Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

fliphook said:
at first when i saw your recent forum post i thought you wanted a tag because you were for it then looking back again i saw oh you don't like and the only reason i see is because its 'non-anatomical'

i would just like to point out it is kind of anatomical from what i can research. it looks to be extra skin that is formed when the dartos muscle (or was it the cremaster muscle) retracts or flexes. just pointing it out if anatomical correctness is your biggest niggle about this. although i'd also like to point out i'm no medical expert and could be very wrong about this.

so i'd like to know is this really that bad? it just seems like the transition between firm and saggy balls. i am genuinly curious.

and as for your ball_flap it may actually need to be scrotum_flap or scrotal_flap like how "ball_piercing" is redirected to "scrotum_piercing."

Noted on Scrotum_Flap instead.

The reasons I dislike it are far more than it being non anatomical, i brought it up because its often depicted at random, not when it Is anatomical (which is as you correctly mentioned a result of the dartos nerve reflex) but that only occurs when either A: its super cold and the person was just in a warm place (and likely has winters deformity) or theyre about to ejaculate (and again is more likely in cases of the winters [aka Bell Clapper] deformity.)

People are just adding it whenever just because other artists are, as if its like some sort of meaningful body feature. Doubly frustrating to me bc a lot of it is appearing in AI art which tells me many artists are using AI and then drawing over it or copying what they see in the output.

I have many many reasons to dislike it. I dont want to see it.
Edit: we could also add cremaster reflex as a tag

Updated

Do we have a tag for when the characters penis is so big that all the blood rushes from theirvhead to it, causing a headache or loss of consciousness or similar things? I have this example but I've seen others that I can't seem to find atm

https://e621.net/posts/4459432

Is there a tag or a way to look up animations that have specifically male or female moans or both?

Why does male_only default to male. I want male only in the image not male included in image.

Is there a tag for cell phone wallpaper size images? As in images and animations in that particular configuration that cell phone screens tend to have?

I feel this would be a good one to have for the exact purpose of finding an image or animation to use as a background that doesn't need much cropping or resizing.

stoneguardian said:
Is there a tag for cell phone wallpaper size images? As in images and animations in that particular configuration that cell phone screens tend to have?

I feel this would be a good one to have for the exact purpose of finding an image or animation to use as a background that doesn't need much cropping or resizing.

it depends on the phone but 9:16 works for a lot of them (see also 1:2 and 18:39)

I am trying to search for human males on ferals but I keep getting ferals on human females. What tags do I need to remove those posts?

Which tag should be used when the image is monochrome, but some elements (for example eyes) are a different color?

m-b

Member
CW: Nonconsent

Is there a lore tag equivalent for 'forced', or 'manipulated into consent'? Specifically in the context of some comics, the character will start out unwilling (and those posts will be tagged as forced), but the character in question will be mentally changed in such a way that makes them outwardly consent (VERY common in things like forced-fem), so those pages can't be tagged with 'forced' due to TWYS.

Examples (these are all forced-fem since it's the easiest to find, but I'm talking about the general context of these being forced): pool:26542 pool:27483 pool:26598

Most days I'm fine, but if I'm having a bad day, stumbling into forced content (even when only contextual) leaves me with an anxiety attack for the next few hours. In the meantime I've resorted to blacklisting individual IDs or, in some cases, the artist as a whole, but it would be nice to be able to tag and blacklist the concept itself.

Is there a tag for creatures eating things that are normally inedible but aren't inedible to them?

Like kobolds are often shown eating metals/coins post #4525196 post #1910085

pica looks closest but seems to have been removed from everything without replacement.

list said:
Is there a tag for creatures eating things that are normally inedible but aren't inedible to them?

Like kobolds are often shown eating metals/coins post #4525196 post #1910085

pica looks closest but seems to have been removed from everything without replacement.

there's object_vore but that's a slightly diffrent thing.

I feel like pica would be the best tag, I don't know why that tag was purged.

Is there a tag for a larger, quadrupedal, penetrating partner walking while the smaller partner clings to their chest?

e.g. post #502478

you'd think this would be so specific we wouldn't need a tag but I've seen it before

m-b said:

CW: Nonconsent

Is there a lore tag equivalent for 'forced', or 'manipulated into consent'? Specifically in the context of some comics, the character will start out unwilling (and those posts will be tagged as forced), but the character in question will be mentally changed in such a way that makes them outwardly consent (VERY common in things like forced-fem), so those pages can't be tagged with 'forced' due to TWYS.

Examples (these are all forced-fem since it's the easiest to find, but I'm talking about the general context of these being forced): pool:26542 pool:27483 pool:26598

Most days I'm fine, but if I'm having a bad day, stumbling into forced content (even when only contextual) leaves me with an anxiety attack for the next few hours. In the meantime I've resorted to blacklisting individual IDs or, in some cases, the artist as a whole, but it would be nice to be able to tag and blacklist the concept itself.

You might be looking for coercion, some form of manipulation, mind break, or even until_they_like_it? There's a lot of tags in this vein so you'd likely have to go through and blacklist pretty much all of the ones on those wiki pages, or try and come up with one that works for contextual scenarios. Unfortunately, TWYS is a thing. I wonder if there's any chance of adding a consent-related lore tag for scenarios like this.

As for my question:

Is there any sort of tag for gory/organ-based bondage? Such as using one's guts or nerves[or wires, if you're a robot] as bondage material [ie ropes]. Really hyper specific scenario, but one I'm very interested in experimenting with, so I'd like to know what to use so people can blacklist it.

Is there a tag for serial pregnancy? That is, being knocked up immediately after giving birth or as quickly as possible, or discussion of same?

Is there a tag for when an outfit is so form fitting you can see the exact shape of the breasts? I've heard this called "boob socks" but Google isn't giving me the kind of results I'm looking for when I type that.

post #4506500

What if we added tags for bound_male, bound_female, coiled_male, coiled_female, etc.? E621 has tags to distinguish between male/female doms/subs, and there are plenty examples of both males and females being bound and/or coiled, so it might be a good idea to have tags used to search for or filter such.

EDIT: Come to find out, bound_male and bound_female tags already exist, they just haven't been used much (yet). But no coiled_male or coiled_female tags exist. Okay if I create some?

Updated

Is there a tag where one partner is larger than the other such that when having sex the smaller one is almost hidden from view? Say a thinner male humping a larger woman from behind while standing such that you can't see the male at all besides maybe his genitalia between the woman's thighs because she is larger than he is?

What exactly is the tag policy as far as multiple artist names? I appreciate when artists like glopossum and daftpatriot have different names for the extreme stuff to make it easier to avoid things (especially on sites without a blacklist), but then we have artists like rosphix/fritzbonn where one is sfw and one is adult, but the name separation was done later, and we have NSFW uploads for both names. There's also some where apparently nobody noticed the name change and we just have 2 different groups of images for the same artist, but I can't remember which one it was.

Watsit

Privileged

kevsnowcat said:
What exactly is the tag policy as far as multiple artist names? I appreciate when artists like glopossum and daftpatriot have different names for the extreme stuff to make it easier to avoid things (especially on sites without a blacklist), but then we have artists like rosphix/fritzbonn where one is sfw and one is adult, but the name separation was done later, and we have NSFW uploads for both names. There's also some where apparently nobody noticed the name change and we just have 2 different groups of images for the same artist, but I can't remember which one it was.

Generally, if there's a public link between an artist's multiple names (e.g. the FA page of Deessel mentioning their Twitter page MintyDerg), they should be aliased together. If there is no public link, they should be kept separate. An artist can also make a request to the admins that separate names not be aliased for different types of content.

qg

Member

is it possible to search for specifically jerking off? i know its possible to search "jerking_off" but it gets generalized into masturbation which is weird because fingering and related tags dont seem to be generalized the same

producer said:
is it possible to search for specifically jerking off? i know its possible to search "jerking_off" but it gets generalized into masturbation which is weird because fingering and related tags dont seem to be generalized the same

penile_masturbation

What tags actually need to be on images like https://e621.net/posts/4536222 to filter it from normal glory hole pics? Honestly, I still think this 'half the body through the wall bondage' thing should not even be considered the same thing as a glory hole and should have its own tag that does not implicate/alias glory hole (wall_bondage?).

kevsnowcat said:
What tags actually need to be on images like https://e621.net/posts/4536222 to filter it from normal glory hole pics? Honestly, I still think this 'half the body through the wall bondage' thing should not even be considered the same thing as a glory hole and should have its own tag that does not implicate/alias glory hole (wall_bondage?).

through_wall

kevsnowcat said:
Does that mean the tag should be removed from cock-only glory holes? It's technically correct... https://e621.net/posts/4393665 https://e621.net/posts/4460797

through_wall is supposed to be for when roughly a half of a character is on each side of a wall.

we probably ought to a seperate set of <bodypart>_in_gloryhole tags (and maybe empty_gloryhole) for when a character has a single body part stuck through.

waydence said:
Breasts wiki page mentions "how the breasts may be seen by the viewer" tags. What would be the opposite of that, tags that suggest that breasts cannot be seen? Stuff like rear_view.

Don't think there's anything more specific than smile. I looked around online a bit, and smile_lines seems like a good name. Refers to various wrinkles that appear when you smile. You can start tagging that if you want.

It has been a while. I will do that, thank you!

Do we have a tag for "Flashing" that actually covers what Flashing (including the wiki) means? I.e., the good old brown coat, indecent exposure etc.

Currently, if you search for Flashing, -Solo, Public you get 4 pages and no relevant images. "Flashing, crowd" is less than 1 page. Is there a tag where someone is exposing themselves to strangers in public? You know, the actual meaning of flashing.

Flashing is currently being used as a replacement for Nude, often entirely solo. Real shame, makes searching for images really hard. I feel like https://e621.net/wiki_pages/4482 does a much better job at describing for taggers what flashing really is. Shame that it's defunct.

Edit: And no, I don't mean exhibitionism, but rather the concept of intentionally revealing parts of yourself to a stranger.

daisychained said:
Do we have a tag for "Flashing" that actually covers what Flashing (including the wiki) means? I.e., the good old brown coat, indecent exposure etc.

Currently, if you search for Flashing, -Solo, Public you get 4 pages and no relevant images. "Flashing, crowd" is less than 1 page. Is there a tag where someone is exposing themselves to strangers in public? You know, the actual meaning of flashing.

Flashing is currently being used as a replacement for Nude, often entirely solo. Real shame, makes searching for images really hard. I feel like https://e621.net/wiki_pages/4482 does a much better job at describing for taggers what flashing really is. Shame that it's defunct.

Edit: And no, I don't mean exhibitionism, but rather the concept of intentionally revealing parts of yourself to a stranger.

flasher?

oopsitripped said:
How to tag actual squirting or female ejaculate that's visibly coming from the urethra like in this animation?
post #2420653
It's not just pussy_ejaculation is it?

that's exactly what it is and exactly what the wiki describes it as:

the phenomenon where a character, at the beginning of a particularly powerful orgasm, ejects a liquid substance originating from the urethra and/or paraurethral ducts within the pussy.

Is there any tags for remarking on large penis size
Or a tag for dialogue questioning/remarking that the penis has grown recently. If not there should be

Is there a tag for when a piece of clothing creates a tuft by disturbing the fur above it? As in above the bikini waist in post #4561514
It's like the furry equivalent of "skindentation".

Is there a better tag than undressing for when a character is just removing one piece of clothing, like taking off a jacket? Something to differentiate "getting naked" from just "removing clothing"

Is there a tag for in-universe artwork? Like, artwork that's contextually clear that it's been drawn by a character in the setting.

Watsit

Privileged

lendrimujina said:
Is there a tag for in-universe artwork? Like, artwork that's contextually clear that it's been drawn by a character in the setting.

It's supposed to be drawing, but that tends to be misused as referring to the post itself.

Is there a name for the part on some animals like goats and sheep where the underside of the base of their tail is bare? Often extended on anthros to the buttocks and genital area and mirrored in the cleavage area.

arrow189 said:
Is there a name for the part on some animals like goats and sheep where the underside of the base of their tail is bare? Often extended on anthros to the buttocks and genital area and mirrored in the cleavage area.

dock?

Howdy there!
I’m looking for a tag related to royalty corruption or some kind of lineage perversion in one of my drawings: https://e621.net/posts/4571477

I remember seeing dethroning as a tag but I’m not sure if it was here or somewhere else.
Anyhow, I tried looking through tags relating to royalty or family_tree but no such luck to any tags related to above, thanks!

arrow189 said:
Is there a better tag than undressing for when a character is just removing one piece of clothing, like taking off a jacket? Something to differentiate "getting naked" from just "removing clothing"

Maybe try "Undressing -Nude" or "Undressing, Topwear, Bottomwear", I'm guessing that should work.

arrow189 said:
Is there a better tag than undressing for when a character is just removing one piece of clothing, like taking off a jacket? Something to differentiate "getting naked" from just "removing clothing"

there probably should be a tag for the situations where the act of removing a piece of clothing does not move a character into a (further) state of undress.
I think naming it something like removing_overwear might work.

I still think we need incorrect_anatomy or incorrect_species_traits to be able to filter out things like bulls with horsecocks but still be able to see pics that have a bull and a horse together. Or hyenas with knots, but not hyenas and dogs together. Anatomy for things like wrong dicks or bunny pawpads, and species traits for things like tigers with big pointy housecat ears or even bigger canine ears.

kevsnowcat said:
I still think we need incorrect_anatomy or incorrect_species_traits to be able to filter out things like bulls with horsecocks but still be able to see pics that have a bull and a horse together. Or hyenas with knots, but not hyenas and dogs together. Anatomy for things like wrong dicks or bunny pawpads, and species traits for things like tigers with big pointy housecat ears or even bigger canine ears.

we do, mismatched_genitalia and anatomically_inaccurate.

Is there a tag for topwear that features a continuous hem on top including the sleeves, leaving the shoulders exposed? Or is there an accepted name for this style in general? As in post #4574850

alphamule

Privileged

post #948050 The OTHER kind of clit ring? As in, not the piercing.
Also, that is supposed to be that science fiction thing the Rack game has that prevents orgasms, I guess. I don't remember the color-code for them. Pink/blue/green/whatever.

bimbonifootlettuce said:
Do we have a tag for when the characters penis is so big that all the blood rushes from theirvhead to it, causing a headache or loss of consciousness or similar things? I have this example but I've seen others that I can't seem to find atm

https://e621.net/posts/4459432

That's a head rush, if you mean the medical term. Yeah, there's all of 1 post with it and I can't really figure out why it's tagged that.

arrow189 said:
Is there a better tag than undressing for when a character is just removing one piece of clothing, like taking off a jacket? Something to differentiate "getting naked" from just "removing clothing"

Oddly, there is no removing_jacket or similar tag for coats/vests/outerwear/etc., but if there was, it should probably be listed here so people can find it quick.

sipothac said:
there probably should be a tag for the situations where the act of removing a piece of clothing does not move a character into a (further) state of undress.
I think naming it something like removing_overwear might work.

Or that, haha.
post #3782586 post #4074529 Removing_topwear is kinda-sorta used for this but it is not really the same thing since it also includes shirts.

Technically, outerwear includes coats and jackets for tops, but AFAIK, it's not normally used to mean that. I think overwear means the exact same thing?

https://www.google.com/search?q=waders&tbm=isch Probably the most well-known bottoms/lowers. This go over your regular clothes, much like long johns and thermal underwear or the mostly useless hose/stockings go under.

https://iwomouterwear.com/products/iwom-sentinel-stalker-system-open-bottom Integrated outerwear
This example is intended for when outside on patrols as shown in the photo of a police officer. You'd also use it for say, fishing, hunting, hiking, or whatever.

Updated

Nimphia

Privileged

I really wish there was a sapient_(lore) tag or something because it drives me nuts that I can't figure out a way to blacklist realistic bestiality without hiding a bunch of stuff I don't want to hide or having an absurdly long list of exceptions on the blacklist line.

There's talking_feral but it's undertagged and only applies if the character is speaking...

dsco said:
I really wish there was a sapient_(lore) tag or something because it drives me nuts that I can't figure out a way to blacklist realistic bestiality without hiding a bunch of stuff I don't want to hide or having an absurdly long list of exceptions on the blacklist line.

the problem is that I'm not sure if it'd take off, we already have talking_feral and nobody uses it.

also sapience is a bit of a gradient, on which side of the line is a character like donkey_kong_(character).