Is there a specific tag for scenarios where clothing is caught in something (like a door for example)?
And if there isn't one, could there be a tag made for it like "snagged" or "snagged_clothing" (or even both)?
I uploaded a pic just now that has that sort of scenario, and I was kind of lost on what sort of tag to add for such a thing.
Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
is there a tag for when a non solo image has a single type of species group?
bill_furray said:
is there a tag for when a non solo image has a single type of species group?
Not really. You could try spectags:1 -solo -zero_pictured -unknown_species
snpthecat said:
But girly is meant to be used for male / male-adjacent genders only? And femboy is already aliased to girly?While not entirely consistent with the direction of the alias, the aliases show they're referring to the same thing.
Girly & tomboy are there because it's meant to describe characters that are acting/dressing/have a body type like the opposite gender
I'm saying that's an issue, because you can be a girl and be girly, and you can be a boy and be boyish. Being a femboy does by definition mean you are girly, but being girly does not by definition mean you are a femboy. Likewise being a tomboy does by definition mean you are boyish, but being boyish does not by definition mean you are a tomboy. I want the tag separated because I want to be able to search for boys that are boyish without the system assuming I want to look for tomboys.
simski said:
I'm saying that's an issue, because you can be a girl and be girly, and you can be a boy and be boyish. Being a femboy does by definition mean you are girly, but being girly does not by definition mean you are a femboy. Likewise being a tomboy does by definition mean you are boyish, but being boyish does not by definition mean you are a tomboy. I want the tag separated because I want to be able to search for boys that are boyish without the system assuming I want to look for tomboys.
We don't tag defaults. You can also do -girly or -tomboy with male or female respectively.
snpthecat said:
We don't tag defaults. You can also do -girly or -tomboy with male or female respectively.
Since when, isn't tagging something as male or female a default? Aren't we supposed to tag what we see?
Also I'm saying it's not default, especially not on this website where fetishes and stylization is the norm. It's literally harder for me to find boyish boys with tags than than it is to find boyish girls. It's literally harder for me to find boyish boys than it is to find girly boys. This is a failure of how the tags work. It is not helping people find stuff, it's making it harder to find stuff.
Also the term "manly" is what I consider a default for grown up men, I still see that tag around. I however don't want to search for manly men, I don't want to search for girly men, and I don't want to search for boyish girls. I want to be able to search for boyish boys, and there is no tag for that because that tag is wrongly defaulted to "tomboy".
Like I'm not some weird fetishist and that's the only thing I can get off to, but it is a thing that I like that I have noticed this website does not allow you to search for due to a failure in how this tag is handled.
Also if for some reason this tag SHOULDN'T be allowed to tag boys, then for the sake of consistency the girly tag should also alias to femboy and the manly tag should not be applicable to females.
simski said:
Since when, isn't tagging something as male or female a default? Aren't we supposed to tag what we see?
We don't tag hand, eyelid, limb, eyes, alive, corporeal, etc. If there's a character, it's a characteristic that they're expected to have.
There's 7 "genders" you can tag, and while not equally likely, none of them are expected as defaults.
It is not a default. Male characters are just as likely to be manly or girly on this website. There are also other personality types that can also not be seen as boyish. There is literally no tags for me to consistently find boyish characters that aren't female.
snpthecat said:
We don't tag hand, eyelid, limb, eyes, alive, corporeal, etc. If there's a character, it's a characteristic that they're expected to have.There's 7 "genders" you can tag, and while not equally likely, none of them are expected as defaults.
Then just like those 7 genders, there's lots of different personality types. Just because a character is male doesn't mean they are boyish. It should be tagged when they are boyish, because there are LOTS of other things that character could be.
Also boyish aliasing to tomboy is LITERALLY as if girly aliased to femboy.
The tags are inconsistent. Either make boyish its own descriptor like the girly tag currently is, or make girly alias to femboy the same way the boyish tag alias to tomboy. That would make the tag system worse for everyone, but at least it wouldn't be unfair anymore.
simski said:
It is not a default. Male characters are just as likely to be manly or girly on this website. There are also other personality types that can also not be seen as boyish. There is literally no tags for me to consistently find boyish characters that aren't female.
Oh you're trying to get something closer to boy, not just male. Well yeah it's lacking.
snpthecat said:
Oh you're trying to get something closer to boy, not just male. Well yeah it's lacking.
Thank you, yes!
simski said:
Also boyish aliasing to tomboy is LITERALLY as if girly aliased to femboy.
The tags are inconsistent. Either make boyish its own descriptor like the girly tag currently is, or make girly alias to femboy the same way the boyish tag alias to tomboy. That would make the tag system worse for everyone, but at least it wouldn't be unfair anymore.
Should there be a tag for how a pussy, perhaps more accurately the pubic mounds looks like from above? Imagine looking down to the floor while standing. Here's two examples:
https://e621.net/posts/1824546
https://e621.net/posts/3857334
Maybe the pulling down/away exposure scenario with that pov in itself could be a tag regardless of gender
sorrowless said:
Should there be a tag for how a pussy, perhaps more accurately the pubic mounds looks like from above? Imagine looking down to the floor while standing. Here's two examples:https://e621.net/posts/1824546
https://e621.net/posts/3857334Maybe the pulling down/away exposure scenario with that pov in itself could be a tag regardless of gender
For your first request:
~pubic_mound ~pussy high_angle_view standing works a bit, but it's not fully successful.
snpthecat said:
For your first request:
~pubic_mound ~pussy high_angle_view standing works a bit, but it's not fully successful.
Came to the same conclusion. I guess it’s not popular enough to be it’s own concept
post #4265006
A 'feral child' in literal sense. As in, a human(oid)/anthro child acting feral. I need to undo the edit, but not sure what tag to use to replace them with. It is NOT feral and child, as normally used on this site. Is there some kind of tag for being feral in the mental sense?
Do we have a tag for psych ward grippy socks? Socks with little plastic bits underneath. Also known as "hospital socks".
Can someone tell me the name of this cow post #3448536 post #3748511? I belive she was created by Shibaemonxsk
Is there a tag for when a character is unsure about another character’s gender? As in based on their looks
sorrowless said:
Is there a tag for when a character is unsure about another character’s gender? As in based on their looks
Is there a Tag for when is a female character being penetrated by a feral horse? I've facing those contents all the time and I don't know what tag to put to avoid this without removing all/some feral/non-feral or feral tags.
lorehokkamek said:
Is there a Tag for when is a female character being penetrated by a feral horse? I've facing those contents all the time and I don't know what tag to put to avoid this without removing all/some feral/non-feral or feral tags.
Female character of any species?
there's feral_penetrating_female equine_penis, not sure if feral_penetrating_female will stay but it seems to be here for now.
skinnyjeansowo said:
Is there a tag for when someone rubs their comically large cock against someone’s whole body?
bodyjob is probably the closest concept for that.
For a secret 'stache, as mentioned here ? It's related as I don't see any tags for specific shaving (or growth because of TWYS) patterns like that.
I was editing pubic pattern and wondering if there's something like chest hair pattern. Is pattern the right word?
Shaving patterns are a hugely underappreciated fetish, I guess.
sipothac said:
gender_confusion?
Thanks!
Do we have one for pants, panties, etc. that are only slightly pulled down (enough to expose parts of the crotch but not enough to expose the genitals)?
post #4280857
g273435d said:
Do we have one for pants, panties, etc. that are only slightly pulled down (enough to expose parts of the crotch but not enough to expose the genitals)?
post #4280857
The description of transformation_through_sex defines it as "Transformations that happen during and/or are caused by sexual activity. [...]
Is there a tag or tag combination to exclude the "caused by" and only have the "happen during"? (I understand that the former encompasses the latter)
As in, could I have it so I only see situations where someone is not transformed because of the sex, but is either A) is having sex but then transforms/grows (maybe someone is a shapeshifter and shifts while close to orgasming), or B) is already transforming and has sex while they transform. At the very least, what can I do to exclude species assimilation/clone tf?
What I want to include:
post #4280750 post #3257242 post #1480290
what I want to exclude:
post #4280705 post #4087241 post #4074747
junktruck said:
The description of transformation_through_sex defines it as "Transformations that happen during and/or are caused by sexual activity. [...]Is there a tag or tag combination to exclude the "caused by" and only have the "happen during"? (I understand that the former encompasses the latter)
They're largely indistinguishable from a TWYS perspective. I don't see a distinction with your examples, for instance; there's no indication the transformation is caused by sexual activity in the latter three any more than the former 3. There is imminent_sex and after_sex, but if a character transforms during sex it's nearly impossible to tell what exactly causes it.
This is mistagged wolverine (species) instead of Wolverine (Angry Canadian) but I'm not sure what to tag it /as/. Personally it looks too human to be here, but I guess because he has pointy ears it's demihuman or elf or whatnot. https://e621.net/posts/63809
would eared dragons fall under non-mammal_ears?
i find them deeply unfortunate but as per being strictly fictional creatures that are usually shapeshifters and in possession of mammal traits i find that tag inappropriate / hard to use. any suggestions? not quite as intuitive as tagging sharks / "requiem_sharks" imo.
Should there be a tag for when a character is against_surface, but backed against the surface, rather than their front, or do the on_glass tags (i.e.ass_on_glass, pussy_on_glass, anus_on_glass, and maybe balls_on_glass) already work for that?
I'm not sure if they would always apply, or if they're only/mostly used for sitting, like over a glass surface.
Is there a tag for when a character realizes another one has an erection? Something like notices_bulge or omgdyhab
Is there a tag for having a male character's anus visible during straight sex? Closest I can seem to get is "male/female backsack anus" but it's not a perfect search for that.
Is there a tag for ejaculating in clothes like in this post post #1833088?
I know there is wetting for urine, and soiling for excrement, but is there one for semen and pussy juice?
Is this what cum_on_clothing and pussy_juice_on_clothing are for?
wizardmagican said:
Is there a tag for ejaculating in clothes like in this post post #1833088?
I know there is wetting for urine, and soiling for excrement, but is there one for semen and pussy juice?Is this what cum_on_clothing and pussy_juice_on_clothing are for?
No. You should use cum in clothing instead.
I believe *_on_clothing would mean it's on the outside of the clothing while *_in_clothing would mean on the inside.
snpthecat said:
No. You should use cum in clothing instead.
I believe *_on_clothing would mean it's on the outside of the clothing while *_in_clothing would mean on the inside.
Ahh okay, thanks.
Edit: is there one for pussy juice too or is that included in cum_in_clothing?
wizardmagican said:
Ahh okay, thanks.Edit: is there one for pussy juice too or is that included in cum_in_clothing?
Unfortunately, I don't think so. cum in clothing seems to be both referring to the action of ejaculating into the clothing, and the presence of cum inside the clothing.
Honestly for pussy juice, pussy juice on clothing might be the best option (wait, it's kinda undertagged :/)
Should a tag like transformation_app be used for ALL transformation via app scenarios, and switcher-roo only used for the specific one that is branded as such and was invented by Tyroo?
Also, if that was the case, it would make sense for switcher-roo to imply transformation_app, and both to imply transformation_through_technology, I think.
What do you call it when the strings of panties stick out from normal clothing like in post #3774624?
wizardmagican said:
What do you call it when the strings of panties stick out from normal clothing like in post #3774624?
I believe that the tag would be whale_tail although it seems to be undertagged and also it's kind of a mess, for obvious reasons.
sipothac said:
I believe that the tag would be whale_tail although it seems to be undertagged and also it's kind of a mess, for obvious reasons.
You are right it's whale_tail, it's a bit more popular in other sites such as gelbooru.
I can’t believe “doesn’t fit” isn’t a tag here. I guess it’s true. It always does
sorrowless said:
I can’t believe “doesn’t fit” isn’t a tag here. I guess it’s true. It always does
there is it'll_never_fit and shallow_penetration
sipothac said:
there is it'll_never_fit and shallow_penetration
Would you look at that. Is there one for when it’s concluded that it doesn’t?
It occurs to me it makes sense why there arent dominant_X tags for species, but it would go so far for improving search results without loosing out on images by searching dominant_prey or pred/prey or -X Species by having literally just dominant_equid, dominant_canid, and dominant_dragon because species dynamics arent relevant. I am aware that this would set a precedent for all species tags / dynamics, so is there a practical alternative? like:
(-dominant_canid -dominant_dragon felid)
would be easy to tag whilst clarifying posts alot without encouraging 3 seperate queries to cover what you might've missed in that one search.
is there some tag with similar utility i'm missing?
Updated
Is there a way to tag pics like these where only the background is AI-generated?
g273435d said:
Is there a way to tag pics like these where only the background is AI-generated?
you mean like the ai_generated_background tag?
Is there a metatag for posts which are uploaded by a linked artist (and with the artist's tag)?
snpthecat said:
Is there a metatag for posts which are uploaded by a linked artist (and with the artist's tag)?
Not if I'm reading the list of available metatags correctly, no. Of course, you can always search for user:artist artist, but I assume you want something more generic than that.
Does anyone know if we have a tag equivalent to what TV Tropes calls Grievous Harm With A Body?
Does this qualify as a taur type of body post #4288539? Looks like a lamia but is a slug
orphan_crippler said:
Does this qualify as a taur type of body post #4288539? Looks like a lamia but is a slug
is there a tag for character with legs the same like thickness all the way up?
Tag for holed line art?
post #3995419
^ The usual technical term is broken_lines but that doesn't exist. It also would overlap with the term 'lost edge', which .. also isn't a tag. Conclusion, probably not tagged.
(I don't think lost edges necessarily need to be tagged, because they are reasonably common, but broken lines are at least as notable as lineless which we do have a tag for.)
This could be difficult to tag correctly sometimes - if you consider a case where increasingly spaced out line segments are used to make the edge gradually blend in to the background, is that a lost edge, broken lines, dithering, halftone, screentone?
Do we have a tag or tag family for legal reform/laws getting changed?
I recently discovered the mandated_nudity and mandated_sex tags, which are great, but only cover situations where nudity is compelled by the law. I'd also like a tag to capture images like post #3878227 and other situations where the law becomes more kinky.
Since it's such a niche subject, if I need to create one I'm thinking public_decency_reform to catch both public nudity and public sex rather than separating them, and then an umbrella tag for general legal_reform to catch other things that don't fit in the first one. I am worried that if a legal_reform tag is created it will get more political opinion art than fetish art though.
I added these images and I wondered if there's a way to tag these features:
- Is there a tag for "colored text on a monochrome/greyscale drawing"?
- The leg image has "short" and "long" length lines that are used as a scale comparison - is there an existing tag that could be used to describe those? (For example, maybe there's already a tag for the distance scales you see on maps - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_scale - which might also fit this?)