Quick toggle to turn off the blacklist for a while, basically a checkbox somewhere on the index that you tick once and as long as the box remains ticked your blacklist is simply deactivated globally.

Why? Saves time, no need to click "show hidden" on every new page and also no need to cut out the contents in your blacklist and have to reinsert them later.

NotMeNotYou said:
Quick toggle to turn off the blacklist for a while, basically a checkbox somewhere on the index that you tick once and as long as the box remains ticked your blacklist is simply deactivated globally.

Why? Saves time, no need to click "show hidden" on every new page and also no need to cut out the contents in your blacklist and have to reinsert them later.

Would prefer it for each individual blacklist selection, so you can selectively unblock certain factors while keeping others blocked.

Rainbow_Dash said:
Unfortunately they do not

@Wyvrn:

Sorry I'm going a little off topic here, but can we actually discuss how many megapixels as a guideline somewhere? There's no metatag implications, but I wouldn't mind manually maintaining if there was some sort of guideline

Seven_Twenty said:
@Wyvrn:

Sorry I'm going a little off topic here, but can we actually discuss how many megapixels as a guideline somewhere? There's no metatag implications, but I wouldn't mind manually maintaining if there was some sort of guideline

From the respective tags' wiki pages:

• hi_res: width >= 1600px or height >= 1200px
• absurd_res: width >= 3200px or height >= 2400px
• low_res: width or height <= 500px

There's also the absurdly_absurd_res. It doesn't have a wiki entry, but it seems to be used in the same way as Danbooru's incredibly_absurdres: applicable if the image's dimension is in the 5-digit range. (>= 10000px)

exactly, but might clean up those wikis to be more clear

I think those definitions need to be reworked actually, probably by requiring a minimum height and (not or) a minimum width.

Otherwise stuff like this counts as absurd_res: post #441106

Wyvrn said:
I think those definitions need to be reworked actually, probably by requiring a minimum height and (not or) a minimum height.

Otherwise stuff like this counts as absurd_res: post #441106

Now where did I see that image... Oh, here it is!
post #334600
Even the thumbnail is basically just a line.

Edit: I've just realized that current rules would allow this image to be tagged both absurd_res (or absurdly_absurd_res) and low_res.

That's exactly what I mean, will probably rewrite it to be based on diagonal pixel depth

Better use of this post.

Feature request: If someone doesn't post an artist tag, either don't allow the post to go through with an appropriate error message, or automatically tag it unknown_artist.

Can y'all make mp4 a compatible upload? I wouldn't know how to, but converting mp4s to .swf and then compressing it down with some pretty terrible quality loss to get around the 50mb cap is irritating...
mp4 would be a smaller filesize and better quality that .swf.

Feature Request: New users can't make forum posts/threads during their first three days

I request this because we have all noticed that trolls/ban evaders relentlessly spamming the forums. Ban evaders cause trouble, and since they can't troll in the comments on posts and can't vandalize the tags due to their new accounts, where do they go to cause trouble? The forums, because there's nothing stopping them. With this tree day wait, it will discourage them from spamming just like the other waits.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Feature Request: New users can't make forum posts/threads during their first three days

I request this because we have all noticed that trolls/ban evaders relentlessly spamming the forums. Ban evaders cause trouble, and since they can't troll in the comments on posts and can't vandalize the tags due to their new accounts, where do they go to cause trouble? The forums, because there's nothing stopping them. With this tree day wait, it will discourage them from spamming just like the other waits.

I agree and before anyone dare say "what if they are having account trouble?" Dmail and email still work for banned users so that shouldn't even be a place to take it

Rainbow_Dash said:
I agree and before anyone dare say "what if they are having account trouble?" Dmail and email still work for banned users so that shouldn't even be a place to take it

they also go to blips.
One thing I never understood was why you guys don't limit the accounts to like say, 1 - 2 per IP, or area address. Might make it harder for 'em to make throw away accounts for the porpous of downvote spaming, ban evading. Ect.

Heres one, a copy button for the post ID#. Make it easier to do anything needing the #(#'s) format.

And another, space the up vote & down vote butttons for posts and comments. Ive been using my kindle a lot recently and I keep hitting upvote when I want to d vote and d vote when I want to up vote. Heck its happened a few times when I had a mouse on myblaptop too.. space it or maybe make them bigger so its easier to hit the right one.

Edit: or makenit so we can change our choise, incase we make a mistake.

As for the deactivate blacklist temporarily thing, how about taking it a step further and giving it a timer with a drop down menu. Then you could set it to like say half an hour, or something. And after 30 min it turns back on.

Esme_Belles said:
As for the deactivate blacklist temporarily thing, how about taking it a step further and giving it a timer with a drop down menu. Then you could set it to like say half an hour, or something. And after 30 min it turns back on.

I'd rather keep it binary on/off in general. If you want an auto-on, make it a strict setting of a few minutes.

Make sure you guys look at the other two post on lave 28, it ate the last of the page spate an shunted me to a new one.

Esme_Belles said:
they also go to blips.
One thing I never understood was why you guys don't limit the accounts to like say, 1 - 2 per IP, or area address. Might make it harder for 'em to make throw away accounts for the porpous of downvote spaming, ban evading. Ect.

It's not uncommon for completely unrelated users to have the same IP addresses so it's not a 100% reliable thing

Rainbow_Dash said:
It's not uncommon for completely unrelated users to have the same IP addresses so it's not a 100% reliable thing

In secondary school all the computers were behind a proxy that made each machine's external IP address the same. Whenever I wanted to download something from a filesharing site that limited downloads for free users based on IP addresses, I basically couldn't do anything if someone else was also using the site. So yeah, IP based filtering is not a really good thing.

EsalRider said:
In secondary school all the computers were behind a proxy that made each machine's external IP address the same. Whenever I wanted to download something from a filesharing site that limited downloads for free users based on IP addresses, I basically couldn't do anything if someone else was also using the site. So yeah, IP based filtering is not a really good thing.

However I'd like a feature that simply displayed new users with the same IP addresses so we can manually pick through and find ban evaders without searching for them

Requested feature: List view posts option

Why it would be useful: By default we use grid view. An option to switch to list view would be helpful for people tagging.

You could click on the image and it would expand to its full size, you would also be able to add tags on the spot, clicking again would collapse the image to its default smaller size.

List view option would be for people that want to add tags quickly and effectively, and grid view (What we have now) would be for people who come here to browse galleries.

What I imagine list view to look like: http://i.imgur.com/zwcTWHq.png

So what do you think? Good idea/concept?

White_Len said:
Requested feature: List view posts option

Why it would be useful: By default we use grid view. An option to switch to list view would be helpful for people tagging.

You could click on the image and it would expand to its full size, you would also be able to add tags on the spot, clicking again would collapse the image to its default smaller size.

List view option would be for people that want to add tags quickly and effectively, and grid view (What we have now) would be for people who come here to browse galleries.

What I imagine list view to look like: http://i.imgur.com/zwcTWHq.png

So what do you think? Good idea/concept?

That is a really nice mockup! And I like the idea. It'd make adding tags en masse without automation much easier.

White_Len said:
Requested feature: List view posts option

Why it would be useful: By default we use grid view. An option to switch to list view would be helpful for people tagging.

You could click on the image and it would expand to its full size, you would also be able to add tags on the spot, clicking again would collapse the image to its default smaller size.

List view option would be for people that want to add tags quickly and effectively, and grid view (What we have now) would be for people who come here to browse galleries.

What I imagine list view to look like: http://i.imgur.com/zwcTWHq.png

So what do you think? Good idea/concept?

You have my +1!

Requested feature: Favorites blacklisting/Disappearing favorites

Why it would be useful: For people that favorite a lot of posts, and want to keep getting new content, it gets sort of annoying when you find a good picture, but you've already favorited it. I realize it isn't a game to see who has the highest favorites count, but I like seeing as many new pictures as possible. As for where it's located, I think the option should be a simple on/off checkbox in your settings.

This may not exactly be useful for everyone, which is pretty much its one drawback to implementing it. Other than that, it's mostly for improved browsing.

Advanst said:
Requested feature: Favorites blacklisting/Disappearing favorites

Why it would be useful: For people that favorite a lot of posts, and want to keep getting new content, it gets sort of annoying when you find a good picture, but you've already favorited it. I realize it isn't a game to see who has the highest favorites count, but I like seeing as many new pictures as possible. As for where it's located, I think the option should be a simple on/off checkbox in your settings.

This may not exactly be useful for everyone, which is pretty much its one drawback to implementing it. Other than that, it's mostly for improved browsing.

It would be nice if favourited pictures were sorted to the back of searches, so you could both go to them immediately on a search, and be guarenteed to only see new content when you first search a topic.

White_Len said:
Requested feature: List view posts option

Why it would be useful: By default we use grid view. An option to switch to list view would be helpful for people tagging.

You could click on the image and it would expand to its full size, you would also be able to add tags on the spot, clicking again would collapse the image to its default smaller size.

List view option would be for people that want to add tags quickly and effectively, and grid view (What we have now) would be for people who come here to browse galleries.

What I imagine list view to look like: http://i.imgur.com/zwcTWHq.png

So what do you think? Good idea/concept?

+1 here.
But if it's going to look like this,the free space could be used for the favourite tags and maybe a save button.
So that if you tackle big projects , you'll be able to add tags on-the-fly.

When mass-editing, could you make it so that it only has effect when left-clicking? I usually use the center button to open them on a new tab so I can have a better look.

It might already be here in some way, shape, or form, but anybody that has used Facebook understands that they can tag someone's name in a post and then it will send a notification to that person letting them know that they have been tagged in it.

We should have a feature that allows you to tag a user (their username) and then it will send some sort of notification to them. You could tag them in comments, descriptions, etc. But limit the number of times they can tag someone, as that could get out of hand and a flood of spam could result.

AmericanExistence said:
It might already be here in some way, shape, or form, but anybody that has used Facebook understands that they can tag someone's name in a post and then it will send a notification to that person letting them know that they have been tagged in it.

We should have a feature that allows you to tag a user (their username) and then it will send some sort of notification to them. You could tag them in comments, descriptions, etc. But limit the number of times they can tag someone, as that could get out of hand and a flood of spam could result.

I don't this would be too useful. We already have the page on your "My account" section that lets you see all the comments, blips, and forum posts that include your name. People that get summoned usually watch these sections to see when the next person needs their help on something.

Lizardite said:
When mass-editing, could you make it so that it only has effect when left-clicking?

That would be quite useful. Seconded.

Lizardite said:
When mass-editing, could you make it so that it only has effect when left-clicking? I usually use the center button to open them on a new tab so I can have a better look.

Genjar said:
That would be quite useful. Seconded.

I'd support this, so fucking much. I probably spend 100x the time right-clicking, locating "open in new tab" on the menu and clicking it than I actually do making edits.

Seven_Twenty said:
I'd support this, so fucking much. I probably spend 100x the time right-clicking, locating "open in new tab" on the menu and clicking it than I actually do making edits.

Middle click or Ctrl+click will do (the open in a new tab thing)

Xch3l said:
Middle click or Ctrl+click will do (the open in a new tab thing)

That's just it... Select any option other than "View posts" from the Mode drop-down list under the search bar, and the middle mouse button (or Ctrl+LMB) will not open posts.

EsalRider said:
That's just it... Select any option other than "View posts" from the Mode drop-down list under the search bar, and the middle mouse button (or Ctrl+LMB) will not open posts.

I'll take that Ctrl+click doesn't work (didn't consider the Mode setting), but middle click does, at least on Firefox and Opera

Xch3l said:
I'll take that Ctrl+click doesn't work (didn't consider the Mode setting), but middle click does, at least on Firefox and Opera

Tried everything (except for 'flag post'). Posts were not opened on new tabs, instead, the selected operation was performed. Using Comodo Dragon (Chromium based).

Huh. I can confirm that it works with Firefox, but not with Chrome.
I suppose it's more of a bug, then..

Advanst said:
I don't this would be too useful. We already have the page on your "My account" section that lets you see all the comments, blips, and forum posts that include your name. People that get summoned usually watch these sections to see when the next person needs their help on something.

Oh. Didn't know that. I'm too stupid to see things that are obvious.

AmericanExistence said:
Oh. Didn't know that. I'm too stupid to see things that are obvious.

Nah it's fine. If you just come here to post on the forums and browse pictures, you don't go to the "My Account" section a lot. And even if you do, you know where you're going, so you don't have to look over all the links again to know where you're going.

You guys seriously need to upgrade the ffd page with a User lockout. Like privileged+ only and the others get a page where the rules for ffd are listed in bold large text. Or maybe at least lockout the new accounts... 98% of bad or stupid ffd are done by accounts that where made that day and probably just to flag something...usually for being offencive.

Edit: cuz ive speculated that the %age of records handed out are in favor of flagging abuse.

Esme_Belles said:
You guys seriously need to upgrade the ffd page with a User lockout. Like privileged+ only and the others get a page where the rules for ffd are listed in bold large text. Or maybe at least lockout the new accounts... 98% of bad or stupid ffd are done by accounts that where made that day and probably just to flag something...usually for being offencive.

Edit: cuz ive speculated that the %age of records handed out are in favor of flagging abuse.

About two years ago I requested to have the FFD page use a dropdown menu with a lot of options, including flagging the post on grounds for being not furry or stupid. Then if they select that reason and click next, it directs them to another page that clearly spells out that the image will not be flagged now and the reason behind that

Then also have artists autodirected to a new takedown page if they select artist/owner removal

Then have duplicate/inferior and have it open up a field to insert the parent post ID and make sure it's parented

The idea was rejected though because "it really isn't that big of a problem" But now that I am an admin I see it as being a minor problem but a consistent one that could be fixed

Rainbow_Dash said:
About two years ago I requested to have the FFD page use a dropdown menu with a lot of options, including flagging the post on grounds for being not furry or stupid. Then if they select that reason and click next, it directs them to another page that clearly spells out that the image will not be flagged now and the reason behind that

Then also have artists autodirected to a new takedown page if they select artist/owner removal

Then have duplicate/inferior and have it open up a field to insert the parent post ID and make sure it's parented

The idea was rejected though because "it really isn't that big of a problem" But now that I am an admin I see it as being a minor problem but a consistent one that could be fixed

that sounds LOVELY.

Rainbow_Dash said:
About two years ago I requested to have the FFD page use a dropdown menu with a lot of options, including flagging the post on grounds for being not furry or stupid. Then if they select that reason and click next, it directs them to another page that clearly spells out that the image will not be flagged now and the reason behind that

Then also have artists autodirected to a new takedown page if they select artist/owner removal

Then have duplicate/inferior and have it open up a field to insert the parent post ID and make sure it's parented

The idea was rejected though because "it really isn't that big of a problem" But now that I am an admin I see it as being a minor problem but a consistent one that could be fixed

+1, sounds like a nice idea.

Rainbow_Dash said:

The idea was rejected though because "it really isn't that big of a problem" But now that I am an admin I see it as being a minor problem but a consistent one that could be fixed

Yeah +1 in my book

Genjar said:
Huh. I can confirm that it works with Firefox, but not with Chrome.
I suppose it's more of a bug, then..

It's not a bug. Firefox does not fire events for middle click, but Webkit-based browser does.

It's just another annoying non-standarized quirk.

Lizardite said:
It's not a bug. Firefox does not fire events for middle click, but Webkit-based browser does.

It's just another annoying non-standarized quirk.

It's fixed in the next version (of e621, not the browser) either way.

tony311 said:
It's fixed in the next version (of e621, not the browser) either way.

Damn, I wasted yesterday's evening coding a GreaseMonkey fix :(

Thank you :)

Requested feature: Place the report button slightly farther away from the options line and color it red, then have the next page's background also be red so it's clear the button is different
Why it would be useful? Less reports for accidentally hitting the report button, more obvious

Rainbow_Dash said:
Requested feature: Place the report button slightly farther away from the options line and color it red, then have the next page's background also be red so it's clear the button is different
Why it would be useful? Less reports for accidentally hitting the report button, more obvious

I still think your idea of the ffd dropdown menu is great. Seems like every single post that has cub or loli in it gets flagged with child porn lately.

Requested feature:
Tagging that determine a species/character and weather they're on top or on bottom in the picture.

Why it would be useful?
I often look for pictures with specific species either being top or bottom. So say I'd like pictures with a lion bottoming, that would be much easier to locate on this great site :)

Suggestion for execution:
bottom:lion

Craeque said:
Requested feature:
Tagging that determine a species/character and weather they're on top or on bottom in the picture.

Why it would be useful?
I often look for pictures with specific species either being top or bottom. So say I'd like pictures with a lion bottoming, that would be much easier to locate on this great site :)

Suggestion for execution:
bottom:lion

I really don't think that's necessary. Also, (if the idea goes through) there will be a lot of mistagging and abuse of it

TheHuskyK9 said:
If the idea goes through, there will be a lot of mistagging and abuse of it

Would it be much worse than it already is? I mean, some tag their uploads really well, others do not. All in all, I can only see it as a positive addition to the site :)

Esme_Belles said:
I still think your idea of the ffd dropdown menu is great. Seems like every single post that has cub or loli in it gets flagged with child porn lately.

I first proposed it I think two years ago

Hmmm....howzabout a way to search spesific tag edits done by a User. Right now I have to snail through my tag history looking for black + or - marks then click to sees if someone was being a dingle. Maybe a way to see tag edits you did that where undone/removed/changed whatever?

Craeque said:
Would it be much worse than it already is? I mean, some tag their uploads really well, others do not.

That's where I come in and fix them.

Craeque said:
All in all, I can only see it as a positive addition to the site :)

You have to consider the opposition to an idea, otherwise the idea would not be realistic if you want people to see it how only you envision it. With that said, overly-specific tags are usually aliased to a more general tag like "left_black_nostril" can be simply aliased to "black_nose" or "pink_blue_orange_penis" to "multi_colored_penis". I honestly don't think that it can help the site but only yourself imo.

TheHuskyK9 said:
overly-specific tags are usually aliased to a more general tag like "left_black_nostril" can be simply aliased to "black_nose"

I meant to use the already existing system for species tags, and then add on to it. A meta-tag if you will, not begin to add over complicated tags, like you refer to.

Craeque said:
I meant to use the already existing system for species tags, and then add on to it. A meta-tag if you will, not begin to add over complicated tags, like you refer to.

If that's the case then I'm neutral with the idea. It depends on if others will find it useful

TheHuskyK9 said:
If that's the case then I'm neutral with the idea. It depends on if others will find it useful

Combines/useful

So I've noticed this in and around the site that some images are flagged for deletion because they are a repost of another image but I had suggestion to maybe stop this that when uploading the site does a search for a same web address or URL's on all images and a message will appear saying something like "Error this content file has already been uploaded" and stop the upload I'm not sure if this can be done but I'm only putting it out there as a thought...

thatoneclarinetist said:
So I've noticed this in and around the site that some images are flagged for deletion because they are a repost of another image but I had suggestion to maybe stop this that when uploading the site does a search for a same web address or URL's on all images and a message will appear saying something like "Error this content file has already been uploaded" and stop the upload I'm not sure if this can be done but I'm only putting it out there as a thought...

If the MD5 is the same it will stop the upload, but it would be a nice feature for it to check if the source URL is the same as you said

Rainbow_Dash said:
If the MD5 is the same it will stop the upload, but it would be a nice feature for it to check if the source URL is the same as you said

Yes another thing is it may be able to stop trolls or whatever from knowingly uploading already deleted images

A 7 day new account dmail block.
To stop people like [censored] from harrassing people like [censored].

A check box in the settings to stop users except admin from dmailing you.

Esme_Belles said:
A check box in the settings to stop users except admin from dmailing you.

Does blacklisting the user help?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Does blacklisting the user help?

It should block all communication including dmail, even from admins

TheHuskyK9 said:
Does blacklisting the user help?

Not when its a ban evader hell bent on harrassing you.
What I mean is a box that stops all below janitor level users from being able to contact you.

Edit/addition: Infact a check box that sets your profile to private with only the report button showing would be good too... harrassing can spread off site if the attacker can see the links to other user's pages and stuff. Maybe set it so only above member levels can do that. Course that'll mean I need a upgrade (add one for users over a certain time limit that admin trust enough or something? Like "Verified User" or "Trusted User" .... bastards starting to become a problem since I have stress related heart problems, in the hospital thanks to another ruptured weak spot in my left lung e.e)

Why not a feature that gives you a short warning if the next picture in a pool is blacklisted?

While I may enjoy the dark twist that post #234486 took, I know there were others that didn't. I know for sure I didn't enjoy post #218794.

It could just be a small text box that pops up when you click the >> button. I think it would be useful.

SirAntagonist said:
I know for sure I didn't enjoy post #218794.

I love this idea for that exact reason.

Why are blips not on the main e6 page?
On that note, why is there no login/my account thing directly on the homepage.

Moon_Moon said:
Why are blips not on the main e6 page?
On that note, why is there no login/my account thing directly on the homepage.

This, a thousand times this. I don't stay logged into e6, and every time I want to visit I have to first go to the posts page or something to log in. Definition of a first world problem, I know, but it seems like a really easy fix

thatoneclarinetist said:
**snip** ...when uploading the site does a search for a same web address or URL's on all images and a message will appear saying something like "Error this content file has already been uploaded" and stop the upload... **snip**

Rainbow_Dash said:
**snip** ...it would be a nice feature for it to check if the source URL is the same as you said

Only problem I can see with a source-check is that some tumblr links possess multiple images. Therefore, if someone is uploading all of them the source would be identical, even though the images were not - unless they directly link the image instead of the post (which I'm not a fan of).

Requested feature:
Automatically add the unknown_artist tag when someone uploads a post without an artist tag.
Automatically add the source_request tag when someone uploads a post without a source.

Why it would be useful:
So you don't have to add these tags manually.