Just confirming something: the proper way of tagging characters who are in mid-transformation is to tag their both forms? For instance, human in process of transforming into a feral is tagged as both human and feral, right?

...thought I should confirm that, before codifying it into the wiki.

Genjar said:
Just confirming something: the proper way of tagging characters who are in mid-transformation is to tag their both forms? For instance, human in process of transforming into a feral is tagged as both human and feral, right?

...thought I should confirm that, before codifying it into the wiki.

That's what I've always done as there isn't really a better way to handle them at this point. Occasionally you have a middle form that is taggable by itself (e.g,, satyr, dickgirl) but in absence of anything like that it's probably better to just tag both forms + hybrid (except for human hybrids, which I'd probably tag humanoid instead, but those are kind of a special case).

But yeah, free to update the wiki; that one has largely been ignored up until recently and could use a writeup.

Edit: Oh, and regarding the holding_whip tag. I don't think I'd bother with tagging them myself, but if people started using it I might.

After finishing up adding scalie to most reptilian images, I'm currently working on adding monochrome to any images I come across.

so, someone turned the Fu_Dog tag into a character tag and it should be a species tag, whats more is there is already a foo_dog tag for the species.
https://e621.net/post/index/1/fu_dog
https://e621.net/post/index/1/foo_dog

Wondering what can be done here. Ill add foo_dog to all the images that dont have it already, but the character tag isnt really necessary because I figured out how we have this misinterpretation. Fu_dog is the name of an old cartoon dog. there is also a Fu_dog_(character) tag thats correct to this character. Can someone create a tag association between Fu_dog and Foo_dog. Might as well leave Foo_dog as the actual correct tag.

Alternately, you could create a tag association between Fu_dog and Fu_dog(character) tag.

How does stuff like this these get tagged? (going through the pokémon stuff)

1.Most of these are otherwise feral/feral-drawn with a combination of feral and human characteristics (breasts + hind legs/paws etc)

I'd use non-mammal breasts but idk how well that works for fictional species

-

2. Also, do we have a tag for..whatever's going on this picture?

Humanoid penises on non-primate species basically

-

3. And what about these 'let's give feral characters hair' -type deals?

-

4. Is there a valid presenting_foot tag or some equivalent for posts like this?

There's an existing presenting_feet but not for the singular foot
I tagged the above with *foot, but since it seems like a new tag, just mentioning it in here

-

5. Doesn't seem like we have a tag for shape themed areola, such as heart pupils.

Went with the same format of [shape]_[noun], although the current trend of tagging areolae is singular, not plural like the above

Additionally there's heart shaped pupils, of which those 2 related tags should probably be aliased to something

-

6. We don't seem to have established tags for otherwise feral characters with humanoid genitalia

There's humanoid penis (20000+), exactly 1 post with humanoid pussy, and 2 with humanoid genitalia.

Posts like

would get tagged using 2/3 of the above (guess which) because it's an otherwise feral character with a human vagina

Edit: Added humanoid_vagina to post #655795 which matches the humanoid_penis tag

If only there were some kind of tag that could be used to capture the idea of something being both feral/non-anthropomorphic and anthropomorphic at the same time!

How convenient would that be

So.

About the fur tag.

There's a lot of ambiguity on the forum as to where that tag should be used. Some suggest applying it only to species which are not furred, such as fur accents on a scalie's tail, whereas I believe using it strictly for such cases would merit fur_accent or some similar tag--it seems convoluted to use the tag for fur accents and not when a character is furred all over.

In any case, I'd like a discussion regarding the tag. Should we use it on any post with fur? Just for fur accents? My personal opinion is that of the former, but I'd like to hear your stance. Thank you.

I think it's redundant to use fur for any search on a furry site. Hell, I forgot it was even a tag. The tuft tags, the fur types, and the colored fur tags are useful, but just fur in general shouldn't be tagged.

My two cents? Alias to invalid_tag

Knotty_Curls said:
I think it's redundant to use fur for any search on a furry site. Hell, I forgot it was even a tag. The tuft tags, the fur types, and the colored fur tags are useful, but just fur in general shouldn't be tagged.

My two cents? Alias to invalid_tag

IMO first implement handling wildcard character search correctly and only then alias it to invalid tag. Currently there's no way to make similar search to -fur since -*fur is not working, and -fur search can be useful.

Granberia said:
IMO first implement handling wildcard character search correctly and only then alias it to invalid tag. Currently there's no way to make similar search to -fur since -*fur is not working, and -fur search can be useful.

Using *_fur works fine. I found out the hard way that the underscore is important. If that isn't the search you are trying for, sorry I misunderstood.

edidaf said:
Using *_fur works fine. I found out the hard way that the underscore is important. If that isn't the search you are trying for, sorry I misunderstood.

I'm talking about negation, searching for posts with no fur tag. Notice - sign before -*fur. -*-fur doesn't work either.

Granberia said:
I'm talking about negation, searching for posts with no fur tag. Notice - sign before -*fur. -*-fur doesn't work either.

You're still not getting the underscore. -*_fur. Try that one.

edidaf said:
You're still not getting the underscore. -*_fur. Try that one.

It was a typo. I tried it and it's not working.
Neither user:Granberia -*fur nor user:Granberia -*_fur works (Meowstic has blue_fur tag, for example and it's still there.), but user:Granberia -fur does work.

Negation and wildcards don't work together (negation doesn't play nicely with a lot of things). If I remember right the search actually treats the wildcard as if it's a literal * character when negated.

The simplest way to test it is to do a search like blue_fur -*_fur, which if it was working would always show 0 results.

Do we have a tag for stuff like this?
post #655581

Specifically, the ridiculously stretched labia, and giant nipples

meat_curtains come to mind, but only one post with that exists, not to mention how colloquial it is

(I might move all these tagging query posts to a separate thread eventually)

-

There's an assertive tag, but no assertive_[gender]
Is there a reason for that?

-

Why does the pointless censoring tag have -11 posts and no alias?

titanmelon said:
-

There's an assertive tag, but no assertive_[gender]
Is there a reason for that?

-

Maybe because the tag has only about 40 tagcount. And I'm not sure whether it should be valid.
There are male_domination (underused) and femdom tags, and if this tag is going to be used differently then how should it be used? As -shy?
I'm not really sure why post #535955 or post #334593 are tagged with this tag.

titanmelon said:
Do we have a tag for stuff like this?
post #655581

Specifically, the ridiculously stretched labia, and giant nipples

meat_curtains come to mind, but only one post with that exists, not to mention how colloquial it is

hyper_labia and enlarged_labia exists, but I don't think that's really what you're going for. Might be time to standardize them a bit.

The nipples can fall under hyper_nipples but they are almost a specific kind of hyper. For example those nipples that Gideon draws that remind me of these things

There's an assertive tag, but no assertive_[gender]
Is there a reason for that?

Up until recently there was a general consensus to avoid gender tags like this with the reasoning that managing them is a bit convoluted when you have to deal with assertive_dickgirl, assertive_maleherm, etc., however it seems like the convention right now is to use (for example) [male/female/intersex]_domination or similar instead, which I think is a good compromise.

That being said, I'm not exactly sure what the difference is tagging-wise between assertive and domination. It seems like they overlap a lot in usage.

Why does the pointless censoring tag have -11 posts and no alias?

The -11 is from posts that were deleted, but had the tag removed after that. It's just a quirk with how the numbers are calculated and I haven't quite figured out a way to trigger them to refresh the number. I recently did a mass edit where I removed invalid_tag on status:deleted posts and for a while the caount said something ridiculous like -3135 for a while (though it seems to have fixed itself). :V

That being said, it doesn't look like aliasing would be really necessary as it's not being actively tagged, but if it were I think an alias to ineffective_censorship might work.

OK people, I want to start looking for posts that should have tags like these but lack them then fix them. Anybody up for help?
-naturally_censored
-nipple_tuft
-featureless_breasts
-featureless_crotch (both genders)
Some artists are universally known for these, like eric_w_schwartz, falvie and starfighter. Others could be found using certain combinations of tag search.

Do we have a tag for this kind of 'angry Top' look? More like a smirk or something

post #656175 post #210113

edit: I'm just going to use angry_top unless someone comes up with a better name

Changed it to angry_dom which is less ambiguous, and fits with the big dom small sub and small dom big sub tags better
-

Glutamate said:
OK people, I want to start looking for posts that should have tags like these but lack them then fix them. Anybody up for help?

The majority of users don't even tag their breasts sizes, far less these.

I'll try to add them in when I can

quick question/suggestion

Could an admin post the most common e6 searches? It would be good to see whats most important to users; for tagging reasons of course... also i think it might show what depraved crap lurks in the hearts of furries.. I love other peoples depravity.

Okay guys I have a simple question:

Apparently post #654866, that contains feral character with penis and secondary cartoonish female characteristics, can't be tagged dickgirl instead of girly male even though difference between those two in feral characters is not that big and over 500 pics can be deleted because of this.

If that's the case then should we retag about 1500 pics tagged with dickgirl feral mlp? Or are we treating mlp posts as special snowflake where tagging rules are different?

Is there a tag for posts like these, where someone is about to be spitroasted but only one orfice is penetrated?

post #161692
(second panel)

I'm using spitroast because it's the closest, most relevant one (tmk)
-

Granberia said:
Okay guys I have a simple question:

Not sure what's being asked; Is it about the similarity between dickgirls and feminine males?

What about crossgender?

titanmelon said:
Not sure what's being asked; Is it about the similarity between dickgirls and feminine males?

What about crossgender?

Question is about when it's okay to apply dickgirl tag on feral character. It seems that it's accepted that on mlp feral ponies it's okay that there are no breasts, but penis and some other female characteristics than breasts.
Yet, if description on post #654866 was correct (check description history), we're about to lose one artist because we're not allowing to tag character on this pic as dickgirl, even though she has more feminine traits than characters on pictures tagged with mlp dickgirl feral. So, is it worth firmly defending TWYS rule in this particular case where the rule is already stretched? I would accept lose of artist if he/she wanted to tag character with penis as a female in our tagging system but, if description is correct, it's actually not the case.

And if we're firmly defending our TWYS rule like it's ten commandments or something than doesn't it mean that it's okay to start tagging project of changing all 1500 mlp pics to male instead of dickgirl.

Removed the inkbunny link for artist #19434 s (Seems to be a link to Missblue and there's no source on either profiles linking them) and renamed the artist tag to s_(akibi) [pixiv nickname_(username)]

*does search for: looking_at_viewer -male -female -herm -cuntboy -intersex*

looks like i've found something related to this thread thats kinda annoying to see. that being people who seem to have forgotten to tag the gender on the pics they upload.

i do that search and suddenly i'm seeing plenty of the things with a - next to them and all such pics lack any form of gender tag.

treos said:
*does search for: looking_at_viewer -male -female -herm -cuntboy -intersex*

looks like i've found something related to this thread thats kinda annoying to see. that being people who seem to have forgotten to tag the gender on the pics they upload.

i do that search and suddenly i'm seeing plenty of the things with a - next to them and all such pics lack any form of gender tag.

Many of them are probably missing a tag but don't forget about the ambiguous_gender.

Also intersex covers the herm and cuntboy tags so you don't need to use those in your search.

Sneaky said:
Many of them are probably missing a tag but don't forget about the ambiguous_gender.

Also intersex covers the herm and cuntboy tags so you don't need to use those in your search.

Also zero_pictured, but I suppose that doesn't matter much if treos is using looking_at_viewer.

I've recently been trying to tag a lot of "solo" images, because the solo tag is often forgotten. Any tips? So far I'm searching "-solo" and adding the solo tag wherever necessary. Just wondering if there's a faster/more efficient way to do this?

ACanofSunDrop said:
I've recently been trying to tag a lot of "solo" images, because the solo tag is often forgotten. Any tips? So far I'm searching "-solo" and adding the solo tag wherever necessary. Just wondering if there's a faster/more efficient way to do this?

-solo -duo -group -zero_pictured -sex -couple
-solo -duo -group pose
-solo -duo -group -zero_pictured -sex chartags:<3

ACanofSunDrop said:
I've recently been trying to tag a lot of "solo" images, because the solo tag is often forgotten. Any tips? So far I'm searching "-solo" and adding the solo tag wherever necessary. Just wondering if there's a faster/more efficient way to do this?

If you're using view posts mode to do this then go with what parasprite said.

If you are using the edit posts mode to do this, it would be a good idea to add -animated to that search too just incase as some animations display thumbnails instead of Flash/Video and may contain a character not seen in the thumbnail. Also zoom in close to make sure there isn't another character in the background (which would be tagged duo solo_focus). On windows the command is Ctrl +, not sure about mac.

ACanofSunDrop said:
I've recently been trying to tag a lot of "solo" images, because the solo tag is often forgotten. Any tips? So far I'm searching "-solo" and adding the solo tag wherever necessary. Just wondering if there's a faster/more efficient way to do this?

Besides what parasprite and DragonFox69 said use some additional tags to divide your search. Either something that is often used with solo (for example selfie -solo -duo -group would probably give bigger percent of solo pics then -solo -duo -group) or your favorite tag. (To me it's easier to tag things I like.)
Also start tagging from the last page of search result. If you're starting from first page then after tagging some pics on it page is filled with new pics that are mixed with those that you didn't tag because they are not solo. If you start from last page then you can simply go page by page without missing anything.
Remember that tentacles don't count as a character, but disembodied_penis does.

Here's an another one that works well:
-solo -duo -group -zero_pictured plain_background -sex

Posts with plain background rarely have many characters. And those tend to be pretty easy to tag, because plain background makes it easy to see how many characters there are; I've sometimes used that search for tag scripting.

In some cases, searching by artist might work. There are some who tend to mainly draw solo poses.

Thanks everyone, these are excellent tips, I'll get back to tagging and I'll be doing so faster as soon as I get back from vacation.

The majority of users don't even tag their breasts sizes, far less these.

I'll try to add them in when I can

Well, tbh those tags are more important. Size is subjective and drama prone. Remember, tag what you see. And by extension, what you should see but don't.

Glutamate said:
Well, tbh those tags are more important. Size is subjective and drama prone. Remember, tag what you see. And by extension, what you should see but don't.

Good point

Breast sizes for e6 are currently defined here

titanmelon said:
Good point

Not sure if I was clear enough. That was not in favor of boob sizes.

Glutamate said:
Not sure if I was clear enough. That was not in favor of boob sizes.

You might be true, but it's better to have them rather than don't, most people can at least tell the difference between small_breasts and huge_breasts. Besides it's not like you have to use them when searching and stuff still gets tagged with breasts.

parasprite said:
chartags:<3

Aw, didn't know we have a way to check for characters in love. Yes that's how I interpreted it at first, derp.

Does anyone know whether there is tag for a sex position like this?
post #675456
The closest I can find is leg_glider_position, but wiki states that bottom should by lying not standing.

Granberia said:
Does anyone know whether there is tag for a sex position like this?
post #675456
The closest I can find is leg_glider_position, but wiki states that bottom should by lying not standing.

I tag those with standing+from_behind+raised_leg, but don't know about any specific tag, no.

Granberia said:
Does anyone know whether there is tag for a sex position like this?
post #675456

I don't think so. That looks like some variant of the frisk, probably too awkward in real life to have a common name. I suppose we could start using frisk_position and tag those as frisk_position + raised_leg, but are those common enough...?

Anthro Scalie tagging project.

I started a tagging project to tag the anthro or feral scalie pics beacause there are a lot of pics that doesn't has them.

I'm working with this tags: scalie -feral -anthro

furry bomb #1 & #2 pools, anyone know who colored them?

oops, seems i ovlooked something and it was the same translator for all 3 pools. just need to figure out who colored them and i can tag that as well.

i was just browsing and noticed the pics in these pools were missing artist tags and thought i'd fill them in. one last thing though...i don't remember how i should tag the translator and who colored the pics. would that be name_(translator) and name_(colorist)?

treos said:

i was just browsing and noticed the pics in these pools were missing artist tags and thought i'd fill them in. one last thing though...i don't remember how i should tag the translator and who colored the pics. would that be name_(translator) and name_(colorist)?

<name>_(colorist) seems to be how we've been handling that one.

We don't usually tag the translator, but there's no reason you can't. <name>_(translator) should be fine for that.

wait, while that's not a bad idea regarding the translator and colorist tagging i think i just had a better idea. at least as far as pools go (would probably be different if it's just a few parent/child pics). i'll just add the translator and colorist (if that name comes up) to the pool description.

huh, looks like checking the comments as i go paid off. i found the colorist, akuvi

edit: *still reading while tagging* (avatar, my expression throughout all 3 pools)

man... more cringe worthy translations please. (sarcasm)

treos said:
wait, while that's not a bad idea regarding the translator and colorist tagging i think i just had a better idea. at least as far as pools go (would probably be different if it's just a few parent/child pics). i'll just add the translator and colorist (if that name comes up) to the pool description.

huh, looks like checking the comments as i go paid off. i found the colorist, akuvi

That's a great idea. It never occured to me to put stuff like that in the description field.

parasprite said:
That's a great idea. It never occured to me to put stuff like that in the description field.

yep and now i've hit another problem regarding the artist(s) in the 3rd of these pools. does the art style and everything of post #70701 match up with the rest of that pool? post #65621 as well. it seems odd that only these 2 out of that whole pool were deleted.

also, if they match up with the rest of that pool then i'm not too sure about the artist tags on them since the rest of this pool, like the last 2, has karate_akabon as the artist (this one wasn't listed on doujinshi.org but it's clearly part of the furry bomb series that guy made).

edit: what? this... *facepalm* post #65622 hello there, B&W version of furry bomb #1. should i parent these to the colored versions in that other pool?

edit2: ok, well after looking through this pool again after i finished tagging. it's not complete at all BUT it turns out that this one is part of the furry bomb #1 and part of the furry bomb #3 pools, just in B&W rather than colored. maybe move and parent the necessary B&W versions of the pics from this 3rd pool to the other 2 pools then delete this one?

@treos: They are all over the place. Furry bomb 1-5, also 1.5, 2.5, etc. (short ones). As far as I know they are all the same artist.

• post #70701 - As far as I can tell it doesn't belong to any Furry Bomb (and certainly not #1), but I can't confirm artist. Leave it in that pool for now, but you can move it to the end if you prefer.
• post #65621 - Goes at the very end (colored Rouge with "Translated by" in top left corner and "Furry Bomb Factory" in bottom right), I moved that. I doubt it is Tojyo based on what I've found, but I am waiting to restore it.

For both, I sent a message to Tojyo to ask if they are the artist. I'll PM you when I get a reply. The rest of them are old (2003-2007) and all by the same artist (afaict), if you want to you can post the rest, but I'll leave it up to you if you feel like it. :P

Shite! I forgot to get to work on tagging! I am very sorry.

Should the stuffed or stuffing tags be used when only vore is present? I'm clearing out some of the 'mistagged plushie' and 'stuffed full of dicks' ones, but I don't know if food-fetish-but-with-vore posts like post #424100 count.

paulapig said:
Should the stuffed or stuffing tags be used when only vore is present? I'm clearing out some of the 'mistagged plushie' and 'stuffed full of dicks' ones, but I don't know if food-fetish-but-with-vore posts like post #424100 count.

I'm thinking both that the two should be condensed into 1 tag, and that a slightly different tag like food_stuffing or something might be more appropriate.

I know there was a few vore-specific "inflation" tags, but I can't remember them offhand atm.

May I propose a change? If we're using the male/female, male/male, female/female, intersex/female, intersex/male, etc., can we use it to our advantage to show which is top and which is bottom? My idea is that unless it's same sex, the setup is "top/bottom". So intersex/male would be a cuntboy or a dickgirl topping a male, and male/intersex would be the opposite. It makes sense does it not?

SilentObserver02 said:
May I propose a change? If we're using the male/female, male/male, female/female, intersex/female, intersex/male, etc., can we use it to our advantage to show which is top and which is bottom? My idea is that unless it's same sex, the setup is "top/bottom". So intersex/male would be a cuntboy or a dickgirl topping a male, and male/intersex would be the opposite. It makes sense does it not?

It might, but keeping the two straight would be kind of a pain to do. There are also a lot of cases where neither character is really "on top" that would cause problems with tagging this way.

On the other hand, we do have male_on_top and female_on_top; intersex_on_top seems like the logical next step, and might be useful to narrow these down in searches if we started using it.

I find it easier and faster when tagging the "Character" the "Copyright" tag will automatically be tagged along with the "Character" tag. I want to do that, starting with the Mario franchise, however I can't or unable to do so?

How can I "Implied" a "Character"? I find it more sensible that the " Character" origins should be included along with the main "Copyright" tag if necessary.

I'm testing out the following so I can get a good grip on the system here whenever I'm going to be doing future edits.

Kylie_Koopa —> Mario_Bros AND Mario_and_Luigi_series

Rosalina_(Mario) —> Mario_Bros AND Super_Mario_Galaxy

Meowser —> Mario_Bros AND Super_Mario_3D_World

I'm not 100% certain if you can Implied multiple "Copyrights" to a "Character", or just one only.

DFKJR said:
I find it easier and faster when tagging the "Character" the "Copyright" tag will automatically be tagged along with the "Character" tag. I want to do that, starting with the Mario franchise, however I can't or unable to do so?

How can I "Implied" a "Character"? I find it more sensible that the " Character" origins should be included along with the main "Copyright" tag if necessary.

I'm testing out the following so I can get a good grip on the system here whenever I'm going to be doing future edits.

Kylie_Koopa —> Mario_Bros AND Mario_and_Luigi_series

Rosalina_(Mario) —> Mario_Bros AND Super_Mario_Galaxy

Meowser —> Mario_Bros AND Super_Mario_3D_World

I'm not 100% certain if you can Implied multiple "Copyrights" to a "Character", or just one only.

You can imply multiple copyrights to a character, yes. If you want to suggest new implications, click Tags at the top, then click Implications and then Suggest . Make sure you read the instructions so you make your implications as intended.

Kida said:
You can imply multiple copyrights to a character, yes. If you want to suggest new implications, click Tags at the top, then click Implications and then Suggest . Make sure you read the instructions so you make your implications as intended.

Thank you.

"Size_gender"/"size_dom_size_sub" tags are useful for finding a specific size_difference pairing, but a lot of posts tagged as size_difference are still missing them. I add them as I see them, but we also need some users to search for images tagged as size_difference without any of these and add them in as applicable. (If you're like me and cannot search that many terms at once, temporarily blacklist these tags and search for size_difference alone).

smaller_female
smaller_male
smaller_intersex
larger_female
larger_male
larger_intersex
big_dom_small_sub
small_dom_big_sub

So, how does one report a pool someone created? Im not sure what to make of this, but someone created a pool of a bunch of images with little in common except that they portray a glorious butt shot, different artists, different uploaders, but most of them were approved by NotMeNotYou, which seems to be the only other thing they have in common...

https://e621.net/pool/show/6581

cjkrythos said:
So, how does one report a pool someone created? Im not sure what to make of this, but someone created a pool of a bunch of images with little in common except that they portray a glorious butt shot, different artists, different uploaders, but most of them were approved by NotMeNotYou, which seems to be the only other thing they have in common...

https://e621.net/pool/show/6581

Just reporting the user or sending a quick PM to one of the mods is fine.

Thanks for letting us know. :)

Ultimate Tagging Project

This tag could be applied to as many as 600,000 posts...

I believe it's time to change the tags "Piranha Plant" and "Birdo" from character to species, since they both are clearly a species.

I would gladly change this myself and fix more errors, but I don't have clarifications to do so.

DFKJR said:
I believe it's time to change the tags "Piranha Plant" and "Birdo" from character to species, since they both are clearly a species.

I would gladly change this myself and fix more errors, but I don't have clarifications to do so.

I remember piranha_plant being a species tag when I last looked at it. I'm not sure who changed it but I can fix that one now.

I agree about birdo with the same line of reasoning as yoshi and many pokémon. They border on character but species is probably more appropriate for tagging purposes (and having 2 tags, one for species and one for character, would make little sense to do).

parasprite said:
I agree about birdo with the same line of reasoning as yoshi and many pokémon. They border on character but species is probably more appropriate for tagging purposes (and having 2 tags, one for species and one for character, would make little sense to do).

Yes, that's what I'm saying. There was more than one Birdo in Super Mario Bros. 2 and as the franchise developed its very likely there's more than one Pink Birdo just like how there's more than one iconic Green Yoshi.

is there a tag for leash law signs. I keep seeing pics involving a sign saying "dogs must be leashed" or something, and no tag. Not that there needs to be one, but its becoming a common theme. I was thinking of tagging it "leash_law". Its simple and short, so people might actually remember to use it. But first I thought Id check here.

cjkrythos said:
is there a tag for leash law signs. I keep seeing pics involving a sign saying "dogs must be leashed" or something, and no tag. Not that there needs to be one, but its becoming a common theme. I was thinking of tagging it "leash_law". Its simple and short, so people might actually remember to use it. But first I thought Id check here.

Not that I know of (and I couldn't find anything obviously related), but I know it's a common enough trope so I'd be fine with it.

leash_law is a good working name, so unless anyone can think of anything better I'd say go for it.

The missing sexuality project has grown to over thirty pages, so I'll try and clear it out tonight.

This has me a bit confused though. post #722815
The initial tagger tagged it as straight, faceless_male and all that.
I don't really know what this should be tagged as. First off, it barely looks like a cock.

Peekaboo said:
The missing sexuality project has grown to over thirty pages, so I'll try and clear it out tonight.

This has me a bit confused though. post #722815
The initial tagger tagged it as straight, faceless_male and all that.
I don't really know what this should be tagged as. First off, it barely looks like a cock.

I guess it kind of looks like a cock. I think all it really needs added are the disembodied_penis and solo_focus tags and it'd look good to me.

Quick question, am I right in thinking that any post that could contain any sound will always have either the Flash or Video thumbnail? Or are there exceptions?

DragonFox69 said:
Quick question, am I right in thinking that any post that could contain any sound will always have either the Flash or Video thumbnail? Or are there exceptions?

I think I remember there being a sound post.

Peekaboo said:
The initial tagger tagged it as straight, faceless_male and all that.
I don't really know what this should be tagged as. First off, it barely looks like a cock.

I'd tag that as a penis, since I can't figure out what else it could possible be. So male/female tag seems appropriate.

I just noticed that the tag Humanoid on anthro exists, and contains almost no posts and is just a slightly different wording than Human on anthro, which is where almost all such posts go.

Concerning the Cryptid Project; is it worth tagging the species of a character if for example their species doesn't appear outside of a few commissions from their creator?

I recently tagged post #712363 as lemoen and wrote the wiki page using source information, but I worry I might be just clogging up the tag system/wiki with one-off species.

DragonFox69 said:
Quick question, am I right in thinking that any post that could contain any sound will always have either the Flash or Video thumbnail? Or are there exceptions?

I think it might be possible to upload an mp3 file, which would use the Sound thumbnail I think I saw. I'd give it a go, but I'm afraid I'll upload something that violates the rules again. If you want to give it a go, though, make sure the file is related. I suppose a good test file would be *shudders* What Does The Fox Say...

DragonFox69 said:
Quick question, am I right in thinking that any post that could contain any sound will always have either the Flash or Video thumbnail? Or are there exceptions?

Yes. The only accepted formats are JPG, PNG, GIF, Flash, and WebM. Of those, only Flash and WebM are capable of producing sound.

TonyLemur said:
Yes. The only accepted formats are JPG, PNG, GIF, Flash, and WebM. Of those, only Flash and WebM are capable of producing sound.

Huh, I remember seeing a Sound thumbnail. Weird. Maybe I saw it on a different tagged image site.

blakashawa said:
Concerning the Cryptid Project; is it worth tagging the species of a character if for example their species doesn't appear outside of a few commissions from their creator?

I recently tagged post #712363 as lemoen and wrote the wiki page using source information, but I worry I might be just clogging up the tag system/wiki with one-off species.

Most people don't bother doing it, but there isn't anything wrong with tagging or writing wikis for obscure/one-off species as long as they are distinct enough to tag.

Note that for invented hybrids we tend to prefer cow + mouse + hybrid over things like "mousecow or "couse", just because there are infinitely many cute names like this that you can give them, which is a lot harder to keep track of than real species tags.

TonyLemur said:
Yes. The only accepted formats are JPG, PNG, GIF, Flash, and WebM. Of those, only Flash and WebM are capable of producing sound.

Thanks for the info! :) I had started adding missing sound and no_sound tags to posts and wanted to make sure I was using the correct search terms to find valid file types before continuing.