Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
Why are there no 1_male; 1_female; multiple_males; multiple_females tags?
These sound like one of the most basic tags to have, yet we don't have them? If I, for example, want to search for group sex, but with just 1 male or female, I don't know how to do that.
wregax said:
Why are there no 1_male; 1_female; multiple_males; multiple_females tags?These sound like one of the most basic tags to have, yet we don't have them? If I, for example, want to search for group sex, but with just 1 male or female, I don't know how to do that.
go vote on topic #43865 to reinstate them. The main reason is that they were aliased years ago and if we were to unalias them, it would be a lot of work to fill them up again.
usernamesexist said:
is there a tag for orgasm denial by pushing the cum back into the balls?
Back-ejaculation, ouch!
Cum in balls is closest I could find for backwards ejaculation. I'm not sure if it's a good fit.
wregax said:
Why are there no 1_male; 1_female; multiple_males; multiple_females tags?These sound like one of the most basic tags to have, yet we don't have them? If I, for example, want to search for group sex, but with just 1 male or female, I don't know how to do that.
Considering that solo_male and solo_female were aliased away, not sure if there's good odds of it coming back.
Same with females_only. Although, to be fair, solo female and solo_female would have had the same results due to implications, anyways.
snpthecat said:
go vote on topic #43865 to reinstate them. The main reason is that they were aliased years ago and if we were to unalias them, it would be a lot of work to fill them up again.
I just read through the thing. Lots of back and forth there, but very few, if any, arguments were given for tags of <one_x> and <multiple_x>. Hell, even <one_x> and just using <group> could work, but they're too busy shooting down <number_x> to actually listen to wants...
Anyways, I put my comment there, but I don't really know how to vote (on mobile)
In my newfound quest to find and populate reverse_thigh_sex posts, I have found a curiosity in my own phsyc.
For some reason I remember a tag "Object_masturbation" for masturbation using say, a stick or a bowstring, rather than a hand or a sex toy.
"object_masturbation" doesn't exist here, so is there a similar tag?
peskeon said:
In my newfound quest to find and populate reverse_thigh_sex posts, I have found a curiosity in my own phsyc.
For some reason I remember a tag "Object_masturbation" for masturbation using say, a stick or a bowstring, rather than a hand or a sex toy.
"object_masturbation" doesn't exist here, so is there a similar tag?
Are you looking for improvised sex toy
Hello, I am posting in this thread bc I am currently wondering if there is a tag for labia/vagina protruding outwards from the character's groin/crotch. Essentially puffy_labia but with more focus on the outer labia hanging out (but not prolapsed. Just an oversized pussy being highlighted). Cheers
joetuffman said:
Hello, I am posting in this thread bc I am currently wondering if there is a tag for labia/vagina protruding outwards from the character's groin/crotch. Essentially puffy_labia but with more focus on the outer labia hanging out (but not prolapsed. Just an oversized pussy being highlighted). Cheers
Isn't that just long_labia like it mentions on the wiki?
savageorange said:
Isn't that just long_labia like it mentions on the wiki?
Yes thank you for helping
Is there a dedicated tag for being partially submerged in a beverage?
I found two: sitting_in_glass and in_beverage; think we should alias one to the other?
I've noticed a lot of art sponsored by lovense coming up, and I want a tag specifically for advertisements for real life products or brands. I've seen a few comments who also wanna blacklist sponsored art.
The closest in use tag I found was advertisement but it's too broad, encompassing in universe and real world ads.
I found the sponsored tag and added it to a few pieces where I thought it fit, but idk if I should add such a small tag to more posts before checking if there's a better tag i missed.
bd_sandpaper said:
I've noticed a lot of art sponsored by lovense coming up, and I want a tag specifically for advertisements for real life products or brands. I've seen a few comments who also wanna blacklist sponsored art.The closest in use tag I found was advertisement but it's too broad, encompassing in universe and real world ads.
I found the sponsored tag and added it to a few pieces where I thought it fit, but idk if I should add such a small tag to more posts before checking if there's a better tag i missed.
I believe the closest we have right now is just blocking the sponsor
Is there a tag for a character with 2_penises penetrating both the anus and vagina of a single other character?
EDIT: just found it, it's paired_penetration -- and criminally underpopulated. I should get on that.
Updated
when there is a picture of a character clearly ejaculating into another but there is no visible cum do we use the cum_inside tag or something else?
Also is there a tag for a character who is obsessed with sex or craving cock?
bill_furray said:
when there is a picture of a character clearly ejaculating into another but there is no visible cum do we use the cum_inside tag or something else?
cum_inside implies cum, which implies genital_fluids, so shouldn't be tagged without visible cum (think of it as a state, that there is cum inside the character, not the act of cumming into a character; it can be tagged in after_sex scenarios where the penis is done ejaculating and has been pulled out already, as long as you can tell there is cum inside).
How could you tell a character is ejaculating into another if there's no visible cum? Given TWYS, there has to be some visual (non-text) indication that it's happening, which is typically through either cum leaking out or an internal view with cum.
watsit said:
How could you tell a character is ejaculating into another if there's no visible cum? Given TWYS, there has to be some visual (non-text) indication that it's happening, which is typically through either cum leaking out or an internal view with cum.
throbbing of the penis and tightening of the balls.
bill_furray said:
throbbing of the penis and tightening of the balls.
There is throbbing_penis, but that doesn't imply a character is cumming since it can be done without an orgasm, dry_orgasms exist, and it can occur just before ejaculation. Similar for balls tightening, which can occur before ejaculation and thus not necessarily indicate they're cumming inside yet.
Updated
We have all_three_filed, but is there a tag just for anal + vaginal on the same character?
watsit said:
There is throbbing_penis, but that doesn't imply a character is cumming since it can be done without an orgasm, dry_orgasms exist, and it can occur just before ejaculation. Similar for balls tightening, which can occur before ejaculation and thus not necessarily indicate they're cumming inside yet.
pulsating dick maybe a better description. I don't get why your baring text in the image from TWYS when there are many tags that rely on text like dialogue and sound effects. text that indicate the character is ejaculating should count.
bill_furray said:
I don't get why your baring text in the image from TWYS when there are many tags that rely on text like dialogue and sound effects. text that indicate the character is ejaculating should count.
That's the general policy. Tags relating to text should be about the text itself (e.g. "fuck" can be tagged profanity since the word is a profanity, regardless of how you interpret it), but a post shouldn't be tagged according to the interpretation of text (a character saying "I'm cumming!" should not be tagged cum. orgasm, ejaculation, etc, without the thing or act being visible). A character can always lie, be mistaken, or use words in a way that's different to e6's definitions (e.g. a character saying they're young may not mean a minor for the purposes of young/young_(lore) tagging, but could mean a young adult, or younger than other characters think). And for non-English text, translations aren't always 1-to-1, the meaning can end up slightly different given how the translator tried to convey the original meaning (assuming it's even a good translation).
1eyed-rosd said:
Is there an opposite of hyper_*? I am trying to make a tag for the in-between of thin_* limbs and stick_* limbs. Micro_* was the only thing I could think of but I looked up that hypo_* was the standard antonym. Just wanted to know if there was already a standard opposite.
I would say small_* and micro_* for anatomy that's progressively smaller than the norm. thin_* would only consider the thickness or width relative to its length, the opposite of thick_*, but it could still be large due to being excessively long (just as something that's thick can still be small due to being excessively short).
Is there tags for, and if there is what are they, for the following scenarios:
1. A group of people waiting to have sex with one person, aka running a train? Typically it'd be multiple penis-havers waiting their turn to fuck one person, but genitals could be reversed.
2. One person going down a line to have sex with multiple others. Again, most common would be one penis haver with a line of waiting partners, but it could be a woman too.
I guess the difference between the two is who would be considered "doing the work", where in scenario 1 it's the group and in scenario 2 it's the single person.
Any thoughts?
strikerv said:
Is there tags for, and if there is what are they, for the following scenarios:1. A group of people waiting to have sex with one person, aka running a train? Typically it'd be multiple penis-havers waiting their turn to fuck one person, but genitals could be reversed.
2. One person going down a line to have sex with multiple others. Again, most common would be one penis haver with a line of waiting partners, but it could be a woman too.
I guess the difference between the two is who would be considered "doing the work", where in scenario 1 it's the group and in scenario 2 it's the single person.
Any thoughts?
gangbang for the first example, I believe? imminent_gangbang if sex hasn't started yet?
I'm not sure on the second one. I've seen a couple images that are basically gangbang with the one being penetrated moving, for example clearly going from one lap to the next as they finish.
watsit said:
of how you interpret it), but a post shouldn't be tagged according to the interpretation of text (a character saying "I'm cumming!" should not be tagged cum. orgasm, ejaculation, etc, without the thing or act being visible). A character can always lie, be mistaken, or use words in a way that's different to e6's definitions (e.g. a character saying the
I think orgasm and orgasm_face tags come into play there, perhaps? As far as the "characters may be lying" thing, I don't avoid what the characters are saying to the detriment of what is almost certainly happening. If you take it that far, no character should be tagged male or female without visible genitals, and any other of hundreds of examples. You'd have images with clear rape not being tagged as such because it's only in the dialog that it's clear. Things like sexual_competition and betting would be horrendously under-tagged if you outright ignore the text, too. There is going to be at least some level of subjectivity in what people see. If you don't tag anything that could be explained away if you do some mental gymnastics I think that's to the detriment of actual tagging, and basically throwing the baby out with the bathwater. But orgasm does cover that. If you start going to the point of "well they could be lying about the orgasm and acting" I think that just results in inaccurate, or at least incomplete, tagging personally.
Updated
zeorp said:
I think orgasm and orgasm_face tags come into play there, perhaps?
orgasm_face if the character's making an expression like they're having an orgasm. They don't have to be having an orgasm (orgasm_face doesn't imply orgasm), just that they have a facial expression like they are.
zeorp said:
As far as the "characters may be lying" thing, I don't avoid what the characters are saying to the detriment of what is almost certainly happening. If you take it that far, no character should be tagged male or female without visible genitals, and any other of hundreds of examples.
A character shouldn't be tagged male or female without visible genitals, outlines of genitals (including bulges and camel_toes), or a masculine or feminine body type. A character saying "I'm a guy!" or "I'm a girl!" should not be tagged such without it being visible.
zeorp said:
You'd have images with clear rape not being tagged as such because it's only in the dialog that it's clear.
If there's no visible indication of a character being forced (which is implied by rape), rape can't apply if forced doesn't apply. rape_play is a thing. Dialog alone doesn't give enough information about what's going on visually.
zeorp said:
There is going to be at least some level of subjectivity in what people see.
Sure, if there's something visible that can be reasonably inferred as the thing, the thing can be tagged (e.g. anal_penetration can be tagged without directly seeing the anus penetrated, when that's likely what's happening from what you can see). But dialog doesn't count as the thing. Dialog only counts as the character saying something, and doesn't affect what's visible in the image (that character being penetrated saying "that feels so good in my pussy" wouldn't mean you can/should then tag vaginal_penetration with maleherm_penetrated, instead of anal_penetration with male_penetrated). Dialog counts as external information, so the information it conveys falls outside of TYWS. You should only tag what the text is, not what it means.
Various traits that lampreys have, where I can't seem to find good tags for when they show up in other species, with no implication of hybrid.
- radially arranged teeth
- multiple rows of teeth
- oral disc / circular lips
Can we get a tag for the dimple above an erect penis, where the shaft meets the pelvis? I've been googling all day and can't figure out what the hell it's called. I can't even find any examples of it now that I'm specifically looking for it.
alphamule said:
I can see why on GIFs. They're... a bad format to still be using in 2022, anyways. Probably just didn't bother implementing a length function for that metadata because it's not really meant to be a video format. We're talking about a format intended for short <5-second loops. XD:edit:
https://e621.net/posts/2908294 -> https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1748
So, is there a non-piercing equivalent to those rings? AKA the OTHER kind of nipple rings? nipple_jewelry and nipple_bondage almost seem right but not sure. Wanted some input in case I got it wrong. Pretty sure that nipple_clamp is wrong... Thanks for help!
I came to this thread 2 years later to ask this as well.
Like if there is a literal ring slipped onto the nipple resting on the areolae. I've seen this but with no tagging to distinguish it from a peirced ring.
usernamesexist said:
is there a tag for orgasm denial by pushing the cum back into the balls?
cum blockage and blocked orgasm are kind of like that, although it's less "cum being forced back" and more "cum not allowed to leave"
Is there a tag for anything with an accurate art style? Say someone uploads art of something weather it be a 2D drawing or a 3D model and it looks JUST like the original content, same body proportions and art style. Is there a tag like "anatomically correct" or "Anatomically accurate" or something? I feel like we could use one since some people insist on presenting certain characters a certain way that can be a bit annoying sometimes.
alaerth said:
Is there a tag for anything with an accurate art style? Say someone uploads art of something weather it be a 2D drawing or a 3D model and it looks JUST like the original content, same body proportions and art style. Is there a tag like "anatomically correct" or "Anatomically accurate" or something? I feel like we could use one since some people insist on presenting certain characters a certain way that can be a bit annoying sometimes.
on_model
Is there a tag for fur or body pattern that's just a solid color? No countershading?
Just searching "-countershade" is too broad, bringing up things that don't have fur at all, eliminating multi-character images, etc.
manitka said:
on_model
There's also on_style. I'm not entirely sure what the distinction is supposed to be.
errorist said:
There's also on_style. I'm not entirely sure what the distinction is supposed to be.
On model is on style, but on style is only on_model if it everything fits the style of the show I think?? But I’m not entirely sure, kinda seems redundant.
lendrimujina said:
Is there a tag for fur or body pattern that's just a solid color? No countershading?Just searching "-countershade" is too broad, bringing up things that don't have fur at all, eliminating multi-character images, etc.
-multicolored_body, and include fur in the search. There's monotone_body but there's some talk about removing it since monotone is just -multicolored
How do i tag an image if there is belly scales shifting when belly gets bulged? I couldn't find any tag like that :(
Examples:
https://e621.net/posts/3441775
https://e621.net/posts/3716328
elvche said:
How do i tag an image if there is belly scales shifting when belly gets bulged? I couldn't find any tag like that :(
Examples:
https://e621.net/posts/3441775
https://e621.net/posts/3716328
this is the only result i found, looks like what you're talking about, but kinda seems like a bad name for it.
Is there a tag for when a pred moves prey from one form of vore to another?
For example, after cock vore, the pred does autofellatio or some other form of self penetration, and cores the prey by cumming them into themselves?
Or, if they have a snake neck, reaching their head into their own pussy/cock/asshole to eat the pray orally from inside themselves?
These two are clearly based on the same thing
post #5060374 post #5075856
Does anyone know the original thing or at least the name?
Is there a tag for animal training or dog sports?
