Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

kevsnowcat said:
Is there a tag or suggestions for group of tags to filter out cock vore (or really, any urethral penetration) where it goes directly into the balls? I don't think urethral_penetration -inside_balls really works since it'll also filter out the rare proper anatomic 'long route'. We need a tag like pee_is_stored_in_the_balls.

Still looking for suggestions on this.

kevsnowcat said:
This is mistagged wolverine (species) instead of Wolverine (Angry Canadian) but I'm not sure what to tag it /as/. Personally it looks too human to be here, but I guess because he has pointy ears it's demihuman or elf or whatnot. https://e621.net/posts/63809

I feel we need a sticky thread "tagging questions" to discuss images where one is unsure of which tags to use. Came across https://e621.net/posts/1213743 today and see it's tagged feline penis, but it doesn't look like one to me. Barely counts as animal penis, though I guess the tapered head sort of makes it ambiguous. Really, we need an anthro_penis tag for 'vaguely animal shaped but definitely not realistic for either'

Is there a tag for different number of fingers on one hand compared to the other?

post #4140620 for example (4 on left, 5 on right). How about for pulling the panty string to the side?

Hello all. I try to search a pictures where some species of animal dominates under other species.
For example - query "dominant_sheep submissive_fox". How i can made a some kind of queries? I offer to merge queries by () or +. For example - query "dominant+sheep submissive+fox" means "art where sheep dominates under fox" and etc.

al1ve said:
Hello all. I try to search a pictures where some species of animal dominates under other species.
For example - query "dominant_sheep submissive_fox". How i can made a some kind of queries? I offer to merge queries by () or +. For example - query "dominant+sheep submissive+fox" means "art where sheep dominates under fox" and etc.

nothing that's _that_ specific, no*, but we have predator/prey and several related tags, also you might find something similar to what you're looking for in here.

*

having <adjective>_<species> tags for every single species would be entirely untenable, it'd end up raising the total tag index by about 30%, and it would never be properly managed.so we only do it for the 5 form categories (human, humanoid, anthro, feral, taur), 8 gender categories (male, female, intersex, gynomorph, andromorph, ambiguous), and however many age groups we tag.

no one ever really wanted to deal with the clothed-nude prefixed tags and that was just ~50 new tags, imagine adding 300,000.

sipothac said:
nothing that's _that_ specific, no*, but we have predator/prey and several related tags, also you might find something similar to what you're looking for in here.

*

having <adjective>_<species> tags for every single species would be entirely untenable, it'd end up raising the total tag index by about 30%, and it would never be properly managed.so we only do it for the 5 form categories (human, humanoid, anthro, feral, taur), 8 gender categories (male, female, intersex, gynomorph, andromorph, ambiguous), and however many age groups we tag.

I understood about having <adjective>_<species> tags for every single species.
But do you have a possibility to expand a search syntax by merging tags together? like an example 'dominant+sheep submissive+fox' (not increasing amount of tags).

Or an other example - Let's say what I need to search 'male/female fox cat vaginal cum_in_pussy cum_inside', where male cat cums in female fox's pussy. Then i need to create an query 'male/female fox+female cat+male vaginal cum_in_pussy cum_inside' or something like. And then i'll get exactly this type of art among other results.

To search exactly this thing or theme on art. Or no need in this syntax functionality?

About tags like a "predator/prey" - thanks for hint. I'll try :)

Updated

al1ve said:
I understood about having <adjective>_<species> tags for every single species. But do you have a possibility to expand a search syntax by merging tags together? like an example 'dominant+sheep submissive+fox' (not increasing amount of tags). To search exactly this type of person on art. Or no need in this syntax functionality?

You can't merge tags in the way you suggest, you can search dominant sheep, and it'll guarantee you that one character in the image is dominant, and one character is a sheep, but it doesn't guarantee that it is the same character.

Your suggestion is also a pretty major modification to the tagging system, which is unlikely to be implemented.

snpthecat said:
Your suggestion is also a pretty major modification to the tagging system, which is unlikely to be implemented.

Oh... it's okay. Maybe they update this in far future :)

proffessor_funbags said:
is there an artist upload tag?
where it's the artist who uploaded the art?
I can't seem to find it on the tag wiki. :/

we don't have a tag for when a post was originally uploaded by the artist. when a post is uploaded by a varified artist their artist tag will have a check next to it. if you want to search you'll need to know the username that the artist uses on e6, and then you can search user:<artist>.

sipothac said:
we don't have a tag for when a post was originally uploaded by the artist. when a post is uploaded by a verified artist their artist tag will have a check next to it. if you want to search you'll need to know the username that the artist uses on e6, and then you can search user:<artist>.

Just wanted to know because I've thought about becoming an artist and uploading stuff here.
I assume I'll need to send an email to an admin in order to become a verified artist?

pleaseletmein said:
Do we have a tag for when part of the labia majora is visible on either side of the panties?

I believe it may be pussy_floss, a delightfully-named tag whose existence I coincidentally learned about today.

Do we have something for when a quadrupedal character is standing with their front legs on a higher surface?

post #2163780

Or for when they're resting their front legs on a higher bar/pole?

post #3544454

(I know on hind legs would probably apply in the latter case but I don't think it would for the former)

I just noticed something recently, is there an actual reason why cervical_penetration doesn't implicate cervix? I'm trying to think of a case where it would be justified to leave it out. cervical_penetration pretty much only exists with internal view, and therefore you would see the cervix too. There's an awful lot of pics with it missing the cervix tag

kevsnowcat said:
I just noticed something recently, is there an actual reason why cervical_penetration doesn't implicate cervix? I'm trying to think of a case where it would be justified to leave it out. cervical_penetration pretty much only exists with internal view, and therefore you would see the cervix too. There's an awful lot of pics with it missing the cervix tag

Was proposed in topic #29949 and rejected on somewhat flimsy grounds. Feel free to re-propose it if you like.

Is there a tag for when species from different animal groups have sex? Mammal, reptile, bug etc.

sorrowless said:
Is there a tag for when species from different animal groups have sex? Mammal, reptile, bug etc.

aside from interspecies? I don't think we currently do, no.

I could see some ultility in creating an interphyla tag (and maybe ones for higher level taxonomic ranks), but filling the tag out at this point would be a pretty large task.

sipothac said:
aside from interspecies? I don't think we currently do, no.

I could see some ultility in creating an interphyla tag (and maybe ones for higher level taxonomic ranks), but filling the tag out at this point would be a pretty large task.

Even a single tag would be useful. Easy way to find exotic partners

sorrowless said:
Even a single tag would be useful. Easy way to find exotic partners

I agree, and I think just one tag is all that's practical really, as classification on here is a little divorced from actual taxonomy at points, especially as you go higher up the chain (e.g. birds aren't actually separate from reptiles).

I would propose intertaxa as the the tag name, with it being defined as relations between members of two or more of the following groups:

mammal
avian
reptile / dragon
amphibian
fish
arthropod (possibly split into crustacean, insect, arachnid, and myriapod) (or maybe even crustacean and "bugs" (insect / arachnid / myriapod))
annelid
mollusk (possibly split into cephalopod, gastropod, and bivalve)
echinoderm
cnidarian
sea sponge
flora fauna

What tag do I search for when I want to search for boys/men who are boyish?
Ie characters like CJ from Animal Crossing, a male character with the demeanor and interests of a young male. Not strongly masculine, not bara, not a tomboy, doesn't have a specified age but acts more like a young male than an older adult male.

What is the male equivalent to the boyish tag, since it automatically changes to Tomboy which is for girls only.

franceneverexisted said:
is there a term for when a presumed sub suddenly becomes dominant, with the "dom" trying and failing to dominate the "sub"?

dom_turn_sub has been used 110 times. It could use a few implications and wiki work to be a more noticed tag, but it seems that describes the content you're looking for.

sipothac said:
filled-in_censorship, I think?
name's a bit weird with it being in past tense, but whatever.

Light saber and black box censorship haha. Yeah, censor bars can be white.

alrickyznetsov said:
Content warning feces/scat:

Is there a tag for when a character is squishing feces, such as if there is a feces bulge in their underwear and they are squishing the bulge with their hand?

I see at least one example like that, here . I think you'd have to have two tags for that. One for the hand and other like blowout? Other would be something like holding feces but that one seems wrong. I suggest something like diaper_squish and holding_diaper or similar-sounding term. I can't seem to find a specific tag for THAT, either.

pleaseletmein said:
Do we have something for when a quadrupedal character is standing with their front legs on a higher surface?

post #2163780

Or for when they're resting their front legs on a higher bar/pole?

post #3544454

(I know on hind legs would probably apply in the latter case but I don't think it would for the former)

Raised hooves (aliased) is applicable for horses. On fore legs is an existing tag, as well. Rearing (aliased) is opposite orientation, yeah.
There is also on back hooves as seen here: post #4318670 (Pretty sure feral's correct tag, not anthro because of those hooves and other reasons)

definitelynotafurry4 said:
perhaps plump_camel_toe?

I'd wonder how that one relates to plump labia if tagging this.

simski said:
What tag do I search for when I want to search for boys/men who are boyish?
Ie characters like CJ from Animal Crossing, a male character with the demeanor and interests of a young male. Not strongly masculine, not bara, not a tomboy, doesn't have a specified age but acts more like a young male than an older adult male.

What is the male equivalent to the boyish tag, since it automatically changes to Tomboy which is for girls only.

This gets into the edge of the Shota discussion where it's not just a fetish tag despite what many seem to think. :/ It almost feels like a default tag situation for youth? Youthful behavior I don't think even has a tag.

So, my question... You know that tag death stare is NOT for this , right? What is the tag for when an expression frozen like those 3 images? 1000-yard?

Updated

pinkyclaws said:
Tag for Mohammed, prophet of islam?

Not sure if trolling, but be careful what you ask for: Muhammad
And yeah, that's like having a tag Joseph for Joseph Smith, or Lafayette for L. Ron Hubbard. But it's the best we have. :/

As a side note for those not aware: The differences in spelling of his name are considered correct by different people.

Is there a tag for poké-speak?
Like, where the pokémon only say their names and don't speak human

poppintarts said:
Is there a tag for poké-speak?
Like, where the pokémon only say their names and don't speak human

I looked at all of poke* and didn't see anything that would fit that. I could've missed it, but I don't think it exists.

^^
-talking_feral seems like a reasonably close match. It would work better if it were more tagged ( forum #354521 ).
Obviously it doesn't work for non-feral pokemon.

If there turns out to actually be a tag specifically for poke-speak then the pokemon page should probably be updated to mention it.

savageorange said:
-talking_feral seems like a reasonably close match. It would work better if it were more tagged ( forum #354521 ).
Obviously it doesn't work for non-feral pokemon.

It also wouldn't work if the poke-speak has a translation with it, or if it goes back and forth between poke-speak and understandable speech, or if there's a talking feral alongside pokemon with poke-speak.

tittysqueezer3000 said:
Is there a tag for male underwear which has a front opening to it? I don't think open_pants narrows it down
post #2286529 post #2637590 post #2600720

You're probably looking for briefs (the wiki specifically mentions the hole) and there are boxer_briefs, which are basically longer briefs.

Via the briefs wiki:

Some briefs have a two-part front with an opening designed to slip the penis through for quick urination (as opposed to pulling it over the top).

savageorange said:
^^
-talking_feral seems like a reasonably close match. It would work better if it were more tagged ( forum #354521 ).
Obviously it doesn't work for non-feral pokemon.

If there turns out to actually be a tag specifically for poke-speak then the pokemon page should probably be updated to mention it.

Thing is, while that is a step in the right direction, it also includes situations where there's just no speech at all from the pokemon, which is not really what I'm looking for

is there a tag for when the subject of a transformation has their original form shown in a cutaway?

Is there any tag that indicates that a post belongs to a pool?
I want to search pools with specific tags

Not sure if asked, but still. Should I use the tag furgonomics to describe animal-based habits or actions? Like... grooming one's body fur with a brush; catching a frisbee with one's mouth; face-washing with one's tongue and hand; scratching one's ear with their hind leg? If not, what would be a better fit? The tag's description only mentions clothing modifications to accommodate for anthro bodies.

ravenousleona said:
Should I use the tag furgonomics to describe animal-based habits or actions?

No, furgonomics is "the modification of a functional object for furry features like ears, tails, wings, paws, and hooves. Examples include modified clothing, objects, furniture, and architecture." It doesn't relate to habits or actions. I don't think there is a tag for depictions of non-human animal-like behaviors, and such a tag could get confusing (since there can be animal-like behaviors that humans will sometimes do, making the threshold of what counts as "animal-based" vague, along with ferals that naturally behave that way).