kora_viridian said:
I tried it, and it lasted all of 7 minutes. Is there another tag I should try?

You should ask wind1019 why it doesn't qualify. Summoning doesn't look quite right, either.

Is there a tag for images that are minimally-edited variants of the same base image, all made by the same artist?
They can be individual images like this and this, or edited together like this and this.
"edit" doesn't apply because that's for images that have been "edited by someone other than the original artist".

reginaldludwig said:
Is there a tag for images that are minimally-edited variants of the same base image, all made by the same artist?
They can be individual images like this and this, or edited together like this and this.
"edit" doesn't apply because that's for images that have been "edited by someone other than the original artist".

Technically, those are called variants or CG sets depending on context but I'll see if I can find it for you. I don't think it's used too often but there ARE sets!

:edit: If it existed, it would be here, most likely: https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1680

Since I don't see it in use and nothing on that list of 'edit' options/see also, I assume it doesn't exist.

Is there a tag for when a sub squeezes their thighs together so their penis is stuck behind their legs? I can't seem to find one; if such a tag exists it is underused

I'm talking like in these posts: post #3423053
post #3378490 post #3361925

junktruck said:
Is there a tag for when a sub squeezes their thighs together so their penis is stuck behind their legs? I can't seem to find one; if such a tag exists it is underused

I'm talking like in these posts: post #3423053
post #3378490 post #3361925

If it did exist, it should be within results of: legs_together erection
I saw many images like those examples.

For a second, when reading that description, I thought you meant thigh_sex/intercrural, hehe.

junktruck said:
Is there a tag for when a sub squeezes their thighs together so their penis is stuck behind their legs? I can't seem to find one; if such a tag exists it is underused

I'm talking like in these posts: post #3423053
post #3378490 post #3361925

Okay, penis_tuck seem to be what I was looking for. And as I assumed, it is vastly underused. It feels like half or more of the posts I see with that pose are missing that tag.
Also penis_backwards for when it's against a hard surface

alphamule said:
Besides looking_at_viewer/staring_at_viewer?

Yea, specifically the mouth

g273435d said:
Yea, specifically the mouth

https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8953 Ah, I found this list. If it's not in there, it probably doesn't have a tag.

What's the difference between bikini_bottom and bikini_thong?
Also: how should this bit of (presumable(?)) swimwear be tagged: post #3460503 ?

deleuzian_cattery said:
What's the difference between bikini_bottom and bikini_thong?

Going by the tag wikis...

Bikini_thongs are any items of swimwear that are designed so the part at the rear goes down in between the buttcheeks and leave them exposed, like thongs/g-strings. Bikini thongs may not necessarily be part of a two-piece swimsuit.

Bikini_bottoms are the bottom piece of a bikini and may or may not be a bikini thong. Apparently they should only to be tagged when you can only see the bottom and not the top, but I'm not sure that's a good distinction or if actual tag usage cares about that.

What is the animation meme used in this short video?
post #2828991
I swear I remember this. I bumped into the tags in this category by accident a week or so ago. The format is three shots of two characters: The first shot shows the first character looking up; the second shot shows the second character looking back, then the third shot is them having sex. I feel like it was originally a SFW meme, maybe? And something involving Mario characters/Bowser or maybe Donkey Kong.
I tried looking through the list of copytags, but there's a jillion small copyright tags.

Is there a name/tag for this position?

post #530266

Do we not have a tag for pupils of different sizes? Or does "constricted_pupils" work just fine?

benjiboyo said:
Do we not have a tag for pupils of different sizes? Or does "constricted_pupils" work just fine?

something like asymmetrical_pupils would make sense, although that tag's only got one post

benjiboyo said:
Do we not have a tag for pupils of different sizes? Or does "constricted_pupils" work just fine?

darryus said:
something like asymmetrical_pupils would make sense, although that tag's only got one post

There's also anisocoria, the medical term, which also only has one post.

deleuzian_cattery said:
There's also anisocoria, the medical term, which also only has one post.

yeah, asymmetrical_pupilsmight be better when a character has two diffrent pupil shapes, rather than two diffrent pupil sizes.

darryus said:
yeah, asymmetrical_pupilsmight be better when a character has two diffrent pupil shapes, rather than two diffrent pupil sizes.

Anisocoria could just imply asymmetrical_pupils.

kora_viridian said:
It might be the Hulk/Black Widow meme, sometimes known as "Hulk Smash"...

thanx

Do we have a tag equal to 凌辱 ? I find sexual_assault may refer to the same condition but do not see much content under it.

watchdog22 said:
Do we have a tag equal to 凌辱 ? I find sexual_assault may refer to the same condition but do not see much content under it.

yeah, that'd probably be the correct tag, although forced also exists, but is more broad to things that wouldn't be considered sexual assault as well as full rape, so you'd need to use it in combination with other tags.
edit: although the tag on Pixiv almost seems to be even broader than that, so...

watchdog22 said:
Do we have a tag equal to 凌辱 ? I find sexual_assault may refer to the same condition but do not see much content under it.

That tag's translation is a community effort, but might miss some subtle (or not-so-subtle) meanings. Also, there are plenty of genres that don't actually 100% match up with their names, in any language/on any site. I guess this is one of them.
強制絶頂 is coerced_orgasm which is related, I guess. We have forced_orgasm as roughly equivalent. I think it might be a translation error?

dzeergy said:
Is there a name/tag for this position?

post #530266

I'm actually curious, myself. I'll try looking for "-rating:explicit facing_partner" or variants. It might not be common enough to easily find. :(
:edit: Cute but nope!
post #2968106

:edit: So far, got to here on a Wikiwalk. https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1816 It seems almost between kneeling and reclining? I'm not even sure of the sitting position itself. Also, I think that 530266 might need updated tags regarding facing each other?

:edit: Hmm... kind of close?
post #3249880
post #3388782

Legs_around_partner? Nope.

Legs_crossed? Seems closer.

Thigh_sex? LOL, no.

Seems I might have exhausted the variants and wiki. I guess you could start a tag name request in that other topic? I think there's some slang term for it, but not sure.

dzeergy said:
Is there a name/tag for this position?

post #530266

alphamule said:
I'm actually curious, myself. I'll try looking for "-rating:explicit facing_partner" or variants. It might not be common enough to easily find. :(

The closest might be deck chair position. But because that's a sex tag, it might not always apply. So for cases where they're not using it to have sex, you could maybe use straddling + other applicable tags like facing_* etc. That would be my closest guess.

I'm wondering if there's a tag for a character sucking on their own nipples. "Auto_Breast_Lick" is the closest I can find, but it's a very small pool. However, searching "breast_suck solo" turns up seven pages of results, meaning surely there's enough examples of this for it to qualify for a tag, but none of them seem to have it. There's probably even more examples that aren't under the solo tag, but was the easiest way to weed out a second character sucking on them instead.

timeswordsman said:
I'm wondering if there's a tag for a character sucking on their own nipples. "Auto_Breast_Lick" is the closest I can find, but it's a very small pool. However, searching "breast_suck solo" turns up seven pages of results, meaning surely there's enough examples of this for it to qualify for a tag, but none of them seem to have it. There's probably even more examples that aren't under the solo tag, but was the easiest way to weed out a second character sucking on them instead.

I think you're looking for self_suckle, there's also autobreastfeeding that has a lot less results.

furrypickle said:
The closest might be deck chair position. But because that's a sex tag, it might not always apply. So for cases where they're not using it to have sex, you could maybe use straddling + other applicable tags like facing_* etc. That would be my closest guess.

Sex in that position is what I was looking for. I first saw it in a deleted scene from Love Actually. I haven't really been looking hard enough, but there are only 2 posts I've found with that position. The other one is this post #237021

dzeergy said:
Sex in that position is what I was looking for. I first saw it in a deleted scene from Love Actually. I haven't really been looking hard enough, but there are only 2 posts I've found with that position. The other one is this post #237021

Oh, cool that you found what you were looking for!

So...
post #2688109
Is the name for that expression "forlorn", or what is the right tag for it, if any?

alphamule said:
So...
post #2688109
Is the name for that expression "forlorn", or what is the right tag for it, if any?

According to Wikipedia:

Adjective

• forlorn
• Abandoned, deserted, left behind.
• Pitifully sad, wretched, miserable; lonely, especially from feeling abandoned, deserted, forsaken.
• Unlikely to succeed; hopeless.

Do you feel any of these fit? At the very least, sad might fit.

Am I correct in assuming we don't have a tag for the fake grass (green and other colors) used in Easter baskets? If I am, may I suggest eastroturf?

eastroturf, n. The artificial grass in Easter baskets. ~ Sniglets

post #205830

(Well, gee, I rather expected there to be more pictures with the stuff than this. :/ )

Is there a tag for a micro character using their entire body to "hug/masturbate" a larger character's penis?

xanthosgambit said:
Is there a tag for a micro character using their entire body to "hug/masturbate" a larger character's penis?

bodyjob

Is there a tag for the body clip? typical on the horse

clawstripe said:
According to Wikipedia:
Do you feel any of these fit? At the very least, sad might fit.

Yeah, looks pitiful and depressed. Probably?

https://e621.net/posts/110864?q=parent%3A110864 Is there a tag like ear_penetrating? Unusual penetration?

alphamule said:
https://e621.net/posts/110864?q=parent%3A110864 Is there a tag like ear_penetrating? Unusual penetration?

I don't know of any tags that describe the ear being the penetrating object into someone else's orifice. I looked into a couple of different options but did not find any tags for that. So I think it's unusual enough that it might not have a tag yet.

Most similar tags are all aliased to ear_penetration, but that works the other way around (things penetrating into the ear). Which is still rare, but a lot more common.

However, I don't think any tag describes the ear being used to penetrate into something else. Or at least, I couldn't find it. So if there is one, it might not be a very intuitive name.

So I would probably use something like ear_in_pussy (which doesn't exist yet, but with that parent and child it would have two images so far). Use that to keep it marked and together for now, especially if you find any others eventually. So then if a better tag for that meaning comes up, it will be easy to switch them over. It also would be similar to a lot of other *_in_pussy type tags, so it's also consistent with something and not too hard to find again. And it avoids being easily confused for that other meaning too. So that would work, for now, at least.

alphamule said:
https://e621.net/posts/110864?q=parent%3A110864 Is there a tag like ear_penetrating? Unusual penetration?

That's actually horn_penetration.

watsit said:
That's actually horn_penetration.

Ah, it looked like they drew ear ridges in addition to a horn. You're right. XD

Hmm, that Chalosan image with that tag is not on the site.

Is there a tag for breast slits like this image:
https://static1.e621.net/data/a2/1d/a21db01ab6b2010b8ad694cd7dca6ee6.jpg

devilofether said:
Is there a tag for breast slits like this image:
https://static1.e621.net/data/a2/1d/a21db01ab6b2010b8ad694cd7dca6ee6.jpg

Hmmm, it could be a less commonly drawn style of nipple_mouth .

devilofether said:
Is there a tag for breast slits like this image:
post #3037976

furrypickle said:
Hmmm, it could be a less commonly drawn style of nipple_mouth .

I don't think so, it seems like there's just nipples hidden beneath the scales... something like nipple_slit would make sense but there's not anything tagged that currently. inverted_nipples is similar but not really. it seems like the closest we really have would just be like non-mammal_breasts...

EDIT: ah, here we go, it seems like a few years ago a random user changed all of the posts tagged nipple_slits to mammary_slit. so it'd seem like this is the tag that's used for this.

although... I'm not sure I really like using mammary_slits for having nipples under scales; it seems to be a bit of real-life anatomy of a cetacean. we may want to split it nipple_slits for when they're on breasts and mammary_slits for the cetacean-like ones.

darryus said:
I don't think so, it seems like there's just nipples hidden beneath the scales... something like nipple_slit would make sense but there's not anything tagged that currently. inverted_nipples is similar but not really. it seems like the closest we really have would just be like non-mammal_breasts...

EDIT: ah, here we go, it seems like a few years ago a random user changed all of the posts tagged nipple_slits to mammary_slit. so it'd seem like this is the tag that's used for this.

although... I'm not sure I really like using mammary_slits for having nipples under scales; it seems to be a bit of real-life anatomy of a cetacean. we may want to split it nipple_slits for when they're on breasts and mammary_slits for the cetacean-like ones.

Hmm, not horizontal areola? ;)

https://e621.net/posts/3314124?q=foxmelra Not entirely confident about tags on this parent and child post, but I'm fairly certain we don't tag "V8" even if it's obviously very likely this vehicle had one, that it's a drawing of. TWYS applies, and hood isn't open. It's outside information? XD Trying to clear up some disambiguation tags.

When there's a bunch of very short animations posted over time then the "long version" is edited together, is there an easy way to figure out which one it is? It would be nice if the thumbnails showed video length like YT. Adding -short_playtime to the search usually fails because people are very bad at actually using that tag.

kevsnowcat said:
When there's a bunch of very short animations posted over time then the "long version" is edited together, is there an easy way to figure out which one it is? It would be nice if the thumbnails showed video length like YT. Adding -short_playtime to the search usually fails because people are very bad at actually using that tag.

Hmm, couldn't a bot automate that? You can find the length of most video formats in just the first kilobyte or so. No need to download (or read, if on server) the entire XX-MB files.

kevsnowcat said:
It would be nice if the thumbnails showed video length like YT

re621 does that for you.

kevsnowcat said:
...Adding -short_playtime to the search usually fails because people are very bad at actually using that tag.

alphamule said:
Hmm, couldn't a bot automate that?...

Pup is tagging it with their bot already. But it seems like it doesn't detect GIFs ^{_{(or it doesn't count for GIFs, I dunno)}}, so if you want them to be removed from the search, add -type:gif to the search bar ^^

dubsthefox said:
re621 does that for you.

Pup is tagging it with their bot already. But it seems like it doesn't detect GIFs ^{_{(or it doesn't count for GIFs, I dunno)}}, so if you want them to be removed from the search, add -type:gif to the search bar ^^

Good to know there's options to try and fix this at least. In some cases the individual parts aren't actually all that short. But I feel like there should be full_version or something when an artist says they're done with multiple scenes and they or someone else edits it into a longer one.

dubsthefox said:
re621 does that for you.

Pup is tagging it with their bot already. But it seems like it doesn't detect GIFs ^{_{(or it doesn't count for GIFs, I dunno)}}, so if you want them to be removed from the search, add -type:gif to the search bar ^^

I can see why on GIFs. They're... a bad format to still be using in 2022, anyways. Probably just didn't bother implementing a length function for that metadata because it's not really meant to be a video format. We're talking about a format intended for short <5-second loops. XD

:edit:
https://e621.net/posts/2908294 -> https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1748
So, is there a non-piercing equivalent to those rings? AKA the OTHER kind of nipple rings? nipple_jewelry and nipple_bondage almost seem right but not sure. Wanted some input in case I got it wrong. Pretty sure that nipple_clamp is wrong... Thanks for help!

I’m not sure if this is the right place, but a few years ago I made the corset_dress tag and rereading it I realized I made a typo, by writing warn, instead of worn. I can’t figure out how to edit a tags description since it’s been years. Can someone please fix it

swagster said:
I’m not sure if this is the right place, but a few years ago I made the corset_dress tag and rereading it I realized I made a typo, by writing warn, instead of worn. I can’t figure out how to edit a tags description since it’s been years. Can someone please fix it

All you have to do is go to the wiki page and hit "Edit" on the menu along the top.

swagster said:
I’m not sure if this is the right place, but a few years ago I made the corset_dress tag and rereading it I realized I made a typo, by writing warn, instead of worn. I can’t figure out how to edit a tags description since it’s been years. Can someone please fix it

clawstripe said:
All you have to do is go to the wiki page and hit "Edit" on the menu along the top.

Like this:
Click on tags and enter corset_dress to get to https://e621.net/tags?search%5Bname_matches%5D=corset_dress then click on the question mark(?) next to the result.
Or you can search by clicking on the Wiki button up top, too. I find that tag search has some benefits, though. It lets you see similar tags.
Do NOT click on 'Edit Tag', but the button 'Edit' to the right of it.
Clicking on 'History' will show previous edits.

just a couple of questions for this piece specifically:

post #3534848

1) the lizard guy is a basilisk from d&d, but when entering in basilisk_(dungeons_and_dragons) it comes out with an invalid tag. why is that?

2) is there a tag for creatures that have 8 legs that aren't arachnids? (octupoped???)

Do we have a tag that is something along these lines?

“I mean the idea is that the rabbit made the cat wear rabbit ears to insult her[…]”

It’s kind of a humiliation thing while being sort of a species play/degradation kind of thing

Probably some type of species dominance?

Edit: it’s probably species_play, but it’s quite underutilized.

kora_viridian said:
I don't think basilisk_(dungeons_and_dragons) is specifically flagged as an invalid tag. If I type in just basilisk_(d it auto-completes to either basilisk_(disambiguation) or basilisk_(dark_souls), so maybe you were seeing the "disambiguation" tag?

I think it's probably octoped ; some of the existing posts with that tag don't feature arachnids. The wiki seems to imply that octoped doesn't have to be an arachnid.

Seems that 8_legs is more specific to anatomy, but octoped is for the species category, instead. It's entirely possible for some species that normally has 10 legs, to have 8, I guess.

https://e621.net/posts/2974691 I'm not sure what the name of those things with suspenders are called. Does anyone know? It's kind of like the top half of waders (clothes for fishing)? Suspenders entry in Wiki suggests that pants are implied by suspenders tag. Also, noticed suspender et al tags. Should I help clean those up? Do I need to do implications on some of these?

suspender_straps (alias?)
suspender_skirt (implication?)
suspender (alias?)
suspender_belt (alias?)

Might need to do something a bit more subtle like check each result for that last one. There might be an interpretation of that tag name that I missed?

Google shows "suspender dress" looking similar to that clothing.

alphamule said:
https://e621.net/posts/2974691 I'm not sure what the name of those things with suspenders are called. Does anyone know? It's kind of like the top half of waders (clothes for fishing)? Suspenders entry in Wiki suggests that pants are implied by suspenders tag. Also, noticed suspender et al tags. Should I help clean those up? Do I need to do implications on some of these?

suspender_straps (alias?)
suspender_skirt (implication?)
suspender (alias?)
suspender_belt (alias?)

Might need to do something a bit more subtle like check each result for that last one. There might be an interpretation of that tag name that I missed?

Google shows "suspender dress" looking similar to that clothing.

overalls skirt? suspenders dress? overalls dress???

idk, maybe go to a fan wiki for a thing with a child/toddler character that you know wears something like that and maybe there they'll have a proper name for it. those overalls dresses are pretty popular with the 6-and-under crowd me thinks

A dress (often denim) with overalls straps/bib up at the top and then a skirt bottom... used to be nicknamed after a brand ("oshkosh") when there was a trend for toddlers for awhile. But I think that reference has fallen out of use, especially as overalls and overalls dresses became trendy for adults again.

So a more generic term for it... Googling "overalls dress" seems to nail it. So that could work and seems straightforward enough that people could easily find it. overall_dress seems to be in use for it already. So I would use that one.

Note: some also try to call it a "pinafore" but those can vary, because it's a repurpose of an older clothing style that is only somewhat the same. The results look more mixed between styles for that one. We technically have pinafore but it's not really being used, with a really weird mixture under it. So not really useful from a practical standpoint. So overall_dress is probably best for that example image.

--

and we probably have a lot more untagged. I know that there's probably some similar images under the 'overalls' tag, because I don't know if we have anything separate for just the straps/bib part of the style. So I think it all collects under overalls as long as the top is that same distinctive style. So I bet there's some overall_dresses in there.

--

Suspenders is a little bit different in concept, because the straps go all the way down the torso, to the beltline/waistline, before attaching to some kind of bottomwear.

While overall-style straps mostly go over the shoulder, before attaching to a front bib that covers part of the chest/stomach and then it all-in-one connects with the bottomwear too as one overall piece of clothing.

--

As for those tags:
suspender_belt looks like it should be --> garter belt instead. So alias probably yes, but send it to garter_belt and not to suspenders.
suspender_pant , suspender_straps , and suspender all just look like suspenders
suspender_skirt could be distinct enough that it's worth keeping, so an implication to --> suspenders would probably work well.

furrypickle said:
A dress (often denim) with overalls straps/bib up at the top and then a skirt bottom... used to be nicknamed after a brand ("oshkosh") when there was a trend for toddlers for awhile. But I think that reference has fallen out of use, especially as overalls and overalls dresses became trendy for adults again.

So a more generic term for it... Googling "overalls dress" seems to nail it. So that could work and seems straightforward enough that people could easily find it. overall_dress seems to be in use for it already. So I would use that one.

Note: some also try to call it a "pinafore" but those can vary, because it's a repurpose of an older clothing style that is only somewhat the same. The results look more mixed between styles for that one. We technically have pinafore but it's not really being used, with a really weird mixture under it. So not really useful from a practical standpoint. So overall_dress is probably best for that example image.

--

and we probably have a lot more untagged. I know that there's probably some similar images under the 'overalls' tag, because I don't know if we have anything separate for just the straps/bib part of the style. So I think it all collects under overalls as long as the top is that same distinctive style. So I bet there's some overall_dresses in there.

--

Suspenders is a little bit different in concept, because the straps go all the way down the torso, to the beltline/waistline, before attaching to some kind of bottomwear.

While overall-style straps mostly go over the shoulder, before attaching to a front bib that covers part of the chest/stomach and then it all-in-one connects with the bottomwear too as one overall piece of clothing.

--

As for those tags:
suspender_belt looks like it should be --> garter belt instead. So alias probably yes, but send it to garter_belt and not to suspenders.
suspender_pant , suspender_straps , and suspender all just look like suspenders
suspender_skirt could be distinct enough that it's worth keeping, so an implication to --> suspenders would probably work well.

Yeah, I've seen adults wear it now, but that example post wasn't. I was looking into info on how exactly this mess should be fixed. I guess we could make separate BURs for each nearly identical thing? Last BUR I tried to make for deck_of_cards, I messed it up. :(

I didn't think to search for *overall* tags, even though I knew it was a thing. Oops. The wiki says some stuff about garters and suspenders. I think normal overalls go all the way down to the ankle?

I noticed there isn't any tag for nipple discharge, despite it seeming like a possible fetish post #2370108 post #3296940

In case you don't want to Google it, nipple discharge is a fluid separate from breast milk that is secreted from the nipples, it's usually caused by hormonal imbalance or excessive stimulation. It's more common in those with growing breasts

It's mostly drawn by Dagasi, but that doesn't discount it's validity as a tag.

It's obvious that the artist's inention was not to draw breastmilk, despite how it's often tagged that way, because when they do draw that, it's opaque and white post #3010639

I'm thinking nipple_discharge fits well enough, I just want to make sure it's a valid thing to tag

dolphiii said:
I noticed there isn't any tag for nipple discharge, despite it seeming like a possible fetish post #2370108 post #3296940

In case you don't want to Google it, nipple discharge is a fluid separate from breast milk that is secreted from the nipples, it's usually caused by hormonal imbalance or excessive stimulation. It's more common in those with growing breasts

It's mostly drawn by Dagasi, but that doesn't discount it's validity as a tag.

It's obvious that the artist's inention was not to draw breastmilk, despite how it's often tagged that way, because when they do draw that, it's opaque and white post #3010639

I'm thinking nipple_discharge fits well enough, I just want to make sure it's a valid thing to tag

I feel like this is how technically pussy_ejaculation is same as cum and ejaculation tags but it's actually distinct. Overlapping categories. Tl;Dr It's hard in a drawing to tell the difference between 'breastmilk' and 'nipple_discharge'. See also: Pre versus cum in furry porn

I guess people are defaulting to "No outside references" part of TWYS, and pretending they didn't see the other image from the artist where it's clearly different.

Do we have a tag for antler penetration?

Also is there a tag for when a character is storing things in between their breasts? post #3199576
If not would cleavage storage suffice?

bill_furray said:
Do we have a tag for antler penetration?

Also is there a tag for when a character is storing things in between their breasts? post #3199576
If not would cleavage storage suffice?

Antlers penetrating (like this infamous Chalosan image with goat horns instead of antlers post #1099) or the other way around (as implausible as that sounds)?

post #1751253 Breast_storage Hmm, something like this?

alphamule said:
Antlers penetrating (like this infamous Chalosan image with goat horns instead of antlers post #1099) or the other way around (as implausible as that sounds)?

antlers penetrating.

post #1751253 Breast_storage Hmm, something like this?

Breast storage tag is for when things are stored in the breast(s) themselves and not in between them. which is why I say cleavage storage would best describe it.

bill_furray said:
Breast storage tag is for when things are stored in the breast(s) themselves and not in between them. which is why I say cleavage storage would best describe it.

cleavage_storage sounds like a good plan and name for it. That tag name is pretty clear, fairly easy to remember and it makes a decent counterpart to breast_storage.
So yes, I think that sounds like a good plan for it!

bill_furray said:
Breast storage tag is for when things are stored in the breast(s) themselves and not in between them.

I feel like that tag should be changed to nipple_storage

darryus said:
I feel like that tag should be changed to nipple_storage

LOL, probably. It seems that it's being used for where it's between the folds, so to speak, not internally or whatever, Austin-Powers fembots style.

bill_furray said:
Do we have a tag for antler penetration?

Also is there a tag for when a character is storing things in between their breasts? post #3199576
If not would cleavage storage suffice?

is there seriously no tag for this classic boob trope? sure there's between_breasts but that's pretty broad, and we already got tags for more specific things that are in betwixt the cleavage like head_in_cleavage or titfuck i think that cleavage_storage is a good candidate, but there should've been a tag for it since day 1 of this site

Is there perhaps a tag for signifying that a piece was made by a certain artist, but was done as a promotional piece for a company and is not visible on the artist's personal gallery?

othabor said:
Is there perhaps a tag for signifying that a piece was made by a certain artist, but was done as a promotional piece for a company and is not visible on the artist's personal gallery?

You can tag the artist, and official_art along with what the piece is for (e.g. a number of pieces done by Caraid are official_art for magic:_the_gathering). Although I don't think there's a tag specifically for when it's not in their personal gallery.

bill_furray said:
Do we have a tag for antler penetration?

Also is there a tag for when a character is storing things in between their breasts? post #3199576
If not would cleavage storage suffice?

object between breasts?

Is there a tag for when people use fictional characters to push their own personal real world views? Like this: https://e621.net/posts/484117
Or this: https://e621.net/posts/2070120

I really don't want to see these but there doesn't seem to be a unifying tag for them. (derpibooru uses "mouthpiece" for example)

post #3541159
Hehe, so, as an avid collector of unusual vore types (and the tag unusual_vore ), I have this goofy image. Commenters joke that it deserves the gun_vore tag, but we're not gonna do that, it'd be one-of-a-kind, and unusual_vore is sufficient.

But that made me wonder, was there something more general this fits into, but more specific than unusual_vore ? I then realized I've seen many pics of what I'd describe as people being consumed by inanimate objects! I've seen toilet_vore , I've seen tuba_vore , I even know a character who wears a jacket that swallows people into its pockets! And, hehe, one of the newest posts in the unusual_vore tag right now comically shows someone being sucked into the fuel tank of their car ! vacuum_vore sometimes applies, but seems to have two different definitions: sometimes it's swallowing prey by inhaling air to attract them from a distance, but sometimes it's someone being sucked down the hose of a vacuum cleaner.

object_vore is the opposite, meaning someone swallowing things (apparently things which have people in them, so like a macro eating an occupied car, or a pokemon eating pokeballs). I suppose for most of these, it may in fact just be vore where the predator is an animate_inanimate , but that not always true. I don't know if I'd include mechanical-people predators in the tag I'm thinking of, y'know, stuff like aeromorphs or the animatronics from FNAF. I was specifically thinking of characters being consumed by objects!

I'm thinking something like object_pred or vore_by_object

seydaschu said:
post #3541159
Hehe, so, as an avid collector of unusual vore types (and the tag unusual_vore ), I have this goofy image. Commenters joke that it deserves the gun_vore tag, but we're not gonna do that, it'd be one-of-a-kind, and unusual_vore is sufficient.

Don't be silly - it should be gun_penetrated!

Is there a tag for a sex toy that goes on the penis and acts basically like an extender or a condom (not a strapon_over_chastity)?

In use here: post #2494992
Visible also here: post #2494987

To me it clearly looks like one of those things that Bad Dragon calls a sheath under section wereables.

xytox said:
Is there a tag for a sex toy that goes on the penis and acts basically like an extender or a condom (not a strapon_over_chastity)?

In use here: post #2494992
Visible also here: post #2494987

To me it clearly looks like one of those things that Bad Dragon calls a sheath under section wereables.

penis_extension ? Google Images seems to agree with me, hehe.

Is there a specific tag for depictions of fat (as in the tissue)?