everyone
are they all lying?
Kemonophonic said:
I've been watching full playthroughs of video games I played over 20 years ago. Some parts I remember quite vividly but others feel like I've never seen them before.
Ita usually the parts i didnt like much which i forget
So I've been unable to view images on pixiv all day
Pinging pximg.net [210.140.92.146] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 210.140.92.146: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Anyone else have this problem?
Nidoran_female would make a room.