Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

notthatsunny said:
While we're at it, is there a tag for "One-woman threesomes" like Cerberus from Helltaker? That thing where hive minds are spread evenly among those involved.

Not sure if these tags apply, but found some related ones:
conjoined_triplets <--- 3 results
conjoined solo <--- 931 results
3_heads solo <--- 1468 results
Those last two seem correct. Adding female-related tags narrows it.

These 'seem' right, but probably is a future tagging project to fix these two searches? Or maybe masturbation and sex exclude each other in this context? Sigh, no, because 'solo' sex should be masturbation but meh@dealing with it right now.
https://e621.net/posts?page=6&tags=solo+3_heads+sex
https://e621.net/posts?page=6&tags=solo+3_heads+masturbation

alphamule said:
Not sure if these tags apply, but found some related ones:
conjoined_triplets <--- 3 results
conjoined solo <--- 931 results
3_heads solo <--- 1468 results
Those last two seem correct. Adding female-related tags narrows it.

These 'seem' right, but probably is a future tagging project to fix these two searches? Or maybe masturbation and sex exclude each other in this context? Sigh, no, because 'solo' sex should be masturbation but meh@dealing with it right now.
https://e621.net/posts?page=6&tags=solo+3_heads+sex
https://e621.net/posts?page=6&tags=solo+3_heads+masturbation

the original question was about Helltaker's Cerberus who has 3 full bodies with a single shared mind.

we do have a hivemind tag, maybe that?

I don't know where else to ask this, so if it would be better for someone else, please let me know.

Should violence against fluffy ponies be tagged with zoosadism? The wiki entry for zoosadism says the following.

"The portrayal of sadistic acts against feral non-sapient animals usually by anthros or other humanoids.

Defined as "paraphilia in which sexual arousal and satisfaction are obtained from torturing a nonhuman animal."
"

I lean "no" because fluffy ponies are arguably sapient, depending on headcanons, and their torture isn't necessarily sexually gratifying. Would it be appropriate to remove this tag?

peacethroughpower said:
I don't know where else to ask this, so if it would be better for someone else, please let me know.

Should violence against fluffy ponies be tagged with zoosadism? The wiki entry for zoosadism says the following.

"The portrayal of sadistic acts against feral non-sapient animals usually by anthros or other humanoids.

Defined as "paraphilia in which sexual arousal and satisfaction are obtained from torturing a nonhuman animal."
"

I lean "no" because fluffy ponies are arguably sapient, depending on headcanons, and their torture isn't necessarily sexually gratifying. Would it be appropriate to remove this tag?

We go by body types, right? They're fantasy horse creatures. Actually, the fact that this is a serious discussion is hilarious. :P

I wonder if removing edgy was a mistake... Too bad it was not used so that people could actually find (or blacklist) images where the artist was trying to be 'cool'.

oozeenthusiast said:
Do we have a tag for a character permanently losing their sexual endurance and becoming a premature ejaculater? On a similar note, do we have any tags along the lines of premature_encouragement or premature_positivity for a character being told to cum early or being admired for cumming quickly?
post #3496909 is the only example I can find, so a tag would be useful to find other ones.

That would be an interesting fetish but not sure I've seen it much on here.

alphamule said:
That would be an interesting fetish but not sure I've seen it much on here.

It is a pretty uncommon one. I haven't seen much for it outside of edits. I'm pretty sure I'll have to make a tag for it myself, and that will mean I'll have to populate the tag, which will be difficult.

oozeenthusiast said:
It is a pretty uncommon one. I haven't seen much for it outside of edits. I'm pretty sure I'll have to make a tag for it myself, and that will mean I'll have to populate the tag, which will be difficult.

I'm still thinking I might have seen some images like this but I think they were untagged. :( I'm trying to find a non-cub example but there's literally hundreds of thousands of posts in this haystack, and I can't remember specific examples. post #2910409

So, tried guessing at these: Pubes press, Pressing pubes, Pubic press, Hand on pubes, Holding pubes, Pressing mons/Pressing mound, Hand on belly?

It feels like that last tag is wrong, somehow. Every single one involves pressing near the navel, it seems. A lot of those would imply pubic hairs, but this is bad because the hand would be covering it. Pubic press would imply the bone/mound, not the hairs. With vaginal penetration, there is a thing where pressure between the hand and penetration is used to increase stimulation, so I'm kind of surprised to still not see a specific tag for it.

It seems like it might get confused with https://e621.net/posts?tags=from_behind_position+hand_on_stomach or https://e621.net/posts?tags=vaginal_penetration+clitoral_fingering which might be why it doesn't exist (anymore?).

post #3357264 Clitoral version of a reach around which is not quite the same thing.
https://e621.net/posts/2124157?q=from_behind_position+hand_on_stomach+clitoral_fingering Not remotely the same, haha.

https://e621.net/posts/2492487?q=from_behind_position+hand_on_stomach+clitoral This seems like it might be a way to search for this within existing posts? Only 5 results which is criminal! It doesn't include ones without actual contact on the glans/hood. :(

post #3667986 Another example of pressing against the pubes.

Updated

Is there a tag for cumming once fully inside (i.e. after vore), e.g. impregnation from within after unbirthing?

post #1155626 is the only example I've been able to find so far.

Updated

tokwas said:
Is there a tag for cumming once fully inside (i.e. after vore), e.g. impregnation from within after unbirthing?

post #1155626 is the only example I've been able to find so far.

We have masturbation_inside_body and sex_inside_body. That particular post isn't either though.
(Might be best to rename to *_inside_pred? _inside_body is somewhat ambiguous).

el_padrillo said:
Are there tags to separate varying levels of pregnancy?

sipothac said:
uhh, there's hyper_pregnancy, if that's what you mean. otherwise there's also the belly and big_belly tags which when searched alongside pregnant might get you wat you want.

https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=0&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2Apregnan%2A&search%5Border%5D=count I suggest starting here. I already see a progression and early tag.

Oh man, there's no image with a rabbit and early pregnancy that has the "I'm late, I'm late!" joke on it. Shame, shame!

Is there a tag for when someone's penis is in contact with another person, but not directly in a sexual way, without stimulation?
À la post #3472541 or post #3462733
There are individual tags that more or less work, like penis_on_breast for the latter and maybe penis_on_belly for the former, but that encapsulates what I'm wondering; even if there was a similar tag for each and every body part, does something more global for the concept of "penis simply touching/resting on the body" exists, without having to specify any body part?

And on a semi-related note, I don't know if this is the thread to ask it but how does a new tag get created on here? I'm a bit lost because of the large amount of procedures required to keep the site orderly.

imnotafurry-but said:
Is there a tag for when someone's penis is in contact with another person, but not directly in a sexual way, without stimulation?
À la post #3472541 or post #3462733
There are individual tags that more or less work, like penis_on_breast for the latter and maybe penis_on_belly for the former, but that encapsulates what I'm wondering; even if there was a similar tag for each and every body part, does something more global for the concept of "penis simply touching/resting on the body" exists, without having to specify any body part?

And on a semi-related note, I don't know if this is the thread to ask it but how does a new tag get created on here? I'm a bit lost because of the large amount of procedures required to keep the site orderly.

It's Wikipedia-like. Most people can edit tags (unless banned!) but you have to be careful, or they'll remove it if you do inaccurate ones. Try really hard to see if the tag already exists before trailblazing, though. I assume you have figured out how to search for tags with wildcards. Example

There's a penises touching tag, but this doesn't apply. There's rubbing/touching/etc. penis tags but those are like footjob or the like.

There's a sort of metatag where you have OR condition on all the penis_on* and similar tags existing on an image.

Updated

alphamule said:
It's Wikipedia-like. Most people can edit tags (unless banned!) but you have to be careful, or they'll remove it if you do inaccurate ones. Try really hard to see if the tag already exists before trailblazing, though. I assume you have figured out how to search for tags with wildcards. Example

There's a penises touching tag, but this doesn't apply. There's rubbing/touching/etc. penis tags but those are like footjob or the like.

There's a sort of metatag where you have OR condition on all the penis_on* and similar tags existing on an image.

Thank you for the information!

While I have the hang of most of the stuff you mentionned by now, I just don't understand your last line about the metatag and the OR condition, so can I bother you with a request for a more in-depth explanation about this?

imnotafurry-but said:
Thank you for the information!

While I have the hang of most of the stuff you mentionned by now, I just don't understand your last line about the metatag and the OR condition, so can I bother you with a request for a more in-depth explanation about this?

When I said metatag, I meant one that isn't actually a real tag. Sorry, confusing because it's the term normally used to refer to stuff like resolution of an image. I was thinking of the ~ operator. https://e621.net/wiki_pages/9169#basics

I'd love to see tags related to body types (ie: pear, hourglass, Apple, orange...) just to be able to sort better what I want and what I don't want to see. This obviously applies only to the more anthro/humanoid characters. Because I mean, having a dozen extra tags related to the female body and less than a quarter of that related to the male body isn't enough. These tags should apply to all and we'd have extra sorting options.

aaronfranke said:
Is there a tag for this bipedal U-shaped body shape, where the legs are below a dip between the front and tail, and the front body is far in front of the legs?

Example: https://twitter.com/Shyguy9/status/1680278948238991361/photo/1

Example: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/41264113/

We'd need a new one since that should be either raptor-like or just kemono. It kinda also applies to what I'm talking about. Maybe we should use pokemon egg groups for other less anthro body types, we seriously need to identify that somehow.

aaronfranke said:
Is there a tag for this bipedal U-shaped body shape, where the legs are below a dip between the front and tail, and the front body is far in front of the legs?

Example: https://twitter.com/Shyguy9/status/1680278948238991361/photo/1

Example: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/41264113/

Kind of like Yoshi (Super Mario World. etc.)? Yeah, it does look kind of like raptors as "L" mentions. If that FA image was posted here, it would qualify for the (aliased) thicc tag, right?
I suspect that it's beyond just 'not practical' to keep track of that, L. You could use some AI tagging methods but I don't think it's feasible, otherwise. YMMV on accuracy, as well.

Is there a tag for posessiveness? For a Dom or Pred saying things like "You're mine now" or "I think I'll keep you" and stuff like that where one character claims ownership of another character or the viewer?

scth said:
Do we have anything for this pose?
post #4179016

Legs in air seems like a good start. Hmm, "results": for ass up, legs in air, and solo look interesting.
Another good one

emilla7 said:
Is there a tag for posessiveness? For a Dom or Pred saying things like "You're mine now" or "I think I'll keep you" and stuff like that where one character claims ownership of another character or the viewer?

That's pretty much the definition of slavery play.
https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=1&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2Aslav%2A&search%5Border%5D=count I don't see any roleplaying tags for it, though. These are not really appropriate.

https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=0&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2Apossess%2A&search%5Border%5D=count Tried possessive?

Updated

happyman23 said:
What about a normal sized penis tag. Tired of seeing hyper dicks everywhere!

You could blacklist big_penis (or exclude it from your searches), which would remove hyper_penis by extension. Of course, this wouldn't help against mistagged or undertagged posts.

Watsit

Privileged

tysonthetyphlosion said:
I don't know if this is relevant here. If not, please show me where to post this question. Is there a tag for deleted posts? I want to ensure I don't have any art in my favorites that are duplicate posts or artist-requested removal of said art. I noticed that deleted posts can still be favorited or removed from favorites. However, they're hard to find due to being hidden. Any info on this would be helpful. Thank you for your time.

You can add status:deleted to the search to only show deleted posts.

Is there any opposition to me making a genital_slit_cameltoe tag? Examples: post #949864 post #3856865. There would admittedly be a lot of gray-area between vaginal cameltoes and slit cameltoes, but in plenty of cases, it should be clear enough.

Also, I'm also wondering if making a slit equivalent of penis_base would make sense? It could be called partially_covered_genital_slit. Examples: post #3761620 post #2905403. However, I don't know if this would be considered unnecessary tag bloat, especially since we already have the similar barely_visible_genital_slit.

vulpes_artifex said:
Is there a tag for apparent nonconsent that implies consent? Example:

post #1787473

Rape_play is the tag for that. See: topic #37971

Updated

Watsit

Privileged

crocogator said:
Is there any opposition to me making a genital_slit_cameltoe tag? Examples: post #949864 post #3856865. There would admittedly be a lot of gray-area between vaginal cameltoes and slit cameltoes, but in plenty of cases, it should be clear enough.

I don't have much problem with the concept, but the name is kind of long and clunky-sounding to me. Perhaps something like slit_outline or slit_indent would work better?

crocogator said:
Rape_play is the tag for that. See: topic #37971

Wouldn't rape_play need something that looks like rape? At least sexual activity? The given example is a solo character presenting herself with dialog that's sarcastically demeaning and drawing attention to herself from the viewer or offscreen character, it doesn't seem like rape_play would be appropriate at all.

Updated

watsit said:
Wouldn't rape_play need something that looks like rape? At least sexual activity? The given example is a solo character presenting herself with dialog that's sarcastically demeaning and drawing attention to herself from the viewer or offscreen character, it doesn't seem like rape_play would be appropriate at all.

Based on the rape_play wiki page, specifically this:

  • A character could ask to not be raped in a way that's clearly not genuine: "Oh no! Don't rape me with your big juicy cock and make me cum!"
  • A character could slyly suggest the other character rapes them: "You know, there's totally nothing stopping you from forcing your cock down my throat right now..."

there's at least some overlap. I'd argue that rape_play should be split into role-played faux rape (which would retain the tag) and something else for situations like this.

watsit said:
I don't have much problem with the concept, but the name is kind of long and clunky-sounding to me. Perhaps something like slit_outline or slit_indent would work better?

Ah, it does seem that "slit" is more common in tag names than "genital_slit". Hmm... slit_outline is consistent with penis_outline, slit_indent does a great job of getting to the point, and slit_camel_toe might still make sense if the tag implies camel_toe, which may or may not be true. If we're going off wiki definitions, a camel_toe requires a pussy, which makes sense. On the other hand, many of the relevant posts already have the camel_toe tag added anyways. Of course, that might solely be due to the lack of a proper tag existing, which is what I'm addressing. Well, thanks for the name suggestions. I'll think about which one works best.

EDIT: Created slit_outline tag.

Wouldn't rape_play need something that looks like rape? At least sexual activity? The given example is a solo character presenting herself with dialog that's sarcastically demeaning and drawing attention to herself from the viewer or offscreen character, it doesn't seem like rape_play would be appropriate at all.

vulpes_artifex said:
Based on the rape_play wiki page, specifically this:
there's at least some overlap. I'd argue that rape_play should be split into role-played faux rape (which would retain the tag) and something else for situations like this.

Admittedly, when I wrote the wiki, I was just listing ways the tag has already been used, and I think both of those points were primarily in reference to post #3265836 (maybe there were others?). I would be ok with splitting up the tag like that.

Updated

is there a tag for thingfs like a_fate_worse_than_death? i know that itself is a tag, but its very underused, and was wondering if there is another name thats used here more commonly.

Is there a tag for that thing where one or more men and one or more women share a bath or hot spring, but it's completely innocent in-universe?

Is there a specific tag, or good set of tags, for sex where the one being dicked is being held by their partner, with their feet just barely unable to reach the ground, or a similar similar? I swear I've seen a tag, but I forgot it.

Might I suggest a tag for canon characters that look like their intended design?

For example this
post #4192074

Does not look like
post #4064324

And I would like to imagine the majority would agree those are vastly different, yet all too common for fanart.
I don't hate the fact that artists draw existing characters like that, I just think there should be a tag that can separate the different body types, and more importantly a tag that states the drawing is close to or exactly what they're intended to look like.

Something like canon_design or anything along those lines.

Watsit

Privileged

shychu said:
Might I suggest a tag for canon characters that look like their intended design?

There is on_model for depictions that look practically identical to their original design. Tags like anthrofied may also be applicable when something looks more anthro than originally designed (even for already-anthro characters, if they look distinctly more human-like while technically still being anthro, that tag can be used).

With the rise of the NPC thing from tiktok, it's only going to be so long before we start getting art inspired by it. What kind of tag should we use for it, and how should it be defined? I think it would be best to create a tag for NPC traits rather than just one for mimicking or referencing the meme directly. That way people drawn in by the meme can find similar content like these below.
post #2203748 post #2203747

I don't think the uniting idea here is gameplay_mechanics, rather I think it's the idea of a character having limited and compelled reactions. Being restricted by rules like not being able to have a name, having a max level, not being able to leave the NPC's predefined spot, and stuff like that are also an element of this. This might be the job of multiple tags if we do see a lot of new art like this. At the very least, a tiktok_npc_(meme) tag or something similar should be useful. Picturd already made an image that can be tagged with it, though it hasn't been uploaded here yet.

watsit said:
There is on_model for depictions that look practically identical to their original design. Tags like anthrofied may also be applicable when something looks more anthro than originally designed (even for already-anthro characters, if they look distinctly more human-like while technically still being anthro, that tag can be used).

Thanks!

The tag is there, it just needs to be used more I guess :)

kalashnikova said:
Is there a tag for specifying how many of either gender are in an orgy/foursome/etc?

Only in very specific situations. So no, not really. There are duo ones (that 'should' work 100%) and threesome ones (that work only for ffm/mff), but AFAIK, nothing for group sex (unless all the same, in which case you can exclude those you don't want present).

Still kind of the best thread to ask these types of questions: Should a penis with an obvious canine knot be tagged crocodilian_penis? This one is tagged both. The upper half isn't really shaped right either, but I suspect changing it would result in a tag war for being "close enough". Fantasy creature, so, obviously, "it can look like anything" but I feel like maybe we should have fantasy_penis as an actual tag instead of aliased to unusual_penis, where fantasy_penis would be "made up, but not really bizarre" while unusual_penis would be "what the fuck is that?" https://e621.net/posts/3336833

This is more accurate to what it should look like https://e621.net/posts/727167

do we have a tag for characters like stand in's or charters that dont have names, like the feture less charters. i dont know what they are called

Is there a tag for the situation where someone doesn't have enough money to pay someone so they pay with sexual favors? It's specific and common enough that it should probably have a tag but I can't find it even on posts where this occurs.

Is there a tag for Self_Species_Unfamiliarity?

You know, when a shapeshifter turns into something for the first time (or is turned into it for the first time) and acts unfamiliar with the creature's anatomy, instincts, needs, physical constraints, and so on?

is there a tag for detailed feet? i don't mind foot fetish but detailed feet really turn me off for some reason

Is there a way to blacklist one tag unless another tag is present? For example, blacklisting all insects unless they're bees?

notthatsunny said:
Is there a way to blacklist one tag unless another tag is present? For example, blacklisting all insects unless they're bees?

You can add "insect" to your blacklist, and add "-bee" after it on the same line.

Is there a tag for scenes in which a dominant character makes two submissive characters have sex, whether by encouragement, instruction or physical force? There's a few tags that I've found that come close but they never really seem to capture it, e.g.:

- service_top and submissive_top mostly imply a power bottom to go with it (plus they're VERY undertagged it seems)
- assisted_sex just as easily applies to any character helping a dom fuck a sub, and also doesn't really count verbal instruction
- forced_partners just as easily applies to characters performing sexual acts near each other, and also doesn't really account for gentler forms of domination
- two_subs_one_dom mostly has submissive characters performing sexual acts on a dom

Posts with this concept are scattered around these tags and it feels like it should be its own distinct thing, even if it's kinda rare

azuredragon2 said:
Is there a tag for when the two users of a double dildo are tagged as different genders? And if not, can this be a tag (I think it should)? And if it can, what would be the proper process of creating one?
Examples:
post #4212765
post #4234017
post #3541433

Don't know whether it would be accepted as a distinct tag. It's pretty much equivalent to the following mildly complex search:
double_dildo ~m/f ~m/h ~m/gm ~m/am ~m/mh ~m/a ~f/h ~f/gm ~f/am ~f/mh ~f/a ~h/gm ~h/am ~h/mh ~h/a ~gm/am ~gm/mh ~gm/ag ~am/mh ~am/ag ~maleherm/ambiguous

(if the terms used in the pairings alternation here seem inconsistent here, that's because they are, eg. there is no 'short form' of maleherm/ambiguous defined (would be mh/ag or possibly mh/a), and 'ambiguous' is sometimes abbreviated as 'ag' but sometimes as 'a'.)

Watsit

Privileged

junktruck said:
Is there a tag/specific combo of tags/pool where I can find more of this pose? looking_at_viewer low-angle_view submissive_pov works somewhat well but I can't find a better one

submissive_pov actually doesn't/shouldn't apply to images like those. The *_pov tags are for first_person_view, which requires some part of the viewing character be visible, and there's no part of a submissive character visible to tag as submissive or first_person_view. worm's-eye_view may help a bit more than low-angle_view, though I'm not sure if there's a tag for a pose like that specifically.

junktruck said:
Is there a tag/specific combo of tags/pool where I can find more of this pose?

Try maybe looming or looming_over. Those tags have some of the "character on all fours over the viewer" images like your examples, but will also include things like "looking up at character with one foot raised", and other poses.

Is there not a tag for characters pretending to be of the opposite sex? For example, a girl pretending to be a boy?

whats the common tag for swallowing/drinking vomit? possibly with it being recently puked up?

How would I go about requesting

unalias boyish -> tomboy
implicate tomboy -> boyish

Right now "boyish" alias to tomboy, and tomboy implies female.
What this means is that it is currenly impossible to search for boyish males with the boyish tag.
This would be if the tag "girly" tag aliased to femboy, it would make it impossible to search for girly girls with the girly tag.

As someone that likes boyish male characters like CJ from animal crossing, I find the alias to tomboy extremely annoying.

simski said:
How would I go about requesting

unalias boyish -> tomboy
implicate tomboy -> boyish

Right now "boyish" alias to tomboy, and tomboy implies female.
What this means is that it is currenly impossible to search for boyish males with the boyish tag.
This would be if the tag "girly" tag aliased to femboy, it would make it impossible to search for girly girls with the girly tag.

As someone that likes boyish male characters like CJ from animal crossing, I find the alias to tomboy extremely annoying.

But girly is meant to be used for male / male-adjacent genders only? And femboy is already aliased to girly?

While not entirely consistent with the direction of the alias, the aliases show they're referring to the same thing.

Girly & tomboy are there because it's meant to describe characters that are acting/dressing/have a body type like the opposite gender

What is it called when someone is involuntarily moving their leg in response to pleasure (or at least scritches)? Example post #4256062

Is it even a real thing or it's made up for the picture and that's why it has no name?