I like both.

its fine just the way it is

Anyone else scared by that smile or is it just me?

The grin kinda reminds me of Robert Judd from the movie Crossroads http://media.photobucket.com/image/Robert%20Judd/boro_01/th_robertjudd.jpg

I like this version. And that's so a rape face.

Ugly female makes ugly male.
Shame, because I've been dying to see something gay from Wolfy-nail (which I know isn't gonna happen, because he doesn't even do it on commission).

NexusTenebrare said:
...I've been dying to see something gay from Wolfy-nail (which I know isn't gonna happen, because he doesn't even do it on commission).

Maybe you should do a search on here for "Wolfy-nail gay".

lucky lion

PowderedToastMan said:
lucky lion

In reference to this post, why is it that when a user of this site posts the subtlest hint that he/she enjoys a work depicting gay acts, or expresses even the slightest bit of emotional relation the the typically feminine bottom, his/her post is voted out of sight?

And the crazy thing is (based on my experience with a very lengthy and heated debate here before), it's not just trolls running amok. These comments are voted down by people who are actually turned on by the work. It just baffles me.

Why on Earth would you vote down a comment in which a person expresses (mildly, mind you) enjoyment of a pornographic picture that you also enjoy? Why is that behavior always labeled as being "creepy." Don't tell me I can't digitally express what we are all thinking. That's absurd.

It's not like comments made by hyper-sexed 12 year-olds stating how awesome a pair of septuple D-cup tits are is voted down. So why target the gay content related posts, which exist on this site in no small number.

Are the members of this board largely 4chan goers who are afraid to admit that they like gay furry art and want to banish anything that makes them think about it in logical terms?

I love the way Wolfy-Nail does females, and they make amazingly cute femboys.

JMay said:
In reference to this post, why is it that when a user of this site posts the subtlest hint that he/she enjoys a work depicting gay acts, or expresses even the slightest bit of emotional relation the the typically feminine bottom, his/her post is voted out of sight?

And the crazy thing is (based on my experience with a very lengthy and heated debate here before), it's not just trolls running amok. These comments are voted down by people who are actually turned on by the work. It just baffles me.

Why on Earth would you vote down a comment in which a person expresses (mildly, mind you) enjoyment of a pornographic picture that you also enjoy? Why is that behavior always labeled as being "creepy." Don't tell me I can't digitally express what we are all thinking. That's absurd.

It's not like comments made by hyper-sexed 12 year-olds stating how awesome a pair of septuple D-cup tits are is voted down. So why target the gay content related posts, which exist on this site in no small number.

Are the members of this board largely 4chan goers who are afraid to admit that they like gay furry art and want to banish anything that makes them think about it in logical terms?

Here here!

Enylyn said:
Here here!

It's "hear, hear", you silly filly.

JMay said:
In reference to this post, why is it that when a user of this site posts the subtlest hint that he/she enjoys a work depicting gay acts, or expresses even the slightest bit of emotional relation the the typically feminine bottom, his/her post is voted out of sight?

And the crazy thing is (based on my experience with a very lengthy and heated debate here before), it's not just trolls running amok. These comments are voted down by people who are actually turned on by the work. It just baffles me.

Why on Earth would you vote down a comment in which a person expresses (mildly, mind you) enjoyment of a pornographic picture that you also enjoy? Why is that behavior always labeled as being "creepy." Don't tell me I can't digitally express what we are all thinking. That's absurd.

It's not like comments made by hyper-sexed 12 year-olds stating how awesome a pair of septuple D-cup tits are is voted down. So why target the gay content related posts, which exist on this site in no small number.

Are the members of this board largely 4chan goers who are afraid to admit that they like gay furry art and want to banish anything that makes them think about it in logical terms?

Well, it's one thing I've seen lost of times for sure and I see someone finally decided to point this out. Totally agreed with you.

damn this is hot!

they should make this one into a flash

jmay said:
In reference to this post, why is it that when a user of this site posts the subtlest hint that he/she enjoys a work depicting gay acts, or expresses even the slightest bit of emotional relation the the typically feminine bottom, his/her post is voted out of sight?

And the crazy thing is (based on my experience with a very lengthy and heated debate here before), it's not just trolls running amok. These comments are voted down by people who are actually turned on by the work. It just baffles me.

Why on Earth would you vote down a comment in which a person expresses (mildly, mind you) enjoyment of a pornographic picture that you also enjoy? Why is that behavior always labeled as being "creepy." Don't tell me I can't digitally express what we are all thinking. That's absurd.

It's not like comments made by hyper-sexed 12 year-olds stating how awesome a pair of septuple D-cup tits are is voted down. So why target the gay content related posts, which exist on this site in no small number.

Are the members of this board largely 4chan goers who are afraid to admit that they like gay furry art and want to banish anything that makes them think about it in logical terms?

Yeah, this site has some... quirks

Even 10 years later