Bad Dragon HQ in 2040.

Cobalt: For when you want a creative way to commit suicide

Cobalt: For when you're a fox.

Variety!

"Portal Annex 02"
I can only wonder what is at Portal Annex 01.

Beaktooth said:
"Portal Annex 02"
I can only wonder what is at Portal Annex 01.

Wall O Tits?

"If there were a wall with 1000 dicks, how many would you choke on?"

None.

"Wow, you're that good? Lolol fggt"

Well, I don't like to brag, buuuuut~
___________________________________

Dibs on Sylenon. :B

Beepmaster said:
Dibs on Sylenon. :B

Guess I'm stuck with Fenrir... Oh well :3

i'll take Pyrfer-(balls)

Added "Kajowwojak" character, as the only actually standing character here

"Is that a dick in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"

:3

HelloKinky said:
Wall O Tits?

No. More dicks. And more and more walls of dicks!

Oh, neat, someone colored it.
Those names could've used a better font though, it's real hard to read them. Or maybe if the dots were a bit closer.

I can only guess that this is what happens when Aperture Science decides to create a pair of underwear.

KhajiitSneakThief said:
I can only guess that this is what happens when Aperture Science decides to create a pair of underwear.

Ah you mean like post #314152 and post #319811? :3

Candle sniffing fuck fence

Jugofthat said:
Bad Dragon HQ in 2040.

And still no good feline toys.

what happens when the batteries die?

All those cocks and you forget the "gay" tag? Geez.

Rally said:
All those cocks and you forget the "gay" tag? Geez.

Really? REALLY???? Ffffffuuuck man, you've been here how long? Those are sex toys not dudes and not actual ticks thus not gay.

Esme_Belles said:
Really? REALLY???? Ffffffuuuck man, you've been here how long? Those are sex toys not dudes and not actual ticks thus not gay.

You're an idiot. Those are portal rings. Those are cocks of actual people. And he's licking one of them. He even has his own cock, via portal ring, in his pocket.

Rally said:
You're an idiot. Those are portal rings. Those are cocks of actual people. And he's licking one of them. He even has his own cock, via portal ring, in his pocket.

Is that a penis in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

PopNotes said:
Cobalt: For when you want a creative way to commit suicide

I'd think tyelle would do a better job

Rally said:
You're an idiot. Those are portal rings. Those are cocks of actual people. And he's licking one of them. He even has his own cock, via portal ring, in his pocket.

Let's remain civil in the comments

paradise *3*

Rally said:
You're an idiot. Those are portal rings. Those are cocks of actual people. And he's licking one of them. He even has his own cock, via portal ring, in his pocket.

I'll choose to ignore the idiot comment, but only cuz I know how heated some people can get over the tags since I do from time to time as well. But really rally, how am I supposed to know that those rings are portals, and not just pretty display suction cups or something? Remember the site rule is "not what you know". And honestly even if they are portals, I didn't know.

now your playing with portals!

Esme_Belles said:
I'll choose to ignore the idiot comment, but only cuz I know how heated some people can get over the tags since I do from time to time as well. But really rally, how am I supposed to know that those rings are portals, and not just pretty display suction cups or something? Remember the site rule is "not what you know". And honestly even if they are portals, I didn't know.

1: Portal Annex, re emphasis: Portal.
2: The portal over my characters crotch, then sticking out of his pocket.
3: As the owner of this image, I can say that this is, without a doubt, Gay, with all of those dicks being real, and in portals.

kajowwojak said:
1: Portal Annex, re emphasis: Portal.
2: The portal over my characters crotch, then sticking out of his pocket.
3: As the owner of this image, I can say that this is, without a doubt, Gay, with all of those dicks being real, and in portals.

Kaj, you're assuming that just because someone sees multiple things in an image, they're suppose to put together what's going on. Most people on the internet can't string together a coherent sentence. :P

kajowwojak said:
3: As the owner of this image, I can say that this is, without a doubt, Gay, with all of those dicks being real, and in portals.

It doesn't matter if you are the owner or not, on this site we tag what see in an image, not what you know. Since it's only one dude in the image and it's assumed that he has many detachable penises, this shouldn't be tagged as gay. We only tag gay when there's two males in the image having sexual intercourse.

TheHuskyK9 said:
It doesn't matter if you are the owner or not, on this site we tag what see in an image, not what you know. Since it's only one dude in the image and it's assumed that he has many detachable penises, this shouldn't be tagged as gay. We only tag gay when there's two males in the image having sexual intercourse.

But what if it says "Portal Annex" above it, making it clear those are portals and not dildos?

TheHuskyK9 said:
It doesn't matter if you are the owner or not, on this site we tag what see in an image, not what you know. Since it's only one dude in the image and it's assumed that he has many detachable penises, this shouldn't be tagged as gay. We only tag gay when there's two males in the image having sexual intercourse.

I think that you're trying a little too hard to avoid the 'Gay' tag.

How on earth could you legitimately think that this is one guy with many different penises, when they're all labeled, and further, each character has a tag as an actual character specifically as an individual character.

Further, you're here making assumptions and considering them above the blatant truth of the matter.

On top of the matter: If there is a single guy with a dildo, would that not be considered gay? In this image, we have my character holding two dicks, and licking one of them, which is a very homosexual act.

Finally, given that this is the internet, me being the owner of the image clears up things that are otherwise up in the air. For example: These are dicks, not dildos. These dicks are on the wall via Portal technology, making them not only still fully functional, but technically still attached to their owners.

You can't over speculate that, because that is the fact. Saying otherwise is not what the image is SUPPOSED to show.

With that said, it ends to the bottom line that this is an image that has a gay wolf, enjoying a number of real, live dicks.

This image is completely deserving of the 'gay' tag.

kajowwojak said:
I think that you're trying a little too hard to avoid the 'Gay' tag.

Not really, since I'm just following the rules on how to tag

kajowwojak said:
How on earth could you legitimately think that this is one guy with many different penises, when they're all labeled, and further, each character has a tag as an actual character specifically as an individual character.

From just looking at it with no outside sources, almost everyone thought that the dude can attach/detach multiple penises to himself and that he has different names for them.

kajowwojak said:
On top of the matter: If there is a single guy with a dildo, would that not be considered gay? In this image, we have my character holding two dicks, and licking one of them, which is a very homosexual act.

We only tag it as gay if there's two or more males having sex.

kajowwojak said:
Finally, given that this is the internet, me being the owner of the image clears up things that are otherwise up in the air. For example: These are dicks, not dildos. These dicks are on the wall via Portal technology, making them not only still fully functional, but technically still attached to their owners.

You can't over speculate that, because that is the fact. Saying otherwise is not what the image is SUPPOSED to show.

With that said, it ends to the bottom line that this is an image that has a gay wolf, enjoying a number of real, live dicks.

This image is completely deserving of the 'gay' tag.

Still doesn't matter that you are the owner. Just because you own it doesn't mean you can tag it however you want. Want to learn how to tag on here? Go here. If you have a problem with it not being tagged as gay, you're always welcome to take it down since you are the "owner". You can go here to do so

TheHuskyK9 said:
Not really, since I'm just following the rules on how to tag

From just looking at it with no outside sources, almost everyone thought that the dude can attach/detach multiple penises to himself and that he has different names for them.

We only tag it as gay if there's two or more males having sex.

Still doesn't matter that you are the owner. Just because you own it doesn't mean you can tag it however you want. Want to learn how to tag on here? Go here. If you have a problem with it not being tagged as gay, you're always welcome to take it down since you are the "owner". You can go here to do so

Jesus, you're a pedantic asshole.

FenrirEX said:
Jesus, you're a pedantic asshole.

With the ability to ban users; shut up.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Not really, since I'm just following the rules on how to tag

From just looking at it with no outside sources, almost everyone thought that the dude can attach/detach multiple penises to himself and that he has different names for them.

We only tag it as gay if there's two or more males having sex.

Still doesn't matter that you are the owner. Just because you own it doesn't mean you can tag it however you want. Want to learn how to tag on here? Go here. If you have a problem with it not being tagged as gay, you're always welcome to take it down since you are the "owner". You can go here to do so

Husky, lemme level with you.

There is only one person here who missed the memo on these being dicks. And they thought they were dildos. One person is hardly "Everyone".

Second: You tag "Gay" if the image portrays homosexual or "gay" acts. Such as licking dick, which the character is clearly doing.

third: Just because you see the image wrong doesn't make you right. The image has plenty of context clues implying (And as the person who commissioned it, informing you that it is, indeed, fact) that these are portal rings, and real dicks. And on top of that, real dicks or not, its still an image portraying a homosexual act.

I would not have known anything about the portal whatever had I not read through the comments, and no, the sign on the board did not provide enough context.

The "gay" tag is used for actual dicks, not dildos. Had I not seen the spiel about some sort of portal device, I would have assumed they were dildos.

Tag what you see, not what you know. If you need outside sources to confirm anything in a picture other than a character's name, it doesn't count. If you need some kind of outside context that cannot be readily provided through the image itself, it does not count.

Gay tag stays off.

Ratte said:
I would not have known anything about the portal whatever had I not read through the comments, and no, the sign on the board did not provide enough context.

The "gay" tag is used for actual dicks, not dildos. Had I not seen the spiel about some sort of portal device, I would have assumed they were dildos.

Tag what you see, not what you know. If you need outside sources to confirm anything in a picture other than a character's name, it doesn't count. If you need some kind of outside context that cannot be readily provided through the image itself, it does not count.

Gay tag stays off.

So, giving oral sex to someone through a portal doesn't count?

kajowwojak said:
So, giving oral sex to someone through a portal doesn't count?

Again:

I would not have known anything about the portal whatever had I not read through the comments, and no, the sign on the board did not provide enough context.

As in, I would have simply assumed these were all dildos. Therefore, it does not count as that is the assumption without necessary outside information.

I repeat, the tag stays off.

Ratte said:
Again:
As in, I would have simply assumed these were all dildos. Therefore, it does not count as that is the assumption without necessary outside information.

I repeat, the tag stays off.

So what requires this image to be gay? Do one of the portal'd dicks (Such as the one in his pocket, which is another MAJOR context clue that its portals)need to ejaculate?

Do the Pulse Monitors that are unique to each dick mean nothing?

kajowwojak said:
So what requires this image to be gay? Do one of the portal'd dicks (Such as the one in his pocket, which is another MAJOR context clue that its portals)need to ejaculate?

Do the Pulse Monitors that are unique to each dick mean nothing?

TheHuskyK9 said:
We only tag it as gay if there's two or more males having sex.

Pretty sure Oral sex is, by definition, sex.

I will not repeat myself again--

The gay tag stays off. It is assumed that these are not real, rather, they are toys. "Oral sex" with a toy is not sex in the first place, because it is a toy.

The sign does not provide enough context, neither do the monitors. I thought the monitors were stickers or something, honestly.

It stays off, and if I see someone add it they will be given a record for tag vandalism.

That is my final ruling.

If you truly must insist.

Ratte said:
I will not repeat myself again--

The gay tag stays off. It is assumed that these are not real, rather, they are toys. "Oral sex" with a toy is not sex in the first place, because it is a toy.

The sign does not provide enough context, neither do the monitors. I thought the monitors were stickers or something, honestly.

It stays off, and if I see someone add it they will be given a record for tag vandalism.

That is my final ruling.

Alright, it's your final ruling, I get that. From there, what exactly WOULD this need to prove it, visually? I would really like to know how much proof you guys DO need.

FenrirEX said:
Alright, it's your final ruling, I get that. From there, what exactly WOULD this need to prove it, visually? I would really like to know how much proof you guys DO need.

Fenrir, didn't you hear? Mods and admin are above logic, and despite significant reason, logic, and explanation, they're able to decide that something in an image is completely different than what the image shows, and make a ruling based solely on their opinions.

Theclarinetist said:
now your playing with portals!

Correction:

"You're playing with portals...CORRECTLY!"

;D

FenrirEX said:
Alright, it's your final ruling, I get that. From there, what exactly WOULD this need to prove it, visually? I would really like to know how much proof you guys DO need.

Two characters actually doing things without outside information to be necessary. There will not be any proof you can provide me to change my ruling on this image, because it will all be from outside sources.

kajowwojak said:
Fenrir, didn't you hear? Mods and admin are above logic, and despite significant reason, logic, and explanation, they're able to decide that something in an image is completely different than what the image shows, and make a ruling based solely on their opinions.

First off, that kind of attitude will not get you anywhere.
Second, I am abiding the rules of Tag What You See even if you happen to not like what that ruling is. You not liking it won't change the rules, nor will it change my mind.

I know what I see, the mod knows what he saw, and a friend of mine knows what they saw, and without outside information or explanations all agreed that what they saw was toys on a wall.

I'm sorry you don't agree with it, but this is how this site works.

It was pretty clear to me that they were portals, and it seems like a pretty darn gay image to me...

tony311 said:
It was pretty clear to me that they were portals, and it seems like a pretty darn gay image to me...

Are there any rules regarding disagreements between admins?

It says "portal annex", they look like real penises/balls instead of just silicone sculptures, they all have names above them, they have life sign graphs, he's got a thing where his penis should be, it's very clear to me that they're portals and real penises. You just have to take a closer look at the image. And therefore it's very clear to me that it is gay because he's licking one of them.

FenrirEX said:
Are there any rules regarding disagreements between admins?

Not technically, but admins are expected to discuss things like this with other admins first; we have a chat specifically for it. In the end, the only person who legitimately has final say is the lead admin (currently DarkAngel). That way we don't end up with admins disagreeing with each other on the site, because it's all hashed out in chat.

tony311 said:
It was pretty clear to me that they were portals, and it seems like a pretty darn gay image to me...

Because you happen to know what portals are. That doesn't mean you should assume that random strangers know all about these games.

For example, I made my initial Bad Dragon joke because I honestly thought those were dildos on display (fastened to a wall) in some development place. While I do know about the Portal series and its basic mechanics, not having actually played them made me fail to recognize those rings as Portal-related.

I have to politely disagree with TheHuskyK9 and Ratte on what gets classified as "gay" here. TheHuskyK9 keeps insisting that it requires two males having sex. If that were true, thousands of images would no longer be valid under the "gay" tag. A guy solo with cum dripping out of his ass, a guy shoving a dildo up his ass, a guy fucking himself with his own tail, two naked guys wrestling, two fully-clothed guys hugging/kissing. None of these examples show two males having sex (though one implies after-sex), yet they are all examples of images on this site and they are all tagged as "gay". I've personally removed the tag from tons of solo images because of the TWYS rule, but I have to side with tony311 here. Even if the cocks were dildos (I'm not going to argue the context clues), the fact that he has so many and is physically licking one should be enough to flag this as "gay". I don't know of anyone who would consider a male licking a phallus, real or fake, not gay.

The ones portraying solo anal masturbation shouldn't have been tagged as gay if they were, since masturbation is only that. After all, pegging isn't tagged as gay either.

Guys frenching each other, however, that's pretty gay even if no sex is involved.

Ratte said:
Two characters actually doing things without outside information to be necessary. There will not be any proof you can provide me to change my ruling on this image, because it will all be from outside sources.

First off, that kind of attitude will not get you anywhere.
Second, I am abiding the rules of Tag What You See even if you happen to not like what that ruling is. You not liking it won't change the rules, nor will it change my mind.

I know what I see, the mod knows what he saw, and a friend of mine knows what they saw, and without outside information or explanations all agreed that what they saw was toys on a wall.

I'm sorry you don't agree with it, but this is how this site works.

"Tag what you see"

I see a man licking a penis

"That doesn't count, because I don't see that"

I see a man engaging oral sex with another man through portals.

"That doesn't count, because I don't see that"

Just because you see it wrong, doesn't make you right.

This is an image clearly partaking in homosexual activities (And I'd like to let you know you've kinda offended wuffamute in that you're saying that all the extra work he put into this image means absolutely nothing) but it isn't gay because you say so.

This is called an abuse of power.

There are two people on this website who can have final say in anything: myself and Varka.

While there is nothing stopping me from arbitrarily settling disputes, such as this, by giving my opinion, I would only do so after it had been discussed within the admin staff. This is what should have happened here.

First off, under no circumstances should you be openly insulting an admin or moderator. If you disagree with their decisions, you may contact me to help me dispute. It is not okay to call anyone a 'pedantic asshole', for any reason.

Secondly, I don't appreciate making disparaging comments about how admins are above logic and can form decisions based entirely on opinion. I agree that may have been the situation in the past, but both Char and I have been working hard to correct that over the past year. Any instances of that happening are individual events, and have been the admin was dealt with.

In regards to the tag, let me be clear: this has not been decided on. We are discussing this in Committee, as it should have been, and we will consider everyone's angles. As always, if you have any constructive criticism, you may post it here so we can consider it as well.

If you have any specific complaints about what was mentioned here, use the report system, or contact me via email/dmail.

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
There are two people on this website who can have final say in anything: myself and Varka.

While there is nothing stopping me from arbitrarily settling disputes, such as this, by giving my opinion, I would only do so after it had been discussed within the admin staff. This is what should have happened here.

First off, under no circumstances should you be openly insulting an admin or moderator. If you disagree with their decisions, you may contact me to help me dispute. It is not okay to call anyone a 'pedantic asshole', for any reason.

Secondly, I don't appreciate making disparaging comments about how admins are above logic and can form decisions based entirely on opinion. I agree that may have been the situation in the past, but both Char and I have been working hard to correct that over the past year. Any instances of that happening are individual events, and have been the admin was dealt with.

In regards to the tag, let me be clear: this has not been decided on. We are discussing this in Committee, as it should have been, and we will consider everyone's angles. As always, if you have any constructive criticism, you may post it here so we can consider it as well.

If you have any specific complaints about what was mentioned here, use the report system, or contact me via email/dmail.

...wait, there's a report system? o.o

Yep! Every comment should have a Report button in addition to Respond. Alternatively, you can go to the user's profile and click Report on the bar above their name.

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Yep! Every comment should have a Report button in addition to Respond. Alternatively, you can go to the user's profile and click Report on the bar above their name.

May I ask why it is impossible to Downvote an admin/moderators post? It gives them the appearance that everyone agrees when that could very well not be the case)

kajowwojak said:
May I ask why it is impossible to Downvote an admin/moderators post? It gives them the appearance that everyone agrees when that could very well not be the case)

That is needed so that our comments can't fall below the threshold to be hidden, to make sure anything that we say will be seen.

We may change the way this works sometime in the future, but we have more irons in the fire that need our attention at the moment.

NotMeNotYou said:
That is needed so that our comments can't fall below the threshold to be hidden, to make sure anything that we say will be seen.

We may change the way this works sometime in the future, but we have more irons in the fire that need our attention at the moment.

I suppose that makes sense, to a degree. I'd try to suggest just making admin votes immune to the threshold (Or give them a threshold of 9999 or something) But if you have more important things, you have more important things.

Both are good suggestions. I know we've touched on it before, and if I recall, it's not terrifically hard to implement, we just need to know what we want to do with it.

Rally said:
edit:
a guy shoving a dildo up his ass, a guy fucking himself with his own tail. None of these examples show two males having sex, yet they are all examples of images on this site and they are all tagged as "gay".

Then the tagger was incorrect, those do not get tagged as gay on here.

Rally said: I don't know of anyone who would consider a male licking a phallus, real or fake, not gay.

Me, and pretty much any person familiar with sexual roles, fetishes and orientations.
I don't become gay by taking a strapon up the butt, nor sucking on a piece of plastic shaped like a penis.

Peekaboo said:
stuff

That sounded more hostile then it did when I read it the first time.
Also, Rupert is best penis.

Though try to be considerate of the flip side:

"Oh, you're not gay, you've just got a fetish for penis"

I'm not going to say that enjoying dildos makes you gay, but it shouldn't automatically make it not-gay either.

But what I'm trying to convey is that these are not dildos, and there's not one, not two, but three separate indicators to this: 1, the name "Portal Annex" indicating that they're using portal technology (And not knowing what Portal is doesn't make everyone else wrong, it makes YOU uninformed)
2: The heartbeat monitors
3: The In-image example with a portal over his own shaft (And sticking out of his pocket)

I wish to apologize for being a dick earlier, but the bottom line is that these are not dildos but actual dicks, and there's more than plenty of context clues in the image itself to not require "outside information" to discover this.

kajowwojak said:
stuff

I weren't arguing against ya, just correcting you on the things you said about those examples.

I actually agree with you, this would be something I'd tag with gay.

kajowwojak said:

Except the "portal annex" could be the name of a store and this could be a complex display shelf. Just cuz it says portal doesn't mean it proves anything, just keep that in mind.
As for the ring over his own shaft, the way its drawn I see a large black area under it, reminiscent of clothing soooo, yeah it doesn't quite say oh hey my Dick is in my pocket.
since the admin made a ruling I have no intention of disputing it anymore.

All these wall texts amuse me... most kek...

Esme_Belles said:
Except the "portal annex" could be the name of a store and this could be a complex display shelf. Just cuz it says portal doesn't mean it proves anything, just keep that in mind.
As for the ring over his own shaft, the way its drawn I see a large black area under it, reminiscent of clothing soooo, yeah it doesn't quite say oh hey my Dick is in my pocket.
since the admin made a ruling I have no intention of disputing it anymore.

Just because you're ignorant to a fact doesn't make everyone else wrong.

God, I love mods and admins. Their ability to piss off jerks is just unmatched. Stay gold, guys. Stay gold.

definitely gay

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Both are good suggestions. I know we've touched on it before, and if I recall, it's not terrifically hard to implement, we just need to know what we want to do with it.

After careful and lengthy discussion we have concluded it should be tagged as gay, as the portal reference isn't blatantly obvious, but obvious enough for the people interested in seeing this image to make the portal connection (pun intended)

and to reinforce it, I also added the "Portal" tag. Don't know why that wasn't there.

"And thus ended the greatest shitstorm over an imageboard tag, of our age..."

Male version of this
Nice!

Rainbow_Dash said:
After careful and lengthy discussion we have concluded it should be tagged as gay, as the portal reference isn't blatantly obvious, but obvious enough for the people interested in seeing this image to make the portal connection (pun intended)

Yall really had a lengthy talk about this?
Cumming this summer(LOL)
in a world where tags are taken seriously, and sexual desires are obscured in mystery, dark angels rule the net with an iron fist. the ones to fight for correctness is the tag teaming duo Rainbow_Dash and Ippiki_Ookami in the action block buster of the year...
"Tag it Right or Die Tomorrow"
-ROFL-

Jugofthat said:
Bad Dragon HQ in 2040.

we can only dream o3o

Best. Fucking. Comment. Ever. PERIOD.

Okay, I'm not trying to make anyone angry, but if the rings can't be tagged as portal_rings in this case, when CAN they be tagged as such?

Rainbow_Dash said:
After careful and lengthy discussion we have concluded it should be tagged as gay, as the portal reference isn't blatantly obvious, but obvious enough for the people interested in seeing this image to make the portal connection (pun intended)

And someone's removed the tag again.

Rally said:
And someone's removed the tag again.

Well, the good news is, they can tell who changes what tags. SO whoever did it won't get off scott-free.

FenrirEX said:
Well, the good news is, they can tell who changes what tags.

Yeah, the tag history for this is basically awesome.

-gay
+gay
-shopping
-lol_comments
+solo
-gay
-detachable_penis
-portal
+lol_comments
+gay
-gay
+detachable_penis
-solo
+drama
+portal
+shopping
+gay

Welcome back to "NAME! THAT! ANIMAL PENIS!" ...Sorry Seth Macfarlane

Ratte said:
Again:
As in, I would have simply assumed these were all dildos. Therefore, it does not count as that is the assumption without necessary outside information.

I repeat, the tag stays off.

All evidence necessary is provided. There is a sign on the wall of penises that clearly says "Portal Annex 2". Now what do you suppose is being thrusted through a portal based on what you see? Could it be the penises with high tech looking cock rings?

Thyne said:
All evidence necessary is provided. There is a sign on the wall of penises that clearly says "Portal Annex 2". Now what do you suppose is being thrusted through a portal based on what you see? Could it be the penises with high tech looking cock rings?

Do not continue drama that has already ended a while ago

TheHuskyK9 said:
Do not continue drama that has already ended a while ago

SMOKE for me...pls!

Well to just quickly get this out there, I thought they were dildos mounted on the wall. That's the first thing I went to, then the character, then the sign... Dildos on a wall coming to a store near you! - BD 2040, great!..

Jugofthat said:
"And thus ended the greatest shitstorm over an imageboard tag, of our age..."

Amen to that, we should have a thread archive of these, I'd love to see what other things come up...
*upvotes*
"You can only vote ten times an hour on comments"
*implied facepalm.jpg*

Thyne said:
Could it be the penises with high tech looking cock rings?

High tech cock rings, those are the future, trust me. Oh the things us humans come up with... :3

Tigerman said:

TheHuskyK9 said:
Do not continue drama that has already ended a while ago

Backseat moderating much?
There is an upvote button for a reason.

PopNotes said:
Cobalt: For when you want a creative way to commit suicide

Comparing those things to him, I'm fairly certain anything on the two bottom rows could kill you

It is the infamous dick thief!

Did somebody say 'Portals'? ;3

I wonder how pissed someone would get if you lost theirs...

Kazekai00 said:
"If there were a wall with 1000 dicks, how many would you choke on?"

None.

"Wow, you're that good? Lolol fggt"

Well, I don't like to brag, buuuuut~
___________________________________

Best answer I've heard for that:

"As many as it would take to kill me."

"Is that my dick in my pocket, or am I just happy to see me?~"

... Wait-

seems this guy is spoilt for choice ;D

It would be awesome if we had the technology to remove our dicks like octopus's and just give it away to some girl
then suck on your own dick.

I just read that whole thread, and holy shit.

The back wall of my fantasy bedroom.

Beaktooth said:
"Portal Annex 02"
I can only wonder what is at Portal Annex 01.

Glory holes, built in DNA extractors, a vast identity database of every social security number in the world, and some very, VERY curious gay men.

I read the one on the middle right as Sylveon at first haha. XD

The punny title was "Wood Paneling" btw

someone removed the 'gay' tag. Fuuuuuu!!!!
(fixed it)

Aaaaand the 'gay' tag is removed again... Stop it. Just stop it.

Rally said:
You're an idiot. Those are portal rings. Those are cocks of actual people. And he's licking one of them. He even has his own cock, via portal ring, in his pocket.

WHY?

i think the word annex in this carries some dark implications

i love me some {dildoes} with (?) heartrate monitors lol

When I first colored this years ago I was told there was some argument from the moderators here about the context clues I left in the image. I stayed away. "I made it as clear as I could- how bad could it get?" I thought.

...okay, notes received. I did a bad job faking the heart rate monitors. I could have tried harder to make that section of the floor look like a proper drain. That's on me. This is actually usable feedback!